User talk:Snowcream

Hello, Snowcream, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Victuallers (talk) 09:04, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't make unfounded assertions, such as certain scholars are not universally accepted. Also as you argued on the Gautama Buddha page, all points of view should be presented. Moreover there were several errors in which the source texts did not say what was claimed. Lastly, some tantric Shaivaites do not accept the Vedas as authority. Thank you for your cooperation in advance. CO2Northeast (talk) 19:01, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please top editing and reverting back Hinduism article.I have noted your course of actions are more about maligning and diluting the truth and factual knowledge which is against the Wikipedia guidelines. If this continues, i will personally make sure of reporting it directly to higher authorities. And will make sure that this gets a bigger light of picture in public. Secondly, i will keep changing it back to "religion" even if you revert it.

You are no one to define what Religion means in Western World, because below is the Oxford Dictionary Meaning of Religion. http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/religion Oxford Dictionary meaning of: religion

the belief in and worship of a superhuman controlling power, especially a personal God or gods: ideas about the relationship between science and religion [count noun] a particular system of faith and worship: the world’s great religions [count noun] a pursuit or interest followed with great devotion: consumerism is the new religion

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.23.195.50 (talk) 19:50, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I saw that you have reverted all changes made by User:NagaSindu in his edit wholesale; I think it would have been better to proceed more selectively. Your point that Hinduism isn't exclusively monotheistic but diverse is certainly correct (however, you could argue it's not unlike Catholicism, where the "elite" version of the religion is exclusively monotheistic but folk religion may be polytheistic in practice, although Hinduism, unlike Catholicism, also includes atheistic individuals), but the changes to the earlier section didn't look bad to me, and didn't directly concern monotheism. Not to mention that he included references – though their validity would have to be argued on a case-by-case basis. Or is there a longer history behind that which I'm not aware of? --Florian Blaschke (talk) 16:12, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The user's edits were from a specific point of view and were not at all comprehensive. Hinduism is in no way a "monotheistic religion". Snowcream (talk) 03:38, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Arabic numerals, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are certain this information is correct, please add a reliable reference to verify the information. Thank you. Zyxwv99 (talk) 14:03, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You reverted this in the article on Hindu philosophy. Your edit summary was: "Hindu philosophy neither obsolete not antiquated...". I think you have misunderstood the reason for placing the link to ancient philosophy there. All schools of philosophy that flourished before 6th century CE are classified as ancient philosophy. Since, all the six āstika schools and the three nāstika schools flourished before this time they can be classified as such. This classification was never intended for medieval schools of philosophy such as Advaita Vedanta, Shaiva Siddhanta, Kashmir Shaivism etc. Of course, I have no issues with you rewording or even deleting the link, if you still feel it implies Hindu philosophy is antiquated.

On a side note, please don't quote BRD as a policy. Besides, if you were following the BRD, the onus was on you to discuss once I reverted your edit, instead of reverting it again. That said, I am not very particular about getting the ancient word in the lead, especially if it leads to misconceptions like these.CorrectKnowledge (talk) 11:44, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that when i modified the sentence to ".. is traditionally divided into .."; it serves your concern. Snowcream (talk) 12:48, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

		The NPOV Barnstar of Merit
		For keeping the POV jingoism away and bringing the full matter to the noticeboard. DBigXray 14:33, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
		This WikiAward was given to Snowcream by DBigXray on 14:33, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The sock has been blocked. --DBigXray 14:33, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You Snowcream (talk) 12:37, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It's regarding your revert in Kerala here. Also you have alleged the author Cyriac Pullapilly with some communal POV. If you have any concerns regarding the reliability of the source, you have to address it in WP:RSN. Currently, the same source has been used without any controversy in WP articles like Nambudiri, Caste system in Kerala, Ezhava etc. Next, you accused Casteist POV on the new contributions and I hope we could discuss to resolve this issue; I've opened a discussion in the talkpage of Kerala and expect your co-operation to improve the article. --AshLey ^Msg 08:46, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

over to talkpage of Kerala Snowcream (talk) 14:46, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted your good faith edits in Kerala since it seems contradicting the already cited source. Also I've some concerns regarding your reason cited to rename the section. Please discuss it too. AshLey ^Msg 13:57, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you are convinced we could save time: some veteran users conveyed that the the title "Religious traditions" is misleading as it it infers that the section would describe the various religious traditions of the people of Kerala. I also concur with it and hence the title was modified. I have tried to address your concern by modifying the title as "Kerala and ancient religious texts". Welcome your view.

If you want to include a different view on the Bali story please cite a better source and avoid inserting within the cited text. Lets discuss it in article talkpage. I'll invite some veteran editors to review it. AshLey ^Msg 14:10, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Snowcream. This message is being sent to inform you that a discussion is taking place at Wikipedia:Wikiquette assistance regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. AshLey ^Msg 09:21, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Namaskar WBRSin (talk) 16:01, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Thanks for leaving a message for me. I noticed your changes. The following are my observations.

• I fully agree with you that Onam is a Hindu festival and I stand corrected.
• I removed two of the pookalam pics you added and restored the vallamkali and pulikali pics based on the observations made on the article's talk page.
• Also fixed some grammatical and typo errors that any of the subsequent edits have introduced.

If you have any objections/observations, leave a message for me in my talk page. Machinist 88 (talk) 17:47, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Indian Union Muslim League, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Yemeni (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:31, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Languages of India, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page English (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I would appreciate it if you would first discuss reverting to a copy of an article that is (say) more than a dozen edits (by registered editors) or a month or so old. Thanks. Student7 (talk) 18:53, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It finally dawned on me that you didn't revert to a prior version, but rather picked up a past version you liked. Edited it offline someplace, then replaced the current version. So we have no idea how far back this reversion goes. This is not really considered cricket for a long-time article. Please revert first, then make changes in place with edit summaries, so that those of us who watch the article can understand not only what you are doing, but why you are doing it. Thanks. Student7 (talk) 17:50, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

See Talk:Cattle_slaughter_in_India#Origin_of_cattle_slaughter, one user has talked about your changes. Bladesmulti (talk) 05:53, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please note 4im warnings are only appropriate for severe vandalism or defamation. Here the user blanked some content without using an edit summary. Nothing above a level 1 warning would have been appropriate. Thanks — MusikAnimal ^talk 19:50, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted your edit on the page. I wonder why have you removed the reasons given by the writer herself for her conversion while some biased writer's version has been given prominence. Also I had read somewhere that Leela Menon's claims were refuted by MD Nalappat. Malayala Sahityam (talk) 05:13, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I was hoping for you to comment on the Onam talk page in this section, you seem to have been part of such discussions earlier also. Thanks. Shimlaites (talk) 12:56, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:27, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Appam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dosa. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Noticed you removed the pic and added Hindu to onam. would like to say few points:

1. if you make celebrate onam by someone who consider everything ‘ഹറാം haram’ , it’ll make them loose their venam. Making them in line with secularism and friendly loosing bond with their religion and religious terrorism. in Kerala Muslims started celebrating onam.

so reconsider undoing your edits 174.192.202.91 (talk) 20:07, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why you reverted an edit of adding reference from a peer reviewed joural in Onam Article. Ranjithsiji (talk) 05:03, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am adding the reference again. Please don't revert again without talking --Ranjithsiji (talk) 16:24, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]