User talk:TruthbringerToronto

Hi TruthBringer. Another editor, UtherSRG deleted [Polar Design] without explanation, apparently because it was left in the queue. I believe you removed it from queue for several reasons a few months ago. The deletion review article is here if you would care to contribute your thoughts? Thank you!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review#Polar_Design

Dear Truthbringer: I have revised the eTouch article to emphasize notability as requested. Below is the copy and also current Wikipedia entries for companies that have a similar offering. Please clarify why these articles are notable and why mine is not. I cannot determine the difference.

Also: eTouch's work with NASA has been documented by the San Jose Mercury News, Computerworld, Government Computer News, The Web Hosting Industry Review, and many other publications that cover the Internet as well as space exploration.

Jaymejia03 17:09, 16 October 2006 (UTC)Jay MejiaJaymejia03 17:09, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

eTouch Systems is a Fremont, Calif., software company that has developed proprietary social computing technologies including an enterprise wiki solution built on a J2EE platform called SamePage. Founded in 1998, eTouch has developed collaboration software powered by a comprehensive Content Management solution. Customers include Cisco, Kaplan, Johnson & Johnson, and NASA.

As the prime contractor for NASA, eTouch led the effort to help the space agency consolidate its 3,000 web sites into a more manageable, single public web portal to inspire the next generation of space explorers. Built on eTouch’s CMS product, NASA’s public portal delivers up-to-the-minute, engaging multimedia coverage of NASA’s wide variety of programs, including dazzling photos and streaming media content from the Mars Rovers mission, the Cassini flyby and the ongoing space shuttle missions. eTouch’s partnerships with Akamai Technologies and Yahoo! ensures that the content can be delivered to anyone on earth and downloaded on the Internet in less than two seconds without interruption or failure.

Since the launch of the Mars Rover missions, NASA’s web traffic has skyrocketed to 50 Gigabytes during special space events, such as the Return to Flight shuttle mission in July 2005 and the Atlantis space shuttle mission to resume construction of the International Space Station in September of 2006. Peak traffic of 50 Gigabytes is equal to all the words in all the books that would fill the U.S. Library of Congress 63 times.

eTouch has leveraged its experience with organizations like NASA to build out an enterprise-class wiki with a blog publishing tool. eTouch SamePage provides a number of advanced features, including WYSIWYG editing, project management, permissioning, administration and support for multiple domains.

---

Socialtext Incorporated is a company based in Palo Alto, California that produces enterprise social software, including a software platform by the same name. It is run by CEO Ross Mayfield and CTO Peter Kaminski. It counts the Omidyar Network and Draper Fisher Jurvetson among its investors. The company's board of directors includes Jimmy Wales, Joi Ito, and Tim Draper. Other company founders are Adina Levin and Edward Vielmetti.

Socialtext is an enterprise wiki and weblog based on Kwiki. It is available as a hosted service (from Socialtext Incorporated), as a hardware appliance, and now as Open Source.

Socialtext was a sponsor of Wikimania 2005 and 2006. It also donated US$2,000 in the Wikimedia Fundraiser 2005 Q4.

---

JotSpot is the first application wiki company that offers enterprise social software. The product is targeted mainly to small- and medium-sized businesses. The company was founded by Joe Kraus and Graham Spencer, co-founders of Excite.

Business customers of JotSpot include Whole Foods, eBay, Symantec, and Intel[1].

JotSpot's wiki is known for its easy to user interface and features such as the ability to send email to each page in the wiki, WYSIWYG editing, and embedded spreadsheet capabilities.

Beyond its basic wiki product, JotSpot also offers other applications including JotSpot Family Site,Class Reunion Planner, JotSpot Live, JotSpot Tracker and more.

In February 2006, JotSpot was named part of Business 2.0 Next Net 25 and in May 2006, it was honored as one of InfoWorld's 15 Start-ups to Wat

---

Atlassian Confluence is a commercial Java EE based knowledge management and collaboration tool produced by Atlassian Software Systems. It is a wiki, and can be used as a bliki.

Confluence is free for philanthropic and open-source projects. Academic and commercial organizations are charged based on number of users.

Some other nice features of Confluence are that it is extensible, and the source code is made available to purchasers. Confluence uses Java EE for the server side and has the ability to connect to virtually any SQL database, utilizing the JDBC-ODBC bridge driver. Formatting of the XHTML front end is done with another open-source software project, Velocity. Velocity is part of the Jakarta project (which was founded by the Apache Software Foundation, most famous for the Apache Web server and the Tomcat Application Server.

Other open-source components used include:

OpenSympony WebWork OpenSympony SiteMesh Hibernate Lucene Confluence also includes a plugin system with a variety of extension points ranging from theming capabilities and wiki macros to custom webwork actions, search extractors and event handlers. This makes Confluence a strong platform for rapid development and modification.

This is TruthbringerToronto's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Archives: 1, 2

Archives

1 2

Personally I don't think he's notable enough outsite the band to have his own article, but I'll restore it if you want me to. -- Steel 21:26, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Yes, please restore it. Thanks. TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 21:58, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've restored. Please consider merging all the content from the individual member articles into the main band article. -- Steel 22:00, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re you comments on my talk page, in recent times I have always gone to a prod (or sometimes speedy) before going forward with an AfD nomination. I will make a concerted effort going forward to place the AfD notice tag on an editor's page if they are not the person who removed the prod tag. If they removed the tag, I assume they are watching the article and a notice is not needed. This is a form of instruction creep.--Gay Cdn (talk) (email) (Contr.) 22:00, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• I indicated to you I would add a notice to the user pages of the creators of pages I nominate for AfD. you left the following template as what should be used, {{subst:afd|Name of article}}, but when I went to add that to a users talk page, it did not work.--Gay Cdn (talk) (email) (Contr.) 13:29, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• I meant to say {{subst:adw|Name of article}}. adw probably stands for Article Deletion Warning. I'm sorry. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 19:44, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Can you look at this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Anthropogeology and tell me what I did wrong? I have not listed an article for deletion in a while, and there have been some changes. So, apparently, I did something wrong, 'cause this does not look right. Thank you for your time. ---Charles 23:28, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Thanks for your note. There was a misplaced {{subst: which I removed. I also commented on the nomination. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 23:43, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks for taking a look. I've listed a dozen articles, at least, for AfD, I'm not sure why I had trouble this time. ---Charles 23:48, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know if reviews really count much or if the websites that did the reviews are significant. The interview barely mentions the Murder of Angels project. Still does not seem like much to me. -Sorry Nv8200p talk 04:41, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have added a comment regarding your argument on the Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Lloyd_Levitin page. Please read it and consider changing your vote. Thanks. --Ineffable3000 02:20, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please explain why you decided to Speedy Keep Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Yavanov, a probable hoax article when all of it's votes during the day were for deletion. --Ineffable3000 07:03, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• I did not. What you saw was a forgery by Infrogtation (talk • contribs • page moves • block user • block log) which I have just reverted. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 07:06, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am very concerned about the recent deletion of around 50 stubs on Australian politicians. These articles lay the foundation for what Wikipedia will one day be..."a multilingual free encyclopedia of the highest possible quality to every single person on the planet in their own language" (Jimmy Wales). This however will not happen overnight. I draw parallels to my own project on Central Coast, New South Wales articles. 90% of the suburbs are stubs. But these stubs encourage anyone to edit. Even trivial information has a place on Wikipedia. It should not worry YOU if the articles contained very little information, but you should be happy that the articles had information. In many cases these articles only needed an infobox and they would have been reasonably adequate. In closing I ask anyone who has supported their deletion, that you reconsider your vote by visiting this page: Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2006 September 30#Albert Piddington (Australian politician) Todd661 10:18, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In reference to your comment about Strata touring nationally according to their website:WP:MUSIC states "Has gone on an international concert tour, or a national concert tour in at least one large or medium-sized country,[1] reported in NOTABLE and verifiable sources." (Emphasis mine) This means notability is not gained by having a national tour, but by having a national tour that was notable enough to be notable to a notable source! Sorry about the overuse of that word for a second. As far as wikipedia is concerned, I do not believe that bigger is better. It is important to stand by wikipedia policy. Green hornet 21:04, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure that I agree that Bishops are generally notable, but I'm certainly satisfied that this Bishop is notable due to the additions you have made. Nice job. Erechtheus 03:37, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not «Nascar Canada» the nonsense, it is the content. But the content has been change after your removal... Next time read the article before removing that tag. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Souris2005 (talk • contribs) 02:34, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

The Barnstar of Rescue For the numerous Wikipedia:Articles for deletion that you have saved with a well written, well researched argument. For Wikipedia's leading inclusionist. AnonEMouse (squeak) 13:51, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Would you please take a moment to look over The Ancient Apostolic Communion article and its talk page. It has been nominated for deletion and I believe it is just as notable as other articles on Independent Catholic Churches.

Thank you. --Kf4bdy ^{talk contribs} 01:58, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I added one link I could find to an article that mentions us in the Aiken Standard newspaper. That is all I have at the moment although there have been two other articles printed one in the North Augusta Star and one in the Kentucky New Era but neither have them in archive online. Is there a way I can add the info from a print article? --Kf4bdy ^{talk contribs} 02:34, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Just cite the print articles in the same way you would in an academic essay, and include a summary if the headline does not offer a sufficient description of the article. See Wikipedia:Citing sources, also known as WP:CITE, for a discussion how to cite newspaper articles. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 02:39, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Do you mind giving it another once over? I have added some reliable sources. --Kf4bdy ^{talk contribs} 03:33, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I changed bi-vocational to "All clergy in the church have paid jobs outside the church", which I think says the same thing. I have heard the term "worker priest" for clergy in this situation, possibly in the context of the Liberal Catholic Church. You mention the number of clergy, but you should also mention the number of the faithful. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 06:19, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for all your help. I have made the changes you suggested. Just slipped my mind while working on this article. --Kf4bdy ^{talk contribs} 06:35, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

hi. Sarah deleted it due to copyvio. Regards, Blnguyen | BLabberiNg 01:55, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The problem wasn't notability; the problem was it was a copyright violation. The author needs to release the text under the GFDL before it can be reinstated. Cheers, Sarah Ewart (Talk) 01:58, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

HI thanks for the info, I've contacted an admin (User:Snottygobble to delete Mount Dale, Western Australia, all the information is in Mount Dale and way. Though WP;Australia has a naming convention for mountains so he may move it to Mount Dale (Western Australia). Gnangarra 10:32, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Its been merged into Mount Dale all the others are redirects. I couldn't add to article, but will have a some more area views as opposed to specific plant life I'll upload shortly. I'll drop you a note when I do, let pick the one thats best to illistrate the page Gnangarra 13:10, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello - I got your message and I admit to being a little confused - but I'm trying to fix the issues that you have mentioned. Social Style is actually a model known world-wide in the human resources/training & development industries and people often ask where it originated. This page details where and how it originated. I've been researching this - speaking with professors at universities (who often also don't know where social style originated). I notice that people use style as a behavioral term and I'm not even sure if they know that it came from social style. Meaning - in the circles that I associate with this is definitely of interest to people and it's notable because it's part of the history of interpersonal skills development - and is comparable to what most people in the general public know about a Myers-Briggs test - which is personality - but social style is behavioral. My point is that I will go in and try and cite more references - but for people in the HR and Training industries - this is of importance- it tells them the history of why they use the models that they use - and where they originated.Contribute Ideas 15:13, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It seems that this page has already been deleted and I can't go in and edit it - please get in touch with me - I'd like to cite more references. And I absolutely believe this is very notable to people in the industry.Contribute Ideas 16:08, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the late reply; the page can now be found at User:Contribute Ideas/TRACOM. Cheers and happy editing. Lectonar 14:33, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I would appreciate your help if possible. I'm quite new to all this and am having trouble understanding why exactly the article on Anthony Yadgaroff is being deleted.

His name was listed on another wikipedia entry (for Bhukaran Jews) and thus we decided to put some information up about him should people want to read it.

I have tried to verify things by adding web sites for various mentioned companies etc, but it seems this is not good enough. It may just be me but I am very confused about what is actually wanted from me in order for this article to remain live.

I am quite happy to change it so that it follows the rules, but I'm just not sure how!

If you could please help that would be brilliant. Thanks.Kimwatkins 13:51, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• You need to edit the article to demonstrate that this person satisfies WP:BIO. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 17:42, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help. I have had a look at the WP: BIO page and do believe that Anthony Yadgaroff satisfies two of the categories, namely:

- The person made a widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in their specific field; and also the alternative test

- Google Test - Does a search for the subject produce a large number of distinguishable hits on Google or other well-known Internet search engine?

With this is mind, I would appreciate it if you could reconsider the deletion of this article.

Many thanks. Kimwatkins 16:10, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. It's just a rubbish article then. Go inclusionism. Dev920 (Tory?) 20:02, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good catch. Evidently I didn't do a very good job of looking for the man. Thanks again ! Angus McLellan (Talk) 22:57, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for improving the article. It has been improved to a level beyond deletion status. Still pretty stubby, but much improved with the references and such. --Jayron32 03:14, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Because of your input on previous music AfDs, I was hoping you would take a look at this article and provide your thoughts on whether or not it meets WP:MUSIC its latest AfD. PT ^(s-s-s-s) 18:29, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for informing me of the improvements made in the Niles McKinley High School article. I have posted my comments here. Sr13 01:41, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi TT: just to let you know, I have moved the contested prod for Knox Glass Bottle Company to AfD. Cheers! Eusebeus 13:40, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to say thanks for bringing the David E. Kendall AFD to my attention. —Lowellian (reply) 23:02, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I greatly expanded the Storybook Land Canal Boats article, and so I removed your proposal to merge the article with the Disneyland article. Disneyfile 05:58, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Well done. Thank you. I agree that a merger is no longer appropriate. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 12:43, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please review this newest AfD, your opinion would be appreciated. PT ^(s-s-s-s) 00:42, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much for saving the article and adding the references. Unfortunately, the Centre's web presence is poor but I managed to find one other relevant link

I nominated this article for deletion. Thanks for adding info and removing the tag. With your additions, I agree that it should stick around. --Wordbuilder 03:36, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Is unchanged since Sept 8, 2006? Is it possible no references are available for it as a legitimate entry? Should I AfD it? I prefer not to. Comments. --meatclerk 20:46, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• I added two references to the article. Could you please take another look at it? ---TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 22:31, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article viability satified. I'll drop the subject with you. I only need to get it something to link to it. If you know of another article that can link to it, please let me know. Lastly, the References section corresponds to footnotes. That is when in the article you see ¹ or [1], those numbers correspond with the notes in the References section. Should anyone have a question about the article, they can read the footnote to check the information. Please try to maintain the references, as I believe they help everyone. --meatclerk 22:44, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I will explain Marcelmizzi (talk · contribs) that the fact he is a co-owner of copyright does not mean he can include such information in Wikipedia. Hopefully that will prevent new misunderstandings. -- ReyBrujo 05:56, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributions history shows that you have been aggressively cross-posting in order to influence AfD discussions. Although the Arbitration Committee has ruled that "[t]he occasional light use of cross-posting to talk pages is part of Wikipedia's common practice"¹, such cross-posting should adhere to specific guidelines found in Wikipedia:Spam. In the past, aggressively worded cross-posting has contributed towards an Arbitration Committee ruling of disruptive behavior that resulted in blocking². It is best not to game the system, and instead respect Wikipedia's principle of consensus-building, by ceasing to further crosspost, and instead allowing the process to reflect the opinions of editors that were already actively involved in the matter at hand. Thank you. --Calton | Talk 06:35, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Not so. Editors who have edited an article are entitled to be notified on an AfD related to their article. If the editor who creates the AfD fails to notify those who have worked on the article, it falls to other members of the community to make that notification. In future, when you create an AfD, prod or speedy, please be certain to notify the original author and subsequent editors of the article of your action using the recommended templates so that the deletion process can be seen to be fair. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 06:43, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not so. Editors who have edited an article are entitled to be notified on an AfD Really? Where exactly is that in the US Constitution? Or maybe it's in some part of the Charter of Rights? One of the more obscure clauses in the Magna Carta?

Reality check: it's called "vote stacking", which is when you try to influence a decision by notifying only those with a vested interest in keeping something. Read the notice: talk page spamming IS frowned upon.

In future, when you create an AfD, prod or speedy, please be certain to notify the original author and subsequent editors of the article of your action. Not a chance. If they really WERE interested, they'd have it watchlisted, wouldn't they? So it's not my responsibility, nor will I waste any time whatsover that I could spend doing something actually productive.

And speaking of things you're supposed to be doing -- but in your case, it's actually true -- stop untagging copyright violations: they're SUPPOSED to be deleted outright from the history, which is the whole point of the exercise. It's bad enough you enable spam, transparent nonsense, and wannabe vanity multiple times daily, but even you should have figured that enabling copyright violation is entirely the wrong thing to do. Or has your "Every Sperm is Sacred!" campaign blinded you to that? --Calton | Talk 16:38, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Please review the Articles for deletion, which states:

• It is generally considered civil to notify the good-faith creator and any main contributors of the article that you are nominating the article. To find the main contributors, look in the page history or talk page of the article and/or use TDS' Article Contribution Counter. For your convenience, you may use {{subst:AFDWarningNew|Article title}} (for creators who are totally new users), {{subst:AFDWarning|Article title}} (for creators), or {{subst:Adw|Article title}} (for contributors or established users).

• Similarly, Wikipedia:Proposed deletion states:

• Consider adding the article to your watchlist and letting the article's creator know that you have tagged it. You can use {{subst:PRODWarning|Article title}} ~~~~ for this.

Comment: To notify an editor of a prod initiated by someone else, use {{subst:PRODNote|Article title}} ~~~~

• And Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion states:

• Users nominating a page for speedy deletion should specify which criteria the page meets; it would also be considerate to notify the original author — remember, everyone was new once. Note that global sandboxes are exempt from deletion.

To notify an original author that their article may be speedied, you can use a template such as {{Nn-warn|Name of article}} for a non-notable article or another appropriate message from Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 17:33, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message. However, in this case I think an English source should be provided based on the editing pattern of 85.81.20.149l, so I can verify whether it is true or not. And as you can see I didn't remove the material in the other edits, I removed the reference and requested an English source. --Inahet 21:04, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You deleted Scott Boyd as a copyvio. I had trimmed it to a stub so that it would no longer be a copyvio, although I don't know if anybody made any edits after mine. Could you please take another look at the article and restore it if that seems appropriate? --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 23:18, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I'm sorry but the version of the article (even the one you had created) seemed to be a direct copyright violation of http://repboyd.com/?sectionid=100&sectiontree=100. If you wish to re-create the article, using your own words, then feel free to go ahead. _└ ^UkPaolo/_talk^┐ 07:37, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for rescuing this from speedy deletion, and for the material you added: that's some quality research.--Philbarker 13:12, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for getting rid of that speedy deletion tag on the Clare Youth Theatre Page. Exiledone 14:47, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Truthbringer,

Thank your for re-including the "RKO Industries, Inc." article. I have a question for which I couldn't find an answer in "editing help." Can an article title be edited? Is there anyway to change the article title from "RKO Industries, Inc." to simply "RKO Industries?" Thank you for your help if you have any suggestion.

Regards,

Dave Barber username: Recycledagplastic

Yes. Click on the "Move" tab and move the article from RKO Industries, Inc. to simply RKO Industries. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 14:07, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please deprod it. - crz crztalk 22:59, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nice job on the save!Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 01:39, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wow! After the Thorton School save, I wanted to give you a Barnstar. Then I saw you already had two, and I didn't want to duplicate. Then I thought about asking you about adminship! Then I re-read your first RfA.

I really don't know if I would suport or not. Would you be able to set aside your passionate inclusionism if you disagreed with consensus to delete? Could you objectively determine consensus? Would you detag CSD's instead of deleting them? These are the questions that will give you the most trouble. On the plus side, you are helpful to others and you have really done a tremendous job saving articles. I have never seen you make an uncivil remark even though you are under tremendous pressure.

I think it is a little too soon to submit an RfA just yet. I would give it another month. Have you done an Editor Review? That would help you smooth over any rough spots. Have any admins been helping you learn the ropes? If you have not been closing AfD's as a non admin, you might want to approach an admin about that. The admins at AfD probably know you prety well by now, anyway.

Let me think about it. I'd like too, but I'm still a little concerned about your judgment.Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 03:03, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I hope I helped you.Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 03:12, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

		The Original Barnstar
		For being an inclusionist that makes this deletionist tremble Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 03:10, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comments at the AfD. If this article is kept, could you try your hand at making it more encyclopedic and less promotional? (If you have time, of course.)

Thanks, --A. B. 19:07, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thx for making some edits there - I was being a little intransigent on the removal of the tags because I wanted to make sure the new user didn't get bad habits early :) --Trödel 14:24, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for catching my overzealous delete request. The article looked like nonsense when I first glanced at it, but it is actually awkward English. I added a suggestion to keep to its AFD page. --Mdresser 14:35, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

		The Article Rescuer Barnstar
		For your countless efforts to improve AfD candidates, helping them to avoid the deletion button by making people change their !votes - it worked for me :). Well done, and keep it up -- Martinp23 00:12, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Got to agree with this guy, keep up the good work!michaelCurtis ^talk+ _{contributions} 23:39, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I ran a Google Scholar name search and saw a lot of "I Walker"s and "Ian Walker"s, so I thought it best to look a bit more closely. A title search brought up the .pdf of the paper, which seemed pretty definitive. Cheers, Caknuck 09:45, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You must be talking about some other Rebecca wilson. See this. :) - Aksi_great (talk) 11:35, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Thank you. I agree that deletion was appropriate in this case, although I might have moved the article to the author's user page instead. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 06:18, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've put a copy at User:TruthbringerToronto/ICA. Just a note- it was deleted by Jimbo so you may want to make sure that spam issues was the only thing present. He rarely does simple deletions. JoshuaZ 06:38, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Thank you. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 06:39, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • The way to thank me is to go run for adminship soon. JoshuaZ 06:47, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I was going to create a page for Kalamandalam Gopi Asan. But u have done it .Our minds may be alike. Congrats and best wishes. A few Kerala wikipedians are not interested in creating pages for such great artist. they may say that he is non notable and will put it for an AfD. A war is going on between Kerala wikipedians.please seeWikipedia talk:WikiProject Kerala. I have followed u and voted Keep for the article on a noted Kerala Cartoonist S. Jithesh. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/S. Jithesh (2nd nomination)Have a look...? The person who put this article for AfD himself says that he is facing mental problems..!User:Ageo020. For these guys wikipedia is just for kidding. Now what is the present condition of the article! Conspirasy against this article is cleared from the talkpages User talk:Tintin1107 .They will say there is no world outside their topic Cricket , films and pista. Sometimes they might ask u what's Kathakali...? What is the medicine for their ignorance.I have been using wikipedia for two years. I accidently came to see this site. I was searching a biography of a person inorder to write his obituary for our newspaper. That search lead me to wikipedia. But I started editing before three or four months. I'm not a computer professional. That is my disqualification. But I will not kill wikipedia through childish behaviour.But unfortunately, here often ignorance and conspiracy wins. Knowledge fails. What a pathatic situation...? I'm thinking seriously about stopping my edits in wikipedia. I cant argue with narrow-minded stupidities. I respect knowledge. But I hate ignorance and intolerance. I can proudly say that I'm the first person who created a page for Kathakali Artist. I have created the pages of Kalamandalam Hyderali,and Kottakkal Sivaraman. I used to contribute on Kerala related art, culture and Malayalam Literature.I have more than 500 edits. The problem I'm facing is that Malayalam Newspaper reports aren't available through google.U r a truthbringer.I too believe in truth! Nileena joseph 03:47, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Thank you for your note. Please keep writing articles, but make sure that they have good references. References do not need to be available online. As long as the reference is complete (name of newspaper, date, name of article, page number, etc.) People will welcome more articles about Kerala as long as notability and verifiability can be demonstrated. It is usually best to write the article offline and then add it all at once rather than using Wikipedia as a word-processing program.
• As well, sometimes an article about another artist in the same field can be a useful model for an article that you are writing. Terry Mosher is a Canadian cartoonist. If you follow the pattern of the Terry Mosher article, it will be easier to write an article about a cartoonist from Kerala. Thank you again for your note. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 04:00, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

But what can I do...? User:Utcursch has protected that page from further editing. But a hot discussion is going on in Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Kerala.Have a look...!Nileena joseph 20:13, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I know we don't exactly see eye to eye on deletions in general. (And I'm perfectly ok with that) But I am a bit puzzled to see you de-prod the article on Neil Rees and then argue in the ensuing AfD that it looks like he's not notable enough. If you felt he was not notable, wouldn't it be simpler to let the prod run? Pascal.Tesson 12:57, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• You're right. I deprodded the article because he initially seemed notable. When I tried to expand the article further in response to the AfD, I found that I couldn't find much additional evidence, so I thought that I ought to explain what I found and couldn't find. I think that deans are usually notable because they can do a lot of good or harm in their jobs, but in this case it's hard to demonstrate motability.
• I wrote a similar comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donald Covington, another case where I suspect that the person is notable but I can't prove it. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 13:49, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. Although the article asserts notability, it is a copyvio from www.om28.com/abouteric.html (dismissing small differences). I am sorry for having brought all this mess around. -- ReyBrujo 02:55, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi TruthbringerToronto Thank you for your immediate assistance with Korean Archaeological Society article. I'm very pleased to have fellow Canadians at my side, fighting for our NPOV of the Wikiworld. Sorry to hear you're unhappy. Is that because it has been overcast and dark here in T.Dot for almost a month??? Hmmm... ah to be in Saskatchewan, my great, wide, and sunny homeland. ㅋㅋ Did you vote today? cheers, Mumun 20:41, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Unhappy because some editors are too quick to label articles as spam or not notable when the articles can be salvaged. As for the municipal elections, I voted just over a week ago in the advance poll.
• You might want to create a Korean-language article about the Korean Archaeological Society at ko:韓國考古學會 I can't read or write Korean, but I'm still interested in the Wikipedias in other languages. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 21:01, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello TruthbringerToronto, I'm LinuxDude, and I see you've contributed to the PREVOST article which I've also contributed to. I also noticed that you've warned anonymous user User:69.159.218.163 to stop his vandalism (thanks for doing that BTW). How can I help get him banned if he continues? I believe the same user is also coming from the IP 64.231.100.174.

--LinuxDude 21:54, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message about the problems with 69.159.218.163 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) and HMCS Prevost. Please take a look at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. You can report vandalism there, but read the instructions carefully. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 22:20, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking an interest in the Clare Youth Theatre Article. Those references may hopefully keep it from being deleted. Exiledone 19:15, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree you have established notability, so I removed the prod. Thanks! 66.108.48.154

I have difficulty finding reliable sources in English using Google only, out of these 71 results for Publimedia Romania and 23 results for Publimedia MediaPRO. Hence I don't think I'll be the one to undelete the page. IMO it'd be better to rewrite from scratch, which CSD G11 allows you to do. (The deleted versions didn't even list Publimedia's website; from what I Googled there is also an Italian company of the same name.) Kimchi.sg 15:20, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Btw I also deleted other equally spammy pages which might be worth redirecting or rewriting: ProTV Magazin, Ce se intampla, doctore?, and DESCOPERA. Given what I've seen from searching for the main publisher, perhaps you should just write a section on what they publish and redirect all the magazine titles there. But that's my deletionist POV. Kimchi.sg 15:34, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Userfied under their respective titles. Kimchi.sg 01:01, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also userfied for your rewriting - User:TruthbringerToronto/The ONE, User:TruthbringerToronto/TARGET, User:TruthbringerToronto/BUSINESS Magazin, User:TruthbringerToronto/Acasa Magazin. Kimchi.sg 01:12, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And User:TruthbringerToronto/ProMotor. Kimchi.sg 01:16, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

They may be "one of the West's largest book publishers" but there are no references to back that up, and all the promotional type copy that was removed from the article keeps getting added back by editors whose contributions are mostly to that article. The prod tag will hopefully induce someone to find sources, but the whole thing smells like vanity (and thus non-notability) to me. I'll see if I can find something on them, but I'm rather too irritated by the self-promotion to want to AGF about it. Katr67 23:37, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I was feeling charitable so I spruced up the article. They actually forgot to mention the Oregon series of books, which was quite popular here. That and finding some outside sources convinced me of the article's notability. Keep up the good work! Katr67 04:29, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It does indeed look better, but however, since it has already been entered into the AfD discussion, I cannot take down the deletion tag. You might also want to add verifiable sources to the history section. Thank you. Diez2 13:10, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Got the degrees you wanted, found nothing under awards so far. Rough 17:08, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• That may be so, but this is obviously not an encyclopedia article. I'm AfDing it since it's a college essay. Danny Lilithborne 02:49, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, when you post a welcome message to a newcomer, could you use {{subst:welcome}}, {{subst:welcome2}}, etc., instead of just {{welcome}}, {{welcome2}}, etc. It means that the text of that particular template will be added to the talk page of the user instead of the user just seeing a sort of mirror image of it. Two advantages are that if the actual template is vandalized, the message you have sent will not be altered in any way, and also less load is placed on the server. For more information, please see WP:SUBST. Cheers. Mkdw^talk 09:16, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just a quick "FYI"

(following is a message I left to Vortexrealm today re: RKO Industries and associated links) I see you are systematically going about removing my submissions/additions. Unfortunately, I won't have the required time to dedicate to a comprehensive retort to your nomination of my article for deletion or your removal of the "see also" link from "recycling" until after the holiday weekend. I imagine by then (and at your current rate) I will have much work to do within associated "recycling" article discussion pages. However, please look forward to fielding my arguments at that later time. Respectfully, Recycledagplastic

Good afternoon,

I would like to include you in my most recent communication with Alex and Trialsanderrors regarding "Plastic recycling":

I realise you are clearly associated with RKO Industries. Adding external links to any articles related to plastic for this companies website is considered as spam and is against wikipedia guilines. Please refrain from putting multiple links to each associated article. Alex 13:26, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Dear Alex,

Is there a reason for you not having deleted the following sentence and reference within the "Plastic recycling" article?

"In Israel successful trials have shown that plastic films recovered from mixed municipal waste streams can be recycled into useful products.[2]"

Knowing this will help me in my reasoning during further communication with you (and others) regarding plastics and recycling articles as well as my contributions.

Recycledagplastic 14:28, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

   I believe that this sentence & reference gives a pictorial illustration of an example of a proceedure of how plastic is recycled. It does not link to the top level promotional page of the site. Ideally the main article would include a pictorial illustration of plastic recycling in action.

   Many of the recycling articles were previously consigned to the process of collecting recyclable materials, which is clearly not recycling. Also the Israeli plant manages to reclaim plastics of a recyclable quality from mixed wastes- this is rare in waste management. Hence I believe this is of note. If you disagree with this feel free to delete the reference & sentence.

   Again I reiterate the point that I am happy to back inclusions related to your company if they do not appear simply in an advertising/marketing/spam format, they need to give value to Wikipedia on the whole. Recycling is an important area which is neglected in Wikipedia.--Alex 15:19, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Alex, Thank you for your communication. Regards, Recycledagplastic 15:31, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

       You are welcome. --Alex 15:33, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

By the way, during previous editing sessions I've found myself having completed an edit only (then) to realize that I'd forgotten to log in as "Recycledagplastic." So, some of my edits are credited to IP 65.40.36.66. If you look at the "Plasticulture" article (and others), for example, you will see that my edits aren't only confined to including "RKO." I am a member of the RKO enterprise, however, my purpose is not to "spam" wiki. I do, however, hope to contribute information regarding a US domestic enterprise that is successfully recycling tens of millions of pounds of materials (annually) which, historically in the US, have primarily been either landfilled or burned on-sight at farms. The reason these materials haven't previously been removed from the waste stream and processed domestically in the US is because of their high level of soil and plant material contamination; particularly plastic mulch film. Our company's niche is processing this extremely hard to clean ag film. I find what we are doing with this particular material to be noteworthy because I can't find any other company whose staple feedstock consists of this contaminated mulch film, whereas it easily comprises 95+% of our resource. I am aware of very contaminated mulch film being containerized and sent overseas; primarily China. I am also aware of domestic US companies processing either relatively clean ag film semi-regularly, or very contaminated film seldomly. RKO has utilized readily available industrial recycling technology and continuously modified it over the course of 4 years. This has resulted in us being able to do what very few claim to do. "Florida Trend" magazine featured an article on our company in Oct. 2004. "American Vegetable Grower" magazine directs their readers to our website (along with six others) in an article on recycling drip tape in their Sept. 2006 issue. The Ft. Myers Newspress featured an article on us in May 2006 and again in June 2006. Before I began my effort in Wiki, I didn't find a single reference to the successful recycling of plastic mulch, drip tape or silage bags within these respective articles. Nor did I find any reference to the successful, or otherwise, recycling of materials in the practice of plasticulture. Still, I have read through ample search engine results regarding very contaminated mulch film not being a suitable material for effective or efficient processing. I forget if it was you or "Trialanderrors" who had undertaken an editing project concerned with articles relating to waste management/recycling. Whoever, it would seem that they would be interested in this which I've written today. However, perhaps not. Sincerely, Recycledagplastic 18:37, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

I would sincerely appreciate any feedback. Recycledagplastic 18:45, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I received your reply at my talk; thank you. Another question: If I made contributions without being logged on under my username(mistakenly), is there anyway to associate my IP-address-identified-contributions with my user account? Recycledagplastic 17:55, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted your copy of Gustav Mahler Youth Orchestra that you placed at the temp page. What you did completely violates the GFDL. It got rid of all the history of the article. Once the article is deleted, ask the deleting admin to restore the non-copyvio versions. Metros232 14:37, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Metrocenter Mall I am referring to, however, is located in Phoenix, Arizona, and I do have access to several historical materials via the Phoenix Public Library, including the Arizona Republic (Phoenix's major morning newspaper) that can be used as references to bolster the legitimacy of the article; I can gather those within the next 48 hours.--Msr69er 20:13, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There's absolutely nothing wrong with properly posting stats from statscan, however, this user has been taking real stats on ethnic origin, regrouping them into new and different categories. Please, feel free to post the proper information, as has been done on other major canadian city pages.- TheMightyQuill 02:16, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently commented on AfDs for Shopping Malls. Please see WP:MALL where there is an ongoing attempt to create a guideline for which malls are deserving of articles. Your thoughts are appreciated. Thanks! Edison 07:06, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure if those citations quite get me to a keep position (I'm wondering if the publications are too small for WP:Corp, which I think I see as being a slightly higher standard than ordinary notability.) But since I'm not sure where I think it should come out in a situation like this, I'm going to move to Neutral. Thanks for your diligence in looking for those cites, by the way, and for pointing them out to me. --TheOtherBob 01:04, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your assistance with removing the attempt to have this article "speedily deleted." I am trying to learn my way around Wiki and obviously have a long way to go. I would hate for the organization to not be represented due to my ignorance.

We expect more media soon - Texas Senator Eliot Shapleigh is introducing legislation in January, 2007 that will give the organization considerably more visibility.

Drew30319 20:20, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there,

Would you mind taking a look at:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Bryan_Brandenburg

It needs more input from seasoned editors.

Thank you, 208.54.15.129 00:25, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Since you removed a previous prod on this article, I thought you might be interested that I just sent it to AFD. (You might look at the big honking list of Ohio libraries I sent to AFD as well.) --Brianyoumans 08:20, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Thank you for letting me know. I left some comments at the AfD which may be relevant to other libraries as well. I think that evidence of notability of a library can often be found in the newspapers serving the library's community, but this becomes difficult if the newspaper does not keep its old articles online. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 04:54, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You forgot to sign your comment in this AFD if I am not mistaken. Capitalistroadster 01:13, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Reply: Thank you for letting me know. You are quite correct.The technical explanation is that I typed five tildes (which generates only the timestamp without the signature) rather than four. I have now added my signature to my comments at the AfD. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 01:49, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What you should probably do is list the article at Wikipedia:Deletion review (follow these instructions). Since what you seem to want to do is have it placed back on Articles for deletion, suggest Relist and clearly give your reasons. —Larry V (talk | contribs) 20:23, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Bougnat Sans Fil, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at Talk:Bougnat Sans Fil. You may remove the deletion notice, and the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. Jehochman (^Talk/_Contrib) 17:07, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to remove prod if you are interested in working on the article. I think this article is premature. Until the WiFi network is up and running, maybe it can be mentioned in another article about municipal wifi networks. Jehochman (^Talk/_Contrib) 17:10, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The network does seem to be up and running, and the article has some references to articles printed in French newspapers. I don't think the prod is appropriate any longer. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 19:47, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, TruthbringerToronto. Considering the message you left me here, I changed my vote to keep. The article was greatly improved. It is now a very good stub. I like especially the references section. --Meno25 00:18, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, just giving you a heads up on a prod. Reading over the stub I just don't see any substantial claim of notability. ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 05:23, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• The references to the article refer to some kind of award. He sounds notable in the area of computer chess. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 07:46, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Thanks for the reply. I've had some experience in the computer chess world (mainly with ICC, my brother's an IM). While Nalimov does garner the occasional mention when discussing tablebases, I don't see him as having made any sort of impact to the history of chess. Since the prod was contested I've decided to [[nominate Nalimov's article for deletion. ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 07:54, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

13:42, 4 July 2006 TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) (prod|nn-film writer director)

How dare you come with such a comment! The guy is quite famous in B-movie circuits! Just because he's no Spielberg doesn't mean he's un-important to the film-industry. Thankfully some attentive user saw this attempt of un-warranted deletion in time and stopped it. KnatLouie 14:40, 3 January 2007 (UTC)KnatLouie[reply]

Please take a look at the Igor Pak article, which has been nominated for deletion. As it is about a mathematician, you may want to comment. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 21:43, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done! By the way, thanks for letting me know when I can help. I'm not going through AfD logs as often as I used to so it's nice when someone points out the ones where I can be useful. Pascal.Tesson 23:00, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't remove prod tags without improving the articles. The tag reads "You may remove this message if you improve the article," just because you think an unsourced three sentence article is worth keeping doesn't give you the right to unprod it without improving it. PatriotBible 02:26, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Reply: I removed the {{prod}} tag because the statement "Doesn't assert notability" seemed to be incorrect. Of course the article could be improved, and I normally do try to improve articles when I argue that they should be kept. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 02:43, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Seemed" is your opinion, only your opinion, as you can see with the afd; your keep opinion is unique. Anyway, there is nothing wrong with letting article go through proding since it will likely get better or be removed. BTW: Are you arguing for a merge now? PatriotBible 03:14, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up. It really is a bad faith nomination. I don't know what we can do about this type of deletionist fundamentalism. They seem to get a bee in their bonnet about something and decide that an article or group of articles isn't according to them non-notable. Albatross2147 08:20, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As you had commented on this article in the past I would ask that you please review my comments regarding your nomination for deletion for Mike Salisbury. I have not had the chance to reply to all of the Natural Burial articles that have been tagged for deletion but will do so shortly. Theses articles are notable however they are WORKS IN PROCESS and require additional research and referencing. I hope you will support this initiative, although they still need work I believe they make a reasonable contribution to the encyclopaedia.Eulogy4Afriend 15:34, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

--TomasBat (Talk) 22:47, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Hubert Bolduc, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.DGG 21:04, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replied to your message here. DHowell 02:49, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think this user ESkog (talk • contribs • page moves • block user • block log) is making waves with a bizarre POV on movie posters images and is absolutely out of line here. Many users are furious with him. Machocarioca 03:57, 15 May 2007 (UTC)Machocarioca[reply]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Graham Day, by UnitedStatesian, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Graham Day seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Graham Day, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Graham Day itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 01:17, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you assisted me with this article in the past. Although I had made significant changes to it after it was userfied, it has unfortunately been deleted. It appears that the consensus (so far) is to re-list it so that should give me a little time to have a discussion. If you could provide any insight into what would help make this article more "noteworthy" I would appreciate it. I'm surprised that the subject of an article that has prompted two changes to existing legislation is still not noteworthy but realize that noteworthy means different things to different people.

Here is the conversation at Deletion Review: Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2007_June_26#Jennifer_Ann_Crecente

Here is the relevant information regarding the new legislation that was added to the article:

• On February 5, 2007, the Texas Legislature's State Representative Dawnna Dukes entered a bill to require school districts in Texas to create policies regarding Teen Dating Violence. This bill was created in memory of Jennifer Ann Crecente[13] and Ortralla Mosley.[14] Jennifer Ann's Group provided testimony on February 8, 2007 to the legislature in support of this bill. Governor Rick Perry signed the bill into law on May 18, 2007 and it immediately went into effect. [15]

• On February 15, 2007, on the the one-year anniversary of Jennifer's murder, Senator Eliot Shapleigh entered a bill to grant posthumous diplomas to students that have been murdered during their Senior year of high school. The bill is named "Jennifer's Law".[16] On May 28, 2007 the bill was signed in the Senate and passed to the Governor Rick Perry for signing. It will go into effect upon being signed or September 1, 2007, whichever occurs first. [17]

Here is the article as it currently resides in my user space: User:Drew30319/Jennifer_Ann_Crecente

Thank you for any advice you can provide!

Drew30319 21:04, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jen Gatien, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Jen Gatien satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jen Gatien and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Jen Gatien during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 18:57, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I'm contacting you in reference to your participation in the Paul Harris deletion discussion. That article, among others, has been nominated for deletion and I think many of the arguments you made on Paul Harris can be applied to the current discussion. Thanks. Chengwes 21:51, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to place this award on your user page, as a token of appreciation for your contributions. If you're willing to help spread the good cheer to others, please see the project page for the Random Smiley Award at: User:Pedia-I/SmileyAward

Luksuh 04:14, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Centre 2000 is up for deletion again - you helped keep it once. :-( Also a similar article at Macleod Mall. Please weigh in on the discussion.68.144.31.71 02:56, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article American College of Psychiatrists, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of American College of Psychiatrists. Jahnx (talk) 09:21, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article International Online Music Awards, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of International Online Music Awards. Kleinzach (talk) 00:53, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I see you are a user located in Montréal, you may be interested in: Wikipedia:Meetup/Montreal. Please add your name to the "Interested" or to the "Not interested" list. Date is set for May 3rd 2008 and Buffet La Stanza is the proposed location. If you have another idea for the location; propose away! Please pass on to any Montreal Wikis you maybe aware of and who are not yet listed as interested, may be interested, or not interested. Pro bug catcher (talk • contribs). 05:01, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated United Cerebral Palsy, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United Cerebral Palsy. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. _(1 == 2)^Until 16:34, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ive seen that youve created the mahatma gandhi foundation page, why not ask an admin to move it or rename the article 'The Gandhi Foundation' ?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.35.93.92 (talk • contribs) 12:41, 24 March 2008

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of United Cerebral Palsy, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.county.hekko.pl/?title=United_Cerebral_Palsy. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 23:31, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:SonocoLogo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:08, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Maryland Horse Industry Board, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Dana boomer (talk) 12:49, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I saw that you deleted the prod on the Maryland Horse Industry Board, with a edit summary stating that all government offices are notable. I have no problem with the removal of the prod tag, especially as you added sources and more information. My question, however, is regarding your statement that all government offices are notable. Do you have a specific Wiki process page that states this that you refer to? If so, could you provide me with a link, because I've been looking for something like this, but haven't been able to find it. If there isn't a page, is this just your personal opinion, or has there been a discussion about it somewhere? Thanks! Dana boomer (talk) 14:38, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Acadian Ambulance Service Logo.png. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 14:23, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Rialto High School, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? FelisLeo^Talk! 09:04, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Cascades Logo 20070510.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:06, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Truthbringer - apparently you are an editor and have had dealings with the Peel Regional Police page. I had previously made changes that were reveresed in the Cotroversies - Wade Lawson shooting death.

I will admit to being a newcomer to Wikipedia and perhaps did not go about it the right way. That being said what is being said on there is an outright lie and cannot be sustained. The officers never recanted their testimony and in fact the jury acquited on the presented evidence.

To allow an article to stand that is an untruth serves Wikipedia poorley and allows it to become nothing more than a vehicle for gross bias and falsehoods.

The writer is quoting a source from a webpage to back his assertations re: recanting. Yet that webpage cannot substantiate its information and has obvious deep bias against police. If this is acceptable then what would stop a person or organization from creating their own webpage, citing whatever, and then posting that as a cite here? Then how do you decide which source is more valid and therefore which post/edit to leave up.

The difference in this Peel Police post is I know the officers, was at the trial and there was no recantation by the officers. If this is not enough we are willing to undertake scanning and uploading several thousands of pages of testimony from the trial to prove the point.

Wikpedia makes great statements about POV, Bias and fact. Is this only on a first come first serve basis for who puts the article up first?

Grond1234 (talk) 19:22, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Brain Tumor Funders' Collaborative, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Cgingold (talk) 01:34, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A page you created, Sean Connaughton, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how they are important or significant, and thus why they should be included in an encyclopedia. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and the guidelines for biographies in particular.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Ndenison ^talk 03:11, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Restored per your request, please accept my apologies, it looks like the page was vandalized (ip edits about the college student) and I hit the delete button as the csd nominator was retracting the nomination and reverting the vandalism. – Zedla (talk) 19:19, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:ThomsonGaleLogo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 11:49, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The link to Sciencedude by Gary Robbins: Obituary of Joel Hedgpeth, which I believe you added, no longer includes the obituary. Can you up-date the link? Kdammers (talk) 02:52, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Done. Please see Joel_Hedgpeth#References -- TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 22:47, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Texas Association of Future Educators requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. Firestorm (talk) 23:49, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I know of it, because I live in Brooklyn, and I realy work with people who are clients of this organization. I help them with learning computers.I've heard that the most popular activity in that organization, is a penmaking workshop. It would be great if you also know where they but that raw goods?

• I am also a railfan, as my name implies.
• I have a friend who wrote made a website about Toronto Tranit [1]
• My email is tramrunner229ATyahooDOTcom, which is actually the best way to rich me.

I am becuase I want to teach in G.E.C Brooklyn, which is a theme of your article But they dont let me to do it.

• Do you seriouly know someone from there? I want to make an exhibition of my train models in their lobby.

GK tramrunner (talk) 15:22, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My friend from Toronto, who created [2] is also a numesmat. I know him personally. But please, dont tell him that I am interested in such projects as AHRC, or Guild for Exceptional Children.

• tramrunner229ATyahooDOTcom
• PS DO you know Rob Hutchinson? He is an expert in Toronto Subway

GK tramrunner (talk) 15:22, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on DobaCaracol requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. magnius (talk) 15:22, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on National Frozen Pizza Institute requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Fingerz^On'Roids 12:02, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:TruthbringerToronto/Publimedia International and related pages you've done nothing with for the last three years have been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:TruthbringerToronto/Publimedia International and related and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:TruthbringerToronto/Publimedia International and related during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. --Calton | Talk 17:46, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello TruthbringerToronto! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 196 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

1. Gary Grimshaw - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 05:02, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Country Radio Broadcasters, Inc.. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Country Radio Broadcasters, Inc.. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:19, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Sacar (charity) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable charity.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MBisanz ^talk 03:51, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TruthbringerToronto,

You are invited meet with your fellow Wikipedians by attending the Montréal meetup scheduled on Sunday, June 27, 2010; between 1500 - 1700 to be held at the Comité Social Centre Sud (CSCS), located at 1710 Beaudry, in Montréal. You can sign up at the meetup page.

The meetup is happening in concurrence with RoCoCo 2010, a free, bilingual, weekend unconference including many people involved with Wikis both within the Wikipedia/Wikimedia Community and abroad. You do not need to attend the conference to sign up for the Wikimeetup, but you are certainly welcome! Bastique ^{☎ call me!}

(PS: Please share this with those you know who might not be on the delivery list, i.e. Users in Montreal/Quebec)

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) 00:50, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 01:29, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Cascades Logo 100x46.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 04:05, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:

• This permission does not give you any special status or authority
• Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
• You may wish to display the {{Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
• If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it

If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! Acalamari 18:29, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Bill Goss (author) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Long unreferenced BLP of non-notable author

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sadads (talk) 21:45, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Ahlstrom Oyj-n logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 05:22, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• I see that the logo was removed from the article, probably because the company has adopted a new logo. Under the circumstances, I do not oppose deleting the old logo. TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 09:18, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Bill Goss (author) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Kevin (talk) 23:46, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bill Goss (author) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bill Goss (author) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. JamesBWatson (talk) 15:33, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The article 'Bivalent (engine)' has some dead links that could not be repaired automatically. Can you help fix them?

Dead: http://people.bath.ac.uk/en2jg/zero-emission.htm

• You added this in August 2006.
• This copy from the archives might be good.

Dead: http://www.bmw.co.th/manufacturing/technologies/12.html

• You added this in August 2006.
• This copy from the archives might be good.

These links are marked with {{Dead link}} in the article. Please take a look at that article and fix what you can. Thank you!

PS- you can opt-out of these notifications by adding {{Bots|deny=BlevintronBot}} to your user page or user talk page. BlevintronBot (talk) 03:53, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Ahlstrom logo 2011.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:26, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Francis Stokes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Francis Stokes (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.

A tag has been placed on Brain Tumour Foundation of Canada requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DGG ( talk ) 20:13, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@DGG: @DGG: I see that the article has been deleted. Please see http://montrealgazette.com/news/quebec/child-with-inoperable-brain-tumour-sparks-foundation

and https://www.google.com/search?pz=1&cf=all&ned=ca&hl=en&tbm=nws&gl=ca&as_epq=Brain%20Tumour%20Foundation%20of%20Canada&as_occt=any&as_qdr=a&authuser=0 TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 22:17, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Independent Office Products and Furniture Dealers Association has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Very minor trade association - unsourced for years

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Andy Dingley (talk) 08:35, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Canadian Business Hall of Fame, which you created, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 02:32, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Keki Dadiseth is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keki Dadiseth until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Uncletomwood (talk) 07:40, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Aime Avignon. Since you had some involvement with the Aime Avignon redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. — JFG ^talk 10:19, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Kalamandalam Gopi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't appear to be notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 00:05, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article American Horticultural Therapy Association has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication that subject meets WP:NORG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jmertel23 (talk) 22:43, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Metropolitan French. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 8#Metropolitan French until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Soumya-8974 ^talk _contribs ^subpages 05:29, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Michael Thomas Victor Denine has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NSOLDIER. Rank isn't high enough to ding the auto-notability criteria. The Medal of Military Valour is only the third-highest Canadian medal, so he doesn't qualify on that basis. No sources found on a search (and yes, I tried using multiple variants of the full name) that indicate he meets any of the other criteria.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 08:00, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Jason Lamont has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication he meets WP:GNG. Medal of Military Valour is only the third-highest Canadian medal of valor, so there should be no presumption of notability based on that. I did not locate any substantive coverage of him on a search barring the announcement of the medal.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:41, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Cobequid Educational Centre Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:12, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Allan Nonymous (talk) 22:16, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GhostOfNoMeme 22:34, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article American Frozen Food Institute has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of WP:NCORP pass

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. asilvering (talk) 20:09, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Herbert Holt (rugby league) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable RL player. Fails WP:SPORTBASIC.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]