Talk:Flexible tank

This article was nominated for deletion on 25 October 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

On 10 January 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved from Flexible tanks to Flexible tank. The result of the discussion was moved.

Early comments

A history of User:Yurixx contribution(s) just now has shown that this is the only English Wikipedia article he has written and he made no other edits. His style of writing leads me to believe he is a foreigner, or at least was in a land where English is not the main language. H Padleckas (talk) 13:47, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The exact meaning of this sentence is not clear to me:
"With the same capacity, the weight and volume of a flexible tank may be just a steely tank's 10% and 2%-5%."
I googled "steely tanks"; there are such things. H Padleckas (talk) 13:51, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Flexible tanks vs Bladder tank

What's the difference between a flexible tank and a bladder tank? Shouldn't these two articles be merged? The RedBurn (ϕ) 08:50, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge of Flexi-bag into Flexible tanks

Per Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Flextank - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 06:04, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Bladder tank, Flexi-bag, and Flexible tanks should be merged. Pkgx (talk) 14:29, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
+1. Bladder tank seems to be defined by some as pressure-rated vessels (steel fox example) with an internal elastomeric bladder (like some expansion tanks), so it may be something different after all. The RedBurn (ϕ) 22:16, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support for the currently open proposal; merging Flexi-bag into Flexible tanks on the grounds of overlap. Klbrain (talk) 16:01, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

For Flexi-bag,

Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 05:35, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 10 January 2023

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 04:47, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Flexible tanks → Flexible tank – Per WP:SINGULAR, article titles should usually be in the singular form. Rreagan007 (talk) 04:29, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:50, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:22, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.