Talk:Boreosphenida

This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Mammals This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MammalsWikipedia:WikiProject MammalsTemplate:WikiProject Mammalsmammal Palaeontology This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology

The contents of the Boreosphenida page were merged into Tribosphenida and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history.

Rougier et al. (2007) and Davis (2011) considered Boreosphenida to be a junior synonym of Tribosphenida; furthermore, Zofia Kielan-Jaworowska, one of the authors who named Boreosphenida, accepted this in her latest book "In Pursuit of Early Mammals" (Indiana University Press 2013, p. 134). Thus, there seems to be no reason to keep these articles separate. --Macrochelys (talk) 17:38, 16 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I concur. Most sources basically use Boreosphenida or Tribosphenida interchangeably. --Falconfly (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 19:40, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Done