[go: up one dir, main page]

Jump to content

Talk:199th Fighter Squadron

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Merger

[edit]

There is currently a separate article for the 464th Fighter Squadron, the original designation for this unit and one that it held for only a year and a half.

Neither of the other two squadrons in the 507th Fighter Group have separate articles for their old designations. The 463d is at 198th Airlift Squadron ahd the 465th is at 465th Air Refueling Squadron.
The material in the second article does nothing but repeat what is in this article, it says nothing in addition.
WP:MILMOS#UNITNAME states that when a unit has had multiple names over the course of its existence, the title should generally be the last name used. The exception for cases where the subject is clearly more commonly known by one of the previous names does not apply.
The combined article (actually nothing would be added to this article as a result of the merger) would not be overly long, requiring a split based on size. --Lineagegeek (talk) 00:00, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 199th Fighter Squadron. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:31, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]