User talk:Snkcube

This is Snkcube's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Welcome! (We can't say that loud/big enough!)

Here are a few links you might find helpful:

• Be Bold!
• Don't let grumpy users scare you off.
• Meet other new users
• Learn from others
• Play nice with others
• Contribute, Contribute, Contribute!
• Tell us about you

You can sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page.

We're so glad you're here! -- Essjay · Talk 21:01, July 13, 2005 (UTC)

Hey I want to personally thank you for all the contributions you have made to several guns N Roses related articles. I dedicated a lot of time to upgrade the Guns N' Roses article. I added lots of pictures and completly re-wrote entire parts of the it. I have submited it for Featured Article status two times but it has been defeated on the grounds that it does not have a Neutral Point of view. If you are interested, contact me to see if we can work together to achieve the FA for Guns N' Roses. C ya! <<Coburn_Pharr>> 16:47, 27 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thanks for the complements! I would be willing to help you on bringing Guns N' Roses to the FA. Snkcube 14:54, August 27, 2005 (UTC)

Hi, I'm the creator of the Yuki Isoya page you recently made an edit to. It said you un-italicized the name YUKI in the second paragraph, however, I never had it italicized to begin with... and there are no edits to the artcile aside from mine and your's (the 69.etc IP is also myself, I forgot to log in) Just wanted to know if that's all your changed or if Wiki burped. hehe, thanks. Natsuki 22:34, 29 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Natsuki! Yeah, that's all I changed. It's pretty strange... I guess Wiki messed it up just a tiny bit. =] ---Snkcube 15:40, 29 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I was wondering why you excessively linked all the dates on Yuki Isoya. I don't see any valid purpose for it... -- NatsukiGirl\^talk 02:20, 19 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hey again! I actually didn't do the linking(s). Rich Farmbrough did and I just removed a lot of it. --Snkcube 03:09, 19 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop reverting the document. Your wording makes less gramatical sense, and introduces inaccuracies. --Tom Edwards 07:13, 19 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

If you read the first sentence, it just doesn't sound right at all. Plus, it's incorrect. --Snkcube 23:26, 19 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The style may well be down to personal prefence, I admit, but my reverts certainly aren't incorrect. I'm the one who trawled the code to find the information, after all. ;-) --Tom Edwards 08:13, 20 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I won't be doing edits to that part of the paragraph anymore. I'll do some other parts then. =) --Snkcube 03:42, 21 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You know, instead of just listing an article for cleanup, it's helpful to the creator of the page and to others to know what needs fixed. Next time, please leave some notes in the article's discussion page for reference. Coolgamer 15:46, 1 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding you DOA character edits, and specifically the info boxes, the blood type should probaly remain linked to the Japan blood type theory of personality, as that is what it was obviously referenced to when it was put in the game. Since you made the edit I'm just letting you know in case you'd rather change it yourself.--Oni Ookami Alfador^Talk|@ 21:08, 3 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The only way I can link the blood type to that page is to modify the template itself. I might do that if you me want to. --Snkcube 22:00, 3 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It would make sense, as its the primary reasoning when a developer includes blood type in a videogame, much akin to how characters in media are often given zodiac signs and such to develop a personality base. --Oni Ookami Alfador^Talk|@ 03:28, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to point out that there's a discussion on Talk:Naruto (manga) about NarutoFan and (illegally) charging money for fansubs, and whether the link should be included. Were you aware of this when you re-added the site? --Pentasyllabic 07:29, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I actually re-added the link before seeing the talk page. So I wasn't aware of it. Should I not add NarutoFan until the whole debate thing is over? --Snkcube 05:29, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry, but you did not do your homework on the Sega Direct of Japan re-issue of refurbished units being resold. The link below is included to back this statement. The German information was wrong in stating that they were selling new console units, it was only a mistake translating the Japanese into German.

I realize you are doing what you think is correct and I respect this greatly, but I am a reseacher/engineer by profession in the audio/video industry - we have direct corporate association with companies like Sega.

Sorry for the mis-information you were given.

http://segadirect.jp/Catalog/CustomPages/CustomDetail2.aspx?File=underd_dc.htm

Thanks for your kind words! Nach0king 09:12, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, Nach0king. =) --Snkcube 04:55, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You do realize that inserting both "right" and "thumb" [1] on an image is redundant, correct...? :) -Zero^Talk 11:14, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, you do have a point. I was just trying to move the picture so the edit buttons won't get crammed into each other. --Snkcube 11:16, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! Just wondering, what excatly is it you have against the blue hearts? THanks! 203.112.2.212 13:21, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have anything against The Blue Hearts. Actaully, I mistakenly unlinked them in the Puffy AmiYumi article. I'll re-link them for you. Sorry if I confused you or anything. --Snkcube 02:09, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You reverted my edits for Maria Swan and I changed them back. Playboy magazine is considered pornographic and they do not engage in sexual acts. It says on her page that she does erotic work and the websites I am directed to are porn sites. I really dont feel that we should blur the lines between super and fashion models between more erotic models for better categorization. I feel that this helps people find what they are looking for. It's up to you but I would prefer if you leave it the way it is.

Thanks,

Jerry Jones 19:50, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's no big deal. After thinking about it, I guess you're right about this. --Snkcube 07:32, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good job cleaning up the article!:P

>x<ino 15:38, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! It took a while to do so too. =D --Snkcube 01:05, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I just wanted to let you know (as someone who worked on them) that all of the Counter-Strike map articles are up for deletion. --Varco 17:20, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I've been reading about the article deletion. A merge to the Counter-Strike maps Wiki article is the best choice. --Snkcube 07:40, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

One is the Puffy AmiYumi image you had posted on their article (or reposted, since it had been there before). Although a source is given, no proper copyright information was given for the image (just putting the proper copyright tag doesn't fully count.).

Also — and this one could get you in more trouble — that anime image has to be taken off of your user page, per WP:FUC #9, which prohibts images from being used anywhere other than on articles. --Cjmarsicano 14:05, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I see. I'll try to fix up the image. And I'm fine with the anime image off my user page. --Snkcube 19:02, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a reason the "pretty much dead" line has been removed from the DeJap Translations article? Any objections to my readding it? TerraFrost 05:16, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't really know why that line was removed. I mean, DeJap is basically dead from my point of view. You can re-add the line back if you want. --Snkcube 20:27, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

what is the reason of reverting my winamp external link add ?

There was already a link containing old versions of Winamp. --Snkcube 06:24, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

{{User PurePwnage}}

LAWL BOOM! Headshot! This user watches Pure Pwnage.

You may enjoy this user box on your use page! Thanks for all your help to the wikipedia! This is a friendly thank you! :) --DragonWR12LB 19:41, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Haha, thanks for the suggestion and comment. I appreciate it a lot. --Snkcube 22:20, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, noticed you weren't too happy about my changing the images in some video game articles (i.e. Zelda II, Zelda:LttP) from 250px wide to 256px wide :) Let me explain — on every computer I've tested this on, 256px widths provide an attractive, perfectly symmetrical whitespace border within infobox CVG. 250, unfortunately, creates a mismatched proportion between vertical whitespace and horizontal whitespace. It's rather subtle, but it's there, and it drives me crazy :) Please test this for yourself. I wouldn't think it'd look different on your system(s) than on mine. I've tested this in multiple browsers, too. In light of this, is there any good reason to force them to stay at 250? In the absence of any reply here I will eventually change them again. --Ecksemmess 13:39, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I'm sorry about doing those changes. I didn't realized my mistakes after editing the article. It's just that I'm used to seeing pictures that end with either a 5 or 0 on the last digit of the pixel count. Once again, I apologize about the edits I've done. --Snkcube 07:15, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No worries :) I'll change them back to 256. --Ecksemmess 09:11, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There's a free image of Sakura Sena on Commons; however, it has the same name as the fair use one you uploaded. The commons one is here. Is it okay if I delete the fair use one, letting the commons one come through? --Golbez 05:27, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You can delete the picture I uploaded. It's better to use the Commons' picture anyways. --Snkcube 06:00, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Your reversions of my wikilinking of the song titles is utterly retarded, but I don't feel like getting into an edit war over something so petty (but it seems you do), so fine... have it your way. Make users search through 5+ paragraphs of text so they can find the one song they're looking for. And your refusal to leave edit summaries for your reversions is amateurish and counter-productive. I explained my rationale for my edits... it seems you can't.--Hraefen ^Talk 15:06, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Articles with multiple links doesn't seem right. And what's wrong with reading through five+ paragraphs? It doesn't hurt at all. And about not leaving edit summaries, these type of edits occured so many times that I got tired of explaining it. Dig through the edit history if you want. And no, I don't want to argue about something so small. If you want to settle this problem, then tell me how you want to do it. --Snkcube 07:51, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Snkcube.

You seem to have something against the track listing wikilinks right? That's around the 10th time you've reverted a wikilink! Only you too. Not arguing, only telling you that. Other songs have wikilink in the track listing. If one particular song doesn't need a link, than the link should be replaced in a similar matter to the previous songs. Josh215 22:37, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, it's more like the songs are already linked in the article and it doesn't need to be linked twice. However, if an album article needs to have the track listing songs linked, then you can go right ahead and re-link them. --Snkcube 07:38, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for deleting my comments from the hddvd talk page. very nice of you. it's not like it was relevant or anything.

Your comment in the HD DVD talk page wasn't related to the article. And HD DVD didn't "win" at all. --Snkcube 22:11, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you removing links in the reference sections from articles? (Sora Aoi for example.) These are not footnotes for a particular fact, which would justify use of the < ref > , but links to an external database containing facts used throughout the articles. Dekkappai 20:11, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Snkcube. I might have been a bit abrupt above. I've been trying to figure out which of us is right in this Reference section matter. Apparently there is more than one interpretation as to what a Reference section should be. To my way of thinking, it is not a section to link to notes within the text. That would be a Footnotes section. What I had in mind for the References is a collection of all the materials used in writing the article. This seems to be reflected here: [2]-- "Complete citations, also called "references", are collected at the end of the article under a ==References== heading. Under this heading, list the comprehensive reference information as a bulleted (*) list, one bullet per reference work." Anyway, my point is that the source should be cited as a source for facts presented throughout the entire article in this case, not footnoted to one particular fact.

No hard feelings, I hope. Dekkappai 21:58, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The links you posted on those articles doesn't seem like they provide any information, except for their stats. If it's that important, then you can leave those links then. --Snkcube 17:56, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for cleaning up my edit. I was half asleep :D *ps. the wii will rule!* Cocopopz2005 13:09, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. =) --Snkcube 17:56, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Sakura Sena.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 22:34, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Image:Rio Natsume.jpg, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. --Yamla 03:06, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The link that is currently used for the source has been modified by an anonymous user. I tried to revert back to the original link, but you decided to use the vandalized link. I believe you misunderstood my edit. However, it seems like the original source link I used has re-directed to a porn site, which isn't correct. --Snkcube 08:35, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Just curious as to why you removed the lyrics to "There's Something In My Front Pocket" from the "You Got F'ed in the A" South Park page? Captain Infinity 13:14, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lyrics aren't allowed on Wikipedia, due to copyright issues. --Snkcube 21:55, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

But it's not a real, published song. It's just the thing that Butters dances to. It could be considered like any other quote from the show.Captain Infinity 23:11, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I guess if it's not copyrighted or real, it's okay to put it on the page. --Snkcube 09:59, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As a member of Wikipeida, I find that your deletion of my discussions on the DOA's Ayane and Kokoro pages illegal and out of line. You did it twice to me, which is two time too many. I have the right to discuss what you deleted. Don't do it agian!--BigMac1212 01:43, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion(s) you did weren't even related to CHANGES to the articles themselves. Remember, talk pages aren't forums. It's not my rules, it's Wikipedia's own policy. --Snkcube 08:39, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated Cathy Barry, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cathy Barry (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 16:36, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated Shoko Goto, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shoko Goto (3rd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 17:29, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! I'm trying to install a task force under the Guitarists Project. Would you like to join? --HexaChord (talk) 21:09, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As much as I would like to, I just don't have the time to commit to Wikipedia right now. I thank you for the kind offer though! --Snkcube (talk) 21:02, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. It's nothing official, so you would not have to participate on a regular basis, but I respect your decision. --Say Headcheese!--hexaChord² 22:19, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And yet, an official call:

You are invited to join the Buckethead task force, a group dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to avant-garde guitarist Buckethead. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. --Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord2 01:14, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Time & Space – A Tribute to Yasunori Mitsuda, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Time & Space – A Tribute to Yasunori Mitsuda. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 17:57, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 17:53, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Time & Space - A Tribute to Yasunori Mitsuda.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:27, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Back to Black. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 23:55, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:16, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:01, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Snkcube! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II ^talk 17:27, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]