User talk:Versageek

If you leave me a message here, I will reply to it here. Please check back for a reply.
If I leave you a message on your talk page, I will check your talk page for a reply.
This way, we keep conversations all in one location, making them much easier to follow. Thanks!
To leave me a new message, please click HERE

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

If I reverted your link addition or removed your links from an article, please read this:

If you have additional information to add to the article, why not simply add it rather than having an external link?

To leave me a new message, please click HERE.

Hello Versageek! Yesterday I’ve added galleries at the page named furniture. They have the purposes to make readers better understand the periods. The edits I make on this page as constructive as possible. The deletion of them is very nonsense. Please let me add small galleries of four pictures at every section of this page. This isn’t a type of vandalism.

Hi Versageek,

I am new to editing Wikipedia and I was hoping to add useful information about insects to pages. I make educational YouTube videos about insects. I do not want to run into a problem with "conflict of interest" policies, but I also think that these videos would add beneficial information to the pages. Somewhere it mentioned, bringing it up in a "Talk" and letting other editors decide if it was a valuable addition. Where would I do that? I tried to just place a couple up and your bot knocked them down and I just don't want to step on any toes as I did not know that links were discouraged. Also, would it be more okay to just add written information to the body and then add the link at the bottom as a reference?

Thank you, Insectopia — Preceding unsigned comment added by Insectopia 2015 (talk • contribs) 20:26, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

For a broad based discussion, you could try: The WikiProject Insects talk page. Otherwise on the individual talk pages of the articles where you are trying to add links. --Versageek 19:17, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your work on OTRS and other technical issues. DThomsen8 (talk) 13:00, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Versageek,

I added the link to Amazon Kindle Direct Publishing. Why was it reverted? Thanks.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Self-publishing&action=history — Preceding unsigned comment added by 54.240.196.170 (talk) 17:06, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links like that are not permitted in the body of articles. --Versageek 17:40, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Versageek, will it be ok with link to this page though: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kindle_Direct_Publishing? --54.240.196.170 (talk) 21:23, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

to link to a wikipedia page use this format: [[Kindle Direct Publishing]], it will look like this Kindle Direct Publishing. --Versageek 03:38, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

hello, Well I was trying to create our wiki So if you know how can I create my own please help me out — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sbcreativo (talk • contribs) 18:03, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you delete it, It's aloud... I had permission from Disney themselves — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7D:2CEA:5900:31B5:D6EF:3D87:332 (talk) 22:26, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

the page sanyog kumar is in the way of deletion . why this is going to be deleted . one thing is clear that this is going to be important ... but u applied A7 here .... but i want this to continued . what to do please suggest ....i don't want it in the way of deletion . thank u — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sanyogchourasia (talk • contribs) 07:36, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

While this young writer may some day merit an encyclopedia entry. He currently does not meet our criteria for inclusion. Try again in a few years. --Versageek 23:57, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This edition is legitimate? or there is an error in it. --186.84.46.227 (talk) 19:19, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do a checkuser check on user:Fuck the Golden State Warriors! Sincerely, Tikeem and user:TikeemIsMyWorld and block the IP address where those accounts originate. 2602:306:3357:BA0:B919:A583:2133:8AAF (talk) 04:47, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like my fellow checkusers have already taken care of it. Thanks. --Versageek 05:15, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, a concern about your bot, XLinkBot, has been raised at: Wikipedia:Bureaucrats'_noticeboard#Unflagged_bot_XLinkBot, please review the discussion on that page. Thank you, — xaosflux ^Talk 19:16, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The page is Pedro Fernández. I had updated It with recent discography, updated, working links to his official page, his Twitter and Facebook pages. Updated the TV section with his 2015 and 2016 shows. Updated the opening with his Grammy awards. Updated the movie section by adding missing roles. Then your bot comes along and wipes it all out. If you can't capture updated data then leave it alone if you see it has been manually updated. That was qiute a bit of effort you wiped out! Please respond otherwise wiki is a waste of everyone's time and effort. SusanneSCSusanneSC (talk) 03:00, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

How can I edit my Boardloch page so it doesn't get deleted? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nicholastharpe (talk • contribs) 03:59, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:XLlinksBot, just created. Not sure if this is an imbotinator or a legit new bot, so just letting you know! Crow^Caw 19:41, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently creation-protected RiceGum, however there's now been a page named Bryan Le (RiceGum) created. Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 16:04, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, my name is Terchi and I am a new writer on Wikipedia. I recently began working on an article on Albert Fattal and was alerted of your attempt to publish the same. I would like to kindly know why your article was rejected and any pointers you may have on how to make my article better. Thanks in advance.

kind regards, (T.terchi (talk) 14:12, 24 August 2016 (UTC))[reply]

The best advice I can offer is to lay off of the superlatives. I read the deleted versions of the article and for a minute I thought it had been autogenerated by one of those programs that uses a lot of big words that seem to say something but are really nonsense. --Versageek 20:46, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Versageek,

I totally understand the terms and conditions, please see that at this page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teaser_(gambling) the explanation on https://www.bestonlinesportsbooks.info/betting-tips/how-to-bet-teasers is good for readers.

You can compare this one: http://www.bettingbrain.com/betting-tips/teaser-betting/ that is already there as well.

Please let me know.

thanks.

regards,

Andrew — Preceding unsigned comment added by AndrewBOS (talk • contribs) 03:14, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia isn't a directory or link farm, also please see other stuff exists. I'm guessing from your username that you have some relation to the site you are adding. Adding links in this manner is discouraged and could cause the site to be blacklisted --Versageek 20:46, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Waiting for your answer.... — Preceding unsigned comment added by AndrewBOS (talk • contribs) 05:04, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You can't put in blacklist a site the have information that matter to people.

I added the articles with information according to the content and what people are looking for.

So...I would like you to explain what do you don't like about the information? What type of information is ok for those pages??

thanks for your time.

regards,

Andrew — Preceding unsigned comment added by AndrewBOS (talk • contribs) 05:10, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

We can and do blacklist sites if they are repeatedly added to articles by users with an apparent conflict of interest. Thus far, you haven't repeatedly added links to the site. The content on the site you want to link to adds nothing to the article that isn't already available, either on the page or in one of the existing references. If you want to add the link to that page, I suggest asking for consensus on the article talk page. --Versageek 16:22, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AndrewBOS (talk • contribs) 00:34, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Someone brought up on Wolfdog's wikipedia talk page that he rarely does edit summaries. On many occasions he will delete lots of text and never put up a summary of his edits. he has been doing this for a long time. 57.9 percent of his edits do not have summaries. I was wondering if you could checkuser this user and see if he's deliberately going around and doing things he shouldn't be doing on wiki page articles? Since he does this so often and so frequently, I think it should be looked into. This would be unfair to all the other users that contribute to wikipedia that spend alot of time trying to make contributions just to have someone go around very often and delete things without summaries. If a user is going around and deleting large amount of text without a reason, I would figure that would be vandalism. And many vandals like to go around doing that under numerous accounts. And account that has nearly a 60 percent rate of deleting things without a summary, is in my view a problem. Thank you. Juliep94 (talk) 21:20, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think you misunderstand the function of the checkuser tool. It detects if multiple users are sharing the same IP address. It wouldn't be of any help here. The best solution in this case would be to ask the user to please use edit summaries. It appears that someone has recently requested that on his talk page. --Versageek 23:41, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for replying. I'm not 100 percent on the rules here so sorry if I'm wrong. Since this user goes around deleting a lot of text all the time from various articles, I was wondering since many vandals do this, if he could also be going under other names and doing something similar? Sometimes people spend weeks/months of research to add to articles. I think it's vandalism if you just go around and delete and snip stuff here and there. Obviously pages evolve all the time, and that's a good thing. But going around and randomly deleting things with no explanation to me is vanadalism. The near 60 percent rate is what worried me. This leads to suspicion. I don't know for sure if they're going under multiple aliases. I figured a quick checkuser would be able to find out if they did or not. And if they didn't, I'd have no problem apologizing for being wrong. I'd apologize to them personally on the talk page if that ended up being the case. Juliep94 (talk) 00:25, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Versageek. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy.

Extended confirmed protection (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned "extended confirmed" user right was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following this community discussion with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas.

In July and August 2016, a request for comment established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions:

• Extended confirmed protection may only be used in cases where semi-protection has proven ineffective. It should not be used as a first resort.
• A bot will post a notification at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard of each use. MusikBot currently does this by updating a report, which is transcluded onto the noticeboard.

Please review the protection policy carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you.
This message was sent to the administrators' mass message list. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:49, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

What are you doing? Why you delete my work on aromanians? What is your problem!? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.211.209.67 (talk) 19:59, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:34, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Versageek.

A new user group, New Page Reviewer, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at PERM. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right.

It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available here but very often a friendly custom message works best.

If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at WT:NPR. (Sent to all admins).MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:48, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please understand Azzura Birleanu is a public person in her own right and it has nothing to do with her father.she has been featured in global news and campaigns and publications that have nothing to do with her father . Reinstate the page , it has substantial links to support my statement — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.29.164.199 (talk) 23:26, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Versageek. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In Nepal Youth Foundation and Olga Murray wikipedia, we found wrong link to website and facebook page. We dont use www.nyof.org, it was changed to www.nepalyouthfoundation.org.

and also regarding facebook link, its changed to /nepalyouthfoundation instead of /nepalyouth.

My changes has been rejected!

Please suggest me, how should we make changes?

Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sanjoj (talk • contribs) 04:02, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year!

Versageek,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Donner60 (talk) 08:00, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Why did you change it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Truth23217 (talk • contribs) 22:31, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I assume you are talking about the changes you (and your IP) made to Psychiatry. In medical articles we generally use the mainstream consensus. If you wish to change that consensus, you need to discuss it on the talk page first. We have an entire article about controversies in Psychiatry, which includes mention of the material you are trying to add to the main article. --Versageek 19:29, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm new to editing at Wikipedia, but your bot undid the edits I made to the Powers, Oregon page and I have been unable to determine why. I apologize if this is obvious, but I have been unable to find an answer online. Thank you.

Lunaseay (talk) 19:13, 13 January 2017 (UTC)Lunaseay[reply]

The bot reverted you because you added a wordpress.com link. If you omit that link, your changes won't be reverted. Also, we don't use inline links in articles like you did here : '''[http://www.scod.com/cities/powers/ Powers]''' . --Versageek 19:35, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Through XLinkBot you reverted a reference added by Rohrigtom to Buchenwald concentration camp page, the reason of which I am unable to understand by the given edit summary. Can you explain better? Many thanks. Carlotm (talk) 02:32, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like this is why it was added to the revert list. --Versageek 03:07, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Slavic speakers of Hellenic Macedonia also call their language "our own (language)" according to statements by the Slavic speakers themselves: [1]. However, your bot removed this legitimate content and the citation, discriminating against it solely on my status as a new user and the domain name where the statement appears: [2]. You may need to adjust the bot's settings to ensure it doesn't delete legitimate content. Առմենիե (talk) 05:02, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Thank you for your message. However I just would like to clarify.

1. I know that this links are no follow and I'm NOT looking here for promotion/alter my page search engine ranking. I just wanted to contribute to "Wikipedia". 2. Previously I added links and they were approved but today you deleted them - no problem. I can see that I'm not very welcome here... 3. In my opinion you should do something here in order that people can understand easily if their links are inappropriate. 4. Just example here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamic_Tension - There is a external link cleary promoting the page: http://www.dynamictension.com/. Why is approved? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tomasz71 (talk • contribs) 13:50, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kind regards, Tom — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tomasz71 (talk • contribs) 13:41, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Tomasz71: It's not 'approved'. Maybe it got missed, or maybe it once pointed to a different page. You could have clicked 'edit' and remove it; I just did. The existence of other inappropriate links is not a good argument for adding more. 86.20.193.222 (talk) 00:22, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[3]

I was pasting a CSD/Copyvio report, and it disliked the link. I couldn't see anywhere on the bot's page to report this. 86.20.193.222 (talk) 00:11, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

please release my wikipedia page named pindi sarhal i will improve the page better thankyou — Preceding unsigned comment added by ADILKHAN1290 (talk • contribs) 19:23, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Versageek! I would like to invite you to help beta test the interface for InternetArchiveBot. IABot is a bot designed to help mitigate link rot on Wikipedia. Users can control the bot by using a Management Interface that was designed to be integrated with and similar to Wikipedia (For example, only autoconfirmed users can run the bot; on-wiki administrators have admin access on the tool; user permissions on the tool are flag based; logs are kept; etc.)

If you'd like to help out, feel free to give the interface a go to check for bugs/anomalies/other weird things and send your feedback to Cyberpower678, the bot operator. Again, the interface is at http://tools.wmflabs.org/iabot/ (If it's down for maintenance right now, it'll be back up shortly). If you are not interested, feel free to ignore this message. Thanks, —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 22:58, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I came across this article doing New Pages Review patrol and noticed on the talk page that you deleted this on 14 October 2016. I am considering taking it to AfD for not meeting notability criteria. I was wondering if you want to have a look and see if it should be speedy deleted (if that is what you did before). That might be difficult because it is an established article and may not fit the speedy criteria. I'll let you decide on that. ---Steve Quinn (talk) 04:11, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Suckapunch Records (official website link) which currently has no connection to the record company, as my suggestion of their myspace page is deemed inappropriate, please consider removal of the link to the hijacked page altogether, sucka-punch records seems to now only maintain a Facebook page https://www.facebook.com/suckapunchrecords

I'm working on a study of political motivations and how they affect editing. I'd like to ask you to take a survey. The survey should take 5 minutes. Your survey responses will be kept private. Our project is documented at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Wikipedia_%2B_Politics.

Survey Link: http://uchicago.co1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_80J3UDCpLnKyWTH?Q_DL=3dz0m2ubQw1KSnb_80J3UDCpLnKyWTH_MLRP_8hOOFMbUUGDUw6N&Q_CHL=gl

I am asking you to participate in this study because you are a frequent editor of pages on Wikipedia that are of political interest. We would like to learn about your experiences in dealing with editors of different political orientations.

Sincere thanks for your help! Porteclefs (talk) 15:25, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to invite you to join the Investment WikiProject. There are a lot of Investment related articles on Wikipedia that could use a little attention, and I hope this project can help organize an effort to improve them. So please, take a look and if you like what you see, help get this project off the ground and a few Investment pages into the front ranks of Wikipedia articles. Thanks!

WikiEditCrunch (talk) 20:55, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. We've encountered a malfunction with this doodad of yours. Here. 93.73.36.17 (talk) 08:42, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That work you deleted gave me sleepless nights to finish. I hope you are happy. Thank you

Hello,

Beginning in September 2017, the Wikimedia Foundation Anti-harassment tool team will be conducting a survey to gauge how well tools, training, and information exists to assist English Wikipedia administrators in recognizing and mitigating things like sockpuppetry, vandalism, and harassment.

The survey should only take 5 minutes, and your individual response will not be made public. This survey will be integral for our team to determine how to better support administrators.

To take the survey sign up here and we will send you a link to the form.

We really appreciate your input!

Please let us know if you wish to opt-out of all massmessage mailings from the Anti-harassment tools team.

For the Anti-harassment tools team, SPoore (WMF), Community Advocate, Community health initiative (talk) 19:52, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am trying to create my wikipedia bio and it seems that my bio is being redirected to another page and after I edit you revert all the changes and everything disapear please help me to solve this problem

148.101.70.2 (talk) 03:47, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Checkusers and Checkuser clerks,

The Anti-Harassment Tools team is seeking input about building the Interaction Timeline feature.

We’re inviting you to join the discussion because you use similar tools such as the Editor Interaction Analyser and User compare report during sockpuppet investigations.

You can leave comments on the on wiki discussion page or send an email to the Anti-Harassment Tools team.

For the Anti-Harassment Tools team SPoore (WMF), Community Advocate, Community health initiative (talk) 19:39, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please let us know if you wish to opt-out of all massmessage mailings from the Anti-harassment tools team.

Hello, Versageek. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 11:13, 4 January 2018 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:13, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I did not intend to spam.

My blog is intended as a useful guide / source of additional info for Irish coin collectors. It is much acclaimed within the coin collecting community - especially to those new to the hobby since I try to explain the history, politics and economics behind the coin issues. I also explain technical wordings and phrases.

It also contains much more info than some of your articles, e.g. St Patrick's Halfpennies / Farthings.

Please re-consider your undo's.

Best regards, James O'Brien — Preceding unsigned comment added by JJJOBrien (talk • contribs) 06:45, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The general rule is that you should not be adding links to your own website. I did look at the site & it does look like it can be useful as a resource, however you should suggest the addition on the article(s) talk page rather than add it yourself. Also, you are consistently breaking page formatting with the way you are inserting the links. --Versageek 20:41, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:03, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This bot is changing my edits to better reflect the current state of Chislic in the state of South Dakota — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.77.246.170 (talk) 02:29, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Versageek, I'm writing you here because I've seen this is the main wiki where you edit and because here you're an abusefilter, checkuser and sysop. I think I've found a few proxies used recently by a single user who hides behind them to make similar unconstructive edits in different pages, and a few socks used to do the same kind of edits created recently. If I write here the suspicious proxies IP ranges, will you be able to block them (as they're forbidden on Wikipedia) and do the same with the socks created over such ranges (as they weren't created for reasons according to community standards)? Let me know, please, I'd like to be helpful to the project by reporting vandals in bad faith who use proxies and socks such as this one! Enowtenorez (talk) 08:11, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your XLinkBot is the kind of thing that drives people away from Wikipedia. I really don't understand why you reverted all my changes. You even reverted my changes that were links to other Wikipedia pages that were relevant to the discussion. Did you spend any time looking through what I attempted to contribute? I really don't think so. The last time this happened to me was 5+ years ago and I vowed to myself to never return to this evil place with power-happy mods and now I remember why! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sdfoley01 (talk • contribs) 08:02, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Good morning. I think that you should change the name of: Ixquick by StartPage. Since the name of: Ixquick is out of date. The updated name is: StartPage. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Notewiki2000 (talk • contribs) 04:27, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

		Happy Christmas!
		Hello Versageek, Early in A Child's Christmas in Wales the young Dylan and his friend Jim Prothero witness smoke pouring from Jim's home. After the conflagration has been extinguished Dylan writes that Nobody could have had a noisier Christmas Eve. And when the firemen turned off the hose and were standing in the wet, smoky room, Jim's Aunt, Miss. Prothero, came downstairs and peered in at them. Jim and I waited, very quietly, to hear what she would say to them. She said the right thing, always. She looked at the three tall firemen in their shining helmets, standing among the smoke and cinders and dissolving snowballs, and she said, "Would you like anything to read?" My thanks to you for your efforts to keep the 'pedia readable in case the firemen chose one of our articles :-) Best wishes to you and yours and happy editing in 2019. MarnetteD|Talk 22:55, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I Ravi Teja.M user I'd: ravi.maturi. I have just edited the above subjected article. In which I have just added the information of the chief temple Architect of that project including his facebook I'd link. I just wanted to know, why did that edit has been reverted back and let me know how to improve my edit.So, that It won't be reverted again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ravi.maturi (talk • contribs) 15:12, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can I please know why my last edits have been deleted? Thank you.

(109.235.153.213 (talk) 11:50, 29 December 2018 (UTC))[reply]

Awesome

Ten years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:14, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You --Versageek 05:07, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I have recently tried to make an edit to the CJRC page to update our contact information as the information provided currently is incorrect. Can you please let me know what needs to be done to update this without the changes being reverted automatically?

Thanks.

Hysteria57 (talk) 12:54, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You might want to check there talk page-deleted my message about deleting the user page with more stuff not in English. (Not sure if this person knows English or not) Wgolf (talk) 01:04, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I was wondering why you had deleted the McAllen TX Temple page. -- Joshua 14:00, 18 October 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jmjosh90 (talk • contribs)

• I can't find the deletion you are referring to - do you have the exact name of the page that was deleted? --Versageek 19:55, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Damon Runyon's short story "Dancing Dan's Christmas" is a fun read if you have the time. Right from the start it extols the virtues of the hot Tom and Jerry This hot Tom and Jerry is an old-time drink that is once used by one and all in this country to celebrate Christmas with, and in fact it is once so popular that many people think Christmas is invented only to furnish an excuse for hot Tom and Jerry, although of course this is by no means true. No matter what concoction is your favorite to imbibe during this festive season I would like to toast you with it and to thank you for all your work here at the 'pedia this past year. Best wishes for your 2020 as well V. MarnetteD|Talk 20:45, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, about https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Popular_Computing_Weekly the link added shows the exact result and purpose of the magazine parts called "type-in software" published to BE USED. this software is in fact PUBLIC DOMAIN and so far useable for everyone who can READ a copy. the link http://www.users.globalnet.co.uk/~jg27paw4/type-ins/popcomwk/pw_names.htm is a subpage aiming on th ZX Spectrum type-in software from this particulair magazine.

the link to THE PAPER version is allowed,

https://archive.org/details/popular-computing-weekly

so please ALLOW the link to the BINARY FORM of the ARCHIVE
http://www.users.globalnet.co.uk/~jg27paw4/type-ins/popcomwk/pw_names.htm

aswell since some software is ready to be used directly as PUBLIC DOMAIN in the form of tape-images. it is an archive just like 'archive.org' to which you DO link. Chris 85.149.83.125 (talk) 03:20, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and greetings! As part of a Starter kit project for smaller wikis, there is a work-in-progress guide around Bots & Tools here: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Small_wiki_toolkits/Starter_kit/Bots_and_Tools. I'm reaching out with a few questions, as there is a mention of the "XLinkBot" on this page in the list of useful bots section:

• Is it okay to have the bot listed in that section? Are there any concerns?
• Would you be okay with folks from smaller wikis reaching out to you for help, and would you be willing to list your preferred method of contact under "Bot owner contact"?
• Is there anything like a note or reminder related to the bot that you would like to add in the "description" column?

Additionally, if you have a suggestion for any other bots or tools currently on the list which should not be there and those that are not there and should be there, I would love to know about them—looking forward to your input! Srishti (talk) 08:03, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello dear, I wanted to contribute to the page, Shahram Qadir. But the result becomes something else and now deletion notice is on the top of the page. I will be grateful if you remove this notice. Thank you so much for your help.

Best regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Garciamilano (talk • contribs) 20:41, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Your bot reverted my edit: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Preah_Maha_Ghosananda&diff=957949038&oldid=957948888

I had added an interview of the said person provided on Youtube by the copyright owner. I think it is a relevant addition to the article.

Could you review it? 2A03:1B20:6:F011:0:0:0:A02D (talk) 07:33, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Versageek,

I have one brand new Amazon Affiliate Website www.bestproductify.com . And i want to make wikipedia page for my website Like a www.nytimes.com/wirecutter/

and other thousands of website. but i don't have proper knowledge

for this and criteria for making website page. And i already received 2 warnings from wikipedia. plz give me some information about this. and how it's impact my site and wikipedia account.

Thanks, Chavda1946 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chavda1946 (talk • contribs) 03:00, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Versageek. You previously blocked this IP per WP:VAN at the end of last month, but they're back again. They seem to be nothing more than a WP:VOA, but I figured I'd ask you about it first since you were the last admin to try and sort things out. -- Marchjuly (talk) 23:42, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AvianSociety.org was removed from Avian. Why? Another link Avian Limited is listed? Avian Society is referred to as Avian just as Audubon is without Society. Avian Society is an educational site and not a "commercial manufacturer" like Avian Limited. (Paul)

Good afternoon, I have made edits to Tylan Wallace Wiki page and it keeps getting deleted. Can you tell me why you have deleted this accurate information. I have verified this information and since wiki is a public site i believe it should be placed there as we have googled this many times before. You have flagged my account and have placed a notification for any movement on tylan wallace account so now I'm placing accurate information on the page and someone keeps removing it. I am also new to this wiki and would like to find out what is going on. I thank you for your time and consideration and I hope I get a response so that I'm not adding content that keeps getting removed. Monroe Ellis ≈≈≈≈ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Monroe Ellis (talk • contribs) 21:34, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The information isn’t appropriate where you added it, and external links to Facebook pages are never appropriate in article text. You might be able to add information about his parents in a section called: ==Early Life==, with text along the lines of “Wallace was born in wherever, USA to Firstname Wallace and Firstname Wallace. This information should include a reference to a reliable published source. --Versageek 16:00, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and thank you for your message although it made me feel discouraged :-( The informations I have corrected and/or added are correct. My father died on January the 2nd and all the other information I have added is accurate. I am (or was, to be more precise) a professional journalist, so I do verify (ex: when I added Thanos Adamopoulos it was because he has a significant musical career as well, and inserted him before Eve because he is older than her). I do understand you should monitor whats on Wikipedia but you make it so inaccessible to 'normal' people that it really discourages me from further editing. Best regards from Portugal — Preceding unsigned comment added by SADAMO (talk • contribs) 08:48, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

My name is Tijana and I am a team leader of Wikinvesting.com project. Along with five of my colleagues and friends who are investment and trading enthusiasts, I have started the Wikinvesting which is based on MediaWiki platform.

Wikinvesting is a non-profit, game-changing movement which aims to round up all those individuals who believe that unbiased financial market information and knowledge should be extensively available to everyone. And this is also how I got to you :) Namely, I was searching for information I needed on financial markets and I have noticed that there isn’t a lot of "useful" information available on Wikipedia (to my surprise). In addition to that, the information available through sites such as Investopedia or Investing is tightly controlled by the business owners and hence easily manipulated. Simply, traders like me could not trust such sources in planning the investment and trading strategy...

So, what we want to create is a base where active or aspiring traders, content writers, investors, and generally financial enthusiasts will share their knowledge and experience, discuss investment opportunities, analyze news etc., all for the purpose of wikinvesting becoming the biggest financial knowledge “open source” base. I am not sure if you are familiar with the recent case of GameStop where gaming enthusiasts gather around the GameStop via reddit forum and prevented the hedge funds from sinking it down. They were basically our inspiration to starting this project.

I would love to share more information about this project with you and also discuss future potential opportunities, hence if you are interested, please let me know so we can continue this on our slack channel.

Cheers,

TijanaRistic (talk) 13:27, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I am a local resident of KPK and I possess authentic information about Idris Khattak which I want to bring to light to the world. Therefore, do not withheld the information as I am uploading the content with reliable and credible sources.

Regards Ali Dawar March 2, 2021 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ali Dawar (talk • contribs) 08:26, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

dear sir/madam, today and yesterday, i tediously updated my own entry Emanuel Tov

unfortunately all the changes have been canceled

can you reinstall them?

i dont know how to sign with the tildes

here's my signature emanuel tov06:55, 30 March 2021 (UTC)109.66.167.147 (talk)

You really shouldn't edit the page about yourself, but rather request changes an the article's talk page. I reviewed the changes & reverted the bot change that removed them. --Versageek 03:10, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion regarding your bot account is currently open at Wikipedia:Bots/Noticeboard#Clearing_bot_watchlists. Please see and respond to the discussion there. If you do not respond, developer action may be taken without your cooperation. — xaosflux ^Talk 14:58, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just to understand: why did XLinkBot remove the Youtube link posted in Michael Nesmith on September 21? Are Youtube links not allowed at all? Or are Youtube links just not considered reliable sources for the body of an article? It's actually an interesting and relevant Youtube video (and apparently stable); would it be acceptable to place it in External Links? (I didn't create the link, but I do have the article on my watchlist).Finney1234 (talk) 10:12, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I wish to create a page regarding the Hanafi Jurist Abul Husayn Al Quduri. I have been referred to yo as you previously deleted a page called al quduri, does the page of the person ive cited meet the criteria needed to be created. Thanks

All the changes I made to this wiki were links to media Lance Sterling owns, they should not have been deleted. I would like to know why our links to our own host websites were deleted. Please post the changes I made.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lance_Sterling

Hi Versageek, please see Wikipedia:Bots/Noticeboard#XLinkBot_has_forked_an_article!_😲 regarding edits made by your bot. Thank you, — xaosflux ^Talk 19:10, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:13, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Hi there. Last Monday I directly sent you an email but realized you might not check that email all that often so I'm posting here in the hopes of drawing your attention to it. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 15:24, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Versageek, I just sent a mail – could you answer it as soon as you're able? Much appreciated! Best, KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 22:16, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The bot hasn't edited for 5 months maybe it needs to be rebooted? LDM2003 (talk) 11:15, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm addressing a tracked syntax error on Wikipedia, and I wondered if you would be willing to assist me for the some of the last few in User space. The error I'm correcting is called the Tidy Font, and due to changes with MediaWiki in 2018, any link written in the format of <font color>[link]</font> with the color stated outside the link does not display the intended colors and instead defaults to standard blue for most browsers. If you would be willing, would you change on your page User:Versageek/Talk/Archive/2 the following?

== Is [[User:XLinkBot|XLinkBot]] working? ==

Please see [[Wikipedia:An#Problem with anti-Vandalism bots.3F|the relavent AN thread]]. Thanks! <font color="amaranth">[[User:NuclearWarfare|NuclearWarfare]]</font>''''' <sup><font color="green">[[User talk:NuclearWarfare|contact me]]</font></sup>'''''<sub><font color="purple">[[Special:Contributions/NuclearWarfare|My work]]</font></sub> 15:30, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

== Is [[User:XLinkBot|XLinkBot]] working? ==

Please see [[Wikipedia:An#Problem with anti-Vandalism bots.3F|the relavent AN thread]]. Thanks! [[User:NuclearWarfare|<span style="color:#F4364C">NuclearWarfare</span>]]''''' <sup>[[User talk:NuclearWarfare|<span style="color:green">contact me</span>]]</sup>'''''<sub>[[Special:Contributions/NuclearWarfare|<span style="color:purple">My work</span>]]</sub> 15:30, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

This will address this error and allow NW's signature to display as they intended.

Thank you, Zinnober9 (talk) 20:30, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2024).

Administrator changes

• Red-tailed hawk
• Robertsky

• Ameliorate!
• Ancheta Wis
• Anthony Bradbury (deceased)
• Cobi
• Ev
• Moondyne
• Worm That Turned

Bureaucrat changes

Worm That Turned

CheckUser changes

Wugapodes

Interface administrator changes

• Enterprisey
• Izno

Guideline and policy news

• An RfC about increasing the inactivity requirement for Interface administrators is open for feedback.

Technical news

• Pages that use the JSON contentmodel will now use tabs instead of spaces for auto-indentation. This will significantly reduce the page size. (T326065)

Arbitration

• Following a motion, the Arbitration Committee adopted a new enforcement restriction on January 4, 2024, wherein the Committee may apply the 'Reliable source consensus-required restriction' to specified topic areas.
• Community feedback is requested for a draft to replace the "Information for administrators processing requests" section at WP:AE.

Miscellaneous

• Voting in the 2024 Steward elections will begin on 06 February 2024, 14:00 (UTC) and end on 27 February 2024, 14:00 (UTC). The confirmation process of current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically check your eligibility to vote.
• A vote to ratify the charter for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is open till 2 February 2024, 23:59:59 (UTC) via Secure Poll. All eligible voters within the Wikimedia community have the opportunity to either support or oppose the adoption of the U4C Charter and share their reasons. The details of the voting process and voter eligibility can be found here.
• Community Tech has made some preliminary decisions about the future of the Community Wishlist Survey. In summary, they aim to develop a new, continuous intake system for community technical requests that improves prioritization, resource allocation, and communication regarding wishes. Read more
• The Unreferenced articles backlog drive is happening in February 2024 to reduce the backlog of articles tagged with {{Unreferenced}}. You can help reduce the backlog by adding citations to these articles. Sign up to participate!

Why would you revert my edits? Any issues? Pls let me know Ajay Aravindan (talk) 10:32, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mainly due to repeated addition of links to https://www.keralatourism.org/event/palakkad-pattambi-nercha/28 --Versageek 11:41, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

okay, Thank you. I won't add any external links. Ajay Aravindan (talk) 11:44, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2024).

Administrator changes Sdkb The Night Watch East718 Isabelle Belato Mzajac Staecker Stan Shebs Sugarfish Tamzin

Bureaucrat changes SilkTork

Guideline and policy news

• Phase I of the 2024 RfA review is now open for participation. Editors are invited to review, comment on, and propose improvements to the requests for adminship process.
• Following an RfC, the inactivity requirement for the removal of the interface administrator right increased from 6 months to 12 months.

Technical news

• The mobile site history pages now use the same HTML as the desktop history pages. (T353388)

Miscellaneous

• The 2024 appointees for the Ombuds commission are だ＊ぜ, AGK, Ameisenigel, Bennylin, Daniuu, Doǵu, Emufarmers, Faendalimas, MdsShakil, Minorax, Nehaoua, Renvoy and RoySmith as members, with Vermont serving as steward-observer.
• Following the 2024 Steward Elections, the following editors have been appointed as stewards: Ajraddatz, Albertoleoncio, EPIC, JJMC89, Johannnes89, Melos and Yahya.

you used to be on wikihow. i was dazwarier in 2019. Do you remember the user that dropped admin trust on that poor excuse for a site down to zero? Reirawzad (talk) 12:59, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2024).

Administrator changes

• Kbdank71
• Kosack
• NrDg
• TLSuda

Guideline and policy news

• An RfC is open to convert all current and future community discretionary sanctions to (community designated) contentious topics procedure.

Technical news

• The Toolforge Grid Engine services have been shut down after the final migration process from Grid Engine to Kubernetes. (T313405)

Arbitration

• An arbitration case has been opened to look into "the intersection of managing conflict of interest editing with the harassment (outing) policy".

Miscellaneous

• Editors are invited to sign up for The Core Contest, an initiative running from April 15 to May 31, which aims to improve vital and other core articles on Wikipedia.

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2024).

Administrator changes

Nyttend

• JohnOwens
• Killiondude
• MelanieN
• Nihonjoe

Bureaucrat changes

Nihonjoe

CheckUser changes

Joe Roe

Oversight changes

GeneralNotability

Guideline and policy news

• Phase I of the 2024 requests for adminship review has concluded. Several proposals have passed outright and will proceed to implementation, including creating a discussion-only period (3b) and administrator elections (13) on a trial basis. Other successful proposals, such as creating a reminder of civility norms (2), will undergo further refinement in Phase II. Proposals passed on a trial basis will be discussed in Phase II, after their trials conclude. Further details on specific proposals can be found in the full report.

Technical news

• Partial action blocks are now in effect on the English Wikipedia. This means that administrators have the ability to restrict users from certain actions, including uploading files, moving pages and files, creating new pages, and sending thanks. T280531

Arbitration

• The arbitration case Conflict of interest management has been closed.

Miscellaneous

• This may be a good time to reach out to potential nominees to ask if they would consider an RfA.
• A New Pages Patrol backlog drive is happening in May 2024 to reduce the number of unreviewed articles in the new pages feed. Currently, there is a backlog of over 15,000 articles awaiting review. Sign up here to participate!
• Voting for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) election is open until 9 May 2024. Read the voting page on Meta-Wiki and cast your vote here!

If or when Abi Carter wins, will you remove the protection? Headtothestripe (talk) 19:30, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sure --Versageek 20:04, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Would you? Headtothestripe (talk) 02:58, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, appreciative. I am talking to a group (three to six editors, apparently) on the Abi Carter talk page. They are trying to remove parts of the article. I have tried to tell them they need consensus.Headtothestripe (talk) 22:27, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Versageek, please visit Abi Carter and the talk page, as well as some editors' talk pages. (See this) There is some serious ownership behavior and edit warring going on. A number of experienced editors are making no headway in convincing Headtothestripe that once an article "goes public", the creator no longer owns it. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 23:14, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The immediate problems have been solved with a one-week block of Headtothestripe. That will likely not change their attitude, so I expect problems when they return. If that happens, a topic ban might be the best solution. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 13:31, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I 've created and edit the page for author C.M. James removing anything that would seem as advertisement or promotion. The goal is not to advertise but to link actual author websites AND links from other sources. Reading over the article I thought everything was strictly information and not bias to the author. If there was a statement made about credentials or awards it was cited in the article. If anything else was placed incorrectly is it possible to know exactly what? Because reading through it I can't seem to find anything that is promotional. Relevant to the subject maybe. If a claim was made then there were links to show that the statement can be verified, but wasn't use to promote. A story and time line is being explained to show when and how c.m. james became a writer which includes correct information, cites, and a timeline. There are accomplishments made by the author which led c.m. james to focus on his passion which is writing. And I thought those needed to be cited. Am I needing to only write actual author information nothing really else? Dmcneely25 (talk) 21:13, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2024).

Administrator changes

Graham Beards

• Deskana
• Mets501
• Staxringold

Bureaucrat changes

• Deskana
• Warofdreams

Oversight changes

Dreamy Jazz

Guideline and policy news

• Phase II of the 2024 RfA review has commenced to improve and refine the proposals passed in Phase I.

Technical news

• The Nuke feature, which enables administrators to mass delete pages, will now correctly delete pages which were moved to another title. T43351

Arbitration

• The arbitration case Venezuelan politics has been closed.
• The Committee is seeking volunteers for various roles, including access to the conflict of interest VRT queue.

Miscellaneous

• WikiProject Reliability's unsourced statements drive is happening in June 2024 to replace {{citation needed}} tags with references! Sign up here to participate!

Hi, in Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard#Is pv-magazine.com reliable? I suggested moving pv-magazine.com from the blacklist to XLinkBot, but I was informed that it isn't operational anymore. Is this true, and if so, what are the chances of reactivating it? ~Anachronist (talk) 20:35, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2024).

Administrator changes

• Elli
• HouseBlaster
• Pickersgill-Cunliffe

• Brianga
• De728631
• Georgewilliamherbert
• Hyacinth (deceased)
• ProveIt
• The Night Watch

Technical news

• Local administrators can now add new links to the bottom of the site Tools menu without using JavaScript. Documentation is available on MediaWiki. (T6086)

Miscellaneous

• The Community Wishlist is re-opening on 15 July 2024. Read more

Hello, Versageek. Just noting that I've sent you an email. Thanks, Sdrqaz (talk) 01:01, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2024).

Administrator changes

Isabelle Belato

• Ian.thomson
• Modussiccandi

Interface administrator changes

Izno

CheckUser changes

Barkeep49

Technical news

• Global blocks may now target accounts as well as IP's. Administrators may locally unblock when appropriate.
• Users wishing to permanently leave may now request "vanishing" via Special:GlobalVanishRequest. Processed requests will result in the user being renamed, their recovery email being removed, and their account being globally locked.

Arbitration

• The Arbitration Committee appointed the following administrators to the conflict of interest volunteer response team: Bilby, Extraordinary Writ

May I know why my user page was deleted? Mrsanjeevyadav (talk) 06:59, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A user page on Wikipedia is for things relevant to Wikipedia, not a place to post your resume / CV / biography. Please see WP:U5. --Versageek 05:57, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you delete my page? What was wrong with it? Mrsanjeevyadav (talk) 10:44, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2024).

Administrator changes

Pppery

Interface administrator changes

Pppery

Oversighter changes

Wugapodes

CheckUser changes

• Courcelles
• GeneralNotability

Guideline and policy news

• Following an RfC, there is a new criterion for speedy deletion: C4, which applies to unused maintenance categories, such as empty dated maintenance categories for dates in the past.
• A request for comment is open to discuss whether Notability (species) should be adopted as a subject-specific notability guideline.

Arbitration

• Following a motion, remedies 5.1 and 5.2 of World War II and the history of Jews in Poland (the topic and interaction bans on My very best wishes, respectively) were repealed.
• Remedy 3C of the German war effort case ("Cinderella157 German history topic ban") was suspended for a period of six months.
• The arbitration case Historical Elections is currently open. Proposed decision is expected by 3 September 2024 for this case.

Miscellaneous

• Editors can now enter into good article review circles, an alternative for informal quid pro quo arrangements, to have a GAN reviewed in return for reviewing a different editor's nomination.
• A New Pages Patrol backlog drive is happening in September 2024 to reduce the number of unreviewed articles and redirects in the new pages feed. Currently, there is a backlog of over 13,900 articles and 26,200 redirects awaiting review. Sign up here to participate!

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2024).

Administrator changes

• Asilvering
• Significa liberdade

• Good Olfactory
• Hesperian
• I JethroBT
• TommyBoy
• Woody

CheckUser changes

• Barkeep49
• Izno

• Doug Weller
• Spicy

Guideline and policy news

• Administrator elections are a proposed new process for selecting administrators, offering an alternative to requests for adminship (RfA). The first trial election will take place in October 2024, with candidate sign-up from October 8 to 14, a discussion phase from October 22 to 24, and SecurePoll voting from October 25 to 31. For questions or to help out, please visit the talk page at Wikipedia talk:Administrator elections.
• Following a discussion, the speedy deletion reason "File pages without a corresponding file" has been moved from criterion G8 to F2. This does not change what can be speedily deleted.
• A request for comment is open to discuss whether there is a consensus to have an administrator recall process.

Arbitration

• The arbitration case Historical elections has been closed.
• An arbitration case regarding Backlash to diversity and inclusion has been opened.
• Editors are invited to nominate themselves to serve on the 2024 Arbitration Committee Electoral Commission until 23:59 October 8, 2024 (UTC).

Miscellaneous

• If you are interested in stopping spammers, please put MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist and MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist on your watchlist, and help out when you can.

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2024).

Administrator changes

• Crisco 1492

• Babajobu
• Daniel
• Elf
• Jayron32
• Thue
• Wugapodes

CheckUser changes

Maxim

Oversighter changes

Maxim

Guideline and policy news

• Following a discussion, the discussion-only period proposal that went for a trial to refine the requests for adminship (RfA) process has been discontinued.
• Following a request for comment, Administrator recall is adopted as a policy.

Technical news

• Mass deletions done with the Nuke tool now have the 'Nuke' tag. This change will make reviewing and analyzing deletions performed with the tool easier. T366068

Arbitration

• RoySmith, Barkeep49 and Cyberpower678 have been appointed to the Electoral Commission for the 2024 Arbitration Committee Elections. ThadeusOfNazereth and Dr vulpes are reserve commissioners.
• Eligible editors are invited to self-nominate from 3 November 2024 until 12 November 2024 to stand in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections.
• The Arbitration Committee is seeking volunteers for roles such as clerks, access to the COI queue, checkuser, and oversight.

Miscellaneous

• An unreferenced articles backlog drive is happening in November 2024 to reduce the backlog of articles tagged with {{Unreferenced}}. You can help reduce the backlog by adding citations to these articles. Sign up to participate!

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:17, 13 November 2024 (UTC) [reply]