User talk:Tempo21

For any article you created that you would like to see deleted, provided no one else has made significant contributions to it, simply add {{db-g7}} to the top of the article, and it will usually be deleted within 48 hours. For more detail see WP:CSD#G7. Sir Sputnik (talk) 03:20, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I added the notice to the articles of Radovan Gudurić and Dušimir Vulović.

Tempo21 (talk) 03:24, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

FK Partizan, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. C679 08:45, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tempo21! As a Steward I'm involved in the upcoming unification of all accounts organized by the Wikimedia Foundation (see m:Single User Login finalisation announcement). By looking at your account, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on Special:MergeAccount and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 01:28, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Urban Book Circle is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Urban Book Circle until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:30, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Will Grigg, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 10:06, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article RedNation Online has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The article is just the repetition of another magazine, Red Nation (magazine).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Egeymi (talk) 17:31, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marko Jovanovic is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marko Jovanovic until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 23:53, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Tempo21, thanks for creating 1952 Yugoslav Cup!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add your references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 12:38, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please respond? Boleyn (talk) 14:17, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Slobodan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eleutherios (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please respond to my messages? WP:Communication is required on Wikipedia. Boleyn (talk) 21:06, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(Talk-page stalker) Hi Boleyn. I am a friend of Tempo, and I also noteced you are a good editor, so I had the will to intervene here. I noteced you asked for sources at 1952 Yugoslav Cup. But I am not sure if you noteced that the external link from RSSSF actually sources the entire article. FkpCascais (talk) 22:54, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your response, FkpCascais. 'External links' just means 'suggestions for further reading' and doesn't indicate it was used as a source - I thought that might be the case, but I can't confirm that without the creator responding to my messages. Tempo21 is risking a block at the moment by not sourcing clearly, and refusing to communicate when other editors raise concerns, which is disruptive editing. Hopefully they will now respond - I am just trying to help solve these issues. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 07:13, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Serbia and Montenegro national football team results, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Gaya and Oita (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove valid maintenance tags from articles without undertaking the improvements required. GiantSnowman 10:04, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:CSL-LOGO PNG version.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-free logo claimed for use as means of visual identification but this is a former logo which is now used in a section with no significant sourced commentary. Fails WP:NFCC#8.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Whpq (talk) 00:24, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Republika Srpska international footballers, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ౪ Santa ౪^99° 22:06, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Republika Srpska official football team managers, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ౪ Santa ౪^99° 01:34, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Republika Srpska official football team, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ౪ Santa ౪^99° 02:44, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ej bre, cesto pitas sta radim i to, eto mozes sam da vidis moje zadnje izmene, samo ukucas u "contributions" i vidis sam sta radim i sta se desava. Evo ovaj covek ti je lepo javio sta radi i dao ti sansu da kazes nesto za to. FkpCascais (talk) 03:21, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Lazar Marković, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 00:00, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Mikki Moore vs. Toronto Raptors.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Jack Armstrong wiki edited final.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Members of the Association of Writers of Serbia has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 21:13, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited BMO Field, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CBC. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tempo21, Thanks for all your work and edits on articles relating to the Serbian White Eagles. I just have one question regarding your edits on the article on Zoran Rajović. You added content that states he is the current head coach for the White Eagles, but the source you included is an archived 2013 Serbian White Eagles roster page from the CSL page. The source doesn't really prove that he is the actual head coach for the 2021 season. Don't misunderstand me I do believe your edits are accurate, but I searched everywhere and I still can't find any source to confirm that he is the current head coach. The CSL and Serbian White Eagles webpages state that Uroš Stamatović is still the head coach. Do you by any chance have any sources to confirm that he is the head coach. I just worried that a different user might challenge the info and have it removed. Thanks for all work. Shotgun pete (talk) 11:45, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Nikola Kalabic wiki.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:35, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Petar Čelik, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. scope_creep^Talk 15:59, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! —Remember, I'murmate — I'ma editor2022 ^{(🗣️💬 |📖📚)} 14:23, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. Tempo21 (talk) 14:24, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi: I see you created Vanja Ejdus in 2009, which explains why a 2009 film was given as her latest role. The text had remained much as you left it, with IMDb as its only reference, and a translation of the film title (since given an article here on en-wp) as the only footnote. This is very bad for a biography of a living person. I managed to reference her being in that film and find a 2010 article about her on sr-wp to expand it a bit. Can you find anything else to bring it up to date, demonstrate she is notable, and so we have a proper, referenced biography about her? I believe we owe it to her since she has had an article for all this time. Yngvadottir (talk) 20:57, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. Thanks for expanding Mladen Krstajić. If a player has played at club and international level and also worked as a manager, there should be no "Playing career" heading. See Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Players. I've fixed the headings at Mladen Krstajić. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 21:53, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tempo21,

Thank you for creating Slobodan Petrović (footballer).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

What is needed are references from significant coverage about this player, and not their own words; in multiple secondary sources which are WP:RS; that is your guide. Lists, Team rosters, pages listing matches and results, databases, Instagram, Soccerway, Facebook, none of these are reliable sources. (There have been changes to the notability guide for sports - see WP:NSPORT ) You may also read WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources. A more comprehensive guide is WP:SOURCES ... Providing sufficient references, ideally giving more information about this player, that meet these criteria is likely to allow this article to remain. Lack of them or an inability to find them is likely to mean that this article is not suitable for inclusion.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 09:21, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tempo21. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Petar Čelik, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:07, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Dragan Kažić, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:44, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Lancers 77 Home Mike Stojanovic.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:24, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,I think that you are knowledgeable about Serbian football. I have a question.

In 1993, Serbian player Aleksandar Jozević played for Daewoo Royals in K League. Can you serch for this player in Serbian internet?

I think that he was not famous player and he didn't have coaching career.

I created many articles about Serbian and Croatian player who played for K League. In list of foreign K League 1 players, I can't Aleksandar Jozević .

Anyway Thanks Footwiks (talk) 12:10, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there,

Unfortunately, I was unable to find more information on Aleksandar Jozević.

If I find anything, I will be sure to add it. Thanks for reaching out! Tempo21 (talk) 14:04, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tempo21. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dragan Kažić, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:01, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Mihajlo Andrejević, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:59, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Alcohol-related deaths in Serbia indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:53, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Pomoz Bog has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Wikipedia is not a dictionary, WP:NOTDICT

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ruud Buitelaar (talk) 02:37, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Prince Andrew of Yugoslavia, portrait.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:01, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Andrew Olivieri, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Football manager.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:24, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]