Talk:Dvorichna settlement hromada

Dvorichna settlement hromada has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: August 28, 2023. (Reviewed version).

A fact from Dvorichna settlement hromada appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 28 September 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows: Did you know... that the Dvorichna settlement hromada has remained divided between Russia and Ukraine since the 2022 Kharkiv counteroffensive? A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2023/September. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Dvorichna settlement hromada.

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Cities This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities Ukraine Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ukraine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ukraine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.UkraineWikipedia:WikiProject UkraineTemplate:WikiProject UkraineUkraine Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Dvorichna settlement hromada/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Miguelsa12 (talk · contribs) 19:22, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I'm planning to review this article. Best regards, Miguel (talk) 19:22, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

I think this article meets all the criteria below. Congratulations!

1. Is it well written?

   A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:

   B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:

2. Is it verifiable with no original research?

   A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:

   B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):

   C. It contains no original research:

   D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:

   B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):

4. Is it neutral?

   It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:

5. Is it stable?

   It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:

6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   Review passed.

--Miguel (talk) 19:42, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Miguelsa12: Wow, thank you so much for reviewing! Was there really nothing that needed to be changed about the article, not even grammar, to make it GA? If so, that's a first for me 🙂 Cheers! Johnson524 01:50, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Johnson524: I don't think grammar (or prose in general) has to be changed. The article covers the main aspects of the proposed topic (an administrative division in Ukraine), all the info is referenced with reliable sources in accordance to the MOS, etcetera. If you want, you may investigate and add more info to upgrade it to Featured Article. Best regards, Miguel (talk) 17:36, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Miguelsa12: I think I am going to hold off on looking at Featured Status as long as the war is ongoing here, but I do appreciate the encouragement 😁 Thank you again for reviewing, cheers! Johnson524 18:08, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 18:42, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

• ... that the Dvorichna settlement hromada has remained divided in half between Russia and Ukraine since the 2022 Kharkiv counteroffensive? Source: https://suspilne.media/459449-mabut-povertatisa-bude-nikudi-ak-zive-dvoricanska-gromada-harkivsini-polovina-akoi-zalisaetsa-pid-okupacieu/
  • ALT1: ... that the head of the Dvorichna settlement hromada would be imprisoned twice by Russian forces for refusing to cooperate after the hromada was fully occupied during the Russian invasion of Ukraine? Source: https://kupiansk.city/articles/263624/-v-dvorichanskij-stg-nespokijno-50-naselenih-punktiv-zalishayutsya-v-okupacii-foto
  • Reviewed: [[]]

Improved to Good Article status by Johnson524 (talk). Self-nominated at 18:11, 30 August 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Dvorichna settlement hromada; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: @Johnson524: Good article. Onegreatjoke (talk) 03:02, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The English text states: "The entire hromada is composed largely of flat, agricultural land, with virtually no industrial areas."

"Entire" and "largely" are conflicting adjectives. Better alternatives could be: "The hromada is largely composed of flat, agricultural ..." or "The entire hromada is composed of largely flat agricultural ..." but I don't know, factually, which would be more accurate. Al Begamut (talk) 04:20, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Al Begamut:  Option 1 Done. Thanks for the suggestion, cheers! Johnson524 12:15, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]