User talk:Tonywalton/Dec-2006

Congratulations, Tony, well earned. jimfbleak 19:51, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, Tony, it's been a long time coming. CanadianCaesar Et tu, Brute? 04:50, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Very well done. Don't go deleting gems such as "Bus Wars" without letting me have a look first! :) Bubba hotep 08:29, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, Tony. I am delighted to have been your first support after your nominator. You will do well.--Anthony.bradbury 17:51, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations on such a fantastic result, Tony. I wish you all the best with your adminship. Sarah Ewart 11:46, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

{{hangon}}

A topic is notable if it has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial published works whose sources are independent of the subject itself.

Annie Mae Mitcham is very well known Throughout Central GA as an educator for the under privileged. She has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial published works whose sources are independent of her which qualifies for inclusion according to the rules.

There are several entries in this media that are far less notable and news worthy than this subject.

20:09, 17 December 2006 (UTC)Mitchamz 20:09, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tonywalton  | Talk 10:30, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In reply to your message, not a bad idea - why don't you add your ooriginal comment to the section on the talk page I've just started. Apparently I'm getting "stressed" about it according to another ed. Escaper7 11:59, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I found that out after I had posted and felt a little silly, there is already a mountain of information and I didn't think that it had been documented amongst the "naming" controversy. Barrison 12:34, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

I was impressed by the near-unanimity of the vote - clearly well deserved. I'm sure you'll be a more sensitive editor than me, I seem to upset people with my over-direct approach. I've changed my sig to a scary font now too, MERRY CHRISTMAS, Jimfbleak.talk.14:29, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the user page revert - looks like they hit quite a few. What did we do?! :D Bubba hotep 16:18, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your support on the Talk page of this article. I have been trying to stop this user (he actually uses 3-4 IPs) from making his hoax edits for several weeks now and appreciate any help in stopping him. Best regards. Jogurney 17:09, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

These are articles that were featured in the newspaper that serves all of Central Georgia:

Annie Mae Leonard Mitcham

Macon Telegraph - May 12, 2006 - B

Ready place in the motherhood hall of fame If they ever build a motherhood hall of fame - a Cooperstown of hugs, rocking chairs and sweet potato pie - then Annie Mae Mitcham gets my vote on the first ballot. She raised 11 children, 10 of her own and a nephew she adopted. Nine of her kids earned their college degrees, and one son served his country with a career in the Air Force. For years, Annie Mae washed other people's clothes and cleaned other people's houses to help put biscuits on her own table. After...

Please reconsider your position on this matter. 01:42, 20 December 2006 (UTC)01:42, 20 December 2006 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mitchamz (talk • contribs)

What can I do to make Annie Mae Leonard Mitcham's entry acceptable for this site?

Why you seemed it fit to remove a piece of artwork that I had produced to honour Christophe Duggary? This man was considered a god at Birmingham City FC and your removal of the picture is tantamount to vandalism! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rupert Johnson (talk • contribs) My picture used a Christian image and you are a wiccan, is this why you removed it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rupert Johnson (talk • contribs)

I will provide you with evidence for why his picture should be included but first of all have a look at the discussion page on Christophe Duggarys page. Here he is called "this god of a player" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rupert Johnson (talk • contribs)

Hi I have a couple of quotes for you from Birmingham City FC's official chat room deadlyellis Posted: Dec 20 2006, 08:26 PM

Damien Johnson

Group: Members Member No.: 5,391 Joined: 26-July 06

I'm sure pictures very similar to that did the rounds at the time of dugarry's playing career at Blues and he certainly had the nickname le god  
   

friendly76 Posted: Dec 21 2006, 09:27 AM

Peter Enckelman

Group: Members Member No.: 1,067 Joined: 12-June 05

To Me he was 'LE GOD' What a player even if it was only for six months, sublime skill, touch and knew exactly where the goal was.

Those six months i must admit were probably the most enjoyable six months watchin the blues for the past ten years easily.

How many time have we in the past gone behind but actually come back playing FOOTBALL and not just lump it forward and hope.

Thanks for the six months and raising the clubs profile LE GOD.

KRO

Rupert Johnson 10:21, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A link to my website with the published picture http://rupertjohnson.bravehost.com/blues_poster.html Rupert Johnson 10:27, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ony could you help my articles? --ForsyteSaga 15:47, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I was wondering--Wikipedia is based on open software, isn't it? Remember when we both wrote the article on the color Old Lace? I also told you that I had written a number of other color articles for Wikipedia. What is the name of the software that Wikipedia uses to make the color box formula on the editing page display as a color box in the article? Is there a place on Wikipedia where I can download this software onto my own computer? Thank you and looking forward to hearing from you. Best wishes, Keraunos 23:40, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank your for removing the tag and thank you for referring to my wordy, hyper-detailed and unnecessarily Cicero-esque defense in such positive terms. Blessed solstice.

◄HouseOfScandal►12:35, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I thought if Chili's deserved a page, so did Leatherby's. I would love to say how great the place is more explicitly but didn't think that would be neutral. I will go looking back at why Chili's get a page and not Leatherby's, the #1 rule is BE BOLD so I will go see which lesser rule I have violated.

Thanks,

  Jim jim@utahnevada.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by Trackandtrain (talk • contribs) 

Hello Tonywalton, thx for the info, I will act as you say. --Erkan Yilmaz 13:19, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I was having trouble with the editing, as you could tell. --DurinsBane87 16:34, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I thought that the last guy was telling me to. sorry, loose ends drive me nuts, but I'll be more patient in the future.--DurinsBane87 18:43, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cut/pasted from my userpage How is it you get a page, and I don't? You are an editor, is that what makes you "notable"?! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Markmayhew (talk • contribs)

God (or your deity/deities) bless you and your family! —¡Randfan!^{Sign here?} 02:30, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

-I was planning to hand these out on the 22nd of Dec. but things got in the way.... Happy holidays! —¡Randfan!^{Sign here?} 20:51, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

help with my article is needed, I don't want it to be deleted! tips/suggestions please? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Richie bartels (talk • contribs)

Hi Tony - thanks for your comments, I think another re-read of the deletion criteria on my part is in order... still getting the hang of this :) Happy Christmas. MikeMorley 13:52, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for clearing up, wikipedia might want to figure out a way to provide for a warmer welcome to newbies though. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Markmayhew (talk • contribs)

Ah, heh. ;) I usually leave protection, for a bit, just in case they calm down and get more rational about it. But if you think it'll help, no objection from me. Luna Santin 10:18, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ooh, even better, then. And you do the same, cheers! :) Luna Santin 10:24, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You might be interested in this: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Permanently blocked User:Technajunky Jayjg ^(talk) 19:25, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that was exactly the tag I was looking for. I didn't find it on WP:TD, which is where I usually go for "article has issues" tags, so I went with the best thing I could find there. Sometimes it's really a challenge with those templates to find what one I'm looking for, though I don't have a better idea on how to arrange them off the top of my head. —C.Fred (talk) 02:17, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm new here, so I just wanted your opinion on something. Cars included in Gran Turismo 4 I really think is a pointless waste of space, and i was gonna give the guys a week to possibly make it acceptable, but they don't seem to be and I really think I should put it nominate it for AfD. Could you do me a huge favor and just look at it and give me your opinion, I don't want to overstep my bounds. Thanks --DurinsBane87 10:36, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

MMM, i don't think that the article have to be deleted because the actual source is from the Coptic Synexarium book. I hope u return the page soon. thnx —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Athanasius 77 (talk • contribs) 15:58, 28 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Please tell me that you, an administator, don't use Alexa as a traffic guide! I'm optimistic that you realize Alexa only ranks sites by users using the Alexa toolbar. It's also called demographics... gamers do not use the Alexa toolbar not to mention that using Alexa to gauge traffic, though a good idea, went the way of the do-do a couple of years ago! And anyone who deletes an article literally while it is being created will get a nice Get a Life message from me! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jasons4me (talk • contribs).

We can't make biographies of other people? That's what I was trying to make.Usertalk: maxpayne4664

While this page has been deleted before, it is NOT a hoax. This is a comedy trio from Chicago's Second City. The page in question is the back story of the characters created by the three. There is verifiable proof/evidence the group exists toward the bottom labeled "The Weathermen Tapes". It is a direct link to a few of the groups comedy clips. They also have a Myspace account at www.myspace.com/the_weathermen

I assure you it is not a hoax and it is not fake. I hope this straightens things out. Having to repost is a bitch. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 1000zorses (talk • contribs) 20:06, 29 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Everything in there is someplace else, pretty much. If not, the stuff's in my hot little head:). I'm archiving my talk page and saving for historical purposes only. Thanks for your concern!Nina Odell 17:13, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You've got it right. I would also like my user page deleted as well. I've got all the stuff I need:).Nina Odell 18:24, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No need. I'm a hothead for sure sometimes. I'm trying to tone it down, but it flairs up about a once a month. That wasn't why I was trying to delete the page, but I found the retirement template and that's enough for me. Thanks - NinaNina Odell 00:23, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

How is it a personal attack? It was a page I created from my friends account for mine. It is not intended as an attack whatsoever, but merely a well-known inside joke between friends. I find it significant enough about myself to put on my user page. --User:Relox 19:21, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I know...it's deleted by now. II didn't know it was a copyvio because it was a copy and paste. I plan to post the article up again after refurmishing. Sr13 (T|C) 19:07, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• 
  Please click on useless image. Happy New Year from a complete maniac. Nina Odell 19:24, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Do you think Gamaliel would get pissed? Do you know him? Thanks in advance.Nina Odell 19:24, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not entirely sure if I am doing this right, but I am extremely pissed off at some idiots contributions to the Newcastle United FC page which I was idly looking at. Ridiculous abuse is not what i look for on wikipedia which generally I respect greatly. I saw that you updated league positions on the site at some point so thought you might be able to sort this out as apparently I can't. Cheers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.32.81.183 (talk • contribs)

Ok, ill remember that. Thanks :) Whammies Were Here (PYLrulz) 13:12, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not a prob. Google gave 96 hits and I even lived in the area that he's from during the period he was supposedly a hit. Never heard of him! Most of the article was the typical vanity stuff. -Yupik 20:36, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]