User talk:Vincent Setiawan Gouta

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Kapas railway station has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Kapas railway station was changed by Vincent Setiawan Gouta (u) (t) ANN scored at 1 on 2018-09-22T13:12:24+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:12, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

What triggers the edit filter named "an automated filter has identified this edit as potentially unconstructive, so it has been disallowed."? Vincent Setiawan Gouta (talk) 13:44, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:Edit filter and list at Special:AbuseFilter. Note that some filter's code is not visible to everyone. Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 15:27, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Vincent Setiawan Gouta! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:06, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Disruptive editor at Teahouse. --David Biddulph (talk) 04:04, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you have recently created an alternative account, Vincentonetrillion, and I am concerned that it might not meet Wikipedia's alternative account policy. After you look over that policy, could we discuss that concern here? I'd appreciate learning your reasons for creating an additional account. Thank you. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 05:21, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vincent Setiawan Gouta (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Please unblock me and I am ok.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Voice of Clam (formerly Optimist on the run) (talk) 08:00, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vincent Setiawan Gouta (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Please unblock me.

Decline reason:

Declined and talk page access removed due to socking and history of personal attacks. 331dot (talk) 08:18, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.