User talk:Vwqvj qwhiu

Hello, I'm InfiniteNexus. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, List of roles and awards of Tom Holland, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. InfiniteNexus (talk) 16:29, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Mia Khalifa. Thank you. Morbidthoughts (talk) 02:35, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Annie Oakley, you may be blocked from editing. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 01:23, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand, I just add some movies Vwqvj qwhiu (talk) 02:55, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please change pending to nominated for the minnesota critics awards. It was determined over two months ago... 24.71.102.130 (talk) 07:24, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I will :) Vwqvj qwhiu (talk) 22:55, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Hailee Steinfeld. Julietdeltalima (talk) 15:13, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to L'Arroseur Arrosé. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 11:25, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:44, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm CorbieVreccan. I noticed that you recently removed content from Sacheen Littlefeather without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. - CorbieVreccan ^☊ ☼ 23:42, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Foxy Lloyd. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jamiebuba (talk) 21:27, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks bro I know that:) Vwqvj qwhiu (talk) 22:35, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Bill Strother. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster _talk 01:53, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, Wingwomen, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it has been moved to Draft:Wingwomen where you can continue to work on it. Please consider using the Article Wizard or the Articles for Creation procedure. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read "Your first article". You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. No issues found so far, however it lacks secondary sources for verification therefore you are given more time to incubate in draftspace shelovesneo (talk) 23:51, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted your addition of an unsourced date of birth to Jocelyn Towne. In addition to Wikipedia's basic principle of citing sources (Wikipedia:Citing sources), a special need for citations applies with regard to elements of a biography of a living person (WP:BLPPRIVACY). Feel free to add a date of birth when it is accompanied by a citation to a reliable, published, non-primary source. Eddie Blick (talk) 22:51, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to David Cohen (Jack the Ripper suspect). Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. shelovesneo (talk) 09:22, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article did contain sources, so that was not a reason to move the page to a draft. However, Vwqvj qwhiu, I do not think you have added any new information beyond that contained in Jack the Ripper suspects#David Cohen, so I do not see the need for a separate article. Are you planning on adding more information? If not, I think David Cohen (Jack the Ripper suspect) should instead redirect to Jack the Ripper suspects#David Cohen. Would you agree with that? SilverLocust 💬 12:19, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Jack the Ripper suspects into Jacob Levy (murder suspect). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. If you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. SilverLocust 💬 12:30, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Vwqvj qwhiu. Thank you for your work on Westcott Clarke. User:DreamRimmer, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hey, it seems like there are several sources available for Westcott Clarke. Would you mind adding some sources, please?

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|DreamRimmer}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 ^{𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜} 06:49, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Westcott Clarke. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 06:08, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Waxworker. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Tina Yothers, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please see WP:BURDEN and WP:DOB Waxworker (talk) 19:39, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Amarna Miller. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Morbidthoughts (talk) 02:43, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Peggy Ahern. Please see WP:BURDEN Waxworker (talk) 14:56, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  _signed, Rosguill ^talk 15:03, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

please don't block me from editing, i won't making disruptive edits again.. Vwqvj qwhiu (talk) 23:39, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Dan Hanlon requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ❯❯❯ Raydann^(Talk) 17:01, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vwqvj qwhiu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I just want to add some filmography on some actor (actress) page, because there's no filmography be showed. I don't think I made disruptive edits. Allright I won't do this again.

Decline reason:

You say that you don't think that you were disruptive, and then say you won't do it again- if you don't think you were disruptive, you will repeat the behavior in the future. Please speak to the reason for the block, "Disruptive editing, repeated issues with failure to source material and engage with concerns despite prior block and multiple warnings". 331dot (talk) 08:33, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vwqvj qwhiu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

just make contributions to pages, I won't make any disruptive edits.

Decline reason:

You will not be unblocked while you refuse to address the concerns that lead to your block. Reread what 331dot told you above. Yamla (talk) 21:19, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vwqvj qwhiu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

original unblock reason

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Daniel Case (talk) 06:11, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Vwqvj qwhiu (talk) 21:24, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vwqvj qwhiu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I won't make any disruptive editing, repeated issues with failure to source material and engage with concerns despite prior block and multiple warnings. Vwqvj qwhiu (talk) 08:14, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are just re-phrasing the block reason. You really should carefully read guide to appealing blocks. PhilKnight (talk) 13:09, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

We don't want you to repeat the block reason back to us. We want you to do as Daniel Case posted above. If you are unable or unwilling to do that, you will quickly lose access to this page. 331dot (talk) 08:08, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Dan Hanlon has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Limited acting career and no clear evidence of sufficient WP:SIGCOV to warrant an article

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 21:16, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Bungle

I deproDed the page. It meets basic requirements for actors. Best, -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 11:21, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vwqvj qwhiu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I won't do this kind of editing again, i though it was right initialy. (and i have done what Daniel Case posted)

Decline reason:

Duplicate request. PhilKnight (talk) 13:09, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dan Hanlon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Hanlon until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 18:48, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vwqvj qwhiu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I won't do this kind of editing again, i though it was right initialy. (and i have done what Daniel Case posted)

Decline reason:

Another duplicate request. PhilKnight (talk) 13:09, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello, Vwqvj qwhiu. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Untitled Buster Keaton television series, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:07, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Vwqvj qwhiu. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bill Strother, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:06, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Vwqvj qwhiu. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Academy Award for Best Title Writing, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:07, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Vwqvj qwhiu. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bill Strother".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:52, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Vwqvj qwhiu. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Wingwomen".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 14:03, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Vwqvj qwhiu. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Westcott Clarke, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:08, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Vwqvj qwhiu. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Foxy Lloyd, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:06, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Vwqvj qwhiu. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Academy Award for Best Title Writing".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:52, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Vwqvj qwhiu. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:David Cohen (Jack the Ripper suspect), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:08, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Vwqvj qwhiu. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Giuseppe Sacco Albanese, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:06, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Vwqvj qwhiu. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Foxy Lloyd".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:03, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Vwqvj qwhiu. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "David Cohen".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:26, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Vwqvj qwhiu. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Benoît Duval, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:06, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]