User talk:TrottieTrue

	The Original Barnstar
	Thank you for your efforts in improving the quality of many articles featuring UK politicians -- these improvements are greatly appreciated by many! Denham331 (talk) 14:44, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

		The Copyeditor's Barnstar
		For your tireless efforts to improve the quality of Wikipedia by copyediting numerous articles Denham331 (talk) 22:04, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The first section is a direct quote from Billboard we can't edit I will go over all the other "#"s I used, and change them to "no." any other changes I should make in format? Let me know and I will fix thanks for your help, Dave Tillywilly17 (talk) 02:45, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. "Billboard" should be italicised, as the name of a magazine. The information should be fully referenced (as on the 1965 article). And no external links in the article itself. I hope this makes sense. TrottieTrue (talk) 03:02, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks I got a big job ahead, please be my advisor

Here are some words I wrote to educate you on what I did:

Go to this page as a sample

All year in music had this format before I started replacing them

1951 in music#Biggest hit singles

this information was copied from tsort.com

It uses sources like RYM (Rate Your Music.com)

Now read this post I made some time ago

Talk:1941 in music

It is a sample of the many talk page posts I made

Nobody ever responded; it was a huge problem that nobody cared about

I had previously replaced pre-1940 pages with mostly Whitburn based material

There are thousands of Wikipedia pages that use his chart information. Nobody wants to change those, it would take years and completely destroy many stub-pages that are completely based on his information. There is no rule against using his information either.

Check 1950-1963, I haven't gotten to those yet. The information was copied from tsort.com approximately 15 years ago. They all violate our rules. The charts I replaced them with 1964-1969 are all based on Billboard magazine information, and will all have proper references when I get around to it.

Maybe you can help me figure out to format the references, it is complicated. I have pdfs of every issue of Billboard for the years I did. But for each song, I only used the issues it made the Hot 100. I have every single date, but this would take months without some shortcutting. Every single record rated came from Billboard's Hot 100 and other sub-charts. The issues are online, but are pdfs that don't hyperlink properly. Google also has many of the issues online. Fortunately, I had hard copies to collect the data I needed. I re-arranged and organized the Billboard data to correct the errors I described in the year-end lists. That is the only change I made, and it was with their existing data.

I did research other websites that had year end lists to see what they did. Some had improvements, but all fell short of correcting or documenting what I envisioned to be done. I went back to my Billboard collection and tracked down each year end page 1960-1980s, copying all text and formulas. It was awful how badly they managed it, and eventually they mentioned less and less about the formula they used and other details about how they chart was calculated.

There were also several years that Billboard printed a second list. It seemed they changed the inclusive time frame every year. They also changed their scoring system almost as often. Why reprint that (Wikipedia already has) again? I used the year end formulas to arrive at one to be used every year, and used Whitburn's year end method to assign the year. I used their Billboard sourced data with these formulas every year to make accurate charts. Everything has a citation, as you can see from my earlier charts from the 1930s and 1940s. This is a massive project for me with no assistance, but everything gets done eventually. It is huge improvement over what it replaced. We could have a technical argument that I created original content, but that's barely true, and should be overlooked, since straightening out the time period for each list of course changed the order. The formula I used came from Billboard, and I adhered to it like a robot. When we say "1965 in music", we mean it.

Please help me clean up my style and formatting. I am mostly self-trained, so I have some issues, but I am a very quick study if you have some time. Tillywilly17 (talk) 23:07, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note that all the references I used over many years are all legal. No discogs, secondhandsongs, or other fan based sites used. 1920-1949 Popular and Country. I have work to do on 1964-1969. Those are the ones that we need to use the Billboard charts directly, because that is the only source for the original information. There are Whitburn books with the data summarized, but why use an incomplete second hand source. That is how I think, I hope we are on the same page. I will soon post an image of the pages I work off, and you will have the total picture. Tillywilly17 (talk) 23:25, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On 23 November 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Eddie Linden, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 23:12, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for letting me know - I'm very pleased that this has made it to ITN. TrottieTrue (talk) 00:11, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shane Richie, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sky Television.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:08, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@TrottieTrue are you able to talk outside the wikipedia or just here? I've got a couple of questions. 2A01:E0A:5E2:D110:A07F:91D:4CC3:D8FD (talk) 12:22, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You can email me via my talk page. Try this link if you can't find it: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:EmailUser/TrottieTrue TrottieTrue (talk) 12:40, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Children of two peers and peeresses created life peers has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 09:44, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just a heads up, I noticed you changed the opening sentence to "was" from "is" in the article Angels (TV series). The present tense should always be used in this context (see WP:TVNOW). Thanks. GhostOfNoMeme 19:18, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't know that. It doesn't make sense to me when I read current tense statements about past shows. TrottieTrue (talk) 00:07, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Robin Cavendish, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Middleton.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:57, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]