Talk:Cowardy Custard

	This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Musical Theatre Cowardy Custard is part of WikiProject Musical Theatre, organized to improve and complete musical theatre articles and coverage on Wikipedia. You can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Musical TheatreWikipedia:WikiProject Musical TheatreTemplate:WikiProject Musical TheatreMusical Theatre

Very good cognate! -- Tim riley (talk) 22:31, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I put the song list into 3 columns, but I know that everyone's browser makes the page look different. Does this look OK on everyone's screens? If it looks bad, we can go back to 2 columns.... -- Ssilvers (talk) 15:28, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just checked on my laptop - looks excellent. En passant, I keep seeing references in GA/FA reviews to putting references in columns, with mentions of reflist|3 and reflist|2 but when I experiment with these the previews still list the refs in one long column. Any thoughts? Tim riley (talk) 19:01, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm pretty sure I saw an FA discussion to the effect that reflist|2 is good, but reflist|3 or more is verboten. -- Ssilvers (talk) 20:04, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

So did I - but I experimented with both and I still got just one long column. Tim riley (talk) 21:17, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, many browsers just show it as one column, but some browsers show the columns, and for those, more than two columns is too much for the reflist. I think if you use Firefox you can see the columns. I use IE, and I only see one column. Best regards, -- Ssilvers (talk) 06:26, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Cowardy Custard. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.a1wdb.com/cgi-bin/women/13539
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110811214309/http://artswrap.co.uk/event/cowardy-custard-tour-2011 to http://artswrap.co.uk/event/cowardy-custard-tour-2011
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101024180352/http://www.denmeadoperatic.hampshire.org.uk/NewWebsite/Arch_CCustard2001.html to http://www.denmeadoperatic.hampshire.org.uk/NewWebsite/Arch_CCustard2001.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:19, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]