Talk:Audiology

This  level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Medicine Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 16 January 2019 and 1 May 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Colligse.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 14:59, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have added a history section, to where I have moved "the origin of the term". A problem I can see is that this article has sections only on audiology in GB and India, while now the history refers only to the USA! Maybe an audiologist historian can fix that, so that one has an overview of the development in the world. This is probably closely related to technological advances, as much as to a caring ethos and clinical skills. The profession being of recent origin, my guess is that the documentation should be available somewhere. A US citizen may add something about the science in that country. --Seejyb 11:30, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Commons Health Select Committee has reviewed service provision and its problems in the UK, with a report in May this year: here. Perhaps worth mentioning. JFW | T@lk 20:47, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The section regarding training in the United States lists 52 states. Obviously, there's 50 states. If this refers to two American Territories, it should specify which territories. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.172.25.195 (talk) 00:18, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In the main section about audiology and audiologists - there were two paragraphs about Hearing Aid dispensers and what they do. This was removed as this information should be on the page regarding hearing aid dispensing. Additionally, there were statements that were inaccurate in the removed paragraph about licensure and certification. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.94.196.254 (talk) 15:13, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Audiology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140405081921/http://ling.mq.edu.au:80/centres/audiology/index.htm to http://www.ling.mq.edu.au/centres/audiology/index.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:09, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello all, I would like to reorganize the introduction section by consolidating the information there to be about audiology and move the information about audiologists to the audiologist section, the audiologist section could use some organization which I would like to organize in a 5 "W" questions way, and lastly, I'd like to add any information I find on the genesis of the field of audiology. I have heard that it began in America as a split from speech language pathologist when they began rehabilitation for WWII veterans who incurred hearing loss during their service. I will of course need to do some research for this before adding it. Does anyone have any feedback on my designs? I am open to suggestions and edits of course. Audeditor 1 (talk) 16:52, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]