Talk:Disney+

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Disney+ article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 2 months

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

Disney High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disney, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The Walt Disney Company and its affiliated companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DisneyWikipedia:WikiProject DisneyTemplate:WikiProject DisneyDisney High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Television Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Film: Filmmaking This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm This article is supported by the Filmmaking task force. Computing: Networking Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Networking task force. Media Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Media To-do List: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Cleanup : Media influence, Video game culture, Sound bite NPOV : Content (media and publishing) Verify : Multimedia, Alternative media, Alternative newspaper Other : Answer requests for comments Apps High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Apps, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of apps on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AppsWikipedia:WikiProject AppsTemplate:WikiProject Appsapps High This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale. Contribute to the project: edit history watch purge Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Good article nominations : Improve Application software, Facebook and Instagram to good article status Stubs : Category:Mobile game stubs, Category:Stub-Class apps articles Internet Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Websites: Computing Low‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Computing. Brands High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers. This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist. [[20th Century Studios#20th Century Family|Fox Family]] Anchor 20th Century Studios#20th Century Family links to a specific web page: 20th Century Family. The anchor (#20th Century Family) has been deleted by other users before. Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 17 January 2024 and 12 May 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Groundhogluv, Madisweatt (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Blackwing143, Roger-roger3, Tsapeg, KaraWilmoth, BlueKnight8, GavinLane22.

— Assignment last updated by Wordnerd104 (talk) 15:07, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes Panenkazo (talk) 18:35, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm pretty sure by now most users watching this page have seen or noticed the new teal D+ logo being used on the platform and websites in some regions. Now, there has been some confusion on which logo we should consistently use as the predominant main logo in the infobox here and on the various templates and navboxes. It has become apparent that this change to the teal version is synonymous with the integration of Hulu in the United States and is featured there along with select international regions, although not in all and the original logo used since launch is still used in other regions, such as the Phillipines as one editor pointed out, while the teal version is used in the UK where Hulu is not but Star is. The teal version is also not used for the Disney+ Hotstar service, despite some editors attempting to include the solo file on those related articles. There is also relevant commentary of the teal logo in this article and having the teal logo itself right next to that text as opposed to at the top would compliment readability and visible interest for readers reading about the logo who may not immediately see it, while the original launch logo is currently placed within the launch details so it would not be deleted due to frequent logo changes in the infobox.

I think we need to establish a consensus on which logo we ought to use: 1) the original D+ logo used from the 2019 launch which is still frequently used on the service and sites in select regions and is what the service is most recognizable as, or 2) the newly WP:RECENT teal version which is primarily made to compliment Hulu, which is a not a service used in every international region and is essentially just a US-exclusive. Pinging editors who have recently editing regarding this to gauge perspectives: @InfiniteNexus, HM2021, SolshineBenie, and ScarletViolet: Trailblazer101 (talk) 15:18, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's pretty debatable to me but according to Logopedia it said that: As of Good Friday, this logo (used from 2019-2024) is still used on very few markets, as well as Disney+ Hotstar on available markets, but it will be expected to completely fade out during the rest of 2024. But I know Star is an international hub for Disney+ while Hulu is an American hub for the aforementioned streaming service.

So for instance, i think we shall use the 2024 logo (most regions) because it's so refreshing, so unique, and so modern than the 2019 one (which still remain in select regions). All those in favour!! SolshineBenie (talk) 15:30, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Logopedia is a Fandom wiki, which is not a reliable source and I don't think we should be using that as a judgement call here. Which specific markets is it referring to? Calling a recent logo "refreshing", "unique", and "modern" compared to the one that has been used and commonly associated with the company and service for years all because of a recent change raises my WP:RECENTISM concerns for personal preference rather than critical analysis of what readers would predominantly expect from this article. Trailblazer101 (talk) 15:41, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh okay. I understand what you are saying about which the Disney+ logo that we can use whenever it's the 2019 one or a 2024 one.

But I'm sorry if i made that remarks on that one. Point withdrawn. SolshineBenie (talk) 15:45, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disney+ is an American product. We always use the name and logo used in the country from which something originated from, whether it be a film, a product, a company, or a brand (except in extraordinary cases like TikTok). InfiniteNexus (talk) 04:48, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

But I am wondering why we are using this monochrome image (which is sourced to Logopedia, so it was possibly fan-generated) that isn't used anywhere in an official capacity, rather than the standard one with the teal background. InfiniteNexus (talk) 04:51, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I can agree on that one SolshineBenie (talk) 11:43, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes Panenkazo (talk) 18:34, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

this is requested feature of entry about disney+, the history of its prices of memebership. 47.155.32.217 (talk) 20:05, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just wondering if anyone can add a catagory for disney films not on disney+, ie watcher in the woods, return to witch mountain etc sailor iain (talk) 14:18, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]