Talk:Interstate 83

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

U.S. Roads: Interstates / Maryland / Pennsylvania Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Topics  Interstate Highways   Locations  Maryland   Pennsylvania   This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it. This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists. This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it. Article recognition:   A fact from this article was featured on the Did you know? section of the U.S. Roads Portal in August 2016.

I removed the following from the Notes section of the article:

• In Harrisburg at Exit 46A towards the Pennsylvania Turnpike (I-76) going southbound turns I-83 into a single-lane expressway, a rarity for American expressways.

I have no idea what it's talking about; it's poorly written (and it doesn't help that satellite imagery of the interchange is terrible). Honestly...I just don't know. I mean, if I get the jist of it, I'd rewrite it as:

• Near Harrisburg, heading southbound at Exit 46A, the highway turns into a two-lane freeway, a rarity for U.S. Interstate Highways.

But again, I don't know what the idea is. --MPD01605 (T / C) 04:12, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Its been a while, but im pretty sure that is not the case. I know that on-ramps could be single lane, however, im pretty sure this is not the case with this portion of the highway. I could be wrong though, and thinking of something else, so if im wrong, just let me knowPYLrulz 11:14, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

From the exit list, exit 46A seems to be part of this interchange: [1] (without labels). None of the roads at the interchange seem to be 2-lane roads. May be the removed text is talking about the two single-lane ramps from I-83 entering from north-east to I-83 exiting west. This isn't a peculiarity I guess? -- Paddu 19:58, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In the route description I just wrote, I simply stated that I-83 exits from itself within the interchange, with each direction of traffic following a one-lane ramp. -TheOneKEA

I-83 at the Eisenhower Interchange becomes one lane each direction on the "through" routes. I-83 Southbound is two-lane entering I-283, and I-83 Northbound is two-lane entering US-322.

The same problem occurs at the I-83 / US-581 interchange. I-83 Northbound is two lanes, one of which loops around to head west on US-581, the other single lane bears off continuing as I-83 North.

As far as I know, this is the only place in the US that is part of the original Interstate system that deviates like this. Hans404 (talk) 18:52, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is actually true:

• While technically not in the categorization of a freeway, I-83 in York, Pennsylvania has an exit ramp that is the Business Loop I-83 and is indeed the only road in America that is an interstate but not considered a freeway. It has a length of 10 miles before it merges with South George St.

I just finished editing the article to bring it into line with WP:IH. Comments welcome. -TheOneKEA

Is this article still a Start-class? I tried to include as much information as possible from other, higher-rated articles in order to improve its classification. -TheOneKEA

Attention-rjl rationale: "Exit list guide for MD needs improvement" – TMF 19:21, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Footnote [4] points to what the never-completed I-83/I-95 connection was to have looked like, so I tried to move the footnote INDICATOR to an earlier paragraph (still in the "Truncation" section of the article), but the footnote indicator showed up as [1] in the preview so I have abandoned that change at least for now.

In Mapquest, I find that Pleasant Street is NORTH of where I-83 comes to grade-level interection now, so that part should be re-written. Yes, if you were on southbound I-83 there and you come to that intersection, the road straight ahead is President Street. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.63.16.82 (talk) 20:15, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

So i was looking at the image in the Truncation section, thinking it looked odd for it's placement. The image is captioned as "The image is a Long-distance view of intersection of Fayette Street, President Street, and I-83," now i am not going to disagree with that it is a long distance image and it's on Fayette St. Here is the problem it's such a long distance image, you can't make out the intersection, the vantage point is just approx 0.5 miles east of the intersection near the intersection E Fayette and S Caroline (http://maps.google.com/maps?q=Baltimore,+MD&ll=39.293062,-76.597714&spn=92.703703,255.410156&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-a&hnear=Baltimore,+Maryland&gl=us&t=w&z=3&vpsrc=6&layer=c&panoid=O3PnyWAm6oQAIsfhReGX6A&cbll=39.293062,-76.597714&cbp=13,-119.68322113324764,,0,-3.838817227376481&source=gplus-ogsb). While it's a nice picture of the downtown skyline, A) you can't make out the intersection, B) it's not a vantage of the downtown that you would see from 83 (which are some nice skylines). I better view would be something like http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=39.29045,-76.60653&spn=92.703703,255.410156&t=w&z=3&vpsrc=6&layer=c&panoid=puEDGUVpHDIZhE7QF5OYow&cbll=39.29045,-76.60653&cbp=13,-18.11470149120104,,0,1.3759967124432393&source=gplus-ogsb . I know it can seem like It's just nit picking but, still. --boothy443(r|e|c|t|o) 05:45, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The ref/link for this section is 404 but there is a page at http://www.i-83beltway.com/bottleneck.html

I assume this is because work has actually started on the project, hard though it may be to believe. 74.99.174.96 (talk) 04:11, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Interstate 83. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141024215736/http://www.aaroads.com/high-priority/corr09.html to http://www.aaroads.com/high-priority/corr09.html
• Added {{dead link}} tag to ftp://ftp.dot.state.pa.us/public/Bureaus/BOMO/RM/RITS/Annual%20Electronic%20SLDs%20by%20County/District%208/Dauphin%20Co.%20%20No%20Pipes.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:36, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Interstate 83. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120731043940/http://www.i-83beltway.com/ess1/i83pa581.html to http://www.i-83beltway.com/ess1/i83pa581.html
• Added {{dead link}} tag to ftp://ftp.dot.state.pa.us/public/Bureaus/BOMO/RM/RITS/Annual%20Electronic%20SLDs%20by%20County/District%208/York%20Co.%20No%20Pipes.pdf
• Added {{dead link}} tag to ftp://ftp.dot.state.pa.us/public/Bureaus/BOMO/RM/RITS/Annual%20Electronic%20SLDs%20by%20County/District%208/Cumberland%20Co.%20No%20Pipes.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:11, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]