Talk:Alaska Department of Fish and Game

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Alaska Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alaska, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Alaska on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AlaskaWikipedia:WikiProject AlaskaTemplate:WikiProject AlaskaAlaska Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent.

Alaska Game Management Units was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 10 December 2012 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Alaska Department of Fish and Game on 10 December 2012. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. Not an actionable request.

No criticisms section despite such criticisms being objectively reported on by third party media

I can't understand why this page is censored...Who genuinely has the conflict of interest here? The department have been the subject of legitimate and well documented criticism from the scientific community. Pretty rough to not only censor editing, but to also fail to provide balanced information on top of this. Even well respected Wikimedia Foundation staff have criticized Wikipedia for censorship such as this. You might not agree with criticisms expressed and documented by third party sources, but to censor the inclusion of any and all criticisms entirely is surely unjustifiable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.61.187.112 (talk) 20:53, 26 May 2018‎ (UTC)[reply]

I don’t know where you are getting the impression that censorship has occured. The absence of material you believe should be here does not indicate that it was removed or censored. Wikipedia is explicitly not censored, but neither is it complete. If you have reliabe sources documenting the criticism you refer to, please feel free to go right ahead and write such a section. And please don’t cry “censorship” without providing the least shred of any indication of evidence of where and when it took place. It just is not helpful. Beeblebrox (talk) 03:42, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]