User talk:Shivashree

Hi Shivashree, I'm thankful for your appreciations. I accept you invitation to contribute towards the information of BAMCEF as I know there are two types of organization functioning on the name of BAMCEF one is known as registered BAMCEF and the other is unregistered BAMCEF. Their goals and motivations and entirely different. I think there is a need to study on this aspect before commenting upon it.

Any future suggestions are requested on my works. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ranjithsutari (talk • contribs) 18:49, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

She clearly was a remarkable person who's life is not easy to document, and your efforts there are much appreciated. However, please note that we may not feature on the main page articles having obvious gaps in content. Materialscientist (talk) 10:20, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

== YesMy Dear, I am OK here and have to complete all the duties before leaving the station, otherwise Principal will not allow to go for such a long duration Leaves. Extremely sorry for not calling and not messaging even. I could hardly check mails also. Also I had to do CBSE exam duties also, so really busy. sorry, As you think I have not hurt with your words. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kmohankar (talk • contribs) 08:33, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thank you for the heads up. Asarelah (talk) 19:52, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Generally a good article. (I am unfamiliar with the subject.) The introduction is too long relative to the article as a whole. Much of the intro. should be taken to the legacy section at the end. The queen who is mentioned should be identified when she is first referred to. Some small cleanup is required to make the language more idiomatic and the tone more encyclopedic. Marshall46 (talk) 11:15, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the update. Asarelah (talk) 16:11, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Namaskar!,
I on behalf of Hindi wikipedia, welcome you to Hindi Wikipedia. After that very many thanks for your comments on an article there. I had given the answer there only. You can see that at वार्ता:झलकारी बाई. Thanks once again.--आशीष भटनागर (talk) 09:35, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On March 21, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Jhalkaribai, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 09:54, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm happy to learn that we share common interests. I've checked you previous edits on The Buddha nd His Dhamma, you have presented the complete table of content, and some reference to the terms in the content. I want to present this article with a perfect overview, where every one will come to know the four points that BabaSaheb has raised in this book and the answers provided in this book. As I know this book is available for free(open source) so I don't think there will be any copyright violations.

Any suggestions are requested on my works

Thank you

Ranjithsutari (talk) 20:47, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Noticed that there are many names in "List of Indian poets" page who do not have their own pages in wikipedia. The policy is to give external reference if there is no individual wikipedia page. In this case, an external reference has been provided.

Hi Shiva... Thanks for notifying me that we don't have any image of Jhalkari Bai on Wiki. I'll definitely post one at the earliest... Thanks Vishwas —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vishwas008 (talk • contribs) 11:11, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jai Bhim!!!

Happy Bhim jayanthi !!!!

I've enjoyed celebrating this auspicious day by hoisting panchasheel flags at many places.

at evening I have once again got the chance to view Babasheb's Movie in public at Buddha vihara.

Your's in Dhamma

Ranjith —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ranjithsutari (talk • contribs) 20:47, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Jai Bheem!!! I'm fine and going good. I hope ur fine too. Here is the link for new page Shetkaryacha Asud(The cultivators' Whipcord) book written by Mahatma Phule. I've created but it needs to be updated with many monuments and places. Ranjithsutari (talk) 14:40, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a little concerned about the promotion of the Jonaki (magazine) hook since the copy editing I stated needed to be done before promotion was not done in any fashion. A native English speaker needs to take a quick pass through to eliminate awkward phrasing and the like before this reaches the front page. - Dravecky (talk) 23:53, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed the article is not created by a native English speaker and it may have some "awkward phrasing" as you noted. Could you please specify those phrasings? (I too am not a native English speaker). However, I will request User:Xeteli to find someone for quick copyedit. The article hook is currently in prep area and will take at least 36 to 48 hours to appear on Main Page. I hope he can find a fresh pair of eye before it appears there. Shivashree (talk) 03:01, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Thanks Shivashree for notifying me the concern. But honestly speaking I am also not a native English speaker. I do agree that the article needs some copyediting. In that case, if somebody comes forward to do the job, I would be thankful to him/her. -- XETELI ^{(HELLO) • FOOTAGE)} 07:24, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, i'm not the one having the blog Man Vadhay Vadhay. I've seen ur work at wokipedia. its incredible. great contribution. thanks for making Nagpur's information available to whole world. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sanketholey (talk • contribs) 05:38, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Keep editing. I will be always available to you for any help. Shivashree (talk) 05:48, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On April 19, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article L. N. Hardas, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 12:24, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Following is the copy-past discussion from Rankithsutari's talk page:

Hi Ranjit: Good work going at User:Ranjithsutari/Castes in India: Their Mechanism, Genesis and Development. Keep it up. I have fixed a few wikilinks in the article and made some minor copyedits. This presentation is an important book for research and study of caste system in many universities and academic programs. This sentence seems a bit ambiguous; can we re-frame it with avoiding the dubious words with some firm reference? This article is cited by many scholars several times and it is certainly an important document for the researchers of the subject. You can find some scholars who cited this book here and here. Sincerely, Shivashree (talk) 04:23, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• also have a look at this article Analysing and ethnicising caste to eradicate it more effectively by Christophe Jaffrelot. Shivashree (talk) 04:32, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ranjith: I really appreciate your efforts contributing to Babasaheb-related articles, but I am afraid that the Castes in India article is not going in a correct direction. Wikipedia is a encyclopedia and not a collection of original sources or quotations (see WP:QUOTE). If you want to publish the complete paper, you can copy paste it on wikisource (I believe it's already there). As it is published in 1917, it is in public domain in USA where Wikipedia server is based. If you just want to quote just some excerpts, you may do it on Wikiquotes, which was almost no information about Babasaheb. On Wikipedia, we write about the things, not the things themselves. I do not want to discourage you, but Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and we must keep it such. Please let me know your thoughts. Shivashree (talk) 04:34, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Shivashree, I am very thankful for your appreciations. I'm presenting this article to give some space for complex points raised by Babasheb. In regard to its complexity it might not be possible to present it in others view. I hope this article is not presenting the complete source itself. I understand the mechanism of Wikipedia:Copy-paste. I hope this article will meet the WP:BK guidelines. Any further suggestions are requested on my works.--Ranjithsutari (talk) 17:23, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This article certainly meets notability guidelines, I am not questioning it at all. As you may have noticed I myself had started this article a couple of years ago, but it was deleted then as I was a very infrequent editor at that time and could not take part in the deletion discussion. What I am concerned about is the structure of the article. The book itself becomes a primary source when we are writing about the same book. We should base our article more on secondary and tertiary sources rather than primary. WP:PRIMARY states that Do not base articles entirely on primary sources. The book is important enough that we can find enough secondary sources to make our article at least a good one. Also, the words like "I", etc. does not look good in encyclopedic content. You can get some help from Wikipedia:WikiProject Books/Non-fiction article. We must be more cautious because this article was deleted once and we will need to get permission from the deleting administrator before moving it to mainspace. Sincerely, Shivashree (talk) 08:32, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's ready to move. It needs some work to be done yet, but let it be open to the Wikipedia community to do. You just ask the deleting administrator before making a move to have a look at the article. I am quite busy nowadays in my professional life and not able to find much time to work on larger projects. Thanks for retrieving this article from the deletion.

P.s. I am copy-pasting this whole discussion to the article talk page to make it available for those who might be interested in the work you did before bringing this article to mainspace. Shivashree (talk) 04:48, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! back to you.

You have Godavari Parulekar on your wish list. I had when I was a child attended a lecture by her.

Yogesh Khandke (talk) 08:06, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Yogesh for dropping by my talk page. If you might have noticed, I have not been engaged in any major project on Wikipedia over the last month. Trapped in a busy schedule. If you are interested, please go ahead and start the article on Godavari Parulekar yourself. You can create it on your userpage as a start and then move it to mainspace as it is ready to go. Here are some references if you want to go ahead:

• Encyclopaedic dictionary of Marathi literature‎ - Page 270
• The Encyclopaedia Of Indian Literature (Volume Two) Page 1823
• Encyclopaedia Of Political Parties
• Mythos and logos of the Warlis: a tribal worldview

You can find many more with Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL. Let me know if you are interested. I will be happy to assist you developing the article. Shivashree (talk) 03:54, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the links and the request to start page on Godavari Parulekar, I already have a few projects at hand which I wish to contribute, Chapekar brothers, Savarkar, Madia Gond, so my hands are full.

Thanks again. Yogesh Khandke (talk) 05:34, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 21:15, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jai Bhim , I got your message but my typing speed is not good and busy in day-to-day work, that's why the reply from me is very late. So my friend be in touch. It's nice to see your articles...., hats off to you. And thanks for you editions in pune sarvajanik sabha. Thanks dear.Adhanter (talk) 21:20, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Hi Adhanter, Thanks for your reply and thanks again for appreciating my work here. I am going through some technical difficulties with internet access and not able to log in Wikipedia very frequently. However, I am very keenly looking at the articles that I've been working on.

Best luck for your future work on Wikipedia. I am looking forward for the best from you. Lovingly yours, Ganesh. Shivashree (talk) 06:14, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. In February you added a citation to a book from the "Webster's Quotations" series published by Icon Group International to this article. Unfortunately, Icon Group International is not a reliable source - their books are computer-generated, with most of the text copied from Wikipedia (most entries have [WP] by them to indicate this). I'm removing a lot of similar references; many other editors have also been deceived by these sources. Another publisher that reuses Wikipedia articles is Alphascript Publishing. Fences&Windows 22:57, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know about these unreliable sources. We must try hard to make Wikipedia a reliable encyclopedia. Thanks again. Shivashree (talk) 03:13, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to have overlooked your message. Remaining on the look out for the information. Regards.BobClive (talk) 08:58, 18 August 2010 (UTC)BobClive[reply]

Thanks Ranjith a lot for starting Fighting against untouchability in the article about Dr. Ambedkar. It was the most important aspect of his life and up till now it was ignored out of the article. Any biographical article about Dr. Ambedkar cannot not even start without this aspect of his life.

I am very sorry that I am having very limited access to internet these days and cannot participate actively in any of your projects on Wikipedia, some of which are too close to my heart. Also, article about Bahishkrit Hitakarini Sabha is very important and it must by on this encyclopedia. If you have writing and speeches of Dr. Ambedkar, the constution of the Sabha is published in Volume 17, part 3, and it will be helpful to you if you intend to start the article. Also teh attached image from commons may be useful for illustrating in the article about the Sabha.

Left me know about your progress. Shivashree (talk) 04:28, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thank you for your appreciation. I think this aspect of Babasahebs' life is very important because it clearly shows the hypocrisy, which still exists in this society. I think presenting this aspect in Babashebs' own words is the best way to justify this article. There are many more articles specifically related to Babasahab which qualify the criteria to be on this encyclopedia, but unfortunately I do not have the access to any of the volumes of "Writings and Speeches of Dr. Ambedkar" moreover I can't afford it. I am trying to find on internet but it is available only in Telugu language that too upto 8 volumes only. If you have any links of the Vol. 15, Vol.16 and 3 parts of Vol. 17 please kindly provide me. Thanks in advance--Ranjithsutari (talk) 09:28, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

unfortunately I do not have the access to any of the volumes of "Writings and Speeches of Dr. Ambedkar" moreover I can't afford it. Same thing with me too bro. Let's hope some betterment in the near future. Shivashree (talk) 10:41, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello I am Mahatee,I'm from Thailand

I can help you Translate Deekshabhoomi to Thai

If you need help,you can contact me here

--Mahatee (talk) 11:36, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I translated at here

I don't know certain vocablary word,how to translate to Thai.

--Mahatee (talk) 05:22, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh sorry

I forget to put link to Thai.

link here

--Mahatee (talk) 11:27, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I've started a stub on the French version. Cheers, Popo le Chien ^{throw a bone} 11:41, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, This article was translated into Persian. Muhammad 11:48, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The German version is ready!--Druffeler (talk) 07:29, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Achauhan1995 (talk) 13:11, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Shivashree, Achauhan1995 has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

I just wanna say you Hi1

I don't remember where I found you from but I think it is somewhere from Indian categories. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Achauhan1995 (talk • contribs) 14:32, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

		The Buddhism Barnstar, Indian Order
		I award you this Buddhism barnstar, Indian order, for writing many valuable articles about India, Maharashtra, Dalit movements, and Navayana Buddhism, as well as promoting these subjects in various languages. Jai Bhim! Shii (tock) 06:34, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I hope you would like to review and add or expand contents to this new article Bahishkrit Hitakarini Sabha. --Ranjithsutari (talk) 15:45, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In the rush of this world it become very difficult to bilieve anybody. But wikipedia is an exception to this you can bilieve and refuse and edit to currect.Vinod Suradkar (talk) 05:52, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

kushal 13:08, 5 February 2011 (UTC)I just want to know about the book of malika amar sheikh 'mala uddhvast vhaychay'. do you know anyone in mumbai from whom i may get this book? as they no more publish this book. reply. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kushal.1889 (talk • contribs)

• Hi, Khushal! Sorry that you have to wait so long for my reply! I was out for a while and was not on Wikipedia for a while.

Sorry, but i too could not find that book. There is always a scarcity of old Marathi books in the market. By the way, did you check with the publishers? Try searching Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL, click on the link here!

Please feel free to let me know if I can be for any further help. Shivashree (talk) 06:23, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited for discussion at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2011 June 1 and also Category talk:Politicians arrested and charges with corruption--- . Shlok _{talk .} 18:09, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ganesh, please take a look at the articles I have edited, through my contributions, you seem to be strong regarding Marathi shudhalekhan, are you familiar with IPA, could you convert Laguna Copperplate Inscription to Devnagari?Yogesh Khandke (talk) 07:28, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, went through the article, nice one!, but frankly, I'm not that familiar with IPA. Also I can read and understand a bit of what is written there, I could not understand it fully, so it would be unfair on my part to try a half-hearted transliteration on my part! Thanks for asking, and please don't hesitate to ask if I can be of any further asssitance. Ganesh Shivashree (talk) 14:47, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

- - - - - - - - - - - - WikiProject Indian Roads - - - - - - - - - - - -
Hi, Shivashree, you are graciously extended an invitation to join the Indian Roads ! The WikiProject Indian Roads is an evolving and expanding WikiProject. We are a group of editors who are dedicated to creating, revising, and expanding articles, lists, categories, road portal and Wikiprojects, to do with anything related to Indian Roads.
As you have shown an interest in article related to Indian roads we thought you might like to take an interest in this growing WikiProject.Thank you for your contributions.
We look forward to welcoming you to the project!

naveenpf (talk) 09:48, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I am from Jalgaon Jamod(dist-Buldana).I am studying in S.Y(IT) of College of Engineering, Pune. There are very few people from buldana and other places editing wikipedia. Actually they don't know about it.Will you help in editing wikipedia if I have any problem. Sir I have seen many pages of Buldana are edited by you. Its really nice to have an chance to learn lot of things from you.Minakshinajardhane (talk) 13:02, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

My name is Victor Grigas, and I'm a storyteller at the Wikimedia foundation. We're telling stories of Wikipedia users, editors, donors, programmers and staff to paint a picture of who uses Wikipedia - for the 2011 fundraiser.

I am in the process of planning a trip to India to gather stories from Indian Wikipedians in face-to-face interviews (possibly on video).

My primary goal is to conduct 15-20 interviews, and hopefully enough of my interviews will make compelling stories that will effectively solicit donations from the public. These stories may also be used for other communication purposes by the foundation.

I found your userpage on a list of prolific Wikipedians and thought I’d reach out to you. Prolific editing is always a good story to tell!

If you are interested in participating, please contact me via my email:

vgrigas@wikimedia.org

Thank you for your time!

Victor

About me: I have been a Wikipedia editor since 2005. My userpage can be found here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Victorgrigas

Sorry sir, I was not able to leave message to you because of my exam. Thanks for helping me and for your appreciation. Now I wanted to create wikipage of my former school The New Era High School.I will collect information and put it in my sandbox . Will you please check it and point out my mistake. I will probably put it after 15/12/11.Thanks a lot.Minakshinajardhane (talk) 15:52, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sure!! Do a bit of research. Find any sources if you can. Read Wikipedia:WikiProject_Schools/Article_guidelines. I will be glad to review it for you. Leave me a note when you are done. Shivashree (talk) 06:40, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

primarily done with article. But article written does not meet to wikipedia standard. I have been tried to write but not able to do it properly. I can link th e the article but I have no reference , All the official data I have collected from school itself. Thank a lot for your help I will need your assistance in future also.Minakshinajardhane (talk) 17:46, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! My name is Kelsey and I am creating an article for a class. Any advice about writing from a neutral point of view? It is a bit of a challenge... Thanks! Ktutts15 (talk) 02:21, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Shivashree. I'm dropping you a note because you used to (or still do!) patrol new pages. This is just to let you know that we've deployed and developed Page Curation, which augments and supersedes Special:NewPages - there are a lot of interesting new features :). There's some help documentation here if you want to familiarise yourself with the system and start using it. If you find any bugs or have requests for new features, let us know here. Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 12:54, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Shivashree (talk) 13:26, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Chicken Egg without Eggshell 5859.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Julia\talk 20:28, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Robert Gill, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Hackney and Marathi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:27, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A nice addition; hope my adds are ok. Going for DYK? More could be added from Gordon. Commons has a category of copies in or at the National Museum in New Delhi - do you know who those are by? Johnbod (talk) 23:38, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• I came to know about the subject by watching the Marathi movie, did a little research and created the article. Thanks a lot that you proofread and added information to it. I hadn't thought of DYK, but it seems good enough now to go. How would be the hook "...that Robert Gill was the first person to make copies of the Ajanta Buddhist cave paintings after their rediscovery to the modern world?" Feel free to change the wordings if you find it more appropriate. Shivashree (talk) 04:14, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Robert Gill at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Redtigerxyz ^Talk 09:44, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You may want to revisit the DYK nomination here. Another editor has provided the second opinion. - Vivvt • (Talk) 07:18, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Can you mention which ALT u've passed? - Vivvt • (Talk) 08:32, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There are issues you need to take a look at and give your opinion. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 11:16, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

On 3 November 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Robert Gill, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Robert Gill spent 15 years in India copying (example pictured) the painted murals of the Ajanta Caves, but most of his work was destroyed in two fires in London? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Robert Gill. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:01, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Shivashree,

Please see my remarks on your question at Talk:List_of_Monuments_of_National_Importance_in_Aurangabad_circle. I hope you can help think to take the next step. effeietsanders 10:49, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your positive comments on my images. It feels good to be appreciated. Superfast1111 (talk) 14:43, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have expanded the article. You may like to add more text.--Nvvchar. 02:45, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Shivashree,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Chicken Egg without Eggshell 5859.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on January 7, 2014. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2014-01-07. Thank you for all of your contributions! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:28, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article A. H. Salunkhe is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A. H. Salunkhe until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Launchballer 22:18, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kishore Gajbhiye is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kishore Gajbhiye until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Uncletomwood (talk) 12:47, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please Write up on " Native People's Party " 123.136.192.52 (talk) 08:23, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please write up on " Native People's Party "

The article Vishwas Patil has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-Notable Civil Servant

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Uncletomwood (talk) 05:23, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Shivashree. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Vishwas Patil, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Uncletomwood (talk) 19:30, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Shivashree. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not make page moves such as this without first gaining consensus. The article makes it clear that there are various spellings of his name and it has existed under the Jyotirao Phule title for a considerable time. You may wish to review WP:RM. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 11:04, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Got it.aintgd (talk) 14:24, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

On 21 January 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mhaimbhat, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Mhaimbhat is considered the first known prose writer in the Marathi language? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mhaimbhat. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Mhaimbhat), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 02:17, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Bhope has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I'm not seeing any significant and/or non-trivial coverage in any reliable source (books, scholarly dissertations et al), to justify a standalone article.It may be further noted that a source from the State Series of The People of India covers the topic but has been determined to have heavily plagiarized from Raj-era sources and is thus unreliable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Winged Blades^Godric 14:43, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Shivashree. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:David Diop.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:36, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Baburao Shedmake, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Gond, Aheri and Sirpur. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I know you are a bot, but thank you, and corrected. GD (talk) 13:16, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Baburao Shedmake at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. The hook was pulled from the queue, unfortunately. Vincent^LUFan (talk) (Kenton!) 11:22, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• @Vincent60030: Thank you. I've replied on DYK Talk. GD (talk) 11:37, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Shivashree. You have new messages at Template:Did you know nominations/Baburao Shedmake.
Message added 03:05, 21 October 2020 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 03:05, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, am writing since you had earlier discussed the subject and had provided reasons why the move needs to be done. Since there is a redirect already present at Jotirao Phule, I submitted a requst for technical help in completing the move. An editor [1] felt that fresh consensus should be sought. I have created a new thread in the Phule Talk page. Would appreciate your inputs, thanks! - Sdsouza (talk) _Jotirao_Phule" class="ext-discussiontools-init-timestamplink">12:44, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tanubai Birje, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tanubai Birje until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gajanan Yashwant Chitnis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gajanan Yashwant Chitnis until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 02:53, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Parmatma Ek Sevak is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parmatma Ek Sevak until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Redtigerxyz ^Talk 17:43, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Shrikrishna Raut has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Long-time unref BLP. I couldn't find sources to establish notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 17:17, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 May 28 § Indian writers by language on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 23:04, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]