User talk:TB Chigz

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to James Maslow has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: James Maslow was changed by TB Chigz (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.904127 on 2013-05-02T14:09:59+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:10, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi TB Chigz! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! SarahStierch (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:16, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. One of your recent contributions to Total Drama: All-Stars has been reverted or removed, because it contains speculative or unconfirmed information about a future event. Please only add material about future events if it is verifiable, based on a reference to a reliable source. Thank you. Creativity-II (talk) 10:40, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mindless Behavior. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Materialscientist (talk) 13:05, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to List of Total Drama episodes, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Creativity-II (talk) 07:17, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Big Brother Mzansi 3 (South Africa) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; font-size:90%; line-height:15px"

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:57, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Big Brother Africa 9 may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Since Team Waka Waka won the Extravaganza for the previous week, they were immune from eviction (unless the Head of House puts them up for eviction.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:37, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Big Brother Africa 6, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fireworks (song). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:41, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Big Brother Africa 2, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hiatus. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Chris Brown, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. IPadPerson (talk) 21:11, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TB Chigz. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tylen Jacob Williams, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Westchester. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:49, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TB Chigz. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited New Edition, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ricky Bell (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:49, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2018–19 EFL League One, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ian Henderson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:34, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TB Chigz. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at 2017–18 Premier League shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Victor Schmidt (talk) 18:57, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thought you might be interested in the conversation and want to take part. Govvy (talk) 16:40, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm SummerPhDv2.0. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, List of Kenan & Kel episodes, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please see WP:KIDSTVDATES. SummerPhD^v2.0 13:35, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wigan's points deduction is as "certain" as any points deduction still under appeal (such as Macclesfield Town most recent deduction). The timing is what's uncertain. But in any scenario where QPR is in the relegation zone, Wigan's deduction would be applied this year. See my explanation here and this reference (i.e. a reliable source showing QPR's probability of relegation is null). There will be at least 3 teams that finish behind QPR: Barnsley, Wigan, and at least one of Hull and Luton. Cheers. Bmf 051 (talk) 09:51, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On every Premier league page from 92/93 to 05/06 can you change the name of Arsenal Stadium to Highbury Stadium because it was called Highbury Stadium and not Arsenal Stadium Bhillwiki2000 (talk) 00:53, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) @Bhillwiki2000: Actually, it was never "Highbury Stadium", just "Highbury", so that's wrong for a start. The correct name of the stadium was Arsenal Stadium, which is why the article is located there. Please don't make any changes to this effect, thanks. – PeeJay 02:41, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No, we cannot change the name because Highbury wasn't the official stadium name. It was only named that because of the location it was in. Besides, we only use the official stadium names on those pages and not the names they were known by at that point. TB Chigz (talk) 07:37, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Falmer Stadium is located in Falmer village, which is not in Brighton itself. RM-Taylor (talk) 21:01, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

While that is true, the club itself is based in Brighton according to the club's page and that's the information we use for the club's location. TB Chigz (talk) 13:34, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Xclusivzik. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Mpura, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Xclusivzik (talk) 16:53, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Mpura, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Please don’t cite unreliable sources per WP:RS Xclusivzik (talk) 19:42, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Mpura, you may be blocked from editing. Xclusivzik (talk) 08:19, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Xclusivzik: no worries. Since I can't find a "reliable" source, I'll leave this page alone and focus on the pages I'm used to editing.TB Chigz (talk) 12:10, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2019–20 Premier League table has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Hhkohh (talk) 06:53, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TB Chigz (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My IP address is 197.221.255.30. TB Chigz (talk) 05:33, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline. You are not blocked, so there's no block I can lift. The IP is blocked, but we very rarely lift those for this reason. Instead, what I will suggest is that you go to WP:IPECPROXY and follow the instructions there to request IP block exemption. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:34, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

TB Chigz (talk) 05:33, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please tell me the exact moment where Roman Reigns said he kicked Jimmy out, not interpretation of Solo Sikoa spiking Jimmy (that qualifes as original resarch). Roman Reigns Fanboy (talk) 04:18, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Actions speak louder than words. I don't remember the Bloodline announcing Sami Zayn's exit yet the attack on him confirmed his exit anyway.

Anyway, this link should verify that the actions taken on Jimmy Uso confirm that he was kicked out of the Bloodline.

"Roman Reigns deals with The Bloodline dissension: SmackDown Highlights, June 2, 2023". YouTube. 2 June 2023.TB Chigz (talk) 06:47, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Again I didn't ask for original research. Because based on that Jimmy saying it's just them now at Night of Champions would be him leaving too. [1] Please provide Roman Reigns or Solo or Heyman explicitly saying Jimmy has been kicked out, not your interpretations of what happened. Roman Reigns Fanboy (talk) 08:34, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And where does it explicitly say that Jimmy Uso left the Bloodline? Cause we can also say that's your interpretation of what happened. I'm not interpreting anything, but simply stating what's on the ground! The two links below should confirm what you're doubting and that source is reliable on WWE updates!

"Jimmy Uso gets betrayed by fellow-Bloodline member and is now kicked out of the faction".

"Paul Heyman gives a potential spoiler on Jey Uso's decision after Jimmy was removed from The Bloodline".

TB Chigz (talk) 08:50, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If that's what you think go ahead, restore Jimmy Uso. But you have any explicit mention by either party of kicking out Jimmy. Other sources offering their own interpretation is not reliable per WP:RSOPINION. Since you think Jimmy was kicked out please prove it. Roman Reigns Fanboy (talk) 09:13, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And which source proves that Jimmy Uso left the Bloodline on his own at Night of Champions? Cause various sources never mentioned Jimmy out of the Bloodline, but rather asked what will happen to the Bloodline next. TB Chigz (talk) 10:20, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Actions speak louder than words." Roman Reigns Fanboy (talk) 10:41, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also [2]. Roman Reigns Fanboy (talk) 11:08, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it's safe to say that this issue is rather based on opinion according to each site cause they all have different views about how and when the uce left the Bloodline. We'll just have to wait for Jey's decision on Friday. TB Chigz (talk) 12:48, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from using Sportskeeda as a reference on WWE-related Wikipedia pages like you did at The Judgment Day when you replaced my reference for Edge opposing the "supernatural plans" for the stable.

I used the Wrestling Observer Newsletter because it is a trusted source and Sportskeeda isn't. For more information, please see the sources page on WikiProject Professional Wrestling. Zippo9310 (talk) 03:15, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That was not my intention. I was just trying to edit the incomplete edit by placing two braces at the end of the reference. I just used the most recent edit that used that, but other than that, it wasn't done intentionally. TB Chigz (talk) 05:29, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In that case, I'm sorry. All I could see when checking the recent edit history was a replacement of my citation with Sportskeeda. Didn't mean to sound so harsh. My bad. --Zippo9310 (talk) 10:36, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[3] WWE says Jey Uso has set conditions for his return to Bloodline, you don't return to something you're a part of. Official word matters over secondary sources, especially sources that are deemed unreliable by Wikipedia consensus. But since I know removing him will lead to an edit war, I have avoided it. Regardless, next time avoid such useless disputes and let things be. Roman Reigns Fanboy (talk) 05:56, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Funny enough I sent an authentic link similar to yours in regards to Jimmy Uso's status, but you claimed I was doing original research yet that came from the official word. You just want to place your opinions on these edits without fully researching on the whole issue in hand. TB Chigz (talk) 08:24, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Plus Jey never left the Bloodline officially. He was practically torn in the middle between the Bloodline and Jimmy. This is similar to when Sami Zayn was out of the faction, but he was still regarded as a member by then. How is this situation different?

Anyway, it doesn't matter now since he's now officially out of the Bloodline. TB Chigz (talk) 08:30, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Crown Jewel (2023), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dragon Lee. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Instead of going back and forth, let's discuss Punk here and see if we can work something out. As I said, Sports Illustrated (a fully reliable source) was the one who reported the story. All 411 did was relay it, and I put the actual SI article in as a reference, so it's right there front and center. I know WWE is being coy in public regarding Punk, but you also have to be cognizant of the kayfabe factor. SI doesn't do kayfabe, as they are a straight sports media outlet. I don't mean to argue with you and I don't want you to think I'm picking a fight. All I'm doing is pointing out where I'm coming from. Vjmlhds (talk) 04:58, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

While I understand what you're saying about the build up of his storytelling, it's still regarded as an event in the future, which is something that's avoided on professional wrestling articles because of kayfabe. Wikipedia clearly states that we cannot add information that's yet to happen. Also, various sources still list CM Punk as a free agent and those sources are actually more reliable than 411 as 411 is a limited reliable source. In my opinion, he should be listed as a Raw superstar once he's classified as one. TB Chigz (talk) 05:06, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sports Illustrated is the source, all 411 was was the middle man. And as I said, I included the SI article itself as a reference. Don't get hung up on 411, SI is the main source, and they are deemed as fully reliable Vjmlhds (talk) 14:23, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My point though is it doesn't make sense to list him as a Raw superstar if it's not made official yet even if it's a planned thing and tonight's episode of Raw proved he's still a free agent, of which current events are more authentic than what's being planned. We have to avoid the kayfabe part of these kind of things. TB Chigz (talk) 03:33, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Chigz. I want to talk about the changes you made on the Damage CTRL page. You stated that Iyo being a leader is just an assumption. But I want to ask, if she's not the leader, then who is? She's the only one who's been making orders and demands. Thatoneguylol101 (talk) 06:26, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, making demands or orders doesn't make one a leader of a faction. If that was the case, either Rhea Ripley or Damian Priest should be the leader of the Judgement Day, but that's not the case. So to answer your question, Damage CTRL doesn't have a leader at this point.

Second, Wikipedia works with sourced and authentic information, of which none of the reliable sources confirm Sky being the leader. Until or unless either WWE itself or its reliable sources confirm that, Damage CTRL certainly doesn't not have a leader.

I hope you have been answered.

TB Chigz (talk) 07:20, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I have. Thatoneguylol101 (talk) 03:54, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]