Talk:Capital Airlines Flight 67

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Disaster management Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Aviation: Accidents This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation This article is supported by the Aviation accident project. Michigan Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Michigan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Michigan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MichiganWikipedia:WikiProject MichiganTemplate:WikiProject MichiganMichigan Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The 'official' version has a great deal of statistical support. The Viscount was designed to be stall resistant by making the horizontal stabilizer designed to stall before the wing - causing a pitch down. A number of other Viscount accidents were attributed to horizontal stabilizer icing causing a pitch down.

The aircraft impacted in an attitude consistent with this and not in one caused by an accelerated stall which would have manifested itself as a roll rate before impact.

Hull's crash was the first CAB accident report I ever read at the age of 8. I think the line suggesting that the accident was caused by a descending turn be amended as the 'official' cause fits the circumstances. Mark Lincoln (talk) 00:06, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Several Viscount accidents were due to the crews not turning on the anti-icing in conditions that required it, and in wrongly delaying engine re-starting as-per airline check lists that incorrectly advised a maximum height for re-starting, when the Dart engines could in fact be successfully re-started at any height. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.150.18.158 (talk) 11:19, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Capital Airlines Flight 67. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://ntl1.specialcollection.net/scripts/ws.dll?file&fn=8&name=*S%3A\DOT_56GB\airplane%20accidents\websearch\040658.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110823112843/http://ntl1.specialcollection.net/scripts/ws.dll?browse&rn=662%22 to http://ntl1.specialcollection.net/scripts/ws.dll?browse&rn=662%22
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.ourmidland.com/articles/2008/03/25/local_news/887716.txt

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:10, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]