User talk:Wangoed

I noticed you were new, and wanted to share some links I thought useful:

• Wikipedia:Tutorial
• Wikipedia:Help desk
• M:Foundation issues
• Wikipedia:Policy Library

For more information click here. You can sign your name by typing 4 tildes, like this: ~~~~.

Sam Spade Apply now, exciting opportunities available at Spade & Archer! 08:09, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)

(Previous statement deleted)

I was refering to the article US Congress, in which after you editied it, most of the tex after the heading "Seats by party (109th Congress, 2005-2007)" had been deleted. If this was an unintentional mistake, please forgive me for rushing to judge your work. I will remove the previous statement I left because I trust that you meant no harm.

Please be careful editing articles. I'm not sure if it was intentional, but you deleted a big chunk of John Kerry presidential campaign, 2004. If there is a problem with your web browser, please fix it before continuing to edit articles. Rhobite 17:51, Apr 21, 2005 (UTC)

no, the album selling for a double album is the same that one disc.. 442000 is the number of copies sold in usa first week of entire-STADIUM ARCADIUM...NOT 221 of jupiter and 221 of mars!

in the past is always considerated double-disc sales like a single-disc album.

--That's actually not true, and you can check Billboard or the RIAA or any other reputable site if you'd care to verify. Wangoed 14:11, 18 May 2006 (UTC) I'm on UKMIX chart analysys forum -> http://www.ukmix.org/forums/viewforum.php?f=5 and they answer from my question " but the 442000 are for real 221x2 (becouse is a double disc) OR are sold 442000 "stadium arcardim" meant like a single disc (so 442000 "jupiter" and 442 "mars")????" here -> http://www.ukmix.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=20740&start=75 and say "It's the RIAA which count each CD, not Soundscan which count 1 copie sold for one copie sold, do not care if it contains 1, 2 or 10 discs. So they are 442000 copies sold of Jupiter and 442000 of Mars, nearly 1 million copies (884k) according to the RIAA rules (adding shipment, this album should be 2xP very quickly). "[reply]

You've still got it wrong, but I'm leaving this up to the discussion page, where it belongs. I'd advise you, despite that irrepressible nature of yours, to do the same. Wangoed 16:56, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I reported you for a WP:3RR violation on Stadium Arcadium. You may view the report here and leave comments there. Thanks. Jtrost (^T | C | _#) 16:27, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three revert rule in regard to the article Stadium Arcadium. Other users in violation have also been blocked. The timing of this block is coincidental, and does not represent an endorsement of the current article revision. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future on the article's talk page (Talk:Stadium Arcadium). Stifle (talk) 19:01, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing, List of Arrested Development running jokes, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Arrested Development running jokes. Thank you. --BJBot (talk) 00:19, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wangoed. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Þjarkur. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Jim Spanfeller have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. – Thjarkur (talk) 10:24, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]