Talk:Leet

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Leet article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8Auto-archiving period: 12 months

	Leet is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
	This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on June 17, 2004.
Article milestones Date Process Result January 19, 2004 Refreshing brilliant prose Kept January 29, 2006 Featured article review Demoted April 28, 2006 Good article nominee Not listed
Current status: Former featured article

,

Pwn was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 12 July 2020 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Leet. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Writing systems Mid‑importance This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Writing systems, a WikiProject interested in improving the encyclopaedic coverage and content of articles relating to writing systems on Wikipedia. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project’s talk page.Writing systemsWikipedia:WikiProject Writing systemsTemplate:WikiProject Writing systemsWriting system Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Internet culture High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Internet culture To-do: edit history watch purge Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles Expand : Pick an article from here or here Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images Stubs : All stubs are located here Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}} See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention

"Leet originated within bulletin board systems (BBS) in the 1980s, where having "elite" status on a BBS allowed a user access to file folders, games, and special chat rooms. "

"Leet" predated BBSes by more than a decade. The term arose when someone noticed how the LCD (not LED) screens, when you had 1337 on it (there was a serif on the bottom of the "1") and looked at it upside down, it "spelled" "LEET"... this quickly made the rounds, I first encountered it ca. 1974 or 1975. Another one was "7734", which, with the open-4 (most text uses closed 4s), looked like "hELL" upside down.

I haven't done anything to the entry, because I can't "document" this, but it's blatantly wrong. It should be elided, if not edited for correction. OBloodyHell (talk) 18:45, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Nah, this trick got its own article: you seem to be talking about the Calculator spelling; which indeed pre-dates t3h ([_]17[_]R3 of t3h 1337 h4xx0rz. The real 1337 starts when you try to obfuscate every word you type with sum kewl 3l373 5pe1i/\/9 some cool elite spelling. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.89.66.133 (talk) 14:01, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • OK, added "1337 upside down". Apparently, "leet"/"1337" make a great ambigram. 81.89.66.133 (talk) 15:24, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I doubt this article is correct in its claims of origin. Handheld calculators of the 1960s and '70s were mostly *only* able to output 7 bits corresponding to the straight lines in the numeral 8 (three vertical (top, middle, bottom) and two pairs of two (vertical on left and right)). With these building blocks, along with the digits 0 thru 9, various letters could be output: A, C, E, F, G, H, I, J, L, O, P, R, S, T, U, Y, and b, c, d, h, i, o, r (or lc gamma), u. (18 of English's 26). In the early 70's, I had a TI calculator that I could program to display those characters, and with a couple of two place code combinations the remaining 8 as well. This clearly was a predecessor of anything similar that appeared 10 years later. It seems like the leetspeak is far less 1:1 with the English alphabet, and that it is not just a superset of the calculator speak, but neglecting to give credit where credit is due is wrong.72.16.96.150 (talk) 03:06, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

nobody would know what this means and it seems like a really random example - Awesomecat713 (talk) 02:41, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My, my, ironially, early Internet users born in 1987 had to face the leeth' peak 109.252.65.192 (talk) 22:23, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

IGBT fits along with LCD displays - things popular in the previous century. The laptop in the title photo also appears to be made somewhere in the 90's or 2000. 81.89.66.133 (talk) 08:01, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Leet has been out of fashion for many years now, and it only ever sees use with nostalgic connotations. The history of its use should be documented, lest we forget when it was actually relevant. 62.198.142.189 (talk) 22:12, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree, as it still has relevance in 202X, as various gamers still use l33t-like orthography modifications to go around a plethora of already taken and abandoned nicknames on Steam. Or to insult or cuss or both thru a filter (see Algospeak subsection for examples). 81.89.66.133 (talk) 15:39, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

" Algospeak shares conceptual similarities with leet, albeit with its primary purpose to circumvent algorithmic censorship online."

" Variants of leet have been used to evade censorship for many years; "

algospeak is essentially just derivative vocabulary of leet that has popularized itself from tiktok, but i don't see how it's significant in differentiating the two, other than the relevance of people using it alternatively in present day. I don't think it needs its own section because this topic is on leet specifically, and I feel like algospeak should be its own topic page that directs to leets origins, not the other way around.

I don't necessarily think that " The approach has gained more popularity in 2023 and 2024 due to the rise in conflict between Israel and Gaza with the topic's contentious nature on the Internet, especially on Meta and TikTok platforms" is relevant either, this is a subsection of the internet trying to tie leet and algospeech in the formative communication system in people regarding current events. i've been active in social media discussing the war against gaza and not once have I seen anything related to algospeak, I didn't even know what that was.

also I don't get how examples like "restarded" "(provides) either the same general meaning, pronunciation, or shape of the original word." in a context that " evade automated online moderation techniques, especially those that are considered unfair or hindering free speech. " really???

also i'm pretty sure using words like "unalive" refer to people who blacklist triggering words like suicide so they don't see them in an irrelevant context, and using the softer alternative is primarily used by people providing information on a subject or event as they are aware of those who blacklist those words.

this whole section is a mess Contributioncat (talk) 07:05, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

H0ld 0n, 7here 15 a 600/) 12eason to mention 4160speak.

1337speak - obfuscates text a li'l to avoid getting b&ed by mods.

4160speak - again, obfuscates text a li'l to avoid getting b&ed by mods.

4150

"Restarted people" in place of "retarded people" - makes sense in general context

4150

f11111111111111111111111111111ne. BRB fixing. 81.89.66.133 (talk) 13:05, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Petition to spin off Algospeak as its own article, since its lexicon is so distinct from leet, and the demographic creating it is so disconnected from the demographic that created leet. Given how alive and dynamic algospeak is, it no longer makes sense to have the two share a page. --Quintopia (talk) 16:59, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just in case: the examples in the section are not really random; rather, every one of them has some association to it.

• 614D05 - the shade of dark brown-gold can be found in Portal and Portal 2 - in-game - at nearly every Aperture Science workspace computer's screen
• 572E55 - the dark purple color is strongly associated with dangerous energy in anime a lot.
• C47C47 - the funny orange shade reminds me of the one fur of calicos and orange cats have... not Marrocan oranges' hue.

The C01025 is an exception, it's a pun on the very word "Color(s)".

Counterexamples:

• 748452 for "tabasq", e.g. tabasco: the green color is associated with bell pepper or halapenjo sauce made of green peppers... not tabasco sauce.
• Deep blue for 1C1641 (coming from Ikigai) is not really creating a strong association.

81.89.66.133 (talk) 11:37, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect N00b to the article Newbie has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 December 13 § N00b until a consensus is reached. 67.209.128.30 (talk) 08:59, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]