Talk:1421

This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Years Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Lists Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Middle Ages Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Removed *another time* the China part. That's nuts.

The part about China discovering the New World was saying that it was definite that it happened. I changed it so it shows it is just a theory. --72.138.9.208 06:06, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Removed the part about Chinese ships reaching the North American continent. Christ, that guy and his book are the worst thing to happen to popular history.--71.112.234.168 05:09, 3 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't there at least be a link to 1421 hypothesis or 1421: The Year China Discovered the World, correct or not?--Justfred 23:25, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There's a hatnote now. 76.66.193.224 (talk) 02:42, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]