User talk:WayeMason

• Previous talk: User talk:WayeMason/Archive1 (2005-2015)

I just came across the article Preston & Cherrybrook, Nova Scotia which you started way back in 2007. It's unreferenced and my attempt at finding anything to support that this is a real thing have only turned up the graphic at Musquodoboit Valley & Dutch Settlement, Nova Scotia which mentions Preston / Cherrybrook / Lake Loon / Lake Major. I can find nothing at Canadian Geographical Names or Community Councils]. I'm thinking maybe it is just outdated? Possibly all the other 'community areas' listed in Template:Halifax, Nova Scotia need attention too? having read your User page I figure you are probably well placed to figure out what to do with this. Derek Andrews (talk) 11:32, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The areas are the HRM planning areas, it was an early attempt to bring some kind of post amalgamation order to the communities. Since I made those pages they have slide sideways from being about the planning areas to being more about the component communities of the areas. I am not going to defend these at this time, but putting 220 communities in the template would be a bit much. Here is the link to the planning areas on HRMs site: http://www.halifax.ca/planning/communityplans.php WayeMason (talk) 23:31, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, and apologies if my question seemed critical, it wasn't intended that way. Derek Andrews (talk) 13:43, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No, sorry if I sounded defensive. I really don't think that the choice was particularly good or right, it was expedient. That is what I mean by not going to defend - I am not sure it is a good choice, or the best choice! WayeMason (talk) 15:07, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I (re)learned during the election that the entire group of African Nova Scotian communities is referred to as the "Preston Townships". I think now that I am out of conflict of interest in HRM edits, I'll try to create an updated framework for all this. WayeMason (talk) 14:21, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Map of Nova Scotia Highlighting Windsor.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:55, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, This image was seemingly uploaded prior to current image polices, Thank you.

However, as part of ongoing efforts to ensure all media on English Wikipedia is correctly licensed and attributed it would be appreciated if you were able to confirm, that it was your own work, by marking it as {{own}}, amending the {{information}} added by a third party, and by changing the license to an appropriate "self" variant. You can also add |claimed=yes to the {{media by uploader}} tag if it is present to indicate that you've acknowledged the image, and license shown (and updated the {{information}} where appropriate).

This will assist those reviewing the many many "free" images on commons that have not yet been transfered to Commons. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:56, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Wikipedia:WikiProject Canada/The 10,000 Challenge is up and running based on Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge for the UK which has currently produced over 2300 article improvements and creations. If you'd like to see large scale quality improvements happening for Canada like The Africa Destubathon, which has produced over 1600 articles in 5 weeks, sign up on the page. The idea will be an ongoing national editathon/challenge for Canada but fuelled by a contest such as The North America Destubathon to really get articles on every province and subject mass improved. I would like some support from Canadian wikipedians here to get the Challenge off to a start with some articles to make doing a Destubathon worthwhile! Cheers. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Novascotiavictoriacountydet.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 03:57, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Is Template:Communities of Bedford/Sackville the best name for this template? You have now a link to a disambiguation page in the template title. And the title is strange anyway. The Banner talk 12:27, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I struggled with that one, Bedford Sackville is what that area is called, I went with the name that is used in other wikipedia articles and in municipal planning documents. See:

• [1]
• [2]
• [3]

The disambiguation page is unfortunate, I will probably fix that later, either with a Sackville article or a Bedford/Sackville article. WayeMason (talk) 13:36, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have unlinked Sackville, to prevent the template showing up in maintenance lists. You can add a link when there is an article. I have also changed the name of the template, naming it now "Template:Communities of the Bedford/Sackville Area", what seems to be your intention. The Banner talk 19:11, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Both of those work, thank you WayeMason (talk) 01:58, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Per your AN3 report I have put back semiprotection on CKDU-FM. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 02:40, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Halifax Public Libraries Logo (colour).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:38, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Nova Scotia Town has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 18:11, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

	The Writer's Barnstar
	I thank you for including Quebec in your Canada. Brianrodgershfx (talk) 19:41, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why thank you sir! I've added it to my bio page! WayeMason (talk) 01:06, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Halifax Public Libraries, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Clayton Park (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Map of Nova Scotia.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned map.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 02:56, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Map of Nova Scotia Highlighting HRM.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned map.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 02:56, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Map of Nova Scotia Highlighting Hants.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned map.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 03:07, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Map of Nova Scotia Highlighting pictou.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned map.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 03:07, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Map of Nova Scotia Highligh.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned map.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 19:11, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cape Breton Regional Municipality, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page NSCC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this article for CCRSB school board in Truro needs to be updated. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chignecto-Central_Regional_School_Board (previous unsigned comment left by User:FreakyBoy)

Thanks for uploading File:Halifax Pop Explosion (logo).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:27, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Finally got to your Kings work - looks good, though I did update a number of citations to the 2016 Census (numbers quoted were from the 2016 census, but the links in the references were to the 2006 or 2011 ones.) As for CBRM, it's clear that a couple of other people have gone over it pretty thoroughly since you worked on it. I also feel like it's a political football I'm woefully unqualified to play with. Conflict about (for example) economic projections, and the way the economy is presented, with regards to word choice, is just something I don't have the ability to get at. Unlike you, I'm not excluded from discussions in the HRM, and if I (ha!) have time, that's where I might be willing to get into a fight for something I think is better. Thanks for making these two better, though! AshleyMorton (talk) 03:14, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hah I just go back to CBRM and strip out the overt, uncited negativity every 3-6 months, it's all you can do, really. HRM page is a mess, makes my palms itch to tear it apart again and restructure it, but I will resist. Thanks for taking the time on the King's one and happy holidays! WayeMason (talk) 16:32, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to move an article don't copy and paste it as you lose the history. From Wikipedia:Moving a page, "Do not move or rename a page by copying/pasting its content, because doing so fragments the edit history. Instead, please follow the instructions given below." and Help:Page history#Moved and deleted pages. I've put everything back for now and will move it properly. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:18, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I guess, the problem for me is there was no way to delete the redirect page, and when I looked at the history there were 5 entries, your original post and no real edits. I didn't see an issue, but fine if you can set it straight. WayeMason (talk) 23:44, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Map of Nova Scotia Highlighting Truro.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Port Hawkesbury Airport logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Halifax Regional Fire and Emergency Crest.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:HrmCcapitaldistrictlogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:15, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Waye. I appreciate that you took on Filmore for mayor. I was born and raised in Spryfield, but have lived in Yarmouth for the past 30 years. I still follow the politics of my home city, and I would have backed you. Keep on keeping on.Wreck Smurfy (talk) 04:05, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ah well, I mean, I tried and I am glad I did. We will see if he can rise the occasion, but at least the Council is very forward thinking! Thank you for the note! WayeMason (talk) 13:59, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]