User talk:SirZPthundergod9001

Hello, SirZPthundergod9001! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! GenQuest "Talk to Me" 04:04, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply] Getting Started Contributing to Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions Directories and indexes Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper) Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Don't worry, it's a pretty good article on your first go. You've provided enough independent reliable sources and it looks fine to me. Ss112 14:45, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Heliosxeros was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Sources are not considered reliable. You could source for third party sources like Billboard. Cheers.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Thoughts of No Tomorrow and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Thoughts of No Tomorrow, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

EROS ^message 15:59, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! SirZPthundergod9001, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! EROS message 15:59, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Gareth Griffith-Jones. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Spell Eater have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ‑ ‑ Gareth Griffith‑Jones ^{The Welsh Buzzard} ‑ ‑ 14:41, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for contributing to the article Straight from the Barrio. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable, by being clearly attributed to reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. Please help by adding more sources to the article you edited, and/or by clarifying how the sources already given support the claims (see here for how to do inline referencing). Thanks! P.S. If you need any help, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia or ask at Wikipedia:New contributors' help page, or just ask me. Thank you. --Jax 0677 (talk) 14:49, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for contributing to the article Prevail II. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable, by being clearly attributed to reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. Please help by adding more sources to the article you edited, and/or by clarifying how the sources already given support the claims (see here for how to do inline referencing). Thanks! P.S. If you need any help, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia or ask at Wikipedia:New contributors' help page, or just ask me. Thank you. --Jax 0677 (talk) 16:29, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Primefac was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Vext's main source of notability seems to come from Bad Wolves and the other groups he has sung for. There is almost no coverage outside the blabbermouth article that really discusses him in any detail (other than listing him as the vocalist for X, Y, and Z bands). Fails WP:MUSICBIO at this point in time. More in-depth sources are required to demonstrate notability, so please add additional independent reliable sources that discuss the subject in detail.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tommy Vext and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Tommy Vext, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Primefac (talk) 15:43, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to Alice in Chains, without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. 4TheWynne^{(talk)(contribs)} 11:19, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The genres you added for Ø (Disambiguation) were discussed in the article, but the reviewer does not state that the album is those genres. Read WP:GWAR for additional discussion about this. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:03, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Avatar (band), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Heavy metal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:37, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pedro the Lion, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Travis Smith (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Robvanvee. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Lifesblood, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Robvanvee 04:57, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at Twiztid, you may be blocked from editing. John from Idegon (talk) 02:01, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SirZPthundergod9001. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at Ghost Empire, you may be blocked from editing. Robvanvee 18:10, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Impending Doom (American band). Walter Görlitz (talk) 19:47, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Between the Buried and Me (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Heavy metal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SirZPthundergod9001,

Thanks for creating A tuning! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Please add your references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 08:19, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, A tuning, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 07:57, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I just wanted to thank you for correcting me on the Last Chance To Make Amends page. I never knew there was a December reissue, and I don't really know anything about it.
On that note, I was wondering if you happened to know what the two hidden tracks are and if you could add them to the page? Whatever the case, thanks for fixing that and have a good day.
-DLR — Preceding unsigned comment added by Darkstar100x (talk • contribs) 20:14, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SirZPthundergod9001. I've returned this to a (slightly improved) redirect until it can be shown to meet WP:NALBUM - charts might do it, but evidence of significant critical coverage such as a number of reviews in reliable and independent sources would also work. ^~Hydronium^~Hydroxide^~(Talk)~ 10:06, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Before the Dawn (band) into Rise of the Phoenix (Before the Dawn album). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:52, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Burn My Eyes, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. 4TheWynne^{(talk)(contribs)} 20:16, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Fear Inoculum. Robvanvee 07:30, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Hybrid Theory. - FlightTime (open channel) 05:05, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at The Eternal Reign. Binksternet (talk) 15:03, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Rapture (Betraying the Martyrs album), appears to be written in a promotional manner and should be submitted through the Articles for creation process. In particular, the claim to being "ultimate" is sourceable only to the band itself, and thus does not belong in a Wikipedia article. There may be other issues too.

Additionally, in compliance with Wikipedia's conflict of interest guideline, could you please disclose whether you have any relationship with Betraying the Martyrs or if you have been paid to contribute to this or any other Wikipedia article before editing the article further.

I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can continue to work on the article. When you feel that the article is in compliance with Wikipedia's policies concerning neutrality and due weight and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 08:51, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. 4TheWynne (talk • contribs) 09:13, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SirZPthundergod9001. When you move pages like "Show Yourself" for diambiguation purposes, please check to make sure that there aren't any non-free files being used in the article. All non-free files are required to have separate specific non-free use rationales for each use; so, when you change the name of an article, the rationale also needs to be correspondingly changed to avoid problems like this. I caught this and re-added the file to the infobox, but non-free files which aren't being used in any articles can be speedily deleted per WP:F5 after five days. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:26, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Are you familiar with the above phrase? If not please read this because you are either attempting to be deliberately deceptive or you are not competent to be editing here. Which one is it? You are stepping frightfully close to an WP:ANI report being opened if this continues. Robvanvee 09:54, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please use the preview function, so you do not submit broken changes. I tried to fix the table layout on a page, when I noticed that you tried the same thing at the same time. --Makkonen (talk) 23:38, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Palimpsest (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lakota (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Amberian Dawn, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. GenQuest ^{"Talk to Me"} 04:00, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Navigation template is the guideline. Template:Led Zeppelin has been corrected. Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:32, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Magma (Gojira album) and Terra Incognita (Gojira album). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.Oroborvs (talk) 10:08, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion as you did at Fortitude (album), you may be blocked from editing. Oroborvs (talk) 22:53, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings. Please refrain from adding this source in support of synth metal, which you've done twice now. It categorically does not label the album as "synth[-]metal"; it only discusses the inclusion of synths in the music. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 15:36, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at The Best of Mercyful Fate. Binksternet (talk) 00:17, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Adakiko. I noticed that you recently removed content from Mr. Bean (animated TV series) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Adakiko (talk) 09:36, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Villain (album) a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Villain (Album). This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Jax 0677 (talk) 03:22, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There's nothing wrong with just using "rock" if "rock" is all you have the sourcing for. It's literally that simple. Judging by the number of warnings you've accumulated on this talk page, I imagine you need to worry less about your own views on genre, and just stick to adding whatever can be directly cited by reliable sources. Sergecross73 msg me 00:55, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect School of Thought. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 October 10#School of Thought until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Jax 0677 (talk) 23:33, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GLAM METAL IS NOT POP METAL ChadGoss (talk) 18:44, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SirZPthundergod9001,

Thank you for creating To Travel for Evermore.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This article needs more references from reliable sources to meet WP:NMUSIC, notability for music articles. Thank you.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 22:05, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SirZPthundergod9001,

Thank you for creating Within (Wuthering Heights album).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This article needs more references from reliable sources to meet WP:NMUSIC, notability for music articles. Thank you.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 22:05, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It’s obvious by your commentary you have an issue with the album. However discogs lists the release as an album. As such, only a band itself decides what is or is not an album, it should remain. Mayhem is one of Black Metal’s big 5, the originals from the mid-80s still releasing today. And black metal, with all it’s sub genres inclusive, is one of the top selling genre groups world wide. I’d argue the controversy and disputed CR status alone are reason for inclusion. The major volume of coverage the album has only increases the reasoning for coverage here. I point out WINC and NPOV. The entire point of the cover was to be offensive. Something not unique to Mayhem or even metal. As the Beatles, Screaming Jay, and Big Little all had intentionally disagreeable covers. Lostinlodos (talk) 05:25, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There were other issues with the album's article; barely any reliable sources in the article, and the album cover being a copyright violation and thereby removed from the page. I don't object to the cover, just the article's quality, and now the article is redirected and should stay that way. It's time we move on....SirZPthundergod9001 (talk) 09:30, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SirZPthundergod9001,

You removed Konvent release from March 2022 metal release.
2022_in_heavy_metal_music#March The justification is : Band has no article

It does not seems consistent. It is not because Wikipedia does not reference it, it does not exist. You can easily find material about this band on the Internet. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.0.210.190 (talk) 10:48, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I know that, but even then, the article is supposed to list bands that have articles. If you can create your own account and create an article for Konvent with reliable sourcing, then we can add them to the article, but for now, we're leaving this article-less band out.SirZPthundergod9001 (talk) 10:54, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please note if a redirect is challenged the correct procedure is to take it to AfD if you still think it should be deleted or redirected. If you reimpose the redirect you will be reported for edit-warring, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 00:18, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why remove the entire drop c tuning wiki I play guitar I like to see which bands play in whichever tuning I’m in. Your blatant disregard for anyone but yourself pisses me off, what benefit did deleting an entire page have? Dumbass Trogdor burninator111111 (talk) 19:08, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but I had to because we could no longer allow articles based on such trivial topics that are better off as sections in a categorical article. If you want to see the bands that play in your favorite tuning, click on this link.SirZPthundergod9001 (talk) 22:04, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please, see the feedback you've received repeatedly. You seem to be redirecting a lot of old articles, without any content merge or any discussion. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. MarioGom (talk) 13:26, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please be careful with restoring content. The content you restored at No More Hollywood Endings in its state did not have any indication of passing notability, even though sources may exist for the album. I have moved the article into draftspace to allow for these sources to be added before it can be moved back. Jalen Folf (talk) 16:12, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally, see also WP:BURDEN. Restorations cannot be made without addressing concerns from an initial redirection. Jalen Folf (talk) 07:19, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In the future, when adding new book entries to articles, please make sure either (1) the entry you're adding as an existing article or (2) you provider a source. I've done the latter in this case. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 00:06, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I find it amusing that in this edit you talk about removing an unsourced section, yet for all intents and purposes you added unsourced genres in the same edit. Genres need explicit citation with refnames. You cannot just add a few reviews and say "I took the genres from those sources, go click on each and find where they are". Also read WP:EXPLICITGENRE. If any of those sources talk about those genres and only say "has x elements", "elements" of something is not an explicit genre. Thanks. Ss112 19:07, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In regards to this and similar edits you made, I wanted to point out that your edit summary "Spinoff (of)" is the new term. is inaccurate. Per the documentation at Template:Infobox musical artist, the spinoffs and spinoff_of parameters are not replacements and are not "the new term" for associated acts, they are very specific parameters that are only for bands that spun off of another band, not for associated acts. An example of correct use of the spinoff_of parameter would be Babymetal, which is a spinoff of Sakura Gakuin. To use your Lacuna Coil edit above as an example, Typo O Negative is not a spinoff of Lacuna Coil, so that parameter usage is incorrect. The consensus at Template talk:Infobox musical artist/Archive 16#Remove associated acts? was to remove associated acts from the infobox. It's not an issue of replacing associated_acts with a different name to keep the associated acts in the infobox, the issue is that the associated acts do not belong on the infobox at all, per the new consensus. Please do not change the associated_acts parameter to spinoffs; the correct way to deal with the associated_acts parameter is to remove the content completely. - Aoidh (talk) 01:10, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contribs to Razed to the Ground! The article might be borderline notable, having a Pitchfork review that is RS (see Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums/Sources) and another that is (surprisingly) generally RS but additional considerations are needed. WP:GNG or WP:NALBUM generally needs multiple, independent, reliable, sources that are significant coverage, while meeting WP:NOR, WP:V, and not violating WP:NOT. But some of the refs you've added might not be reliable, see WP:RS. Thanks! VickKiang (talk) 21:59, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Unexpect, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gypsy music.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know, maybe ask if the other people working on the article want to cut it down to just rock and see if that stops the dispute. RockabillyRaccoon (talk) 12:30, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't mean cut it all down to just rock, I meant just remove a couple genres that are only noted as traces (alternative rock and rap rock). But OK, I'll ask other people in the article's talk page. Thanks for the suggestion....SirZPthundergod9001 (talk) 22:59, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. This applies to any and all articles. Lapadite (talk) 06:41, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello SirZP. Per MOS:ALBUM, personnel and production should be part of the same section, not made into separate ones. Thanks. Ss112 23:53, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page A Sign of Things to Come, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 09:41, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Winged Waltz, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Winged Waltz until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Tarot (band), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 22:45, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

i am just updating my legal name. i am trans and this is a dead name someone keeps reverting. i have the legal documents to prove the name is legitimate. Galamity33 (talk) 20:46, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, you're galamity? Nice to meet you. I enjoy your contributions to Trivium. Anyway, we appreciate your edits on the Trivium page, but we have to revert them due to lack of reliable sourcing, and Metal Archives isn't reliable. We may consider letting you update your legal name on the page if you can publish your legal documents somewhere, unless there's some info you want to keep private. I hope you understand, and have a nice day.SirZPthundergod9001 (talk) 00:28, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

my legal documents are published here on this video:

youtu.be/U1Q8Id5bUYs?si=ZKp6vZOxk4Bwq_xS Galamity33 (talk) 02:09, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SirZPthundergod9001. Thank you for your work on Disparity (Oceans Ate Alaska album). Broc, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start, a "Reception" section could be added to expand the article.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Broc}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Broc (talk) 14:18, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Order Divine is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Order Divine until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Broc (talk) 11:20, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ARandomName123 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Second source is fine, but first source is deprecated, and should be replaced. Additionally, please replace the table on top with something like {{infobox band}}.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Big Brave and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 01:22, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, dead links should not simply be removed. Instead see if an archive link exists at https://web.archive.org/ --FMSky (talk) 14:22, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the suggestion, FMSky. That shall help me find sources that are otherwise inaccessible or dead.SirZPthundergod9001 (talk) 06:14, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:28, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:41, 13 November 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Another reminder that all content additions require sourcing to verify it. Even band roles should be sourced in the article body or somewhere. Thanks. Sergecross73 msg me 18:17, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]