User talk:tronvillain

Hi Tronvillain! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 20:12, Thursday, March 17, 2016 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Thanks, it was a fun little exercise. --tronvillain (talk) 22:58, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you don't have access to a reference, please don't make claims that X is not supported by the reference. If you can't access a source you should ask if someone else has it and could provide it to you. (i got the Houglum book from google books, so you should be able to as well). I have a shitload of work to do and you have wasted my time. Jytdog (talk) 16:46, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I literally said "or at least the associated quote." What do you think the quote is supposed to be, if not support for the sentences the citation is attached to? As I said in the talk page, the existing quote doesn't appear to be used support anything in the article. -tronvillain (talk) 17:33, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Here is what you wrote: "Ah, I see you've switched to the Houglom reference, which doesn't actually contain the quote you mention," So now in addition to not checking sources before you challenge content, you are misrepresenting what you yourself said. If you continue to do things like this, people will just start ignoring you. This is not a game, it is scholarship. Do your own homework. Do not waste other volunteers' time - it is the most valuable thing Wikipedia has (and my time is the most valuable thing I have) Jytdog (talk) 18:30, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, that? Sorry, I meant that the attached quote didn't contain the quote you mention, not the text itself... which is why I suggested changing the attached quote. --tronvillain (talk) 18:41, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And I wasn't trying to misrepresent what I said, I thought you were talking about(further down on that same diff) "Also apparently unsupported by its citation (or at least the associated quote) is 'She also saw the body as continually under attack from gravity; in her view, gravity tends to compress fascia...'." --tronvillain (talk) 18:55, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

So you are not even able to acknowledge that you raised all kinds of "concern" - in great detail - without having checked the source yourself. I have little patience for bullshit and none for people who double down when called on it. You get no more of my time. Jytdog (talk) 19:10, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I totally acknowledge that I didn't originally check the source myself... because I was talking about the quote attached to the reference. If the quote was just removed entirely, I wouldn't even have commented, but a large quote attached to a reference should support something in one of the three spots using it as a citation. Perhaps it was added as support of something else which was subsequently removed? Anyway, when you quoted a different part of the two referenced pages, I suggested changing the quote. And now that I've checked the source, it raises a few concerns of its own, as I mentioned on the talk page. --tronvillain (talk) 19:35, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What about removing "that"? It is sometimes just extra verbiage and doesn't change the meaning. http://www.dailywritingtips.com/five-words-you-can-cut/ - Example - "Can you remember the time that you reverted changes removing a word?" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikehenke (talk • contribs) 15:56, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tronvillain: That ED site certainly contains blatant, over-the-top, absurdly exaggerated statements about people and topics, in an attempt to appear humorous, I suspect. However, certainly on the JzG page, it provides a series of links to real, existing Wikipedia web pages / discussion pages that contain highly profane quotes authored by the admin. I'm sure I'm not mistaking what I'm seeing with my own eyes on Wikipedia discussion pages. So there evidently appears to be absurd falsehoods mixed with sprinkles of truth. Tosresearcher (talk) 00:01, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Something fishy?? Negative labelling on Chiropractic. A request for clarification. The Banner talk 21:26, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Rolfing#Anti_Rolfing_moderators -- 69.58.248.1 (talk) 11:31, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This might interest you. I wonder if that line of thinking changes your view about how prominently we should promote this technically accurate and favorably perceived classification. WhatamIdoing (talk) 04:47, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Trolling is not allowed. Do your research on Naturopathy before editing. [1] From, NPOVarticleNow (talk) 03:05, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Accuracy is not "trolling." You just linked to Mercola, and there is essentially no source less credible than that. Try reading WP:FRINGE. --tronvillain (talk) 05:49, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I know you've been a part of discussions on the rolfing wiki in the past. == Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in. ==

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The discussion is about the topic Rolfing. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! Cyintherye (talk) 23:27, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tronvillain, I just reverted a new account here. This article is on my watchlist because of its connection with the Serial killer article. Will you help me keep an eye on it? Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 02:06, 14 January 2017 (UTC) I[reply]

@Flyer22 Reborn: Thanks for the heads up. --tronvillain (talk) 05:43, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking a look. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 00:32, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You might be untested in Template talk:London Gazette#Rewrite as wrapper around template:cite news -- PBS (talk) 21:04, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I just wanted ask why you undid my edit to The Daily Beast article that removed the line referring to it as liberal because of it's source.Scholar200 (talk) 03:53, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I undid that edit because The Daily Caller is an adequate source to establish something as subjective as it being described as liberal - there are countless other instances of it being described as such (usually by various conservative sites). That doesn't establish it as actually being liberal, which is why I have their self description there as well. --tronvillain (talk) 13:12, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I would appreciate your comments at Talk:Electromagnetic hypersensitivity#Reopening Sweden EHS matter --papageno (talk) 04:37, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Money.Net. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pleasd don't do this:[2] again. See WP:DAILYMAIL. --Guy Macon (talk) 19:01, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Guy Macon:I hadn't seen that consensus. Still, too bad - it seems to be the best of any the articles on the suicide, before the EHS thing really caught on. --tronvillain (talk) 22:56, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You are right—"Barricade" it is. I was basing it off my CD edition (not found at Discogs), which for some reason lists it as "Barricades". Mac Dreamstate (talk) 16:05, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose every time something gets retyped there's a chance something is going to be changed. --tronvillain (talk) 16:35, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm also thinking I might have a high-quality bootleg, since Discogs has no trace of my one despite the vast amount of versions. Nonetheless, good spot. Was there a source for that release date I had to revert, btw? I could only go by AllMusic. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 18:56, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No, I was misled by the John Carpenter external link - they used the film's release date.--tronvillain (talk) 22:53, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Tronvillain, thanks for creating Edward John Cameron!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This has been tagged for several issues.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 19:53, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Somewhere Over the Rainbow (Album).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:49, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I added information I compiled from several articles on the calculation of the distance to the horizon. You deleted it stating it was an unsupported opinion. But as a traumatic brain injury survivor, I don't understand things all the time. Can you explain what that means to you and why you applied it to my addition. What I read concluded that no equation is accurate enough to calculate the distance to the horizon because there are too many variables. These are what I thought were facts so can you help me understand. OK thank you and have a great day. Ldecarlo36@gmail.com Ldecarlo36 (talk) 10:15, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The effects of atmospheric refraction are discussed both at the beginning of the section, and in the subsection below. The assertion "The earth is circular so no matter what way we look the curve should be visible in this coastal photo, but the horizontal line separating the ocean from the sky appears just as it is, a horizontal line with no visual evidence of a curve." is simply inaccurate - at sea level on a sphere, the math does not predict any visible curvature of the horizon line. --tronvillain (talk) 17:30, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is mistake? In other articles see Journal of Bacteriology, Journal of Clinical Microbiology, Experimental & Molecular Medicine.. --Мит Сколов (talk) 20:53, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Index Medicus exists as a curated subset of MEDLINE, so it seems very odd to have it first in the order. --tronvillain (talk) 21:02, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

..And PubMed Central? --Мит Сколов (talk) 21:14, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Is an archive of open access articles. PubMed is the search engine for MEDLINE. --tronvillain (talk) 21:22, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What means "PubMed is the search engine for MEDLINE"? See: PubMed and not are MEDLINE https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog/101600560 --Мит Сколов (talk) 20:18, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

See here. PubMed searches some other things as well, but its main component is MEDLINE. --tronvillain (talk) 20:27, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Prince of Peace (film). Since you had some involvement with the Prince of Peace (film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:46, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Cassianto behavior, per WP:5P4]] and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. As threaded discussion is not permitted in most arbitration pages please ensure that you make all comments in your own section only. Additionally, the guide to arbitration and the Arbitration Committee's procedures may be of use.

Thanks,

You were recently listed as a party to a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Civility in infobox discussions. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Civility in infobox discussions/Evidence. Please add your evidence by February 17, 2018, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Civility in infobox discussions/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:50, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An arbitration case regarding civility in infobox discussions has now closed and the final decision is viewable at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted:

1. Any uninvolved administrator may apply infobox probation as a discretionary sanction. See the full decision for details of infobox probation.
2. Standard discretionary sanctions are authorized for all discussions about infoboxes and to edits adding, deleting, collapsing, or removing verifiable information from infoboxes.
3. Cassianto is indefinitely placed on infobox probation.
4. The Arbitration Committee recommends that well-publicized community discussions be held to address whether to adopt a policy or guideline addressing what factors should weigh in favor of or against including an infobox in a given article and how those factors should be weighted.
5. All editors are reminded to maintain decorum and civility when engaged in discussions about infoboxes, and to not turn discussions about a single article's infobox into a discussion about infoboxes in general.
6. For canvassing editors to this case, Volvlogia (talk · contribs) is admonished. They are warned that any further instances of canvassing related to arbitration processes will likely result in sanctions.

Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard#Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Civility in infobox discussions closed

For the arbitration committee, GoldenRing (talk) 08:59, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:The Mystery of the Sphinx.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:30, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've reverted you as Colavito's birthdate isn't widely known - and of course I don't think you sourced it. Please read WP:BLPPRIVACY. Thanks. Doug Weller talk 17:29, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Bitcoin Cash. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chickcharney, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Legendary (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Bitcoin. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Bitcoin Cash. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Leigh Hart, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aukland (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Hospitals. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Profectus theory. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You said "It may constitute original research, but I contacted the WDC and the image was released for April Fools Day. You can see that the date it was released was May 31.*chuckle*" but I'm pretty sure you meant March 31. AddWittyNameHere (talk) 15:43, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up. --tronvillain (talk) 17:12, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sucuriju gigante, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Constrictor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Kombucha. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Political views of American academics. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be interested in this AfD. :bloodofox: (talk) 18:09, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Related, if you haven’t already seen in, there’s also this one. :bloodofox: (talk) 18:20, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

:bloodofox:, did you see Mbielu-Mbielu-Mbielu? I thought you were looking at that at one point. --tronvillain (talk) 18:51, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like I missed this AfD. I'll take a look now. :bloodofox: (talk) 19:08, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Blanchard's transsexualism typology. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tronvillian. Firstly, the strong feeling I'm getting is that you don't want to discuss the chaos magic page anymore, so I'm sorry for messaging you about this. However, I feel I should canvas your opinion, because it was you who put the "fringe theory" tag on the page in the first place. I've spent some time adding some new content to the page, under the "concept and terminology" section, in an attempt to give adequate weight to the mainstream view. I've tried to address this from the historical, theological, anthropological and psychological perspectives, and from the point of view of occultism more generally. Only then have I moved on to discussing the chaos magic viewpoint. Would you mind casting your eye over it and saying whether or not you think the mainstream view is addressed adequately, and -- if so -- whether you think the tag should now be removed? Rune370 (talk) 21:41, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject UK Railways. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Viruses. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Tree of Life. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Bipolar disorder. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Novum Organum. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Prana, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ruah (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Dressed to Kill (book). Legobot (talk) 04:26, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Human evolution. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Machine Intelligence Research Institute. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Brave (web browser). Legobot (talk) 04:26, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your cmts. I agree Uscinski and Parent have other purposes for their research. But rather than pursue any remaining issues on that thread, I'd rather ask for your thoughts on the following, if that's ok.

The term 'conspiracy theory' has been and continues to be used in legal contexts, e.g., as

• From Yanev, L. D. (2018) Theories of Co-perpetration in International Criminal Law. Brill. p. 86: quoting Robert H. Jackson, U.S. Supreme Court Justice who helped draft the London Charter of the International Military Tribunal, which created the legal basis for the Nuremberg Trials. He then served in Nuremberg, Germany, as United States Chief Prosecutor at the International Military Tribunal in Nuremberg: “The American proposal is that we utilize the conspiracy theory by which a common plan or understanding to accomplish an illegal end by any mean, or to accomplish any end by illegal means, renders everyone who participated liable for the acts of every other.”[Minutes of Conference Session of July 4, 1945. Document XX, in R. Jackson, Report of Robert H. Jackson, United States Representative to the International Conference on Military Trials, London 1945 (Washington, D.C; Dept. of State, Division of Publications, Office of Public Affairs, 1949), at 129 (italics added by Yanev)]

• Justice Sotomayor: "A conspiracy theory says you don't have to commit every act [of the conspiracy]." https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2015/15-145_a07i.pdf

As opposed to the political context, where the term is used predominantly and perhaps exclusively as pejoratives by opponents, in the legal context it is used by proponents or adjudicators in a non-negative manner.

Should we not acknowledge this different use of the term? Humanengr (talk) 03:39, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It might justify a section on niche use as a legal term to simply refer to conspiracies, but deducing that from those two references seems like original research. Occasional use differing from standard usage doesn't change the standard definition. You'd probably need sources establishing its legal use more generally. --tronvillain (talk) 12:42, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thx, will consider. Related and putting together what I take from your position with other ascriptions taken from the literature, is the following a fair characterization of 'conspiracy theory' as used in this article:

1. (Almost) never established as fact.
2. If established as fact, referred to as 'the x conspiracy', not as 'the x conspiracy theory".
3. Involves large numbers of people in positions of authority (governmental, science, …).
4. Labeled as 'conspiracy theory' by detractors, not by proponents.

Humanengr (talk) 02:54, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Anesthesiologist. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of cognitive biases. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your helpful contributions in relation to "culture of life". I feel I have painfully been ploughing a furrow for weeks but I'm determined as it's an important point and critical that Wikipedia be seen to be neutral and balanced. I am having to deal with BrianCua on a daily basis on a range of articles and it's becoming quote wearying. So I appreciate the fresh pair of eyes you have bought to the discussion. Contaldo80 (talk) 21:25, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Rivers. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there, thanks for all your hard work on Airmail Pilot!  :) That one was actually on a list of articles as part of a project to get cover images on all video game articles, but you went above and beyond with that one. If you do not mind taking a look at a few more, Action & Bumping Games, Adventure in Time, Air Traffic Controller (1978 video game), Android Nim, Ants!!!, Apocalypse: The Game of Nuclear Devastation, Atlantic Balloon Crossing, and Attack Force (video game) still needed covers, or anything else you might be able to find to improve them! Thanks again for your good work. BOZ (talk) 15:11, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hey BOZ, I appreciate the thanks. I stumbled across that project when the image parameter on the talk page for Voyeur II was corrected, and Airmail Pilot was one of the first things I clicked on. I still have to expand the gameplay section. I'll try to take a look at the others. --15:30, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

Awesome, anything at all you can do. :) BOZ (talk) 15:53, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

On that first one, I have been wondering if "Action Games" and "Bumping Games" were two separate releases? I thought I saw an ad somewhere which gave me that idea. BOZ (talk) 17:25, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'll see if I can find anything. Ah, found it. They were separate releases as well as being collected together. -tronvillain (talk) 18:01, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, OK, that explains that then. :) BOZ (talk) 19:58, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you are interested, I also just started a stub on The Software Exchange. BOZ (talk) 21:02, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like there was an attempt to add a cover to Air Raid (1979 video game), but that turned out to be the image for the similarly-named Air Raid (video game). If you get a chance, could you take a look and see if there is a cover image for the older game with the same name? :) BOZ (talk) 16:23, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I can find an image of the cassette, but nothing turns up for a box. I'll settle for the title screen. --tronvillain (talk) 21:54, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for everything! Since you were able to help with the other Creative Computing games well, do you see anything that can be used for Super Invasion — Spacewar? BOZ (talk) 12:36, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'll see what I can do, depending on how much time a recent deletion discussion takes up. Hey, are you posting over on Category talk:Video game articles requesting identifying art too? I didn't see your username over there. --tronvillain (talk) 13:05, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking a look at that - similar situation with Monster Mash & Battleship (although not sure if there were separate releases for those games), if you can find anything for that. BOZ (talk) 12:29, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, that's a tough one. --tronvillain (talk) 21:51, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I can find mention of a Monster Mash on the Apple II {also here, here, here and here)and apparently another for the TRS-80 Color Computer (though it might be the same), but nothing for the TRS-80 1 & 2. --tronvillain (talk) 23:56, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Figure they may be the same game on different platforms? BOZ (talk) 04:49, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe, but it's difficult to be sure enough for an article. --tronvillain (talk) 13:32, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm thinking of merging to the list until more information can be found about it. BOZ (talk) 13:37, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Probably a good idea - you can still use the reference on the list. --tronvillain (talk) 13:59, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Three more PRODs (hastily following addition of multiple templates) from the "collections are not notable" IP user, this time the Action & Bumping Games that you worked on earlier, as well as Space and Sport Games, and also Space Games-3 which I actually have a second source for, that I plan to add as soon as I get the chance. If you don't see anything more for those, I will probably just handle with merges as well (in fact, it looks like the IP has already done the merge work with a few of them into Creative Computing, so it's not clear why they still want to delete). BOZ (talk) 06:16, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well, Space & Sports Games appears to have been released separately as Space Games-I and Sports Games-I, as seen here, with more detailed descriptions here. I'd probably redirect to the list of Creative Computing games and move the reference over there. The same is probably true of Action & Bumping Games. You'll notice there's also Strategy & Brain Games, collecting Brain Games-I and Strategy Games-I. I'd add the second source and possibly keep Space-Games 3. ---tronvillain (talk) 15:15, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You got it. It's been a rather busy week, but I can do that hopefully soon. BOZ (talk) 00:40, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I just wanted to say, although I brought some articles to you above with problems, as I have been adding reviews to early-80s games and starting little stubs with those same reviews, I have also come across some stuff that I felt was really missing from WP. In particular, for one of my favorite VG publishers from the late 80s and early 90s, I was able to add some good stuff regarding earlier works from SSI. I started The Shattered Alliance, Torpedo Fire, and The Warp Factor for example, and an article for the RapidFire line, so anything you wanted to do on any of those would be much appreciated of course. :) I also note that Computer Conflict is currently unsourced, but most of the games on List of Strategic Simulations games from 1982 and earlier are looking OK. BOZ (talk) 02:56, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Neat. I'll try to take a look. I'm currently doing a little work on Adventure International related pages - it's ridiculous that some of the games don't even have pages. I'm currently just collecting references at the moment. --tronvillain (talk) 21:44, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am definitely in favor of filling in gaps wherever they are, especially on things that should have articles! I was in fact thinking of adding articles on the games that you mention, but I do not have the sources to do it right. Of course, as I continue adding reviews from Space Gamer, I might just find something for games #10-14.  :) BOZ (talk) 23:54, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've accumulated some things. As it turns out, Sorceror of Claymorgue Castle won 1984 "Adventure Game of the Year" from the Golden Joystick Awards. --tronvillain (talk) 00:00, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I think you mentioned Phoenix Software recently, and increasing coverage on their games. I did a Google search and found this: http://gue.cgwmuseum.org/galleries/index.php?pub=1&item=0&id=1&key=0 I also noticed that List of Apple II games includes most of the games listed on that page. BOZ (talk) 04:29, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I had stumbled across that too. Sherwood Forest and Masquerade will probably need an article at some point. --tronvillain (talk) 16:26, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I see that the French versions of Sorcerer of Claymorgue Castle, Secret Mission both cite a few English sources that you could probably put to work. :) BOZ (talk) 01:25, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And also Savage Island was just created! :) BOZ (talk) 13:54, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nice. I may not be able to get to them until after Christmas though. --tronvillain (talk) 14:03, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I tried making an article for Klondike Adventure[3], which is apparently a 1982 release by SoftSide's "Adventure of the Month Club", but the article was redirected to SoftSide before long. However, that article does not mention anything about an "Adventure of the Month Club" or the game Klondike Adventure (or, for that matter, Windsloe Mansion which I started at the same time under the same circumstances) so I am a bit mystified. Do you know of any sources that could be used to restore Klondike, and then improve Klondike and Windsloe, and if possible to get something on the Club in the SoftSide article? BOZ (talk) 16:37, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Just back today and haven't had a chance to catch up, but I'd suggest expanding the Software section of Softside with a "Softside Adventure Series/Adventure of the Month" subsection and a list of the games. We'll see if we can expand Klondike and the others after that. --tronvillain (talk) 22:12, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back! :) OK, I will add a quick bit to it. BOZ (talk) 12:53, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Do you see anything that might help on Crystal Caverns (video game)? BOZ (talk) 12:24, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Do you see any useful sources that could be added to Space Battle or Time Trek? BOZ (talk) 04:44, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'll see what I can find. Interestingly, Space Battle appear to also be an Intellivision game that was apparently one of Mattel's top six sellers in 1981.^[1][2][3] Also, this, which also has a bunch of history and looks at various systems. --tronvillain (talk) 19:27, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It's amazing how many notable (but unremembered) topics still don't have articles. :) BOZ (talk) 23:36, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!  :) Do you see anything useful for Pigskin, Star Cruiser, Space Games-3, or Tycoon? BOZ (talk) 23:12, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Still working on Space Battle actually, (catalogue, some other reviews) though I won't be able to finish that until next week. I'll see what I can find on those. --tronvillain (talk) 23:59, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, OK, no problem! If you get the chance, would you also be able to see if you have anything useful for Galactic Empires, The Mean Checkers Machine, and Winged Samurai? BOZ (talk) 23:03, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I also have Lost Dutchman's Gold, if you get a chance to take a look. BOZ (talk) 23:38, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take a look. The problem with researching these things is that I keep stumbling across new things to distract me. The Book of Adventure Games is coming along nicely, eh? --tronvillain (talk) 23:56, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely - I don't want to pull any of your attention away from that! :) I will have to try to find some time at some point to start stubs for some of those redlinks. :) Not soon, but eventually. BOZ (talk) 04:09, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

These three might be longshots, but Space and Sport Games, Simutek Package One, and Star Trek III.4 could use more sources if you know of any. BOZ (talk) 23:59, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I just want to say thank you for all your help, and have a great weekend! If you see anything for Meta-Trek that is about the only other one I am looking for at this time. BOZ (talk) 19:30, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you have a chance for a couple more, could you please take a look at Galactic Trader and Slag? BOZ (talk) 04:51, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hey man, although I have said it before plenty of times, first of all I want to say a huge thank you for everything you have done on the articles I started, and everything else you have done in general for old school video games.  :) Rather than keep bugging you about this game or that game, since you have really gotten involved with some and are making great progress on them, I am going to just leave you to work on what you want to your heart's content. I have compiled a list of what I have seen so far from Space Gamer's reviews into this user page: User:BOZ/SGVG. I created between half and 2/3 of those pages, and added notes about the review to the already-existing articles. You have been hard at work on the first two on that list for several days, so I am not about to stop you.  :) You can keep going down the list one at a time to work on them as much as you want, or you can skip around and pick up things you want to work on, and you can stop whenever you want and come back whenever you want. I will continue to update this user page whenever I have added new reviews, although I only have maybe a dozen issues or so to go through. You will continue to see my "thanks" whenever you add something to an article that I created.  :) BOZ (talk) 21:27, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

In case you are interested in those, I started articles on video games based on Fighting Fantasy gamebooks: Seas of Blood, Rebel Planet, and Temple of Terror. BOZ (talk) 15:27, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there! :) If you are interested, I am back at it with retro video games, at least in a small way. :) So far this month I started Planetoids (video game), Master Trader, Cosmic Trader, and Space Ace 21 and I found a review for Meteor Mission II[4] so hopefully more will turn up so the article can be restored at some point. :) BOZ (talk) 17:31, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there! I am back into retro video games in a much bigger way than before, now adding Computer Gaming World reviews to articles. :) Do you have anything that can improve The Battle of Shiloh (video game)? BOZ (talk) 16:09, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I spent a lot of time working on User:BOZ/Early computer game reviews so that should prove useful if you need more reviews for games. :) BOZ (talk) 22:11, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Sugar. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Alex Shih (talk) 00:03, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tronvillain! Apologies for my delay in getting back to you. I haven't had much time to get on here and edit recently. Regarding the article you mentioned, I suppose it doesn't hurt to keep it in its current state. Someone might be looking for it, given its historical interest. That said, these groups still exist and still seem to push pseudoscientific concepts now and then (although far less than they once did), so I understand your concern. This isn't a topic I specialize in, but it's something I should definitely pay closer attention to. :bloodofox: (talk) 21:28, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Either there's something happening off-wiki or it's the same person as here.[5] Doug Weller talk 19:53, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'll add that one to my watch pages. --tronvillain (talk) 19:59, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Who's Harry Crumb?, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Doubleday (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:21, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Saw this source but was unsure if it was going to be accepted as an RS, I take it you think it is?Slatersteven (talk) 11:09, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It always depends on context of course, but probably. --tronvillain (talk) 13:20, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you reverted the change of date formats in Bob Readick with the explanation "place of birth does not constitute 'strong national ties' - retain established date but format".

I must be missing something, because when I read the article the only "national ties" that I see are American. He was born in the United States. He acted on radio programs in the United States. He also acted in Broadway plays (although your reversion eliminated that addition, along with his role in This Is Nora Drake on radio. If he has "strong national ties" to a country that uses British date formats, shouldn't that connection appear in the article?

I also don't understand why it was necessary to remove the categories that I added and the two text additions that I mentioned above. Eddie Blick (talk) 17:19, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Eddie Blick. I don't recall removing any categories - I intended to just edit the dates and added the dmy template. Perhaps I wasn't editing the most recent version of the page (I was on my phone for a change). As for the dates, per MOS:DATEVAR, "The date format chosen by the first major contributor in the early stages of an article should continue to be used, unless there is reason to change it based on strong national ties to the topic or consensus on the article's talk page." And simply being an American does not constitute "strong national ties." --tronvillain (talk) 19:42, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lukwata, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anthropos (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm wishing you a Merry Christmas, because that is what I celebrate. If you don't like Christmas or just don't celebrate it in any of its forms, then please accept a generic "Happy Holidays". If you celebrate no holidays at this time of year, then hopefully you will be satisfied with an even more generic "Season's Greetings".  :) BOZ (talk) 15:47, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating The Second Mrs. Burton. It's always good to see additional coverage of programs and people from old-time radio. Eddie Blick (talk) 19:41, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I still have a bunch of material for expansion over time. As it turns out, Patsy Campbell was Terry from 1947 to 1955, while Teri Keane was from 1957 to 1960, with Jan Miner in between--tronvillain (talk) 19:50, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:2010–2017 Toronto serial homicides. Legobot (talk) 04:36, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Conspiracy theory. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Fermat's Last Theorem. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:The NeuroGenderings Network. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Rocket Lab. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jean-Pierre Petit. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Brexit. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Prozzäk logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:16, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Electric smoking system. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Electric smoking system. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Programma International, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Super Invader (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:25, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Rheumatoid arthritis. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Audi Q3. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Electric smoking system. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Electronic cigarette. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Urolagnia. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Aviation. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Bitcoin Cash. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Cloudflare. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Campus sexual assault. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Trains. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Marvin Minsky. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Transgender. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Dendrochytridium. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:BMW 3 Series (E36). Legobot (talk) 04:26, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:BMW M3. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Map projection. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Bitcoin Cash. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Windows 98. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Sharyl Attkisson. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Bitcoin Cash. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm wishing you a Merry Christmas, because that is what I celebrate. If you don't like Christmas or just don't celebrate it in any of its forms, then please accept a generic "Happy Holidays". If you celebrate no holidays at this time of year, then hopefully you will be satisfied with an even more generic "Season's Greetings".  :) BOZ (talk) 21:52, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Aman Kumar Goel ^(Talk) 07:22, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I'm well aware of that. They are, after all, prominently displayed at the top of the Ayurveda talk page. I just happen to think pseudoscience should clearly be identified as pseudoscience on Wikipedia. --tronvillain (talk) 07:52, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

excuse me but why is someone who works in the oil industry editing a topic that is not within their field ?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.181.6.123 (talk) 16:32, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That's... not how Wikipedia works. Try Wikipedia:About or Help:Editing. --tronvillain (talk) 19:50, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and greetings,

This is just for your kind info. Since previously you have participated in an inconclusive RfC discussion at this RfC in year going by, and since some related aspects are under discussion at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#Titles, honorifics and appeal to popularity may be you want to join in to share your inputs or opinions.

Thanks and regards

Bookku (talk) 05:53, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm wishing you a Merry Christmas, because that is what I celebrate. Feel free to take a "Happy Holidays" or "Season's Greetings" if you prefer.  :) BOZ (talk) 05:16, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers and Talk:COVID-19 misinformation on "Maths, science, and technology" request for comments. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 04:47, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Parkinson's disease on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 05:30, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Wuhan Institute of Virology on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 09:30, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:List of nearest terrestrial exoplanet candidates on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 03:31, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Main sequence on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 05:31, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Al-Biruni on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 09:30, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm wishing you a Merry Christmas, because that is what I celebrate. Feel free to take a "Happy Holidays" or "Season's Greetings" if you prefer.  :) BOZ (talk) 20:25, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Rapid-onset gender dysphoria controversy on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:31, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Autism spectrum on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:30, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello - my name is Susan Gerbic (Sgerbic) and I'm writing to you because at some point you joined Wikipedia:WikiProject Skepticism. This might have been months ago - or even years ago. With the best of intentions the project was created years ago, and sadly like many WikiProjects has started to go dormant. A group of us are attempting to revitalize the Skepticism project, already we have begun to clean up the main page and I've just redone the participant page. No one is in charge of this project, it is member directed, which might have been the reason it almost went dormant. We are attempting to bring back conversations on the talk page and have two subprojects as well, in the hopes that it might spark involvement and a way of getting to know each other better. One was created several years ago but is very well organized and a lot of progress was made, Wikipedia:WikiProject Skepticism/Skeptical organisations in Europe. The other I created a couple weeks ago, it is very simple and has a silly name Wikipedia:WikiProject Skepticism/Skepticism Stub Sub-Project Project (SSSPP). This sub-project runs from March 1 to June 1, 2022. We are attempting to rewrite skepticism stubs and add them to this list. As you can see we have already made progress.

The reason I'm writing to you now is because we would love to have you come back to the project and become involved, either by working on one of the sub-projects, proposing your own (and managing it), or just hanging out on the talk page getting to know the other editors and maybe donate some of your wisdom to some of the conversations. As I said, no one is in charge, so if you have something in mind you would like to see done, please suggest it on the talk page and hopefully others will agree. Please add the project to your watchlist, update your personal user page showing you are a proud member of WikiProject Skepticism. And DIVE in, this is what the work list looks like [6] frightening at first glance, but we have already started chipping away at it.

The Wikipedia:WikiProject Skepticism/Participants page has gone though a giant change - you may want to update your information. And of course if this project no longer interests you, please remove your name from the participant list, we would hate to see you go, but completely understand.

Thank you for your time, I hope to edit with you in the future.Sgerbic (talk) 07:35, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Sea on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 08:30, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Rapid-onset gender dysphoria controversy on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:30, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Lion on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:32, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Standards of Care for the Health of Transgender and Gender Diverse People on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:30, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Kilometres per hour on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:31, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm wishing you a Merry Christmas, because that is what I celebrate. Feel free to take a "Happy Holidays" or "Season's Greetings" if you prefer.  :) BOZ (talk) 23:22, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Frontiers in Psychology on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 23:30, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Foreskin on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:31, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Clarion Fracture Zone on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:31, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm wishing you a Merry Christmas, because that is what I celebrate. Feel free to take a "Happy Holidays" or "Season's Greetings" if you prefer.  :) BOZ (talk) 00:23, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:SpaceX Starship flight tests on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:30, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Light skin on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 12:30, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I see you're a member of WP:Folklore, would you be interested in joining a wikiproject on oral tradition (which folklore is a subset of)? Kowal2701 (talk) 18:37, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Linden Hill Cemetery requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

A) this refers to two cemeteries - the Linden Hill United Methodist and the Linden Hill Jewish - and neither is particularly noteworthy. unnecessary redirect.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Omnis Scientia (talk) 22:05, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:26, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:List of common misconceptions on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 23:30, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:41, 13 November 2024 (UTC) [reply]