User talk:ThedancingMOONpolice

Tightrope (Walk the Moon song), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Sulfurboy (talk) 03:28, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Fall Out Boy - Uma Thurman (Official Deluxe Single Cover).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:58, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ThedancingMOONpolice. You have new messages at Adabow's talk page.
Message added 06:59, 4 November 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Adabow (talk) 06:59, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Dawin - Dessert (Official Single Cover).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:28, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Fall Out Boy - Uma Thurman (Official Deluxe Single Cover).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:41, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there,

Since you do a lot of editing with charts and certifications, I was wondering if happen to have a subscription to Billboard.biz. If you do, then could you possibly do a favor for me? I've been working on a lot of Rise Against song articles recently, and some of the articles list Bubbling Under Hot 100 appearances. Since I can't access that chart without a subscription, I was wondering if you wouldn't mind checking and seeing which songs made it to that chart, and their peak position. I know that "Savior" made it to number 2, but that's it. I would greatly appreciate it, and I'd be in your debt. Famous Hobo (talk) 21:57, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have a Billboard.biz subscription, but the way I find charts on there is to go to the chart search and type in the artist's (or band's) name and choose the chart name. And yes Rise Against did have more songs on the chart and they can all be found on this link: http://www.billboard.com/biz/search/charts?f%5b0%5d=ts_chart_artistname%3ARise%20Against&f%5b1%5d=itm_field_chart_id%3A344&f%5b2%5d=ss_bb_type%3Achart_item&type=2&artist=Rise%20Against ThedancingMOONpolice (talk) 02:32, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oh wow, thanks! That's incredibly useful. Wonder why I never discovered that. Famous Hobo (talk) 03:05, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ThedancingMOONpolice. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Tove Lo Habits original cover.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 23:28, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ThedancingMOONpolice. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ThedancingMOONpolice. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wats all dis about Tamara Lisa Edison (talk) 02:22, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Tamara Lisa Edison: Some person has been editing Wikipedia articles to spread misinformation and I had to undo the changes. ThedancingMOONpolice (talk) 02:38, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I've seen you've been improving a lot of Billie Eilish articles. I appreciate your work because it does help a lot with getting the articles ready for GA. And speaking of GA, I was wondering if you are interested in helping me get some Billie Eilish articles to GA? I've already got Bitches Broken Hearts, Six Feet Under, Party Favor and Come Out and Play nominated. Let me know if you are interested. DarklyShadows (talk) 06:41, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@DarklyShadows: No problem. Just wanted to help out some articles and do some general fixing. ThedancingMOONpolice (talk) 07:33, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Do you want to help get some Billie Eilish articles to GA?  DarklyShadows (talk) 07:37, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's not my main focus right now, but I'll continue to do more editing when needed. ThedancingMOONpolice (talk) 07:40, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Different Colors, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pop (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:25, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Different Colors you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 10:01, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Different Colors you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Different Colors for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 10:01, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tightrope (EP), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vinyl.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:27, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Different Colors you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Different Colors for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 08:21, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On 16 August 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Different Colors, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that indie rock band Walk the Moon worked with AT&T and the Deaf Professional Arts Network to create an American Sign Language video for "Different Colors"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Different Colors. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Different Colors), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited One Foot (Walk the Moon song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chorus.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:08, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You did not get a response to this question. I can't give you a clear answer but read WP:LR. I think it is acceptable to leave information if a reliable source verified it at one time, and a less reliable source might be enough. I have made a practice of using this logic to add information to articles, though, and others might not agree. — Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 22:32, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:46, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Shut Up and Dance (Walk the Moon song) belongs in the Songs comopsed in D-flat major category, but you removed it. Do you want the Shut Up and Dance (Walk the Moon song) page in that category?2601:584:180:3D80:5A5:524:C795:9E99 (talk) 20:21, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding this edit where you said you fixed an incorrect chart position, it was not incorrect at the time Lk95 added it earlier. Billboard changed their sales numbers later in the day. Ss112 04:42, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I know, but it is incorrect now which is why I listed it as such. ThedancingMOONpolice (talk) 05:12, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Can You Handle My Love??, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tommy English.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Regarding the Canadian chart position you added to Post Malone discography, it was not sourced. The source in the header was an old Billboard URL, http://www.billboard.com/music/post-malone/chart-history/canadian-hot-100. You cannot navigate to the Canadian peak of "Motley Crew" using that old URL. Please make sure the URLs verify the content you add; I always make sure the URLs on discographies are correct when I add chart positions to them, so every other editor should as well. Thank you. Ss112 04:48, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I will try to be more aware of that next time. Thanks. ThedancingMOONpolice (talk) 04:53, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Since you edit lots of Justin Bieber songs, I thought I would let you know about Don't Go (Skrillex, Justin Bieber and Don Toliver song). Will you please take a web archive of this website linked below? It shows that the song was released to urban contemporary radio on August 31, 2021, so after the website gets rid of old dates, we still have the proof. Thanks!

https://www.allaccess.com/urban/future-releases

I took a web archive of the website, but I did not see the song listed on there when I did. Did you mean to link to the Rhythmic page instead? Because I do see a date for the song there. I saved an archive of that as well. ThedancingMOONpolice (talk) 03:49, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it was the wrong link, my apologies. Thank you for your help. Will you go to Let It Go (DJ Khaled song)? It features Justin Bieber and 21 Savage. This article can use some expanding, but not sure how. If you can try to add more sources or anything, that would be great.

I'll see if I could try to expand the article at some point. ThedancingMOONpolice (talk) 04:55, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Would you mind expanding the article Deja Vu (Post Malone song), an article for a song by Post Malone featuring Justin Bieber? This has barely any content, as it mostly has the personnel and chart positions only. Thank you for your time.

I will see what I can do when I have time. ThedancingMOONpolice (talk) 01:29, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I hate to ask people for favors, but can you add the cover art for this article: Shivers (Ed Sheeran song)?

You can use the image over in this link for the cover: https://genius.com/Ed-sheeran-shivers-lyrics. It’s also verified on Sheeran’s Instagram for your proof: https://www.instagram.com/p/CTURj4aHkQQ/?utm_medium=copy_link.

Hey! I just uploaded the cover and added it on the article! PopLizard86427 (talk) 12:33, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much!

Could you check out this article below?

Don't Check on Me (song by Chris Brown featuring Justin Bieber and Ink)

Can you please expand this article? There are also a few mistakes to fix. Thanks.

I may or may not work on this. I'm getting more busy with stuff at the moment and I usually do research on Bieber's own music rather than what he's featured on. ThedancingMOONpolice (talk) 05:04, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Would you mind getting a web archive of this link below?

https://www.allaccess.com/top40-rhythmic/future-releases

It’s for a radio date, and the date goes away if it’s not archived. I plan to use the web archive for this new Giveon song article, “For Tonight”.

Here is the link for the web archive you requested. ThedancingMOONpolice (talk) 19:37, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I added a new section on the article Changes, and the section is called Songs. Could you please expand that section? I feel like it could definitely use some more sources and some more information about the lyrics and the type of songs. However, I don’t have any ideas on what to add to the section. Could you please take a look at it? Have a great rest of your day. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.58.99.49 (talk) 20:58, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I might work on the section when I have time to do some research on the songs. ThedancingMOONpolice (talk) 21:24, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, about this section. Not trying to rush you, but could you please help with this “Songs” sections in the article Changes (Justin Bieber album)? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 104.6.205.87 (talk) 00:33, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I've noticed that you've removed the temporary sources below chart positions on Justin Bieber discography several times. I'm just going to be restoring the citation when it achieves a new peak, and it can be tedious to restore the citation if the song is actively moving up week upon week on a chart. Perhaps it would be best to wait for the song to finish its chart run and remove the citation when it's showing signs of slowing its ascent, or when it's actually descending instead of feeling you need to remove the temporary source from below the chart position every week when the pre-existing column source updates. Thanks. Ss112 06:33, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I would like to inform you that I am not the one removing the temporary sources for peaks from the Justin Bieber discography page. The one who has been doing it is an IP user. The only temporary sources I have removed recently were for the certifications that cite a Twitter post rather than the databases, which I replaced. ThedancingMOONpolice (talk) 06:44, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If an editor has started a thread on your talk page, please respond (t)here. I'm aware IP editors also remove the sources, but I could have sworn I have seen you do it too. If not, apologies, I will ask the IP editors not to. Ss112 06:46, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I will make note of that. Thank you for letting me know. ThedancingMOONpolice (talk) 07:08, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Hope you are well. Would you please get a web archive of this link?

https://www.allaccess.com/urban/future-releases

It is so I can add the fact that a song was sent to urban radio today. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.58.111.37 (talk) 22:35, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to get a web archive of the link, but as of right now, it is redirecting to the previous capture. Hopefully the web archive is made available soon. ThedancingMOONpolice (talk) 23:19, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey. I have a favor to ask you about the article, Get Me (Justin Bieber song). Would you mind adding the cover art? You can get it from this link (see this link to get the cover art: https://genius.com/Justin-bieber-get-me-lyrics). The same picture is used for the song on Justin Bieber’s official YouTube channel (YouTube link: https://youtube.com/watch/eI_ifdDi1R4). Thank you. 65.36.59.228 (talk) 02:14, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, ThedancingMOONpolice. Did you get my message? Not rushing you.

Yes I did. I don't think it is an official cover for the song since the audio video is animated and the aspect ratio is not square. If there is an official source for cover art, like for "Intentions", then I will add it. ThedancingMOONpolice (talk) 02:22, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ThedancingMOONpolice, I will look for it. Also, could you by chance try at some point to expand the articles, All Around Me (Justin Bieber song), Habitual, and Come Around Me? Not rushing you, and happy holidays!

Hi ThedancingMOONpolice, just a heads-up - this user is a sockpuppet who is evading their block. I would advise you not to perform any edits for them. Please kindly see their talk page and their SPI case, here for more info, thank you. AshMusique (talk) 18:08, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Sundayclose. I noticed that you recently removed content from Abbey Road without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Sundayclose (talk) 19:41, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I will try to keep that in mind. Thanks for the reminder. ThedancingMOONpolice (talk) 19:52, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@ThedancingMOONpolice: I am letting you know about this new article, "Attention". Omah Lay and Justin Bieber have released a collaboration today and since nobody really knows Omah Lay, I am simply telling you about this article for his collaboration with Justin Bieber so you can edit it or expand it if you want because I would like to know what I can fix for that new article that I have written. Thank you and have a good spring break! 172.58.176.211 (talk) 06:10, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Kehlani - Up at Night.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:21, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there, hope you are well. Just a question, did anyone ask you to upload the cover for Up at Night (song)? I'm asking because the IP who created that article is the same sock, Rishabisajakepauler, who previously asked you to upload covers for them here on your talk page. Just a heads up again, if an IP asks you to upload cover art, it most likely is that same sock, and you shouldn't peform any edits for them. AshMusique (talk) 18:43, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@AshMusique: No, I uploaded the cover on my own accord when I came across the article and found it did not have one yet, similar to the "Essence" remix. I have had my issues with IPs editing things, who I suspect are the same person since working on Justin Bieber articles, such as falsely stating that a release was canceled when the sources did not indicate that. ThedancingMOONpolice (talk) 19:30, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh okay, sorry for insinuating that you perfomed edits on behalf of them. Yes, that sock does edit Bieber-releated content quite regularly, they make it too obvious. Anyhow, thank you for the response. AshMusique (talk) 19:36, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I wanted to reach out to you about a recent revert you did to remove a message from my talk page. In your edit summary, you said that the revert was due to the IP address being a sockpuppet of user Rishabisajakepauler. I wanted to look into that a little further, but upon reviewing that user's sockpuppet investigation archive, I don't see this IP address listed anywhere. I've since received another talk page message from this IP user, but I wanted to check in to see what led you to believe this is a sockpuppet and not a genuine user. Thanks! Sock (tock talk) 21:30, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Sock: The sockmaster has a ton of IP ranges available to them, and the IP posting to your talk page is making the same edits from the same geolocation as the sockmaster (see the history of Remember This (Jonas Brothers song), for example). It's certainly the same editor, and I've blocked the IP.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:41, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Ponyo: Ahh, gotcha. Thank you for the explanation! Sock (tock talk) 21:45, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ThedancingMOONpolice. Just a quick hint, when using {{Certification Table Entry}} you do not need to specify the amount of sales certified like you did here. The main point of the template is that it does this for you. If the template does not display a sales figure, it is most likely because you are missing something and the template documentation can help you figure out what. In this case, you were missing |type=single, like I corrected here. If there is any problem and you don't get the results you are expecting, you can either ask me directly or ask at the template's talk page. Happy editing! --Muhandes (talk) 12:02, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Muhandes: I understand why you are telling me this, but for some reason those specific SNEP certifications that have recently appeared are not categorized correctly in the database (they are labeled as "Single" instead of "Singles"). So if you clicked on any of the links from the entries I added with the type parameter set to single, the certification would not show up at all. That is why I purposely omitted the type parameter for those instances and supplied the sales amount manually. If you want I could always go back to what I was originally doing for these types of situations and just use certref. I hope you understand my reasoning. ThedancingMOONpolice (talk) 18:10, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I understand your reasoning. However, if the choice is between |salesamount= and |certref=, the latter is preferred. The former creates an entry in Category:Certification Table Entry usages of salesamount without salesref, since it is treated as an unsourced number. If you are using |certref= you can still use {{cite certification}}, like I did here (I corrected the seven pages). However, if this is a common problem, perhaps a batter solution is to account for it in the template itself by adding a parameter or something. How common is it? Do you have any idea when it occurs? --Muhandes (talk) 18:30, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Muhandes: Ah, I see now. Thank you for telling me about the category issue, I will use certref then. I cannot really not tell you when or why this sort of event occurs. For some reason SNEP made all those "Single" certifications viewable just now even though the certification dates would suggest they should have appeared earlier. They have added new certifications to their website and those are labeled correctly as "Singles", so I don't know what happened to the earlier ones. The only thing I can tell you is that it seems to be affecting some releases from 2016 to 2020. ThedancingMOONpolice (talk) 19:02, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This happened before with Germany certifications and we added the (poorly chosen) |best=no option. If you are going to add many such certifications I can do the same in this case. --Muhandes (talk) 19:09, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Muhandes: I do think it would be a good idea to have an option to search all certifications for an artist/title even with the type parameter specified in case an issue like this happens again, since it seems to have affected a lot of singles and other users are starting to add the certifications that do not work with the type parameter specified. ThedancingMOONpolice (talk) 20:21, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I see what you mean. The only problem is cases where we want to make the distinction between a single and an album with the same title, but the harm in this is less than the harm in having a wrong link. By the way, this very fruitful conversation should probably have taken place at the template's talk page. --Muhandes (talk) 07:59, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I took your advice and single certifications now use categorie=Tout. Let me know if you have any updates on this. --Muhandes (talk) 09:41, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I will do so. ThedancingMOONpolice (talk) 13:51, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please add the cover art for the single article Up at Night (song)? You can get it from here: https://tidal.com/track/222815539. Thank you! 99.71.209.242 (talk) 18:26, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello ThedancingMOONpolice!

• The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
• We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
• Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
• Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
• If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.

Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:21, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @ThedancingMOONpolice. I've noticed that you added missing swedish certifications with the link in the Grammotex database. I also have access to the complete certification list from IFPI Sweden, but I don't know how to search the Grammotex for an online source. For example, how did you find the page for Zedd-Clarity in the Grammotex site? Greetings YGO24895 (talk) 01:13, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I need to add: I've found the Grammotex numbers in the monthly lists I received from IFPI Sweden since 2023, but my "complete" list 1987-2021 and my year list 2022 are missing these. If you have access to a list with Grammotex numbers, would it be possible to send it to me? Many thanks in advance.YGO24895 (talk) 01:41, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@YGO24895 Unfortunately, I do not have an actual list of Grammotex numbers. What I have been doing this past week is going through Sverigetopplistan's chart archive, more precisely the mostly overlooked Dance and Heatseeker charts, and finding entries that did not enter the main singles chart (entries that are not searchable on Sverigetopplistan). I obtain the number by using Inspect Element and finding the data-sart value before inputting it into the Grammotex site to see if it yields a certification that is currently undocumented. I was only able to find the entry for "Clarity" as it charted for one week on the Dance chart. So anything that has received a certification but has not charted anywhere is still basically impossible to find. Some works may also have multiple numbers that have a certification for one entry, but not the other, like "All I Want" [1][2] (the entry number changed during its first and second week on the main chart). This method could still be useful if something has charted on one of the main charts, but does not show up in Sverigetopplistan's search results for some reason, like Tiësto's A Town Called Paradise.

I just started utilizing Grammotex after Sverigetopplistan stopped returning the JSON files for chart entries, which made it harder to verify when something received a certification, so I searched for an alternate source. I found a web page of one of Grammotex's charts, and the url looked distinctly similar to how some Swedish certifications used to be cited. I figured to do something similar on the Grammotex site using the data-sart value. I hope this has been of some help to you. ThedancingMOONpolice (talk) 04:21, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your detailed information. I've managed to find the numbers this way as well, but like you said: That unfortunately still excludes a lot of certs. GreetingsYGO24895 (talk) 06:38, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@YGO24895 If you are still interested, I have managed to extract what I believe to be all entries in the Grammotex database that have a certification registered (at least up to now) and wrote a script that can be used to search through the list. I cannot confirm if I missed some entries somehow, but some older certifications like "... Baby One More Time" (single) seem to not be logged even though the song is shown to have one through the archived document. ThedancingMOONpolice (talk) 04:51, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Yes, I'm still interested. How can I access it? YGO24895 (talk) 05:20, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@YGO24895 You can access it here. ThedancingMOONpolice (talk) 05:52, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much :) YGO24895 (talk) 05:55, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I'm TheNuggeteer, I recently created a WikiProject focusing on Tyler, The Creator and you might be interested to join. Thanks, 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 02:58, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]