[go: up one dir, main page]
Jump to content

Talk:Antarctic

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Reference, merge, and/or rename?

[edit]

Aside from the fact that this article is as yet unsourced (aside from a nondescript tourist link), I am unsure if a distinct article about the region is warranted; arguably, it's a POV fork, and the content can be dealt with, if not already, in the parent article. I mean: is there a referenced definition for the region? (Compare with Antarctic ecozone)? Europe and Asia can also be construed as regions, as can any geographical entity, but should we create region articles for them too?

As well, I wonder if this article is titled correctly: since the northern polar region is referred to as the Arctic, would it not make sense to name this article Antarctic or similar? The New Oxford Dictionary of English, after all, does define Antarctic (noun; 3rd sense, with 'the') as the south polar region. (Which somewhat flies in the face of my comments above!) Bosonic dressing (talk) 01:31, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I beg to disagree with the merger suggestion per relevant past discussion, see Сontinent or More than a Continent? . Apcbg (talk) 06:04, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Noted; per above. Having perused the discussion there previously, the main crutch there is that some other wikis have an article each for the continent and region ... which is not necessarily relevant. You have also cited what is (or is not) official in English, without having provided ANY citations to support your assertion. I don't see anything here yet that is not already, or cannot be, included in the main article; thus, this article still seems to be a sort of fork. Yet, Britannica's article for Antarctica entitles the topic 'Antarctic regions' within the body of the main article, which to me says that in the very least the article might benefit from a different title, like Antarctic or similar. Nonetheless, this article remains unsourced. Bosonic dressing (talk) 09:55, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Your renaming proposal seems to have some merit, indeed the USBGN Geographic Names Information System (GNIS) says in its entry for ‘Antarctica’ that:
“The term Antarctic has been applied to the southern polar regions of Earth, and Antarctica to the continent, by analogy with the term Arctic, applied to the northern polar regions.” GNIS: Antarctica.
Perhaps we could have some more editors commenting on the issue of established English usage of ‘Antarctic’ for the wider South Polar Region as opposed to ‘Antarctica’ for the continent itself. Apcbg (talk) 14:56, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for this. The GNIS reference does it for me, both in annulling my request for merging this article and in strengthening the case for perhaps renaming it.  :) 'Antarctic (region)' is another possibility, given the term's primary meaning as an adjective. Less duplication with the parent article and more references would be nice, which can be worked on. Bosonic dressing (talk) 16:15, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
In retrospect, I would propose boldly moving this article to Antarctic, and then building the article lead to cover its dual use as pertaining to the continent and the south polar region. Something like:
or similar. Thoughts? Bosonic dressing (talk) 20:35, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I suppose we could try the Antarctic title. By the way, Arctic is an adjective too but the relevant article doesn't start with that. Perhaps it would be natural for the 'Antarctic' article's opening to mirror that of the 'Arctic' article, say:
etc. Apcbg (talk) 05:31, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Apcbg (talk) 16:03, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I thought about this as well; I'm just very mildly concerned that someone will come along to indicate that the term is commonly an adjective and not just used to describe the region. However, this doesn't appear to have materialised at the northern end, so why worry!? So, thanks for the effort and the lead looks good! (I may tweak later, though.) Bosonic dressing (talk) 17:26, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Why the name of the image is 'Nordkap' though it is claimed that the picture is taken in Antartic? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.219.150.194 (talk) 21:31, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Probably because there is a 'Nordkapp' on the picture, namely the Norwegian cruise ship Nordkapp. Apcbg (talk) 04:42, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of New Swabia.svg Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Flag of New Swabia.svg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests August 2011
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 19:22, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hindi version

[edit]

An IP has posted feedback requesting this article in Hindi. I don't know enough about Hindi to even recognise if it is one of the languages for which we have an interlanguage links (or even if there is a Hindi Wikipedai). Is there a Hindi reading/writing person who can resolve this issue? Mitch Ames (talk) 12:59, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

UK

[edit]

The phonetic spelling of "Antarctic" in UK English has an "r" before a consonant. Actually, in most UK dialects, the "r" is dropped before a consonant. It is retained in the South West and Scotland, and then, different "r"'s are used. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.147.175.160 (talk) 15:41, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Temperature?

[edit]

Where are the seasonal temperature numbers like in the Arctic article? Do you not know or are you unwilling to admit that Antarctic never gets above freezing, because it hurts tje AGW cause? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.147.135.123 (talk) 20:37, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Antarctic. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:05, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

introductory paragraph - ambiguity

[edit]

The statement "The region covers some 20% of the Southern Hemisphere, of which 5.5% (14 million km2) is the surface area of the Antarctic continent itself" is ambiguous. does it mean the area of the Antarctic continent is 5.5% of the Southern hemisphere or that it is 5.5% of the 20%? This needs clarification. 212.159.59.5 (talk) 10:53, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Of the Southern Hemisphere. Apcbg (talk) 17:30, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Antarctic&oldid=1252174409"