Talk:HTML5
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the HTML5 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 31 days |
This level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
To-do list for HTML5:
|
This article was nominated for merging with Semantic HTML on August 2014. The result of the discussion was not merge. |
|
||
This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
NPOV dispute
[edit]The section "Distinction between W3C's HTML5 and WHATWG's HTML" contains personal names and looks very aggressive. Please, refactor it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:1458:204:1:0:0:101:E1AC (talk) 12:04, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
Is the "Cleanup" to-do done?
[edit]The to-do list above includes "Cleanup : Distinction between W3C's HTML5 and WHATWG's HTML". Has this item been accomplished by the addition of the table in the new section Differences between the two standards? Ennex2 (talk) 01:31, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
I have now removed that item from the to-do list. Ennex2 (talk) 00:25, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
- @Ennex2: Thanks. I did much of that cleanup job, but wasn't aware of the to-do list. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 11:45, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
I've put a similar TODO back up. This article seems confused about whether it's topic is HTML5 or the HTML living standard.Metaquanta (talk) 07:29, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
Confusing first sentence
[edit]"HTML5 is a software solution stack that defines the properties and behaviors of web page content by implementing a markup based pattern to it."
So we have a stack implementing a pattern to content, thereby defining properties and behaviors of content.
I am mystified. Surely this can be stated more clearly, perhaps without the buzzy word "solution". -- FIPAR (talk) 21:25, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
- It's really bad and didn't use to be. You should find the most recent clearer version and put it back. Metaquanta (talk) 07:31, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
- Done. Restored the version that preceded this:[1]. Metaquanta (talk) 05:15, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
Was the recommendation retired?
[edit]This sentence says the recommendation was retired: "The W3C recommendation of HTML5 was retired[.]" Was the recommendation retired or was HTML5 retired? Timhowardriley (talk) 16:03, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
- B-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in Technology
- B-Class vital articles in Technology
- B-Class Computing articles
- Mid-importance Computing articles
- B-Class software articles
- High-importance software articles
- B-Class software articles of High-importance
- All Software articles
- B-Class Websites articles
- Top-importance Websites articles
- B-Class Websites articles of Top-importance
- All Websites articles
- B-Class Computer science articles
- High-importance Computer science articles
- All Computing articles
- B-Class Internet articles
- Top-importance Internet articles
- WikiProject Internet articles
- WikiProject Computer science articles
- Wikipedia pages with to-do lists