User talk:Work2win

Hello, Work2win and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Joyson Prabhu Holla at me! 18:48, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply] Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: Edit a page • Upload and use images • Create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Help desk: A Wiki Styled page to ask questions on Help directory: A comprehensive list-style help contents page Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Simplified manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Peer review • Featured content Miscellaneous User pages • Talk pages Awards a registered contributor can achieve and award Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

While you have made some valuable edits with sources, there are also many unsourced additions with a whole bunch of refs clasped on. Please cite the passage to the ref instead of tagging everything on to the end, because then someone has to go through and clean it up. There were also some unsourced additions.(Lihaas (talk) 12:40, 11 January 2012 (UTC)).[reply]

Nice edits coming along . Just a heads up to add sources (as i see you now did per sentence) and writing has been consistent with WP:MOS and WP:ENGVAR(Lihaas (talk) 17:37, 14 January 2012 (UTC)).[reply]

Once again, kindly see the MOS dor date formats and do not use "&" as it is unencyclopaedic, instead spell out the word as "and"Lihaas (talk) 18:31, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is the 4th time you are disregarding advice per this edit. WP is not a weblog, there is a MOS for new editors. Please read that.

I can also help you with any questions because your edits are definitely adding valuable info.

See this edit for changes, also note the refs to the sentences instead of collating at the end.(Lihaas (talk) 17:07, 17 January 2012 (UTC)).[reply]

And yet for the FIFTH time you are ignoring polite calls. We don't use "^&" and "th" as you did here [1] per MOS. next time your edits wont be construed as AGF and reverted.(Lihaas (talk) 13:01, 20 January 2012 (UTC)).[reply]

Kindly READ the MOS sheet for dates, etc before editing(Lihaas (talk) 22:45, 22 January 2012 (UTC)).[reply]

Nice idea to put the polls in the table instead of prose (despite the fact that many people call for it in prose). Anyways, i say you struggled to make it a table so i have done it on the page now ;)Lihaas (talk) 05:06, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I guess you're watching the results coming in...we can add an "analysis" section at the end. And there is a lot of talk of the rahul gandhi flop show (and priyanka was there too this time). Perhaps even compare to that of Bihar.Lihaas (talk) 06:19, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:Work2win/Kolkata Hospital Fire has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Kolkata Hospital Fire, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article, if you have any questions please ask on my talk page! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 21:12, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:submit}} to the top of the article.)

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Kolkata Hospital Fire.
• To edit the submission, you can use the edit button at the top of the article, near the search bar
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the reviewer's talk page. Alternatively you can ask a reviewer questions via live help

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia!  Chzz  ►  21:18, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your work was good and appreciated and you can move it to the subsection of AMRI HospitalsLihaas (talk) 04:22, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There already is a subsection about the fire, your article has more content so you can paste it into that subsectionLihaas (talk) 04:25, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please try to remember to sign your posts on talk pages with four tildes, four of these symbols... ~. Doing so will automatically sign your posts with your Wikipedia user name. Cheers, Shearonink (talk) 05:15, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Kolkata Hospital Fire, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:45, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

1982 Gonda Encounter, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 18:13, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Sitush. I noticed that you made a change to an article, List of Iyengars, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 20:32, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Work2win. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Kolkata Hospital Fire.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Kolkata Hospital Fire}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 23:26, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your page does exist, because rather than submitting it to AFC, you created it directly yourself; this is why you weren't notified, because there was nothing to notify you about, unlike with 1982 Gonda encounter, in which case it was accepted by another editor before it was moved into article space. Jinkinson talk to me 15:14, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

--

Hi ! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 00:55, Monday, November 18, 2024 (UTC)

Jhansi (Vidhan Sabha constituency), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Hack (talk) 03:58, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the Barnstar on my Talk Page :-) Cheers AKS 07:33, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Work2win :)
I re-corrected it back,sorry it was mistakenly done.MediaJet talk 16:04, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove Talk page sections without valid reason as you did with Congress Factions on the Talk page of Indian National Congress.Jonathansammy (talk) 15:08, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jonathansammy, the changes i had done were with consensus and unanimity and there was a valid reason that official social sites like twitter, facebook shouldn't be used for political parties articles, no promotion or publicity should be done in Wikipedia. Only official sites should be used. Here are the discussions after which the action was being done.

• Discussion in Binksternet's talk page
• Discussion in Sitush's talk page
• Discussion in BJP's talk page

The text you removed had nothing to do with Twitter, Facebook or any other social media. All I asked for was what happened to Congress factions and , when did Congress (I) started calling itself Indian National Congress. Thanks. Jonathansammy (talk) 14:12, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well, Jonathansammy i don't think i did any changes related to the article, only i had posted a question on the talk page, nothing else. Work2win (talk) 17:47, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the Barnstar on my Talk Page :-) --Dineshkumar Ponnusamy (talk) 05:19, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Template:Indian general elections, 2004 page, your edit caused a missing references list (help | help with group references). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:32, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Uttar Pradesh Legislative Assembly election results, 2012, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Fiddle Faddle 20:03, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Work2win. You have new messages at Nick Number's talk page.
Message added 18:38, 25 June 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Lily Thomas (lawyer), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Becky Sayles (talk) 00:30, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lu Houmin, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

— Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 12:34, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, sorry if this is a stupid question but I have to make sure: is "Lu" or "Houmin" his last name? — Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 12:35, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

^ I think you missed my question. — Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 16:41, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jeraphine Gryphon,

Big apology for not able to answer the query in time, well i think Lu is the last name because Chinese people put their surname(family name) first and then their own name.

Thanks,

work2win

Great, thanks. — Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 11:29, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jeraphine Gryphon,

I want to know the meaning of patrolled for knowledge basis. I got the notification mentioning that article Lu Houmin has been patrolled by a user, what does it exactly mean since i did not see any changes in the article after it.

Thanks & Regards,

--Work2win (talk) 21:15, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's nothing, really. When new pages are created (in any namespace), then they have a little link/button at the bottom right corner of the page saying "Mark as patrolled". It's possible only autoconfirmed people can see that link, I don't know. The point of marking pages as patrolled is to confirm that the page is not vandalism or other undesirable material. I think this is the relevant info page: Wikipedia:New pages patrol/patrolled pages. — Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 08:01, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jeraphine Gryphon, thanks for the satisfactory reply. --Work2win (talk) 17:42, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Do not do that - they can be usually restored using http://archive.org or other means. You are basically removing valid references. Materialscientist (talk) 21:42, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Materialscientist,

Apologies from my side, it won't be repeated.

Work2win (talk) 21:46, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

We should keep deadlinks when they can be restored (see WP:DEADLINK); also we should not remove a complete reference when only a url is dead - many references are valid even without urls. Materialscientist (talk) 21:47, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

See also WP:DEADREF. That said, dead links can usually be removed from the "External links" section. Materialscientist (talk) 21:51, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:28, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Uttar Pradesh Lokayukta. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 21:43, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Robert McClenon,

As mentioned, i have removed references 34, 41 and 42 which were having errors. Sorry, i have searched and didn't find equivalent English word for lokayukta, the nearest word is anti-corruption ombudsman which has been mentioned in the page. The Up-lokayukta is having almost same functions as that of a lokayukta, with slight difference in allowances and powers.

• A Up-lokayukta has lesser allowance than the lokayukta
• Both lokayukta and up-lokayukta(may be more than one) are appointed by the governor and in case of the selection of up-lokayukta only the governor has a role but he consults the lokayukta also for this.

I have searched the official site, but didn't find the word deputy-lokayukta word, only up-lokayukta

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Uttar Pradesh Lokayukta. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 21:44, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Robert McClenon,

The lokayukta act, 1975 is a bill passed by state legislative assembly of Uttar Pradesh, not by Parliament of India, many individual states in India have their own lokayukta like Maharashtra Lokayukta. One small request, in the info box table the following three lines have been added, but are not visible, i am unable to rectify it, shall you help for the same.

|term_start = 16 March, 2006

|predecessor = Sudhir Chandra Verma

|successor = None(stayed by the Supreme Court)

Work2win (talk) 06:43, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Uttar Pradesh Lokayukta, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 07:10, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SwisterTwister,

Thanks for the update, one small request, in the info box table the following three lines have been added, but are not visible, i am unable to rectify it, shall you add the above lines in the infobox.

|term_start = 16 March, 2006

|predecessor = Sudhir Chandra Verma

|successor = None(stayed by the Supreme Court)

Check the full parameter list of {{Infobox official post}}, paying attention to spelling and capitalisation. If not present, of if not correct, they will not display. Fiddle Faddle 20:10, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Chirula, Datia, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 17:05, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Agastya, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dvaraka. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Saty Narayan Ji Mandir, Nabha

added links pointing to Nandi and Bhairav

Ashramavasika Parva

added a link pointing to Gandhari

Parashurama

added a link pointing to Trishul

Stri Parva

added a link pointing to Gandhari

Trishikhibrahmana Upanishad

added a link pointing to Dhyana

Vitthal Temple, Pandharpur

added a link pointing to Annapoorna

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:27, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Shachi

added a link pointing to Varun

Virata Kingdom

added a link pointing to Arjun

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Parthasarathy Temple, Triplicane

added a link pointing to Sumati

Patan Devi

added a link pointing to Bhairav

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:21, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Brahma

added a link pointing to Atman

Brahmapureeswarar Temple

added a link pointing to Darshan

Kandariya Mahadeva Temple

added a link pointing to Vaishnavi

Kaumari

added a link pointing to Trishul

Keleswaram Mahadeva Temple

added a link pointing to Darshan

Kripapureeswarar Temple

added a link pointing to Vijayadasami

Mīmāṃsā

added a link pointing to Deva

Papanasanathar Temple

added a link pointing to Deva

Parashurameshvara Temple

added a link pointing to Vaishnavi

Ranganatha Temple, Thiruneermalai

added a link pointing to Bharata

Soundararajaperumal Temple, Thadikombu

added a link pointing to Ganesa

Sri Venkatesa Perumal Temple (Melathiruppathi) – Mondipalayam

added a link pointing to Darshan

Vaikuntam Queue Complex

added a link pointing to Darshan

Veezhinathar Kovil, Thiruveezhimizhalai

added a link pointing to Darshan

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:49, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Badrinath Temple

added a link pointing to Darshan

Sun Temple, Modhera

added a link pointing to Varun

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:07, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Gandaberunda

added a link pointing to Dasara

Sambandar

added a link pointing to Darshan

Swetharanyeswarar Temple

added a link pointing to Airavat

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:23, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Uthamar Kovil, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Darshan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Kashi Vishwanath Temple

added a link pointing to Bhairav

Narasimha Temple

added a link pointing to Ganesa

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:13, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ranganatha Temple, Hyderabad, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Darshan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Kanaka Durga Temple

added a link pointing to Trishul

Surkanda Devi

added a link pointing to Sati

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:36, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I've temporarily protected 6-5=2 to get the IP to discuss the "inspired by Blair Witch" changes that he keeps submitting, ([2][3][4]) but you should consider opening a discussion yourself at Talk:6-5=2 if you intend to contest the addition. Alternatively, you might consider leaving a note on the talk page if you intend to drop the stick on this. Frankly, I think that would be a good idea. The problem we had in the past was that the sources being used were ambiguous and the contributors were saying things that were not supported by the references, like claims that the film was based on Blair Witch, vs. inspired by Blair Witch, which are two different ideas. Anyhow, the most recent reference the user has provided would normally be sufficient to support a claim that the film was inspired by Blair Witch, so I don't think the stonewalling is really helping us here. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:54, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Talbehat, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lalitpur District. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:14, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sivasakthi Amman Temple, Thiruninravur, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bakthavatsala Perumal Temple. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:34, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Srimad Bhagavata Book 1, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gandhari. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Work2win. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

You marked https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colombo#cite_note-Treasure-67 as 'better source needed' on grounds of circularity. I can see that the source isn't ideal for the text it supports, but I don't think it is circular in the sense of being derived from Wikipedia. Do you have any objection to my changing the grounds of 'better source needed'? Shuggaroth (talk) 20:26, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done Shuggaroth (talk) 20:53, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Work2win. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Work2win. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:10, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]