Talk:Doria-Pamphili-Landi

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Italy Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Text and/or other creative content from this version of Doria-Pamphili-Landi was copied or moved into Doria (family) with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Hi all,

I moved this page from Doria-Pamphilii-Landi to Doria-Pamphili-Landi to adhere with the general convention (which appears in many other places across Wikipedia) of spelling the Pamphili surname (on English Wikipedia) with 1 final i rather than two.

The Italian convention uses the long i which produces Pamphilj - a note which is made on the majority of pages referencing the Pamphili name.

The page using the alternate spelling now redirects here.

Hope this is not of great inconvenience. Stalwart111 (talk) 03:51, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Both articles describe the same family; the only difference seems to be that one focuses on the history before its renaming, and the other after. Psychonaut (talk) 09:16, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Psychonaut, that's a pretty accurate assessment I think. This article deals more with the Pamphili part while the other mentions them not-at-all. It would have to be a fairly surgical merger but I think the suggestion is probably a good one. St★lwart¹¹¹ 09:26, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A complication I've just discovered is that Doria Landi is a Google-Translated version of it:Doria, which already has a corresponding English article Doria (family). So now there are three potential sources and targets for the merge. —Psychonaut (talk) 09:33, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is also related I think. St★lwart¹¹¹ 09:37, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It seems that the main current problem with the page is the duplication of pre-17 century history that relates exclusively to the Doria family and is already covered on this page. Can I suggest a solution would be to simply move the Admiral Andrea Doria material to the Doria (family) page so that it is covered once on a 'family' page, in addition to its coverage on Andrea Doria. Klbrain (talk) 21:56, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Completed a rather modest move of material, as indicated with the 'copied' templates above. Klbrain (talk) 22:54, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Doria-Pamphili-Landi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070404011338/http://www.doriapamphilj.it:80/ukhome.asp to http://www.doriapamphilj.it/ukhome.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:44, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]