Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ogimon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete per G3 as a blatant hoax Nancy ^talk 17:24, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ogimon

No encyclopedic content Vistro (talk) 05:30, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No sources, little context (I am unable to tell which Digimon series this one is from as the article does not help), no assertions of what makes this specific monster notable (it appears to be 1 specific Agumon, it would be like having an article specifically for Ash Ketchum's Pikachu). TJ Spyke 07:04, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete - drivelly, non-notable. NB: the AfD tag was removed twice by article creator, so I replaced it. ╟─Treasury Tag►contribs─╢ 09:59, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete No context at all. --Artene50 (talk) 10:22, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – clear WP:HOAX, is author's fan fiction. — sephiroth bcr ^(converse) 10:29, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. —— sephiroth bcr ^(converse) 10:37, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Hoax of the worst quality. Splendid (sarcastic) grade 0 pictures --KrebMarkt 11:04, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as pure vandalism. --Farix (Talk) 13:01, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete - G3 added, blatant hoax. — neuro^(talk) 14:46, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete vandalism / deliberate misinformation. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 16:07, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.