User talk:TDFan2006

If I get multiple messages, please eventually archive them, thanks!

User talk:TDFan2006/archive
User talk:TDFan2006/archive2
User talk:TDFan2006/archive3
User talk:TDFan2006/archive4
User talk:TDFan2006/archive5

User:TDFan2006/sandbox
User:TDFan2006/sandbox2

Because of Cyphoiddick I have been blocked because they think I'm a sock... The Toon Disney Guy (talk) 07:28, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not certain who you are talking to, but please be sure they read all the behavioral evidence in your sockpuppet investigation. Then convince them that although Unorginal (aka Uno) was a frequent Hoshi sock, it is a mere coincidence that "Unovia" appears throughout multiple versions of your sandbox as well as on the talk page of this blocked, disruptive Aberdeen IP address. If they're still listening, explain to them that these edits were made in good faith: [1][2][3]. If they haven't tossed you in a peat bog by this point and still believe that you're a victim, let me know--I want them on speed-dial in case I ever need a jury. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:12, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah yeah, thitever. Oh, and on that IP's talk, it says Uvoania, not Unovia. And I don't know how that shit is good-faith. The Toon Disney Guy (talk) 07:24, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It says Unovia as well. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:51, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, you are clever, but, how is there proof Hoshi used that IP address? The Toon Disney Guy (talk) 09:37, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Note that I've removed talk page access due to abuse. However, this also means that no one really needs to talk to TDFan2006 anymore. I won't protect the talk page, because I suppose it is possible there is a good reason someone might need to post some kind of notice here in the future, but if it isn't clearly important, then please don't post here. --Floquenbeam (talk) 11:33, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TDFan2006 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

That CheckUser thing must have made a mistake, I am not a sock of HoshiNoKaabii or any of those shitheads, you guys should stop being a dick about it, because I'M NOT A SOCK, I'M A NEW USER, even with all those similarities. The Toon Disney Guy (talk) 10:37 am, Today (UTC+1)

Decline reason:

If we unblocked every account which simply claimed that it was not a sockpuppet, there would be no point in blocking such accounts in the first place. You will need to provide plausible reasons for the similarities in your editing, plus the rest of the technical and behavioural evidence against you, if you wish to be unblocked. Shouting, "I'm not a sock!" doesn't do anything to help your case - and you might want to rein in your language on any future unblock appeal, as well.Yunshui ^雲_水 13:59, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sky Channel 1989.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:14, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sky One 1990.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:14, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:PlayhouseDisneyLogo2000.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:35, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:PlayhouseDisneyLogo2000.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:39, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:DisneyChannel2007.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 07:53, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Disney Channel 1997.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 07:58, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TDFan2006, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

SummerPhD^v2.0 15:56, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Nick logo 2005.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused logo with no article used, it's also can't move to commons because of an unused logo will be deleted as of out of project scope.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Willy1018 (talk) 13:59, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:CBBC 2002 logo.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Depreciated in favor of the higher quality File:CBBC 2002 logo.svg. This image is of particularly low quality (straight lines are wavy here), so there's no reason to retain.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:13, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:CITV logo 2006.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused, superseded by File:CITV logo 2006.svg

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 15:47, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]