Talk:201 (South Park)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 201 (South Park) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months

This page is not a forum for general discussion about 201 (South Park). Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about 201 (South Park) at the Reference desk.

	201 (South Park) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones Date Process Result May 7, 2010 Good article nominee Listed
	A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on May 4, 2010. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that during the opening sequence of "The Squirt and the Whale", The Simpsons addressed the controversy surrounding censorship of the South Park episode "201"?

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Animation: American / Television / Computer / South Park Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by the Animated television work group (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by the Computer animation work group. This article is supported by the South Park task force (assessed as High-importance). Comedy Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Islam: Islam and Controversy Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Islam and Controversy task force. Religion Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Television: Episode coverage Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force (assessed as High-importance). United States: Animation / Television / Colorado Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Animation - American animation work group. This article is supported by American television task force (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Colorado, our collaboration to create, improve, and update Wikipedia articles about the U.S. State of Colorado. To comment about this article, select the Add topic tab above. For questions about, or to make suggestions for Colorado articles, go to our project's talk page. We invite you to join us!

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers. This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist. [[Paramount Pictures#Paramount Home Entertainment|Paramount Home Entertainment]] Anchor Paramount Pictures#Paramount Home Entertainment links to a specific web page: Paramount Home Entertainment. The anchor (#Paramount Home Entertainment) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before. Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Based on watching the episode I'm skeptical of the explicit claim in this article that the "CENSORED" box was added by Comedy Central. The episode "200" used Muhammad's name whereas this episode transparently censored it, which shows obvious tampering; the moral resolution was also obviously censored, as confirmed by the creators' statements; but "200" also featured the "CENSORED" box, and Tom Cruise's acquisition of the CENSORED box following his use of the machine seems too much like part of the joke and not part of the censorship. It was also consistently animated in the same manner as characters typically are in South Park. Can we at least agree not to make a claim one way or the other regarding the "CENSORED" box? Or is there additional evidence that I'm not aware of? Dcoetzee 13:42, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Black CENSORED box was a joke. Comedy Central said right from the get go they refused to actually show Muhammad, and the censored box was making fun of that. Besides if the box was added by Comedy Central, Matt & Trey would have mentioned it in their statement. Grapesoda22 (talk) 04:45, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Here is a non-404ing link that has the statement from Matt and Trey [1]. Here is the statement, as copied from that website:

In the 14 years we’ve been doing South Park we have never done a show that we couldn’t stand behind. We delivered our version of the show to Comedy Central and they made a determination to alter the episode. It wasn’t some meta-joke on our part. Comedy Central added the bleeps. In fact, Kyle’s customary final speech was about intimidation and fear. It didn’t mention Muhammad at all but it got bleeped too. We’ll be back next week with a whole new show about something completely different and we’ll see what happens to it.

As Grapesoda22 mentions, the statement talks about Comedy Central censoring the audio but doesn't say anything about them censoring the video. - Kerrick Staley (talk) 21:32, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 201 (South Park). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100426042405/http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/declassified/archive/2010/04/23/security-stepped-up-at-comedy-central-following-threats-against-south-park.aspx to http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/declassified/archive/2010/04/23/security-stepped-up-at-comedy-central-following-threats-against-south-park.aspx
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100509002328/http://www.metronews.ca/halifax/entertainment/article/516960--nobody-not-even-muhammad-is-off-limits-macfarlane to http://www.metronews.ca/halifax/entertainment/article/516960--nobody-not-even-muhammad-is-off-limits-macfarlane

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:29, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

We should add info (not URL) where the uncensored copies reside nowadays. Zezen (talk) 08:55, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Episode 201 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 19 § Episode 201 until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 23:01, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]