Talk:Hirak Rif Movement

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Berbers Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Berbers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Berbers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BerbersWikipedia:WikiProject BerbersTemplate:WikiProject BerbersBerbers Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Morocco Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Morocco, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Morocco on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MoroccoWikipedia:WikiProject MoroccoTemplate:WikiProject MoroccoMorocco Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Help expand the project: edit history watch purge You can help! يمكنكم أن تساهموا Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Mounir Charïbi Assess : Rate the Unassessed Morocco articles and Unknown-importance Morocco-related articles. Cleanup : Cleanup listing for this project is available. See also the list by category Geographical coordinates : Add geographic coordinates to articles in Category:Morocco articles missing geocoordinate data Photo : See requested photographs in Morocco Stubs : Morocco stubs Other : Translate from Arabic: Sellam Ameziane, Mrebih Rebbu

Hello/Azul TheseusHeLl, why did you move the article back to "Hirak Rif"? You cited WP:COMMONNAME, but I haven't seen any English-language sources that use this name. "Hirak Rif" might make sense in French, but it doesn't in English. In English it would have to be something like the "Rif Hirak" or the "Hirak of the Rif." If it's supposed to be a transliteration of حراك الريف, I think it should be "Hirak Ar-Rif." إيان بريم (talk) 18:58, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Azul @إيان بريم: I think the title should stay "Hirak Rif" or changing it to "Hirak Movement" or "Hirak Rif Movement". Your concerns are understandable, but "Hirak of the Rif" is an uncommon name for these demonstrations. From my research this is what some English-speaking newspapers/websites are using.

• Hirak Rif (Amnesty International UK, The Middle East Monitor, CTV News, VOA, Washington Post, Human Rights Watch, BBC)
• Hirak movement (FP, JNAS, The Japan Times, BBC, The Guardian, Al Jazeera, Al Jazeera, Irish Independent) -TheseusHeLl (talk) 21:55, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@TheseusHeLl: "Hirak Rif Movement" seems good. إيان بريم (talk) 02:16, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, you can move it if you want. -TheseusHeLl (talk) 02:19, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

In the legacy part of the article it says no demands were not answered, but in the above article it says that the state responded to their demands, this is a contradiction! The rif area had significantly changed since 2018 in terms of infrastructure and economically. I think we should update the source Retcycube (talk) 10:04, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally the source interviews an immigrant, which probably hasn't visited the area since he was asked why he escaped to europe, so logically he has no way of knowing if the hirak 's original demands were answered Retcycube (talk) 10:08, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]