User talk:Wikociewie

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:GOSiR and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 13:23, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wikociewie! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 13:23, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by NP83 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wkra Żuromin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

NP83 (talk) 01:06, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

LKS Włodawianka Włodawa, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

SportingFlyer T·C 10:09, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article KS Mewa Gniew is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KS Mewa Gniew until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Alexandermcnabb (talk) 05:02, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sokół Zblewo, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

SportingFlyer T·C 08:56, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Netherzone was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

What is needed to establish notability is significant coverage in reliable sources WP:RS that are independent of the person. We don't use music download sites or music selling sites for sources, those should be removed.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Black Lodge (artist) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Netherzone (talk) 12:21, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking the time to review the draft. As the other sources I used included various articles, news sites, and a printed publication, - if I removed the two references to Bleep and Bandcamp would that improve the article enough (or you just don't believe the subject is notable enough anyway)? Thanks ~~~~ Wikociewie (talk) 12:53, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Thanks for your note. Yes, you should remove the music download or sales sites, they are not appropriate for an encyclopedia entry. He definitely doesn't meet WP:NARTIST as a visual artist; as to meeting WP:NMUSICIAN it doesn't seem like it to me, however I will leave that to another reviewer who is more familiar with some of the other sites. Netherzone (talk) 13:08, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I've removed the segments related to the areas you've flagged up. I'll try to resubmit it and see if another reviewer believes it to be notable as you say. Thanks again for your feedback - even if the article isn't accepted it's a learning curve and I appreciate your time! Wikociewie (talk) 08:37, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ca was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

The sources doesnt really feel in-depth to me. Some are simple charts of scores. Some only mentions the club once of twice.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wkra Żuromin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ca ^{talk to me!} 11:09, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wikociewie. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:GOSiR, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:01, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wikociewie. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "GOSiR".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:02, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Streatham Rovers. Thanks! Ca ^{talk to me!} 11:35, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

You removed some material, but failed to meet the needs of the prior review. You have work to do.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Black Lodge (artist) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 13:01, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Streatham Rovers, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 14:31, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The irony is not lost on me! Hope it survives. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 14:32, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You should have been made aware under the terms of WP:DRAFTIFY that this has now been moved back to becomeDraft:Streatham Rovers, and you may work on it and resubmit it after you have addressed that banners now placed upon it. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 22:02, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This draft needs to be completely rewritten to make clear that it is fiction, and to talk about why that fiction is notable and what impact that fiction has had on the real world. –Novem Linguae (talk) 00:56, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Trainspotter. Thanks! S5A-0043^Talk 22:44, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Trainspotter, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mach61 was:

I have two main issues with the draft as is. First, a few of the sources appear to be self-published blogs (such as kanpai-japan and kikuko-nagoya). Second, most of the "Nuisance behaviour and crime" section appears to give undue weight to a few routine incidents in an article about the hobby as a whole. Try to use reliable, secondary sources which analyze the subculture more broadly.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Densha otaku and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mach61 (talk) 14:20, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thank you for reviewing the article and taking the time to give feedback. I have now removed the citations to sources that are self-published blogs. Although, one of the citations I have used as a replacement is another personal blog albeit by the author who coined the term being referenced in her book - so I think this can be considered more reliable? (If not I’ll find another source!)

With regards to undue weight given “to a few routine incidents in an article about the hobby as a whole” in the ‘Nuisance behaviour and crime’ section; I would say that although they may seem trivial they were specific instances reported in a news article titled ‘Thoughtless rail fans spoiling it for hobbyists’ where they were given as examples of densha otaku “breaking the law”. However, if you think removing them would improve the article then I’m happy to do so. Wikociewie (talk) 12:31, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I stumbled upon your sandbox. Nice topic. When you are ready, please nominate it for front page exposure at WP:DYK; let me know if you need help. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 01:09, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Piotrus: Hi there, I finally got round to making the article (Bikini boys). Would you kindly let me know if you think it’s good enough to try nominating as you suggested?! Wikociewie (talk) 19:58, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Wikociewie Very nice! I recomment submitting it to WP:DYK. Let me know if you need help with the process. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 02:11, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes please - I'm not quite sure how to nominate it. I could do with finding the best hook in the article too... Wikociewie (talk) 11:52, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Densha otaku. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 02:01, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Densha Otaku, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

K-Pop contributor (✍️•📚) 05:03, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Randompersonediting Thank you! Wikociewie (talk) 09:39, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wikociewie. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Black Lodge (artist), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:04, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wikociewie. Thank you for your work on Open Letter to the Party. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work. Really needs a more specific title. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:58, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Wikociewie,

I saw your work on articles related to anarchism and wanted to say hello, as I work in the topic area too. If you haven't already, you might want to watch our noticeboard for Wikipedia's coverage of anarchism, which is a great place to ask questions, collaborate, discuss style/structure precedent, and stay informed about content related to anarchism. Take a look for yourself! We also have a stub (short article) expansion drive, if you'd like to participate.

Feel free to say hi on my talk page and let me know if these links were helpful (or at least interesting). Hope to see you around. czar 13:16, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You might also be interested in this list of potential articles on Polish anarchists to be translated. I haven't checked the sourcing on each to confirm whether each merits their own article but as long as there's abundant reliable, secondary sourcing for each and nothing unsourced, each should be a good candidate. Feel free to bring any of those biographies to the aforementioned noticeboard for discussion too. czar 12:27, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wikociewie. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Black Lodge".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 12:57, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Brody Pomorskie railway station. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. C F A 💬 23:18, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Clearfrienda:. I've improved the page a bit. Thought I'd get your opinion if you think it's is ready to be moved back? Wikociewie (talk) 11:28, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. Per WP:NTRAINSTATION:

Train stations have no inherent notability and are not presumed notable for simply being train stations, but may be notable if they satisfy the WP:GNG criteria, the criteria of another subject-specific notability guideline, or other criteria within this notability guideline.

So your best bet is probably getting it to meet WP:GNG. Based on the sources in the article: 2 and 3 don't really go in-depth and offer more "niche" coverage. I'm assuming source 4 is independent but I don't know for sure - it goes a bit more in depth. 5 and 7 are database entries which don't count towards notability. 8 is probably your best source. I didn't look online for any other sources since I don't speak Polish. It's definitely way better but to be honest I doubt it'd survive AfD at its current state. I wouldn't object to moving it back - you'll just have to see what another NPP reviewer thinks. Let me know if you have any more questions. C F A 💬 01:24, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wikociewie. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Wkra Żuromin, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:07, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are doing very nice job. I was suprised to see there is no article on en for pl:bananowa młodzież. Maybe something for your to-do list? _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 02:33, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I did have gitowcy lined up for my next project - but struggling to find sources for it. Not heard of bananowa młodzież before - sounds like an interesting topic. Thanks for the tip! Wikociewie (talk) 15:29, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh btw, I haven't had any luck finding out why the tombakowa młodzież got their name - thought they might be named after an area in Warsaw called Tombak but couldn't locate anywhere of that name.... Any ideas? Wikociewie (talk) 15:32, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. As per your suggestion I’ve finally got around to creating Banana youth! Text still needs some fleshing out and the image isn’t great (initially took it for a newspaper clipping but the photo itself fits). Let me know what you think… Wikociewie (talk) 21:44, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, thanks a lot for updating several articles related to Polish football clubs with their logos. For future edits, may I ask you to avoid using .jpg and instead look for files with transparent backgrounds? PNG is the preferred option for logo submittions, while GIF should be avoided when possible. Thanks a lot in advance! KibolLP (talk) 09:20, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks for the feedback. I will do so in the future! Wikociewie (talk) 10:04, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Start Otwock club badge.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:47, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Wkra Żuromin Badge.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:47, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Włodawianka Włodawa Club badge.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:48, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Foto-Higiena Błyskawica Gać.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:13, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Wikociewie. Thank you for your work on Karl Olma. Another editor, Rosiestep, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating this article. I enjoyed learning about this person as I hadn't previously known about the Halcovian/Alzenau dialect.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Rosiestep}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Rosiestep (talk) 08:13, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Rosiestep: Thank you for the feedback - glad you enjoyed it! Wikociewie (talk) 18:22, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Macaddct1984 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Good Guy Boris and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

– macaddct1984 ^{(talk | contribs)} 12:30, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

While c/e bikiniarze, I noticed you don't use citation templates. They are useful for metadata, links, etc. You can auto-generate them by pasting ISBN, DOI or links to articles (academic in particular) into the automatic cite tool in Visual Editor cite generator. See my latest edit there. Oh, and I see you did not create a redirect from bikiniarze to bikini boys - I'll do it now. People can use Polish terms on en wiki, and they should be redirected so the search works. Cheers, _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:51, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking the time to send me a message!

I think I took so long to write the article that I’d only discovered citation templates half-way through (eg I used the Template:Cite podcast somewhere) but I’ll try to use them more diligently. I didn’t know that they can be done automatically either so I’ll try that out too!

Thank you for creating the redirect - that didn’t occur to me at all!

Regards, Wikociewie (talk) 23:16, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!

Why did you remove my colorized image from the article Zazou?

Best regards

--Gebu (talk) 21:14, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. Originally I was going to add your colourised image to the new infobox but when I read that it was based on the film Stilyagi, an historically inaccurate 21st century depiction of a post-war Soviet subculture, I decided the non-colourised image might be more suitable… Wikociewie (talk) 23:05, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Wikociewie. Thank you for your work on Bikini boys. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work. The lead really needs expansion.....it's really not yet explanatory. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 13:57, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Peter-Ernst Eiffe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rickling. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Banana youth, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 22:01, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Christa Lörcher, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Independent.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:03, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Good Guy Boris and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 08:30, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wikociewie. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Kociewians".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:15, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wikociewie. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Streatham Rovers".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:58, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wikociewie. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Aleksander Kupczyński, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:07, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wikociewie. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Concrete (magazine), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:08, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Pogoń Tczew Club badge.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:40, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]