Talk:A259 road

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Brighton This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brighton, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource about Brighton and Hove. If you would like to participate, please visit the project pageBrightonWikipedia:WikiProject BrightonTemplate:WikiProject BrightonBrighton ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. Hampshire Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hampshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hampshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HampshireWikipedia:WikiProject HampshireTemplate:WikiProject HampshireHampshire Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article has been marked as needing immediate attention. Highways: United Kingdom Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Highways, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of highways on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HighwaysWikipedia:WikiProject HighwaysTemplate:WikiProject HighwaysHighways Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the United Kingdom Roads Task Force. Sussex Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sussex, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sussex on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SussexWikipedia:WikiProject SussexTemplate:WikiProject SussexSussex-related Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. UK geography Start‑class Low‑importance This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography Start This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The road is longer than 19 Miles and it also runs from Emsworth (West End) To Folkestone (East End). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.36.37.33 (talk) 10:59, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Very close to meeting B-class requirements, needs a general layout improvement, ie clearer section divisions, a typo and shrinking a few details. Will do that + fix above if I get time in next few days. Baldy Bill (sharpen the razor|see my reflection) 19:42, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The first paragraph states that there are 7,700 accidents at a rate of 383 per mile. This would mean that the A259 was 20 miles long.In fact as the detail in the box on the r-h side clearly states the road is 120 miles long. This would equate to 65 accidents per mile. Alternatively, the 7,700 accidents relate to only a portion of the total road distance, in which case this should be made clear. Moreover, the link to the BBC article [2] and Autotrader [4] do not exist. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.39.233.13 (talk) 10:38, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on A259 road. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.southeast-ra.gov.uk/documents/alignment/rfa-feb09.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120223074620/http://www.eastsussex.gov.uk/NR/rdonlyres/B57BFD05-65C7-4887-8904-62F837DE9002/0/CD912LocalTransportPlanMajorSchemeBusinessCaseMay09.pdf to http://www.eastsussex.gov.uk/NR/rdonlyres/B57BFD05-65C7-4887-8904-62F837DE9002/0/CD912LocalTransportPlanMajorSchemeBusinessCaseMay09.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120223074639/http://www.eastsussex.gov.uk/NR/rdonlyres/A8C14371-6C71-4098-96E0-0983AE0D89E1/0/CD75_seeda_hastings_bexhill_prosperity_report.pdf to http://www.eastsussex.gov.uk/NR/rdonlyres/A8C14371-6C71-4098-96E0-0983AE0D89E1/0/CD75_seeda_hastings_bexhill_prosperity_report.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110724055159/http://www.bettertransport.org.uk/blogs/bexhill-hastings-link-road-should-be-rejected to http://www.bettertransport.org.uk/blogs/bexhill-hastings-link-road-should-be-rejected
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.sussexwildlifetrust.org.uk/conservation/planning/page00010.htm
• Added archive http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20100702205438/http://www.southeast-ra.gov.uk/documents/factsheet/30.pdf to http://www.southeast-ra.gov.uk/documents/factsheet/30.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:42, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]