User talk:Teflon Peter Christ/Archive 2020

Archives

2008 • 2009 • 2010 • 2011 • 2012 • 2013 • 2014 • 2015 • 2016 • 2017 • 2018 • 2019 • 2020 • 2021 • 2022

A discussion has begun at WT:ALBUMS#RfC on producer entries in infobox album regarding the |producer= parameter used in this infobox. Please add your comments there. – TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 13:30, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited New York Dolls (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tony Parsons (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited My Beautiful Dark Twisted Fantasy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tweet (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 15:25, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Got Live If You Want It! (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Browne (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 16:13, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm undoing your Dark Magus revert, and if you'd bother to look further down the page, you might also see that I was making the info in the lead match information that was already in the release section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.224.75.23 (talk) 10:59, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Whatever. Get a life. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.224.75.23 (talk) 16:27, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

One, I just saw that you're more of a typically unpleasant "Wikipedian" stalker than I thought. Noted. The way you talk about yourself in the third person is cute, too.

Secondly, delete this after you have read it. Then stay off of my current talk page. You are not welcome there. For anything. We clear? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.224.75.23 (talk) 11:42, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Anokha – Soundz of the Asian Underground (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Table and Bhangra

Jackie (Jackie DeShannon album) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Gavin Edwards

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:MyGirlotiscover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:41, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Jack Johnson (album) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Famous Hobo -- Famous Hobo (talk) 07:20, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Jack Johnson (album) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Jack Johnson (album) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Famous Hobo -- Famous Hobo (talk) 08:22, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1980 (Gil Scott-Heron and Brian Jackson album) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kingsif -- Kingsif (talk) 17:21, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article 1980 (Gil Scott-Heron and Brian Jackson album) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:1980 (Gil Scott-Heron and Brian Jackson album) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kingsif -- Kingsif (talk) 07:21, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Songs of Innocence and Experience (Allen Ginsberg album) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MarioSoulTruthFan -- MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 21:22, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Songs of Innocence and Experience (Allen Ginsberg album) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Songs of Innocence and Experience (Allen Ginsberg album) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MarioSoulTruthFan -- MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 16:21, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Songs of Innocence and Experience (Allen Ginsberg album) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Songs of Innocence and Experience (Allen Ginsberg album) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MarioSoulTruthFan -- MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 21:01, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Got Live If You Want It! (album) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MarioSoulTruthFan -- MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 15:01, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Got Live If You Want It! (album) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Got Live If You Want It! (album) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MarioSoulTruthFan -- MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 17:40, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Got Live If You Want It! (album) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Got Live If You Want It! (album) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MarioSoulTruthFan -- MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 17:41, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You could report this editor, I been watching this editor for awhile now and they have been warned multiple times by other editors before but keep ignoring the warnings. This kind of behavior can be considered as unacceptable. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 21:33, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't know that's how it was done. Anyway, thanks for responding in-depth. I follow everything you wrote, and I'm fine with the explanation. I don't necessarily agree that self-publishing should automatically discredit a review, given notoriety meets a threshold. Theneedledrop website is not Fantano's main point of contact with consumers of his reviews, and I'm sure the number of video views is at least equal to the number of readers of many of the reviews that Metacritic aggregates. I think more credit should be given to new media creators who are very much part of (please excuse the buzzword) the zeitgeist of modern music culture and consumption. Fantano's reviews are in-depth, cogent, well-researched/well-considered, and well-received. And, they are indeed subject to editor reviews.

That said, I accept that there are already 10 reviews listed and that his score is an outlier (though, to that end, so is The A.V. Club giving it a 100). And, while I believe he does meet a notoriety threshold, I'm also OK with calling his neutrality into question. Though, reviews by nature are opinion pieces. And, again, The A.V. Club review is so glowingly saccharin it's almost silly. Finally, I accept that no matter what I believe, I'm not nearly established enough to question what has been determined by Wikipedia vets.

That's my piece. Thank you.

Mattevt (talk) 22:30, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Christgau's Consumer Guide: Albums of the '90s you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kingsif -- Kingsif (talk) 21:21, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Christgau's Consumer Guide: Albums of the '90s you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Christgau's Consumer Guide: Albums of the '90s for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kingsif -- Kingsif (talk) 22:41, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Christgau's Consumer Guide: Albums of the '90s you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Christgau's Consumer Guide: Albums of the '90s for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kingsif -- Kingsif (talk) 12:41, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I realized that there are a bunch of sources available out there which have not been used to expand the article Back in the High Life. Care to join me in making this article a GA? If so, I could focus on the background, production and recording info while you do marketing, reception and criticism. We'll need a legacy section. Binksternet (talk) 14:43, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate the offer, but I don't have a great deal of interest in the topic, nor the attention span for such a commitment right now. I'm sure you'll do a great job yourself though. isento (talk) 16:15, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, gotcha. Cheers! Binksternet (talk) 16:23, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Closing discussion per WP:EVADE.
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
Why does it say this then: Error: No text given for quotation (or equals sign used in the actual argument to an unnamed parameter) Quiet storm is a radio format and genre of contemporary R&B, performed in a smooth, romantic, jazz-influenced style. Error: No text given for quotation (or equals sign used in the actual argument to an unnamed parameter) Jayneties (talk) 18:52, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply] Also you happy for me to include hip hop soul to The Miseducation of Lauryn Hill as per https://www.ew.com/article/1998/09/04/music-review-miseducation-lauryn-hill/Jayneties (talk) 18:57, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

How's it going? There seems to be some confusion regarding how album certifications and album sales work with an editor on my talk page. Was hoping you could help clear some things up for them (I've tried explaining, but they still don't get it). --Blastmaster11 (talk) 16:51, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Album era you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:24, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is to let you know that House of Music has been scheduled as WP:TFA for 30 August 2020. Please check that the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/August 30, 2020. Thanks! Ealdgyth (talk) 15:08, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Album era you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Album era for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:01, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Do you mind to take a look at this discussion. 2402:1980:8316:EE97:D2C2:CD96:1545:89DE (talk) 10:18, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:01, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:Isento: Thank you for your work on this DYK. Work like this makes Wikipedia an absolute joy to read. —  AjaxSmack  23:01, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't do all that much, but thank you. isento (talk) 04:18, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No. You need to argue your case at MOSLINK talk. It's back on my list, so eventually it will be delinked again. It's a pity that we have a few editors who are unaware of the practices of the site. Tony (talk) 09:33, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have Asperger's? isento (talk) 09:41, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

isento, you are the biggest jerk in wikipedia history. You clearly have issues. As the parent of an autistic child, go to hell. Go play on the freeway. 156.146.39.1 (talk) 00:42, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jokes on you. I don't live near a freeway. isento (talk) 00:45, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

wow......... do you do anything here other than call people names and start fights? holy crap, dude you got to maybe take a break. I've bever seen any one this unpopular online ever. there are even memes of you all over 4chan, dude. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 156.146.48.135 (talk) 18:45, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

flattered to have gotten under the skin of a few bitter cretins who frequent known incel hotspots. isento (talk) 22:10, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@isento... you are standing on the edge of a cliff with one foot dangling over the abyss. I suggest you step back while you still can. -Ad Orientem (talk) 22:15, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe if someone takes the "abuses" (boo-hoo) thrown my way from the start ([1], [2], [3]), I'll take these reprimands more seriously... isento (talk) 22:17, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you have complaints about the conduct of other editors, you have been around long enough to know how to handle it. How you choose to take my caution and warnings is up to you. But do not make the mistake of ignoring them. My patience is about exhausted and my finger is hovering over the block button. -Ad Orientem (talk) 22:27, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Great. Thanks. You can go away now. isento (talk) 22:28, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:NOBAN. Also FTR I have issued a warning to 156.146.48.135 for their above post that you chose to restore. Best regards... -Ad Orientem (talk) 22:40, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

LOL. You offered NO warning to Bgkc4444 for baselessly accusing me of being racist and sexist, repeatedly! Please don't offer your best regards XD. The jokes really on all of us if you let people like that go around crying wolf like that. isento (talk) 22:43, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi isneto! I noticed that a while ago you brought the Spin Alternative Record Guide to GA. Would you happen to own a copy of this? If so, would you be able to provide me the page number that Bowie's Diamond Dogs in on? Thanks! – zmbro _(talk) 00:14, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @Zmbro:. Brilliant job expanding the article so far. I don't own a copy. Google Books shows the page to be 4. But for future reference, if this information is otherwise unavailable, you can simply cite the chapter (ex. "David Bowie") in the citation for the book, in lieu of a page number. That has been acceptable in my experience. isento (talk) 03:12, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much I'll keep that in mind! – zmbro _(talk) 04:34, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Runaway Love (EP), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Christgau's Record Guide.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:41, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi isento. Can you check it out what's going on? [4] 183.171.114.231 (talk) 04:24, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I guess it's solved. 183.171.121.93 (talk) 02:04, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Isento. You seem to be engaged in (I believe) three edit wars on Beyoncé. If editors revert your bold edits, I advise you to follow WP:BRD by starting a discussion on the talk page in order to resolve the dispute instead of edit warring. Please stop this behavior, as well as the incivility you are expressing to editors who you disagree with. Thank you. Bgkc4444 (talk) 22:06, 24 August 2020 (UTC)Bgkc4444[reply]

Your messages and edit summaries reek of hypocrisy. isento (talk) 22:31, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop the incivility directed towards me and other editors, including on this page, my talk page, and in the article in question. I genuinely hope we are able to coexist on Wikipedia without either of us having to resort to insulting, ridiculing and condescending comments. Bgkc4444 (talk) 22:47, 24 August 2020 (UTC)Bgkc4444[reply]

Yes, please stop. isento (talk) 22:49, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jam session, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Like Water for Chocolate.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:24, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Six years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:23, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you today for House of Music, "about a 1996 studio album by the R&B band Tony! Toni! Toné!. It was their fourth and last album, a platinum seller, and widespread critical success, deemed by some critics as their best work, an influence on 1990s neo soul, and a masterpiece of 1990s R&B music."! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:07, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Christgau's Record Guide 80s.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:39, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for working with me on this. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 04:12, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I believe there's a dispute between us on the lead to the critical reception of Red, please assume good faith per WP:AFG; All my edits have been different revisions rater than reversions for a reason, to help progress the situation to a point where there isn't a dispute. With that said I want to deescalate this edit war and am going to revert the lead paragraph to the state it was in Red (as revised 16:33, 22 September 2020) and for us to reach consensus in the talk page if we want to proceed with our edits. But I want to check up with you beforehand to see if you're fine with this course of action, so let me know if you're good. Thank you CASalt (talk) 23:37, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No. There is no good reason for Metacritic's decade-end list to be mentioned in the opening paragraph to a section whose main subject is the reviews the album received. AnyDecentMusic's score can be noted. Decade-end lists are covered further down the section. isento (talk) 02:58, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I'm not a regular Wikipedia editor like you so I don't see any reason to litigate this further. Though, since it seems like you've been monitoring this page for a while, it would be appreciated if you could maybe at some point expand the lead. Because right now it's just a once sentence reference to Metacritic and not really representative of the section like a lead should be IMO. And it looks weird, especially in contrast to the leads on most other albums wikipages, which are full paragraphs. Anyways, take care. CASalt (talk) 03:22, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I would like to ask your help on this particular issue on Ariana Grande article. The article is so decorated with unnecessary fancruft and puffery, especially propagated by the user Mirrored7.

1. I removed the superfluous autograph image from the infobox and that user keeps adding it back. As we all know, Grande is prominently known for being a singer and an actress. However, that specific editor keeps adding the "songwriter" bit to the prose. I've reverted it thrice; and I don't wanna do it anymore. Yes, she writes some of her songs, and that is why "songwriter" is in the infobox, but further putting in the first line of the prose? That's misleading. She's not primarily known as a songwriter.

2. Just because I removed "songwriter" from the lead line and short description, Mirrored7 tracked my contributions and learned that I primarily edit on Taylor Swift articles, and has started to unnecessarily disruptive-edit the lead of the Taylor Swift article, over things that have already been discussed, resolved and settled with other users. This is petty fan war behavior.

Please look into this, as I believe you're experienced in dealing with such editors. Thank You. Regards. BawinV (talk) 12:02, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like you've had some help already. I'm not too familiar with the content of those articles, but I agree with your points and will keep it in mind. isento (talk) 20:03, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Two things:

• you are not a good person
• suicide is always an alternative.

Now, get back to making EVERYONE around you miserable. It's the one thing you're good at. 143.244.37.211 (talk) 20:17, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Have we dated? isento (talk) 00:50, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

We both know you could never get a date. 143.244.37.230 (talk) 12:25, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

::: Hahaha wow. This is pretty flattering... isento (talk) 12:41, 14 October 2020 (UTC) [reply]

Keep talking like that to me, and I might let you go all the way with me ;) isento (talk) 12:41, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I know I'm not. And I'm sorry for whatever I did to you. I've probably hurt a lot of people, and I've hurt, too. But I've been humbled recently, and I've realized it's the only way. And I'm determined to get better. isento (talk) 04:53, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Jimmy Lee (album) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 13:02, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Jimmy Lee (album) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Jimmy Lee (album) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 11:01, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Jimmy Lee (album) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Jimmy Lee (album) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 08:22, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion has begun at WP:RSN regarding the website should be count as an unreliable source and should be remove off the ratings template. Please add your comments there if interested. – TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 01:36, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have given you credit on the nominations page; care to leave any comments? --K. Peake 08:12, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Love for Sale (Bilal album) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 08:21, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]