User talk:Ser Amantio di Nicolao/Archive 30

Greetings, can you do me a favor and use AWB to plough through User:Jaguar's GA review list on his user page and fix the tags on the talk pages like this, they should read topic= rather than subtopic= . Comprende?♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:46, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers, I'm sure Jaguar is grateful too!♦ Dr. Blofeld 20:53, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Help me understand: Wikipedia:Good article nominations/Instructions, tells me the parameter name is subtopic, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:01, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it is when nominating, but not when actually listing a GA. It's definitely topic=, as you can see by the fact that Jaguar's tags now work and show the "genre". Confusing to people.♦ Dr. Blofeld 05:22, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that, Ser Amantio di Nicolao! Whenever a GAN is initiated it begins with "subtopic" but I'll be sure to change it to "topic" from now on, and add the pages correctly. JAGUAR  21:34, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for adding categories to the women artist pages! :) Megalibrarygirl (talk) 03:19, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Mary Brewster Hazelton page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:27, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On 3 July 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Per Holknekt, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Swedish fashion designer Per Holknekt (pictured) placed second in the first Swedish Big Brother season before starting the clothing company Odd Molly? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Per Holknekt. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 01:11, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Iryna Harpy (talk) 06:09, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You do not have my sister Alexis Hunter in the list of feminist artists. She died a while ago and She is our of probate now so I am trying to deal with her work. She is on Wiki as am I. The Tate is about to take in her archive. All the best, Alyson hunter — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.5.50.14 (talk) 08:40, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why would u edit his page who thinks about him24.112.184.42 (talk) 02:28, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to James Cook, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Moriori (talk) 02:33, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Stop! You seem to be adding this category to a lot of incorrect people! Stephenb (Talk) 11:33, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I and another editor have removed quite a few errors, but I certainly don't have time to go through and check all the AWB changes you have made. I think you should do so though! And please be more careful next time. Thanks, Stephenb (Talk) 11:48, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) There do seem to be quite a few... I thought initially you might just be picking up aviators as sportspeople, but this chap was a 17th-century admiral, and Ronald Wilberforce Allen was a politician with no even remotely sporting history. Far be it from me to offer advice, but I'd be tempted to mass-revert myself and start again from scratch. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 11:50, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Struway2: and @Stephenb: - I think I know where the problem lies. Should be a fairly simple fix - I'll do it in a couple of hours when I'm back at the computer. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 11:56, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Have you figured out what the problem was? And do you intend to revisit all of your edits to rectify the problematic ones?Moriori (talk) 20:35, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It should be all sorted out now. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 20:40, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may wish to consider Maurice Edwards, Norman Collier, and Norman Scarth. Bearing in mind that I only checked the M's and N's; I see no reason why those letters should be the only ones to still have errors needing fixing. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 22:55, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hope you're right ;-) cheers, Struway2 (talk) 14:37, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John and Vera Richter, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gymnasium. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tracy is my first cousin if you'd like to get more info for this wiki, let me know. An I'll start firing questions his way. Williamh8430@gmail.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.164.181.24 (talk) 18:42, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Was my grandfather. Today I noticed there's a new Wikipedia page about him (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harry_D._Dixon), which is just astonishing and would tickle him to death if he were alive. I doubt he's a high priority, but any info you want about him I am happy to send your way. You may contact me at hdixon@donniedixonlaw.com. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:901:0:74F0:C88B:7AD2:9B07:40F9 (talk) 19:57, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for creating this page of my great aunt, Joan. She adored cats, more than people. She lived with her sister, Joyce, for her many years and I remember her very well. She would have been flattered that someone remembered her and her writings. She wrote science fiction at a time when very few, if any, women were actually publishing works in this genre. Thanks again, Anne — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.10.167.90 (talk) 23:52, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Tahiry Mosa has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced biography of a living person

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Patchy1 09:57, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Charles Sylvain Rabotoarison has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced biography of a living person

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Patchy1 10:00, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Jean Parfait Laurent Mafilaza has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced biography of a living person

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Patchy1 10:03, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Michael D. Lett has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced biography of a living person

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Patchy1 10:10, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Mlib Tmetuchl has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced biography of a living person

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Patchy1 10:11, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Ruffine Tsiranana has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced biography of a living person

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Patchy1 10:11, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, can you use AWB to tack this to the foot of all articles in it?♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:57, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why would Constanze Backes be only operatic? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:42, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

i like folk singers and their sonngs ,nevertheless their every stories like songs with the rythm of life especially from xi an ,china — Preceding unsigned comment added by 113.200.212.68 (talk) 23:42, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello friend, I'm a upcoming Hip-hop artist and I have been wondering how to get a Article.. I seen you did another Artists article and I was wondering what it would take for you to make me one. You can check my website out CLKentrell.com and please get back with me, on any info about this. Thanks. My email is CLKentrell@gmail.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:C4:8003:ED42:DCF4:21FB:7531:83A1 (talk) 22:30, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Can you add a section to Dusty Harrison's Wikipedia page that has all his fights in chronological order with the results, location, and such like at the bottom of Jimmy Lange, Floyd Mayweather Jr and a lot of other boxers wikipedia pages. I would do it myself as I've made many changes to Dusty's page recently with the permission of his father but I don't know how. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wbballplayer13 (talk • contribs) 14:32, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Throop was a brother of the Lambda Iota Society at the University of Vermont — Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.171.187.29 (talk) 00:54, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you , Jimmy McNeece — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.4.56.147 (talk) 09:23, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Daniel Halpin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Halpin until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:35, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ser Amantio di Nicolao, I had just renamed the category Zork to Infocom games and was right in the middle of re-categorizing several dozen articles, and unfortunately your edit has upset my plans; please don't be offended when you see a few reverts. My plan is to keep the category Infocom containing articles related to Infocom but excluding the Infocom games, and create the subcategory Infocom games containing the actual games themselves. Prhartcom (talk) 20:52, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

All done; thanks for understanding. That must be a pretty good time-saving tool you have there; I'll have to look into that. Cheers. Prhartcom (talk) 21:20, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Can you think of any categories for this new article? Mound of Butter (Vollon). I am sure that the only one it has is wrong, too. It's a painting not a painter... Hafspajen (talk) 23:43, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I would have a better salutation but am not sure of your name. My name is Simon Perchik and I'm here to thank you for entering my name on Wikipedia. It means a lot to me and I want you to know that. Simon Perchik <simon@hamptons.com>

Would you add a picture of Bob Haro to his wiki page please?

Thank you, Rob

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Martin Allwood, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Canon. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

	Baritone Cheese of Basel / Ser barytonowy z Bazylei
	It is not the first time that I see you lend a hand to my/someone's new addition to Wikipedia, and aside from recognizing that, I always (well, for some time) wanted to let you know that "ser" is "cheese" in Polish, and likely in some similar (sommelier?) form throughout the IndoEuropean language family. Smacznego! Mareklug talk 10:01, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Since you made the last two edits to the ACM page, I'd like to call your attention to the new info posted on the talk page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Anna_Cora_Mowatt -Needs a registered editor who knows what he's doing... 96.37.252.235 (talk) 00:12, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - I'll try to have a look when I have time. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 00:51, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I have updated the page Domiziano Arcangeli but you reverted it, the person who is page about, wants to update it and sent me that data which i uploaded, can i send it to you and you put it in appropriate way, please help.Dr shida (talk) 14:23, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am his grandson, and my brother believes you wrote the article...

If we are right, do you have any record of the sources you used besides the necrology? And what got you started on it??

I live in San Francisco, not active on Wikipedia, but I am a researcher and historian, fascinated by this, Bill — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.66.128.59 (talk) 00:48, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, sorry - I have an edit on it, but the bulk of the work was done by User:Anderswarr - he'd be the person to ask. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 00:50, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you make the category change to the Michael the Syrian page? and left no explanation on the talk page? Sr 76 (talk) 08:45, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please can you undo your changing of categories in articles? I have reverted the category move. GiantSnowman 09:45, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I was wondering if you could confirm me because I want access to the extra features on Wikipedia. I just started and I believe that I have enough edits over my first day that will show that I am not a vandal and that I am here in good faith. I already looked at the dorm for making these requests and it said most looking to get expedited from the 4 day wait are denied so I decided to come directly to an administrator. I would really appreciate it if you would confirm me and it would be an honor for you to be the one. Thank You TheEditorOfAllThingsWikipedia (talk) 20:39, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I just received an alert saying that you patrolled me. Does that just mean that you are keeping an eye on my user page? I couldnt seem to find any infornmation about what that meant as far as an administrator doing it to a user. Is this just because I made the request above and you are reviewing my profile or is it something bad? Thanks TheEditorOfAllThingsWikipedia (talk) 21:38, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I notice you've been adding categories to a number of articles. I believe some may benefit from more careful consideration. With regards to WP:CATDEF and WP:OVERCAT, articles should be categorized as much as possible by defining traits, rather than any trait. Specifically, but to illustrate a broader point, you've added a number of Writer categories to a scientist: William H. Behle (e.g Category:American science writers and Category:21st-century American writers). I think these are superfluous, and somewhat tangential: virtually all scientists write (i.e. publish papers and/or books), therefore categorizing them as writers, which indirectly lumps scientists with playwrights, novelists, etc. is somewhat unhelpful. While some people are commonly and reliably known as writers and science writers (e.g. Carl Zimmer), and some scientists are also known for their popular writing (e.g. Stephen Jay Gould, William Beebe) not every scientist who writes should be categorized as a writer. While some may argue that there is little or no harm in over-categorizing, I believe too many extraneous categories can distort public perception of how a subject is actually known. I think even if a subject technically falls into a category (any scientist who includes an illustration in a paper is technically an illustrator, and an author who published a single work and died in 2001, but did the majority of their work in the twentieth century, might merit inclusion in 21st-century writers), they should only be categorized as such if they are commonly and reliably described as such. A good rule of thumb, per WP:NONDEF, is (with few exceptions): if the characteristic would not be appropriate to mention in the lead portion of an article, it is probably not defining. Another way to think is, would you be likely to find the subject in a book titled with the category name? In conclusion, while I appreciate your efforts to improve Wikipedia, I urge due consideration be applied to categorization. All the best, --Animalparty! (talk) 20:40, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that some edits performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. They are as follows:

• On the Radhika Nagpal page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
• On the Mary Brewster Hazelton page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check these pages and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:26, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please delete and WP:SALT that page? The user keeps recreating it, now using ips, after receiving 3 warnings so far. Valenciano (talk) 08:39, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You changed the category in various articles from Male dramatists and playwrights to English male dramatists and playwrights, without also eliminating the now redundant category of English dramatists and playwrights. Dream Focus 20:13, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you add WP UK Politics? Does he serve in the House of Lords?Zigzig20s (talk) 10:32, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What is the logic behind it?Zigzig20s (talk) 19:10, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, in a number of articles you changed the "category:Male novelist" to "German male novelist". As I understand it, this category is a subcategory of "Male novelists by nationality", that is, it refers to the nationality of the person in question, not to the language they wrote in. If this is correct, the categorisation for Robert Musil and Joseph Roth is wrong - they were both Austrian (or Austro-Hungarian), while Charles Sealsfield was an Austro-Hungarian as well as a US citizen. Albrecht Conz (talk) 01:13, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for fixing this! - I just noticed another one: Franz Blei was Austrian / Austro-Hungarian too. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Albrecht Conz (talk • contribs) 01:27, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ser, can I ask you what list you are using to add the category "20th-century poets" to articles? I ask because you've added it twice in two months to Ian Charleson, even though Charleson was not a poet or author and had no published poems at all (in fact the only poem he's ever been recorded to have written is a single one in his diary). Anyway, if you let me know where this is stemming from, maybe we can remove it so this won't happen again. Thanks very much! Softlavender (talk) 05:43, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Ser, FYI, I've just WP:AGF rolled back the category American Male Suicides on the Donald Freed page, as it is misleading, as I believe he is very much alive.Bellagio99 (talk) 19:07, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Category:English male short story writers etc per the hierarchy and the category page are for classifying English people and not English language writers if you see the tree at Category:English writers. It is mighty confusing but that's what it is and some articles like R. K. Narayan etc don't belong in this. cheers. —SpacemanSpiff 04:05, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you are leaving redundant cats again. When you added English MALE classical composers, you forgot to remove English classical composers. -- Ssilvers (talk) 03:12, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	Thank you. Rubbish computer 01:21, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lynne Sharon Schwartz, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Scribner and William Morrow. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Sir. Can you please consider this request to prevent further edit-warring? Faizan (talk) 20:06, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That's a case of clear edit-warring just like that happened at 2014–15 India–Pakistan border skirmishes. As you helped us out there, so I thought requesting you here. Please consider. Faizan (talk) 20:12, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Faizan, this was your third revert. Please be careful. See here for declined request. This edit war seems to be between two users only. Consider dispute resolution; further reverts may result in blocks. Airplaneman ✈ 23:09, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Airplaneman: My regrets, I admit that I made three reverts, and had already stopped after that. I would be more prudent. I am trying to resolve it on Talk:Hafiz Muhammad Saeed. Faizan (talk) 19:37, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've undone some of the Cat-a-lot'ing from Category:Japanese male composers to Category:Japanese composers per WP:SUBCAT. The redundancy is not necessary. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 02:32, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Good man, you have done huge amounts of re-categorisations with classical composers recently. Yet, I very much wonder what your logic is. Please explain. First you have changed a lot of categories from, say, "German classical composers" to "German male classical composers", and now you are changing them back, deleting the "male" again. Why? You did so yesterday with American ones. Are you suggesting that there are German and French male classical composers, but no American? Shall Americans remain genderless? I had to do a lot of cleaning up behind you when, for instance, for an Austro-German composer like Simon Molitor you changed the "Austrian" to "Austrian male", but the German not. Then, for a number of American composers on my watchlist (like William Foden, Patrick Gilmore, Swan Hennessy, Victor Herbert, or Jane O'Leary), I inserted the "male", to follow your work. But then you switched them back to non-male. WHY?

By the way, when you change categories, please make sure your new categories fit in alphabatically with the other categories. I had to do A LOT of cleaning up behind you for this, too, at least a hundred or so in the past few days. Thank you for your consideration. – Aklein62 (talk) 07:14, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ser Amantio, A user that doesn't yet know to write edit summaries has been doing massive recategorisations at all kinds of places [1]. Can you review what he has been doing, and get him/her to stop the inappropriate edits? Cheers, Kautilya3 (talk) 09:08, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please read the message below edit request. You should view the source for that edit request, copy that from inside the collapsible box for "August (2015)" in the source. I am sorry to disturb you once again, but the article is not looking well. Faizan (talk) 19:55, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I just noticed that you participated in many of the name moves of early Philippine history articles. I must express concern about this. First of all because "Middle Ages" is not a term widely used with reference to Philippine history, and second because the term is associated with western history, which gives the impression that the direction of Philippine history at the time belonged to the same set of historical trends. This severely obscures many of the nuances of early Philippine history. May I invite you to discuss this at Wikipedia_talk:Tambayan_Philippines#Massive_move_of_article_names:_History_of_the_Philippines_.2F_.22Middle_Ages.22 ? thanks. - Alternativity (talk) 00:39, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for cleaning up after me! You've done a great deal of it over the years :-) --Peripatetic (talk) 08:44, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi – you've added the category "20th-century novelists" to the page on Edwin Morgan. Did he write a novel (or novels)? I've only ever known him as a poet (principally), and a dramatist and translator. Scotliterary (talk) 09:14, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Good Afternoon Sir! Hope you are fine and feeling good. Dear Ser Amantio di Nicolao! I hope you are fine and feeling well ! Dear my friend. he is our Tribal and He is famous in Balochistan. If you don't allow his name in wiki then how peoples known his biography ... he is our first young and good prince in dorrazehi tribe. and i hope you understand what i am saying. and yeah he is also singer and script writer... I hope you help me better and submit his article in wikipediA thanks. Your Brother From another Mother. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daniyal baloch (talk • contribs) 10:42, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm confused by your recent additions of "American Sportswomen" to tennis players who never represented the USA. Some, like Tamarine Tanasugarn, don't even live in the USA. Some were born here and left, some simply maintain a residence for tax purposes but are not citizens and play for other countries. Those are not American sportswomen as far as I can tell. Fyunck(click) (talk) 17:58, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oh my goodness, it looks like you did hundreds of these edits to tennis players. Please remove ALL the tennis players from the AWB list and fix your recent additions. I sure hope the other project's sports players aren't as badly messed up as the tennis players are. Fyunck(click) (talk) 18:27, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well, they are. A lot of mountaineers, explorers, geologists, cartographers, adventurers, suddenly are now "sportswomen" thanks to this machine-mass-editing. And when I talk about it on the Humanities page, they say "the problem is fixed" and they order that I should not talk about it there. Akseli9 (talk) 07:32, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You are now doing the same with Category:American sportsmen and non-American ice hockey players.[2][3][4][5][6][7] Your error rate is unacceptable, so you need to slow down and personally check each and every addition. Prolog (talk) 14:44, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have any good categories for this? Hafspajen (talk) 23:53, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Simply wonderful. Hafspajen (talk) 01:41, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Listen your box should say: This user is one of the 2 most active Wikipedians of all time. ... not 40. Hafspajen (talk) 01:53, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You said the problem is fixed, you even forbid to talk about it anymore on the Humanities page where I started to point it, well, no, you did not fix yet what you've done, that is, wrongly categorizing as "sportswomen" some women who are not sportswomen. "Fixing the problem" would have been to revert all your wrong edits. I can do only the ones that are in my watchlist, but even that would be wrong too, because it's not fair that I'd have to waste my time in reverting what you did wrong. Also: I don't know about all the articles that I don't watch in my watchlist. How many more articles are similarly wrongly categorized by your "fixed problem"? Did you do the same "fixed problem" to other articles too, like sportsmen too, and to how many nationalities did you do it? All of them? Akseli9 (talk) 07:24, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted some of your wrong edits, and I left some others, waiting for your fixing "within a couple of hours". Now and after our talk on my [talkpage], I see that you are not going to fix them. It means to me that you can create mistakes and leave them to the other contributors to hopefully fix them. Akseli9 (talk) 10:02, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Laura Branigan page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:16, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello... I saw that you had made an edit to the Wikipedia article on Beverly Wolff. I was one of her students, graduating in 1998 from Florida Southern College. She continued to teach me privately years beyond graduation, supporting me in starting my budding singing and directing career.

I'd like to talk with others who knew Beverly over the years. As we share the stories of our experiences with one another, we may be able to further expand the article.

I've reached out to her son. Hopefully, he and I will meet sometime, and I'll learn even more.

I'm curious to learn about the recent edits made.

Katherine Elizabeth Abbey / EternalMagdalene Founder, Temple of Life

eternalmagdalene@gmail.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1006:B023:3980:4C28:5FFF:7B8:F73 (talk) 22:18, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I don't understand why but a problem occured on the page after your last edit on Alex Borstein. Can you fix that? Thanks. -- yabancı^m 09:58, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There was also a problem with your edit to John Patrick Shanley. I undid it to tidy up the page. No problem w/ edit content, don't even know what it was. Regards Tapered (talk) 17:42, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

PS: After the undo, when I clicked on your version before my undo, the problem had disappeared--it was not replicated. Tapered (talk) 17:45, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

W. H. Auden has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. MusicAngels (talk) 19:34, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I opened the page and found a script error so I simply reverted the edit. It had nothing to do with the content. MattSucci (talk) 05:11, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to start from the beginning. David Helpling is an award winning ambient musician of some repute. He posted a notice on Facebook that his Wikipedia page needed "some love"; e.i. an update. I had done a bit of editing, a correction here, a contribution there. So I said I would do it. Sometimes I wish I hadn't! Not only had his page not been touched since 2011 the writing was insufficient, out dated and largely poorly written.the Alert box at the top of the page states:
The page is labeled an orphan, it is not an orphan. Other pages now link to it.
The topic of this article may not meet Wikipedia's notability guideline (dated Oct 2011);
The person is regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by peers or successors. The person has created or played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work or collective body of work. In addition, such work must have been the subject of an independent book or feature-length film or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews.
David Helpling is listed on YouTube, iTunes, Pandora, IMDB, Facebook, Twitter, Spotify, allmusic, My Space, he has his own production company DHM... Since the material I found on my own probably would not fit Wikipedia's guidelines I contacted Mr. Helpling and he provided some links of interviews I would not have found on my own. Now it seems anything I do to his page brings up a new alert/issue/problem. I've provided references that were not there previously, some of these trigger spam alerts; I, as a major contributor am accused of being too close to the primary source and ...appears to have a close connection with its subject, etc, etc. Mr Helpling contributed himself which was deleted by an administrator, (I think I understand why). Mr Helpling told me he will no longer contribute to Wikipedia because it "...gives me a headache". I think I understand why he feels this way.

So...what I am requesting is that the alerts at the top of this bio be removed because they are either false or outdated. Any other issue regarding Wikipedia guidelines I wish to have resolved. This guy has a well respected track record going back 1996 and deserves to have a decent bio on Wikipedia. I don't mind other parties contributing; this is what Wikipedia is about. However I'm getting weary of the issues invoved in trying to do it for him.
Utnijlj (talk) 14:08, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, can you add Category:Las Vegas entertainers to those on the list which currently don't have the category?♦ Dr. Blofeld 22:01, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I can add information on Julius Pisarowitz. He is my great great grandfather. I have a letter and copies of documents to substantiate my claim. I tried to write about him on Wikimedia, but it would not take it. I tried in Wikipedia and my user name was blocked.

If you are interested in his background and a son and great grandson who both followed his profession, I can help you. I would appreciate it if you would add to your written piece on Rudolf Dellingerwith credit to myself and my 3rd cousin. We've both been researching Julius for years. Mary E P04:46, 29 August 2015 (UTC)Kidd-jacobson (talk)Mary E P

I've thought of something you can do. Go through the year country lists like List of American films of 1956 and add a See also *List of American films of 1956 link at the bottom of the film articles. I believe somebody started doing it already but they're nowhere near fully done. Same applies for the List of Argentine films of 1946 etc.♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:56, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Any luck with this?♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:22, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What I meant was to add the link at the bottom of all film articles on a given list. E.g for American films of 1946 go through the A-Z list and add See also List of American films of 1946 at the bottom of articles like Gilda etc. ♦ Dr. Blofeld 09:13, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, not only US but other countries too. Might require a few edits!♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:37, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

How did you get on with this afterwards? I've noticed a few links added in places. Surely you haven't finished the American lot already?♦ Dr. Blofeld 07:37, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Channing, the Media Director of the Labor Community Strategy Center. I saw that you removed an image from Eric Mann's (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eric_Mann) page that is has an original that exists in our archive. I'm wondering who gave you the authority to remove any images from the page, and why the image was removed? Please contact me immediately

Channing L Martinez, Media Director Fight for the Soul of the Cities Labor/Community Strategy Center channing@thestrategycenter.org 3780 Wilshire Blvd. Suite 1200 Los Angeles CA 90010 Tel 213-387-2800 Fax 213-387-3500 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.20.219.242 (talk) 20:19, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{WPW Referral}}

PHIL LESTER DESERVES A DESCRIPTION OF HIS PERSONAL LIFE JUST AS MUCH AS DAN HOWELL DOES U FILTHY STAIN. TISK TISK — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.204.20.25 (talk) 03:16, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

My name is Paula Silas Guy and I am Paul Silas' daughter. Could you please add me to my father's bio under children? I can be reached at psilasguy@gmail.com if you have any questions. Thank you for your consideration!

Best, Paula — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.159.202.159 (talk) 12:11, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

My name is Paula Silas Guy and I am Paul Silas' daughter. Could you please add me to my father's bio under children? I can be reached at psilasguy@gmail.com if you have any questions. Thank you for your consideration----

Best, Paula — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.159.202.159 (talk) 12:12, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I'm afraid I'm about to start rolling back your category changes to the Burma-related articles – the categories were moved in error by an editor unfamiliar with the convention that categories with years are named in accordance with the name of the country in that year (e.g. Category:1978 in Rhodesia. Sorry you had to waste time on this work... Number 57 19:26, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Anything that is pre-1989 needs to be moved back (that's when the name change happened). Thanks for your help! Number 57 19:42, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, it's not your mess. I've asked the editor who caused it to revert their moves, so hopefully they will. Cheers, Number 57 20:04, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, your work is really appreciated, as always! 21:37, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Hello, I notice that you have been replacing the 20th-century British musicians category by 20th-century English musicians on several articles. For some of these musicians, I don't think it is appropriate as they are not necessarily English... On what basis do you make the change and would you mind my correcting it (on the articles for which I'm sure it's wrong)? Thanks TroisiemeLigne (talk) 08:28, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Is category or page was move without discussion is valid? The main page is BWF Grand Prix Gold and Grand Prix and so for the category itself Category:BWF Grand Prix Gold and Grand Prix, it should not be? Why a person move without discussion are not punish, and does let him spoiled the other good work? --Aleenf1 07:16, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This including the Category:2015 BWF Super Series and its article, its been engaged in move war ever since and also Category:2016 BWF Super Series, the article was created without much more information, it just simply a bracket in article and did not serve any good purpose to create it too early while we are still in 2015 season yet. The editor appear also like he "OWN" the article and mass move the article without any discussion, even i'm try to discuss to him before, it appear nothing is constructive. --Aleenf1 12:35, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Any point worth mention is the editor likes to rollback the editing, without mention the reason, just look through to his contributions. --Aleenf1 12:44, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Even is harsh and uncivil, but it is a troll what so ever. See Template:BWF Seasons and Template:BWF seasons, 2015 BWF Super Series and 2015 BWF Superseries, he created another one for his own, he treat Wikipedia like his own website, do whatever he want. --Aleenf1 14:10, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Admin, just block both of us, is not working, keeping 3RR. --Aleenf1 14:38, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot for the help in this page! Rei Momo (talk) 20:35, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Two question, please: Then, the page is it good? May I ask your help in the future? Thanks a lot and greetings from Caselle Landi. Rei Momo (talk) 05:47, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you and have a nice week!!! Rei Momo (talk) 06:33, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I just want to make a correction. On my cousin Dennis Fuller's birth year. It was 1960 not 1959. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.87.124.20 (talk) 04:39, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Cimarron (1960 film)

added a link pointing to Ralph Reed

Sarah Lee Fain

added a link pointing to Episcopal Church

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rodolfo "Corky" Gonzales' nationality is not "American" b/c that's a continent, not just one country in the Americas. His Nationality or Ethnicity is Mexican American or Chicano who is a U.S.A.citizen. The U.S.A is a pluricultural society of which Mexican Americans will be the majority minority by 2050, when there will no longer be an Anglo Saxon Protestant majority. [[Wikipedia:Signature Luis Garcia y Ayvens comment added by 71.165.204.121 (talk) 14:19, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm DVdm. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Kingstree, South Carolina, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. DVdm (talk) 16:27, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello my name is Lorena Rodriguez, I'm seeking help to find out about my family history we were being helped by a lady but is no longer helping us, she said we are yokuts, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lorenacesena55 (talk • contribs) 18:27, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

How can I contact you Lorenacesena55 (talk) 18:33, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thought you might want to update that Pat Mastroianni was on CW's Beauty and the Beast. Thank you for all you do. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.222.168.226 (talk) 06:28, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding edits such as this, please see the discussion presently at the bottom of User talk:Philg88. I think that moving things around now is likely just to confuse things even more (and I pretty much guarantee the outcome will be to use the Goud spelling). - Sitush (talk) 09:09, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you undo the whole article? I sat hours and filled in the right information. I belong to that ethnicity and filled it so people know about us. The whole article is spelt wrong. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WikiRobo (talk • contribs) 12:11, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am currently reading a novel by S.M. Stirling called The Desert and the Blade. He has a troubador quote The Golden Journey to Samarkand as a song in chapter 18. After reading the chapter I looked up the poem on Wikipedia and found your article about James Elroy Flecker. I thought you might be interested in the reference. Cheers, Sam Koogler 70.32.219.108 (talk) 16:45, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! You renamed category Ostrozky family to Ostrogski family. Obviously, you probably do not know what Ostrogski - is in Polish language. But Ostrozky weren't the Poles - they were descendants Rurykids. Please, see Lubomyr Wynar. Ostrozky in the Encyclopedia of Ukraine, vol. 3 (1993). Thanks.--Бучач-Львів (talk) 09:02, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Annie White Baxter, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Annie Rooney. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:29, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your categorising of Arndís Þórarinsdóttir. I appreciate it.

I see you've added Arndís to Icelandic women writers‎, which is fine, but you've removed her from Category:Icelandic writers. This is falling into a trend whereby male Icelandic writers are being categorised as 'Icelandic writers', but female Icelandic writers are being categorised as 'women Icelandic writers'. This is obviously gender-biased and has the effect of marginalising women. Might I suggest that we allow Arndís to be both in 'Icelandic women writers' and in 'Icelandic writers'? (It would be good to implement this for the other 39 women writers and the 1 male writer who have been categorised in this wy too.)

Thanks!

Alarichall (talk) 20:22, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ser-- The Reirer page is self-advertisement for his press work. It does not fit the standards found on the wiki info page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.94.205.169 (talk) 00:17, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

	The Writer's Barnstar
	Have to say it's a pleasant surprise to see you back writing articles again. Not that your prolific AWBing and knoming isn't of enormous benefit, but it is nice to see you sitting down and writing decent start class articles! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 06:53, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Thomas Wightman

added links pointing to Union and Henry Inman

Ruth Virginia Brazzil

added a link pointing to Center Point, Texas

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:48, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, dearest Ser Amantio di Nicolao, how are you? I opened this new page and I ask 2 minutes of your time, please, to read it and corrct my mistakes.

Thanks a lot for your help and see you soon!!!

Rei Momo (talk) 10:17, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Grazie milleeee !!! Rei Momo (talk) 21:05, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You mentioned that there were stage versions of Rigoletto performed in churches in 1990's and 2000's. Do you have any info on where I can locate these stage versions of the musical? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:100B:B009:3ECF:E5AB:FCAB:C48B:665B (talk) 17:56, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Tuareg rebellion (2007–09) page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:43, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you have spent some time on adding articles to mandolin categories. While writing Giuseppe Anedda just now, I noticed that there is a category called "category:Classical violinists". Do you think that a similar category "category:Classical mandolinists" would be useful? There are getting to be quite a few. Also I don't know if you noticed the new list I have worked on List of mandolinists (sorted); once it's done, I suspect it will need to be merged back into List of Mandolinists, but I haven't done that before. All the names from list of mandolinists are built into my page; should I just past one page into the other? Thanks,Jacqke (talk) 17:33, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate the offer to help do an administrative merge with the articles. After I spend more time getting it cleaned up and sourced, and double check all the names on the other list, I will get back with you for that help. Thank you,Jacqke (talk) 17:47, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Edmund Blacket page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:35, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm looking for a sculpture by Julia bracken wendt, called Water Nymph. Naked woman sitting on heels with hands on lap. 166.172.189.251 (talk) 01:23, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, in stubbing Martina Ibaibarriaga it seems we don't have a category for Category:Basque women. Can you create and populate? Perhaps a few should have their own occupation categories, we only have Basque women writers at present.♦ Dr. Blofeld 09:30, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Moonlight Point to Aspland Island, both articles that you started. Now there's one about 3 paragraphs long. Smallbones_(smalltalk) 03:17, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You recently created several file talk pages using AWB for images of album covers, including File talk:Onyx.jpg, File talk:Overkill.jpg and File talk:Nu002.jpg. I presume you were working from a preparsed list because those images had been renamed in the interim to unshadow images on Commons of a gemstone, a concert and a nude woman respectively. These talk pages were therefore incorrectly tagged. Please try to avoid this in the future. Thanks, BethNaught (talk) 06:58, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry too much about it. I always watch files I move so any accidents won't go unnoticed. Thank you. BethNaught (talk) 10:37, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I so appreciate all the work you do on categorizing my files. I just did one for Agnes Ellen Harris and note that two I think she should be in are not created. "Oread institute alumni" (which I did inadvertently create but is red?) and "Alabama Women's Hall of Fame". It also occurs to me there is probably a state Women's Hall of Fame for every state? Can you help? SusunW (talk) 15:39, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I just got AWB. I've read the instructions, and I'm not too stupid, I don't think. I got it downloaded, and I can open it and login. I can get it as far as making a list, and checking the options. But when I do start, it doesn't do what I want. It goes through the motions with the little bar at the bottom looking like it's checking, but nothing then happens. I can't figure this out. All I want to do, at least to start, is check for ISBN format on a couple of select articles. — Maile (talk) 22:29, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ser Amantio. As I know you are not only an expert on categories but have also supported our interest in biographies on women, I wondered whether you could help me to sort the various categories under Category:Women architects. I have been trying to add categories for the various countries (e.g. Category:Argentine women architects) but I see that although the new categories are sorted correctly, the older categories (e.g. Category:American women architects) appear unsorted at the top of the category display. I would have thought the Americans, Australians, Brits, Finns, French, German and Greeks should be sorted together with the others. How can I achieve this?--Ipigott (talk) 18:29, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've just seen that the category for American women architects was written "Category:American architects|*". Should all the others be written the same way? I see for Women writers, they are all under Category:Women writers by nationality and are sorted in alphabetical order. Maybe I should do the same for the architects?--Ipigott (talk) 18:42, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think I've more or less sorted it out by adding cat Women architects by nationality. Now it looks more or less OK.--Ipigott (talk) 19:10, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm attending. Are you? --Rosiestep (talk) 02:02, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Severino vasconcellos was not born in 1981. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:FB90:240A:3D48:5AA5:8341:201E:DD90 (talk) 00:00, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. Remember me? (I'm the one that tried to fix cat-a-lot...)

Anyway, I noticed your edits in this topic that reverted my edits. Please see here, where I have started a rename discussion. Thanks. Epic Genius (talk) 16:41, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Krett12 (talk) 16:39, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This editor is steering the problem again, by not link to article that was created and insert back to main article itself. [8][9]. Numerous time rollback but it get revert again. --Aleenf1 07:34, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, i can't deal with this user, Wikipedia is owned by him. --Aleenf1 07:51, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks, i monitoring. --Aleenf1 13:55, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This Ghosteditr (talk · contribs) is awesomely match based on his timing of account creation and editing, doesn't it mean socks? --Aleenf1 14:15, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why was this category renamed? What other kind of sport players besides basketball would play for "Baloncesto Malaga?" Baloncesto = "basketball." I'm not saying "CB Malaga" was the right name, but this one is ridiculous. Rikster2 (talk) 17:07, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please review You have tagged some single covers as being a part of WP:ALBUM, e.g. File talk:Jens Lekman - Friday Night at the Drive-In Bingo.jpg. The template {{Non-free use rationale album cover}} is used for both, so you have to apply some discrimination as to which is which. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:22, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you were mentioned, along with the rest of the Top 10 Wikipedians by edit count, in this news piece: http://priceonomics.com/the-most-prolific-editor-on-wikipedia/. Thanks, ––Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 16:25, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi MY name is Evelin Boney, I will like for the formation of his marriage change. We got married September the 5th 2014, I will like for his ex wife to be off the website. 2607:FB90:2B0D:E69A:DD06:60F4:15B2:CB1A (talk) 00:57, 18 October 2015 (UTC)Thank you.[reply]

Thank you for your help at Free Speech Flag.

Most appreciated,

— Cirt (talk) 01:48, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, will do. :) — Cirt (talk) 01:57, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Recently the templates Template talk:Turkmenistan squad 2012 AFC Challenge Cup, Template talk:Turkmenistan squad 2010 AFC Challenge Cup, Template talk:Maldives squad 2012 AFC Challenge Cup, Template talk:Nepal squad 2012 AFC Challenge Cup were deleted at TfD. You then recreated the talk pages using AWB. This inappropriate creation of File talk: and Template talk: pages has been a problem before and there is probably a lot of mess you've made that I haven't seen to clear up. Please immediately review your AWB practices and tell me how you will fix these problems. Surely it's not difficult to check whether a page exists before creating a talk page for it? BethNaught (talk) 07:10, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Good day. Forgive me if you're not the person I should be going to for this. I was browsing Demetri Martin's page and attempted to follow an external link to a palindromic poem of his, but the target URL seems to have changed. I attempted to change/update it myself, but it got confusing real quick and thus didn't do anything. If you do happen to find time in your day to possibly update the info, it would appreciated. The new URL is: [10] - Demetri Martin's Fractal Poem. And if possible, try to keep the existing words as what you see in the references. It's reference number 5, by the way. Thank you for your time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:646:8C01:E272:1151:D00D:9A02:AD84 (talk) 16:10, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

With this ever dramatic world and winter coming, here's a cup of tea to alleviate your day! This e-tea's remains have been e-composted SwisterTwister talk 05:24, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I see, Ser Amantio, that once again you have been helping us out with categories in this connection. While this is useful and I realize your are primarily a notario, your valuable contributions to Women in Leadership indicate that you might be able to embark on some new articles in connection with Women in architecture. I'm sure you can find one or two interesting names on Wikipedia:WikiProject Women/Women in Red/Women in architecture. We've still a day or two to go on the current editathon so just have a go! (I very much appreciate your choice of user name. I once played the part of "Herr Bau-, Berg- und Weg-Inspectors-Substitut Sperling" in the wonderful German comedy Die Deutschen Kleinstädter. If only I had remembered when I registered for Wikipedia, I could have used it as my user name!)--Ipigott (talk) 16:13, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And if you can, I need help. Have at least 2 women Sue Courtenay and Rocio Romero who attended Southern California Institute of Architecture. When I input the category Southern California Institute of Architecture alumni someone removes it. I am sure there are others out there who would go in this category. Can you make it not be red? SusunW (talk) 21:38, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Gracias mi amigo. Thanks for the help SusunW (talk) 00:35, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You are an extremely prolific editor, but please do not sacrifice quality for speed, as you did with these edits. Not only does it mean that people need to clean up after you, it also goes against WP:AWB#Rules of use item 1. --Redrose64 (talk) 22:26, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your Cat-A-Lot edits aren't just incredibly boring, they're also totally hogging the Recent changes screen. I'm just gonna turn this computer off and watch more of the Benghazi hearings, and it'll be all your fault. Drmies (talk) 01:25, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for moving the members of Category:The Catholic University of America alumni before I got round to programming a bot to do them. However, the category pages do not reflect the change. Would you mind doing null edits on the remaining pages to force an update? – Fayenatic London 07:46, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OK, that's done now – I just finished the few that were left today. – Fayenatic London 11:33, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, so it was you who did most of them - thanks. – Fayenatic London 22:18, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Redrose64, Drmies, and Magioladitis:.

• At 07:36, October 28 (UTC), you made ~70 Cat-a-lot edits in one minute. I'm not familiar with the tool, but I cannot see how a page can load, you press a button and the page saved in under one second.
• At 07:46, October 27 (UTC), you made 36 AWB edits in one minute.
• At 07:40, October 27 (UTC), you made 57 AWB edits in one minute. A bot running AWB can't go that fast. I average ~22 edits per minute with my AWB bot around the same time of day. If I'm manually doing something real "trivial" with AWB, I can get upto ~12 edits per minute. Heck, the "infamous" OccultZone could manually only do upto 25 edits a minute.

I see alot of complaints from above about your AWB and Cat-a-lot edits. I see people saying for you to slow down. I see people complaining about your mistakes. I don't see you responding to any talk messages as you have only responded to two messages in four months.

You are violating WP:AWB#Rules of use, rule #1, as Redrose64 mentioned above. You are not listed at CheckPage#Bots, thus you are running a bot illegally. To run a bot illegally means you have modified AWB's software.

I have turned off people's permission to run AWB and have taken people to ANI to have it turned off. However, I was more familiar with them and had personally given them each warnings before terminating AWB access. I know people have hacked AWB before to allow them to run in bot mode and/or without permission, but I don't recall the specifics. So, I'm asking input from the people I pinged and also would like to hear from you. Bgwhite (talk) 07:17, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't run a bot - I can assure you that all of the edits that I make are human-controlled. How Cat-a-Lot works I cannot speak to, exactly; I admit that it is a powerful tool, and one whose functions I am still learning. For the rest, it is indeed possible, if one is quick on the button and has a fast internet connection, to make large numbers of edits per minute.

I also do not respond on my talk page to queries, but I do respond. Looking over discussions from the past month I see four or five related to various aspects of my automated editing, and I responded at the time to each one.

I will slow down, if that is a problem - I have tried to address problems as they are raised and modify my editing accordingly, but if it is required of me to slow down I will do so. But I give you my word that I have never hacked, nor will I ever hack, AWB. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 11:52, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No, it is NOT possible to do 50+ or even 20+ AWB edits a minute. One is NOT to be quick on the button. I am a AWB user with a fast internet connection and I know that it is not possible. There are only two ways to go this fast: 1) bots 2) multiple AWB windows open and just pressing save as fast as one can. Both are against AWB rules. We all make mistakes. For some reason, people think if you are using AWB, you shouldn't make any mistakes and they get upset. Nevermind I'm usually cleaning up after people making mistakes via manual edits. The odds of a mistake are much higher if one is running fast. I'm asking you to follow the rules. If you want to run as a bot, then sign up and get a bot account.

There only two talk messages in the past four months that you have responded to here. You may have responded elsewhere. Majority of users, like me, like to keep the discussion in one spot. This is why I copied your message here. Bgwhite (talk) 21:34, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I do tend to respond elsewhere - I have always done so.

I will slow myself down, but I assure you I have not been intending to run as a bot. And I do spot-check my edits; sometimes things fall through the cracks that I don't intend, but I do try to make sure that happens as little as possible. Though I don't claim to be infallible, certainly. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 21:48, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You are a black box: I once complained about your creation of file talk: pages after moves. Then you made the same mistakes - and not a single incident - with template talk:. You never got back to me about how you supposedly fixed it, and the tone of your replies makes me feel somewhat taken for granted in mopping up your mistakes. The way you have been creating these pages, ie ridiculous quantities in one minutes, proves you were not checking manually immediately before each edit, which would have eradicated the problem at a stroke. But no, that's too slow for you, it appears. BethNaught (talk) 21:55, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry if my response to you gave you the impression that I am cavalier in my thoughts; I assure you that is not the case. To be perfectly frank, I had meant to run some tests with AWB before responding to you further - I want to be certain of a couple of its functions before addressing your concerns. (I can't say that I recall ever being informed by AWB that a page being recreated is one which had already been deleted, but I freely admit that I may have missed something, and wish to double-check before going further.) Unfortunately, circumstances intervened and by the time I could return to it, I had actually forgotten all about our discussion - my apologies. I have rather a lot on my mind at the moment.--Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 23:11, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My concern is that you do massive amount of recategorization without any discussion or collaboration with others, say, at CFD. There is no oversight with categories. Once a category is removed, it is difficult to find out what articles were placed in a category unless you know the editor and go through all of their contributions. It's not like article edits where editors have pages on their Watchlists and can correct errors. It is extremely easy to get it in your head that "X" is the right way to categorize a subject and make many changes very fast without anyone even being aware what you are doing. This is not just you, there have been instances in the past where editors have had topic bans from creating categories or adding/removing categories to pages. With HotCat, edits are fast and easy and it's a powerful tool. If mistakes are made, it can be very time-consuming for other editors to go back and figure out what happened. This is less about you, Ser, than about how much HotCat increases the potential to make colossal errors. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:25, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry - HotCat or Cat-a-Lot? I agree, the latter is a powerful tool. I try to use it judiciously - I feel that I have been doing better as I have come to understand its properties better - but always welcome a little flea in my ear should concerns be raised. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 23:11, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Bgwhite, I have no dog in this fight, though I whined like one earlier. I don't use HotCat (in fact, you'll find that I've used ColdCat, it's living dead opposite) and I don't know much about bots. Ser, I think you have a tendency to listen to people; that's a good habit. All the best to you all, Drmies (talk) 14:35, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Cat-a-lot works differently from HotCat. It is possible to do 200 edits with Cat-a-lot after checking individual entries in a few seconds because it takes one click to perform all edits. That's the maximum number of pages listed per page in a category and the time has to be spent before clicking that edit button once. I've used it a lot on Commons, it can take a long time to check the individual entries to see if they should be selected for the move/copy, but once you've done that and selected the individual entries then the time taken to perform all edits is just a few seconds. I also keep multiple tabs open at the same time and do the selections on different tabs and click edit in one go as that would prevent me from missing other changes to my watchlist. Just an FYI for Bgwhite, since I saw this thread pop up on my watchlist. —SpacemanSpiff 14:55, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • Exactly. Cat-a-Lot requires work, which I put in before hitting the button - you don't see that, only the final result. I do use it sometimes to transfer articles between categories, only if I'm absolutely certain that all articles in one category belong in another. But that's it. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 21:50, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
      • Thank You SpacemanSpiff for the explanation on Cat-a-lot. It helps out alot. Looking at Ser's history more, you did 164,000 edits in October. You were doing close to 1,000 edits an hour multiple times and on the 26th, you did ~1,400 edits with AWB in one hour. This is impossible to be doing manually. If you want to do these types of fixes, get a bot account and run a bot legally... plus it has the added bonus of another talk pages for people to complain on :) You said you would slow down and you have. It looks like those high spurts with Cat-a-lot are ok, just keep an eye out for the AWB edits. Bgwhite (talk) 06:30, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Ser Amantio di Nicolao

You can find an absolute correct description of Aggházy in the publication of ^[1]

http://www.thefreelibrary.com/New+Light+on+Liszt+and+His+Music%3A+Essays+in+Honor+of+Alan+Walker%27s...-a021187316

About Aggházy: Well-known in his day as a performer, composer and teacher, Károly Aggházy left a legacy of piano music combining elements of romanticism, nationalism, and occasional dissonance which characterized that period of transition in Hungarian music from Liszt to Bartók. Though relatively conservative in style, Aggházy was master of the short form, and within this genre he wrote some minor masterpieces that warrant scrutiny today. Aggházy was born in Pest, Hungary, on 30 October 1855. He began his piano studies at the age of eight with István Bartalus. At twelve Aggházy enrolled as a student at the National Music School, where his father served on the board of directors. There he studied piano and composition with Antal Zapf and Victor Feigler for three years, graduating in 1870. The Director of the National Music School, Gábor Mátray, a renowned musicologist, wrote in Aggházy's report book: "He was such a diligent student ... at composing ... he did not miss a single lesson and his outstanding musical talent is honored by an 'excellent' grade at the end of the 1869-1870 academic year."1 Aggházy's first public appearence as a pianist was given at the National Conservatory on 13 March 1870, when he played Liszt's Hungarian Rhapsody No. 12. During the Summer of that year, Aggházy met Liszt for the first time, visiting him in the Augusz residence at Szekszárd. Liszt was highly impressed by Aggházy's talent as a composer and pianist, but another five years were to elapse before Liszt engaged him as a student. Aggházy studied at the Conservatory of Music in Vienna with Dachs and Bruckner from 1870-1872, showing some of the compositions he had written during that time to Franz Erkel, who recognized signs of "a genuine musical talent, which, provided it's carefully nurtured, promises a bright future" (Bonis). Upon recommendations from Erkel and Liszt, Aggházy received state scholarships to continue his sudies in 1873 and 1874. Liszt accepted Aggházy as a piano student after hearing him play on 18 February 1875. Aggházy recorded this exciting moment in his diary: "At two in the afternoon I met Liszt. The old man received me with great fondness. Now I am his student!" (Bonis), For the next three years, Aggházy attended the Hungarian Roya! Academy of Music in Budapest, studying piano with Liszt and composition with Robert Volkmann and Kornél Ábrányi. As a student at the Academy of Music, Aggházy received the Liszt Scholarship three times. (This scholarship was established in 1873 by the city of Budapest to commemorate the fiftieth anniversary of Liszt's musical career. It stipulated that during his lifetime, Liszt would choose the most deserving pupil from those attending the Academy to receive a prize of six hundred forints, which was equivalent then to the yearly salary of a secondary school teacher). Aggházy received the prize in 1876, 1877, and 1882, and he was considered to be one of the best Hungarian students of Liszt, along with Aladár Juhász (1856-1922), István Thomán (1862-1940), and Ilonka Ravasz (1857-1922). Upon completing his studies at the Academy, Aggházy went to Paris on another scholarship, which he received again through Liszt's recommendation. He collaborated with the violinist Jenő Huber (who later changed his name to Hubay) in a series of concerts, playing their debut, on the recommendation of Vieuxtemps, in the Salle Érard on 28 January 1879. During the next two years, they toured thirty-five Hungarian cities as well as England, Belgium, Luxemburg and Algeria. After two and a half years of concertizing and travel, Aggházy returned to Hungary on 8 July 1881, settling in Budapest, where he taught piano at the National Conservatory beginning 27 September 1881. One of the main reasons for his return to Budapest and a teaching career was his love for Alice Farkas, whom he married in November of the same year. In 1883 Aggházy left Budapest to become Head of the Piano Department at Stern's Conservatory in Berlin, a position for which Liszt had recommended him. He remained in Berlin, teaching at the Stern and Kullak Conservatories until the Stern Conservatory closed upon its founder's death in 1889; during the years spent there, his teaching and compositions became well known throughout Germany. Many of his finest piano works were published by German publishing houses, such as Kahnt in Leipzig and Bote & Bock in Berlin. Several excellent musicians were trained at Stern's Conservatory under Aggházy, including Johannes Döbber (1866-1921), a well-known German composer and conductor. During the 1880s a resurgence of nationalism in Hungary prompted an attempt to repatriate all prominent and talented Hungarian artists. Aggházy's friend and chief proponent, Zsigmond Justh, wrote laudatory articles in the newspapers, advocating Aggházy's appointment to a professorship at the Academy of Music. Unfortunately the position at the Academy, originally proposed to entice Aggházy back to Hungary, did not materialize, and he returned once again to teach at the National Conservatory. Later a position at the Academy was offered for a second time, but he took offense and turned it down, perhaps out of pride, choosing to continue at the National Conservatory, where he taught for the remainder of his life. In 1891 Béla Bartók's mother brought her son, aged ten, to Aggházy, who was greatly impressed with the boy's pianistic skills. As one of the most highly respected teachers in Budapest during the 1890s, Aggházy was perhaps the first to assess and recognize the young Bartók's genius as a musician. During the same decade, he sustained a growing interest in opera, serving as a rehearsal pianist for the Royal Opera House during the 1891-1892 season in order to better famliarize himself with the stage. Aggházy's first opera, Maritta a Korkós Madonna (Maritta, the Girl with the Pitcher), set in Spain, was performed in Budapest on 14 October 1897. Parts of Maritta were well received, but much of the work was considered weak due to the poor libretto by Fuhrmann and the quasi-Wagnerian harmonies used throughout, which didn't appeal to Hungarian audiences of his day. Aggházy's second opera, Ra\'ennai Nász (Wedding in Ravenna) was never performed. The early twentieth-century compositions of Aggházy consist of many nationalistic pieces, inspired by the return to Hungary of the mortal remains of the eighteenth-century freedom fighter Ferenc Rákóczi (or Rákóczy). Pieces composed during this phase of Aggházy's creative life, what Ferenc Bonis called his "kuruc" period, include the Rákóczi Funeral March (Rákóczi Gyászinduló), Funeral Themes in Memory of Ferenc Rákóczi II (Gyászhangok II. Rákóczi Ferenc Fejedelem Emlékére), Hungarian Moods (Magyar Han­gulatok), and the Rákóczi Symphony (Rákóczi Szimfomiukus Én ekkö Ite mény), Unlike his mentor Liszt, Aggházy was a traditionalist. Where Liszt was the proponent and champion of "music of the future," Aggházy chose a more conservative path, creating a credibility gap the early part of the present century. Personal problems, plus bis inability to comprehend such radical approaches to composition as serialism, neo-primitivism, and polytonality caused him much unhappiness during his waning years. He died in Budapest on 8 October 1918, perhaps the last representative of a century that saw romantic and nationalistic elements in Hungarian music come together in full fruition. Although over one hundred compositions for piano are attributed to Agghá2y, this figure is misleading, as most of his titled opus numbers consist of many shorter compositions ranging from three to twenty-four in number. In an autobiographical letter written to the Pallas Lexicon, dated 6 October 1909, Aggházy listed the pieces for soto piano and piano four-hands which he felt were his most significant keyboard works.3 By examining specific selections from this keyboard repertory, we can trace the development and describe the characteristics of his eclectic musical style. The solo-piano compositions (together with opus number and publishers), which he listed in order of publication, are listed below, and a title page from one set is reproduced on the opposite page: 1. Canon (Albumblatt)/Jaborsky 2. Serenata alia Chitarra/Weinholtz 3. Nocturne, Op. 6/Kahnt 4. Toquade, Op. 8/Sipese 5. Fantasiestücke, Op. ]0/Sipese 6. Ungarische Tanze, Op. 11 7. Kleine Rhapsodien, Op. 12 8. Fantasie über ein Weinachs Lied [sic], Op. 14/Harmonia 9. Moments Caractéristiques, Op. 16/Harmonia

10. Variations sur un Théme de Grétry, Op. 20/Harmonia 11. Etude de Concert, Op. 21 /Bote and Bach 12. Lőndlerstimmungen, Op. 22/Harmonia 13. Fünf Landler Impromptus, Op. 24/Hainauer 14. Musique de Pantomime, Op. 29/Hainauer 15. Pusziaklűnge/Schoit 16. Cinq Soirées hongroises/tiainanzT 17. Three Mazurkas, Op. 26/Hainauer 18. Four Caprices in Octaves, Op. 27/Hainauer 19. Pieces Intimes, Op. 28/Hainauer

This list belongs today lo the Music collections of the National Széchényi Library, Budapest, Hungary

20. Three Pieces, Op. 33/Bárd 21. Magyar Hangulatok, Op. 35/Pesti Könyvnyomda Részvény-Társaság Kiadása 22. Rákóczi Gyászinduló, Opus 36/Pesti Könyvnyomda Részvény-Társaság Kiadása 23. Gyaszhangok, Op. 37/Pesti Könyvnyomda Részvény-Társaság Kiadása 24. Soirées hongroises (second series)/Bárd 25. 4 Kömuyü rapszodia/Ro2snyai 26. 2 Magyar Cstik (third series)/Rozsnyai 27. Elegia/Rozsnyai 28. Gavotte MusettefRozsnyai

Those he listed for piano four-hands include: 1. Poémes Hongrois 2 Jürz/Bot? & Bock 2. Rondo all'ongharere, Op. 18, No. 1/Bote & Bock 3. Marcia, Op. 18, No. 2/Bote & Bock 4. Lakodalmas, Op. 15/Hannonia 5. Sw/fó Hongroise, Op. 19/Harmonia

The original Hungarian Text of' Ferenc Bonis, in Muzsika [Budapest] 2/3 (March 1959).

^[2]

Remarks This text was converted of pdf to doc, printing errors are possible The title list is not complete, (if necessary I'm able to complete it I would be very happy if you would be enough kind to make a new en.wikipedia page to Aggházy. Aggházy was my grandfather, therefore I know a lot of his works. For more information you can find me here: herpy@herpy.eu

Inform please me about your work Best regards

Miklos HerpyHMArnold (talk) 08:01, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I have a question regarding William Arnold Newton. Do you have further Information about Mr.Newton? As of now I've only found little Info about him and his life except for the Wikipedia Page. Also it is known that in 2005 his case was reopened again, but it is unknown if there was Progress whatsoever. I hope you can help me. Do you also have a copy of the orbituary that is cited on the Wikipedia article?

Best S.F — Preceding unsigned comment added by S.F.Binda (talk • contribs) 10:36, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

Do you have further Information about Mr.Newton? As of now I've only found little Info about him and his life except for the Wikipedia Page. Also it is known that the LAPD reopened the case in 2005. Maybe you can add this to the wiki article?

Best S.F. — Preceding unsigned comment added by S.F.Binda (talk • contribs) 10:49, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Frank Rusconi did not own the quarry, his brother Joseph, my gran grandfather owned it and lived nearby. I have a letter from the farmer who owned the neighbouring property concerning that can confirm that if necessary. His brother Frank lived many miles away, in Gundagai. The quarry is near Orange, there is a monument there, on an old slab of marble, to Joseph. I am Robina, daughter of Frank (Joe's weekday son) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.60.158.199 (talk) 11:00, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm curious. "In critical condition" sounds very non-standard to me. "In a critical condition" sounds standard. But I'm a Brit - is it a BritEng v AmEng thing? Ghmyrtle (talk) 19:05, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Page: Lee Maynard

He has published two books since — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.81.119.115 (talk) 05:44, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And so we got there eventually! Can you do me a favor and clean up my Turkish village stubs, remove the ,district part of the beginning and infobox and also recategorize them by district like I did with the earlier Turkish provinces? I think you know what I mean.♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:18, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers. Yeah we passed it about lunch time here, it's certainly a major milestone and worth of celebration, even if most articles need work! To create 5 million article subjects is something in itself! No doubt though it's only a tiny percentage of what could be. To think though that when I arrived we had about 1.1 million articles, to think we're five times the size of then!♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:41, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you consider how big the world is and how many people speak English, yeah incredibly slow to develop really. I mean if every adult in the UK created just one article this year, 10 minutes of their time, we'd have probably near 40 million new articles. Just predicted 5 March 2023 for Wikipedia:Seven-million pool. ♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:06, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, though for some reason category American male journalists got added Aşağıihsaniye, Çaycuma!♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:47, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

How far did you get? There was early 1900s-2015 and other countries like France and UK etc too.♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:51, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why are Mary Beard, Daniel Yergin, Andrew Bacevich & Charles Beard NOT historians? DEddy (talk) 14:00, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, what is up with removing the category from historians? --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 20:45, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

	We couldn't have done it without you
	Well, maybe. Eventually. But the encyclopedia would not be as good. Celebrate 7&6=thirteen (☎) 13:41, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed your “Accident and Incidents” entry of 7K-9268 as intending to divert to AAC. There is no evidence, at the moment, that the flight crew intended to divert to AAC. The Reuters article which you link makes no reference to a diversion attempt nor do we yet have any official transcript of ATC communications. You also indicated that the crash site was 35km from AAC. The crash site is located at N30.16 E34.17, 57nm (102km) from AAC.

At this point, we have only conflicting speculation that the crew may have attempted to divert; moreover, even if the crew was planning to divert, with several other suitable fields closer to the crash site (including VDA, MIP, TCP, HGER, H36, & AQJ) concluding that they were attempting to divert to AAC would also be speculative.Indelaware (talk) 23:49, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have noticed that so far absolutely zero of the scientists I have done for the WikiProject Women in Red Women Scientist's Editathon have women categories. No American women anthropologists, no Bolivian women biologists, etc. Should I NOT list them that way? SusunW (talk) 01:12, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! I've just noticed that you've overtaken User:Koavf as the most prolific contributor ever! Hearty congratulations! David Cannon (talk) 01:25, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Congrats from me too! ϢereSpielChequers 08:58, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Wow, that it amazing. Surely your spelling isn't as bad as mine? Congratulations. You ought to get a huge banner or something here. Martinevans123 (talk) 00:31, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• ... This ... actually ... happened???? Congrats. Steel1943 (talk) 02:37, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• So many mistakes and so many automated wrong editings, having to endlessly correct your mistakes and having to complain about your numerous automated wrong editings..! Certainly no congratulations from me, you and your record-setting habit/addiction are making the encyclopedia worse, certainly not better! Akseli9 (talk) 05:11, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a way you can mark your edits like [11] minor? So I can hide them from my watchlist? Cheers, --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:42, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am in possession of such a disk, and I purchased it off of e-Bay two years ago. Tom chiquilion@msn.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.180.6.36 (talk) 16:35, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, dearest Ser Amantio di Nicolao, how are you?

I've opened this page, and I ask you please 5 minutes to read it and correct my mistakes. I'll be pleased to help you in Italian and Portuguese.

Thanks a lot for your precious help!

Rei Momo (talk) 16:08, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot and have a nice week end! Rei Momo (talk) 08:49, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Idriss Aberkane is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Idriss Aberkane until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Кумкум (talk • contribs) 17:31, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dear gentleman In your remark on the death of song writer Pulak Bandopadhyay you mentioned he committed suicide by jumping in the deep waters of the river Ganges in Kolkata. In fact he jumped in river Yamuna in Delhi....if my memory has not become so weak.... I felt to bring it to your notice. Hopevagter checking the fact you will rectify this. Regards Prabir Brahmachari Mumbai Email pb1955@gmail.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.182.178.201 (talk) 19:14, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, this seems poorly developed. Can you split the existing ones, I think ones like New York City, LA and Chicago would likely have their own under United States. I suspect there's tons of defunct night club articles on here already which are not categorized, so if you can find some to populate it this would be great.♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:35, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Well, we both know that potentially we'd have dozens of articles on defunct nightclubs in all the major US cities making the sub categories very appropriate. We'll get there eventually I'm sure. I still think there'll be a lot of existing articles which should be categorized as defunct, but might need to be done manually going through the nightclub categories which I can't imagine you have time or the will to do haha!♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:39, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wrote a bunch of code to change the citations on the Sully Historic Site article from the current version to the proposed formatting. Cannot implement this without consensus. Would very much appreciate your opinion at the talk page. Abel (talk) 02:11, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Was he "Irish" or "British" or do we need to define his nationality in some other way? A debate on the subject, to reconsider a long-standing consensus that he was Irish, has started at talk:George Bernard Shaw. Just in case you're interested. Current comments are at "Nationality", at the foot of the page - although an earlier thread at "Irish"? may also be relevant. --Soundofmusicals (talk) 06:07, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As a current or past contributor to a related article, I thought I'd let you know about WikiProject Virginia Tech, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Virginia Tech. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks and related articles. Thanks!

Go Hokies (talk) 04:31, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to, please take a look at the article about Marie Serneholt, which is this weeks selected TAFI article. Regards,--BabbaQ (talk) 16:26, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Check it out. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 16:32, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, You added categories as '19th century opera singer' and '20th century opera singer' for Harry Plunket Greene. Is this really appropriate? So far as I know (and I researched and wrote most of this article sometime in the dim and distant past, at first under my long-redundant previous username) he made an opera debut in one season only, in 1890, and then decided not to pursue a career in that direction but devoted himself entirely to the concert platform, oratorio, recital, lecturing, judging contests, teaching song, etc. I have never seen or read any other description of him taking an operatic role, and (notably) not during the 20th century at all. At any rate, I'd be inclined to leave him out of the 20th century category. Or is it a case of 'once you have done it you always are one'? And if so, what other walks of life might that apply to? For really, he is an example par excellence of the 'NOT-opera singer', which is one of the defining things about his career. Any thoughts? Merely a gentle inquiry, no wish to dispute, Kind regards, Eebahgum (talk) 00:29, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reply. I see the dilemma! I suppose this turns on whether a category is part of a personal definition, or a search tool leading to a fact, hence the peculiarity in classification. I shall not alter what you have put. Good wishes, Eebahgum (talk) 00:42, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If I haven't worn out my welcome, I have an issue. L'Oréal-UNESCO Awards for Women in Science has two parts, the laureates and the fellows. While there is a category for "L'Oréal-UNESCO Awards for Women in Science laureates" there is none for the fellows. When I tried to put it on Diana Marcela Bolaños Rodriguez I noted hotcat returns two choices for the laureates? Can you help sort it out? SusunW (talk) 16:23, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This one is also a fellow and not a laureate Kathrin Barboza Marquez. And another Eucharia Oluchi Nwaichi SusunW (talk) 17:41, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much! Very much appreciate the help. SusunW (talk) 03:16, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I'm the biographer of Albert Lance/Lance Ingram There are but some minor errors on the page. I should also advise you that I have now published the biography as an eBook available on Kindle, iBooks, Kobi, Smashwords. It is also now a paperback edition from sapphiremedia@tpg.com.au, Amazon and eBay. I have administered a Facebook page for six years - Albert Lance/Lance Ingram - the tenor Should you require any further information you can contact me at dcolin989@gmail.com or the sapphire media email address. I would appreciate if you might add this in the article and by external links/references. My kind regards, Doug Holden — Preceding unsigned comment added by 120.152.12.150 (talk) 03:28, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you See for your help with my article on HERMAN CHARLES KOENIG. One more link would be helpful: he wrote the Introduction to the subject book, published by Arkham House, and there's an article on same in Wikipedia. Koenig is mentioned there too, so a link from his name to the bio would also be nice. 108.5.32.56 (talk) 05:13, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Check it out; I stumbled upon this article and did some work. Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 06:30, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited! Join us remotely! World Virtual Edit-a-thon on Women in Religion

Dates: 5 to 15 December 2015 Location: Worldwide/virtual/online event Host: Women in Red (WiR): Did you know that only 15% of the biographies on Wikipedia are about women? WiR focuses on "content gender gap". If you'd like to help contribute articles on women and women's works, we warmly welcome you! Event details: This is a virtual edit-a-thon hosted by WiR. It will allow all those keen to improve Wikipedia's coverage of women in religion to participate. All levels of Wikipedia editing experience are welcome. RSVP and learn more: →here← --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 06:30, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

		Happy holidays.
		Best wishes for joy and happiness. Ser Amantio de Nicolao, may you have the best holiday Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 12:19, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Up the Faraway Tree, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Talk:Up the Faraway Tree and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Talk:Up the Faraway Tree during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. NJ (talk) 16:42, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	Thank you for making an incredible amount of contributions. Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 00:47, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

7&6=thirteen (☎) has given you a Dobos torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it. To give a Dobos torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

7&6=thirteen (☎) 22:00, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

How do you get your edits on Wiki Commons using cat-a-lot to appear on your Wikipedia edit contributions? Monopoly31121993 (talk) 21:17, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am new to wikipedia & don't know where to report regarding problematic editors. I have seen you taking care of Jarmur. So, I am reporting here that a user named Nardisoero is doing disruptive edits at least to the badminton articles - as I haven't checked his edits to other fields.

Here's an example of one of his most recent edits to an article: a) Older version; b) Nardisoero's version.

Please go through his humongous number of problematic edits. And try to stop him. I could revert just three of his edits today on the Srikanth Kidambi's article. And I think I can't revert more due to the three-revert rule. So, please do something regarding this issue.-NitinMlk (talk) 02:01, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

take a look at Verita Bouvaire-Thompson - which has no categories, among things, is up for deletion and cats might help, unless you feel that it is beyond help thanks, Carptrash (talk) 19:08, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks many times over, I dedicate my next egg nog & rum to you. In fact, the next three. . Carptrash (talk) 00:13, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notable or not, she is at least well catalogued. She also shown up in the two Bogie bios I p[icked up at the library today. Carptrash (talk) 18:49, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, dearest Ser Amantio di Nicolao, how are you?

I put some news more in this page, ans as you travelle too in it, I ask your opinion, if my poor English is correct. It will take to you just two minutes. Thanks a lot for your precious help!

Rei Momo (talk) 23:55, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot for your precous help!!! Rei Momo (talk) 07:29, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Misa (moth) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Misa (moth) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Blackbombchu (talk) 17:09, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Have you resumed with 1976 yet? The links are really useful!♦ Dr. Blofeld 22:36, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Xmas Ornament.jpg

To You and Yours!

FWiW Bzuk (talk) 03:31, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Allow others to flood your page with seasonal greetings because Christmas is coming... Jim Carter 13:00, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Merry, Ser Amantio di Nicolao! At this wonderful time of year, I would like to wish you a Merry Christmas and a very Happy New Year! May you have a delightful 2016! MarnetteD|Talk 14:09, 20 December 2015 (UTC) [reply]

Say, why are you removing persondata from various politicians such as Buckshot Hoffner and Hart Benton Holton, to name a few?--184.97.149.210 (talk) 20:21, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message

	Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2016!!!
	Seasons' Greetings Ser Amanito di Nicolao. May you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this Christmas and New Year. It has always been a pleasure working with you, and I wish you and yours all the very best in 2016. Happy editing, SW3 5DL (talk) 21:03, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

	Seasons Greetings
	Christmas! Christmas, everywhere, on every talk page, I do dispair Seasons being greeted and Wikibreaks told, but still time for a little more editing, for being WP:BOLD! So go on, go forth and enjoy beyond concern Your Wiki will be waiting for when you return. Have a great Holiday Season. Buster Seven Talk 18:29, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply] This card designed by User:Samtar.

Thank you! Wishing you all the best for a happy and safe holidays! Grutness...wha? 08:20, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ser Amantio di Nicolao Wishing you a joyous Christmas and a prosperous new year! BoringHistoryGuy (talk) 14:32, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

		Season's Greetings
		Wishing you a Happy Holiday Season, and all best wishes for the New Year! A jultomte for you! Hafspajen (talk) 11:53, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, dearest Ser Amantio di Nicolao, how are you? Here I think for this year we don't have snow for Christmas.

Please, I'vge opened this page now, and I ask some minute of you time to read it and correct my mistakes. Thanks a lot for your precious help and Merry Christmas and Happy 2016!

Rei Momo (talk) 15:14, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I told him you’d been good, made lots of useful edits, did not engage in, but fought against vandalism, were always willing to come to the aid of a friend, were a downright upright editor who had generally made wikipedia a better place in 2015 than you found it in 2014.

He told me he’d keep it in mind.

Carptrash (talk) 18:04, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Found a bit of an issue over there that you might be interested in diving into as well, if you feel the need! In the meantime, merry Christmas! Vivisel (talk) 18:59, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Henry Goddard (architect), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Timberland. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:49, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

	Wishing you a Charlie Brown Charlie Russell Christmas! 🎄
	Best wishes for your Christmas Is all you get from me 'Cause I ain't no Santa Claus Don't own no Christmas tree. But if wishes was health and money I'd fill your buck-skin poke Your doctor would go hungry An' you never would be broke." —C.M. Russell, Christmas greeting 1914. Montanabw(talk)

	Merry Christmas and happy New Year
	Thanks for making Wikipedia A better encyclopedia. Best wishes to you and your family. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 20:27, 24 December 2015 (UTC) |}[reply]

I could not imagine there was no category for the United States Foreign Service personnel, but I don't find one. My file Gwendolyn Wilson Fowler shows it in red. Surely there are other people who were not diplomats, etc? You are the category expert, can you help? Gracias, mi amigo. I hope that your holiday season has been filled with cheer. SusunW (talk) 20:49, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. No rush, I don't know if it's just that I don't know how to search the categories (likely) or that there just isn't one (unfathomable) ;) SusunW (talk) 22:36, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Henrietta Szold page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:24, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you Are interested in unpublished works of Fela Sowande you may contact me at guyper@ix.netcom.com. I have most of what is left including original recordings and papers. I am Guy Pernetti, adopted son and guardian of his works. If interested, feel free to contact me. I am looking for a responsible facility for his work. Respectfully, Guy Pernetti — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.81.134.63 (talk) 05:17, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ser Amantio di Nicolao, this is about the article about "Gert Ledig". I think you added a book called "Darling, translated 1957" and I am very interested in the source of that information. What is the original German title and when was it published originally? Thank you for your answer! Trupikow Trupikow (talk) 10:07, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

One of our esteemed editors wants to delete this. Please keep a weather eye on it. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 13:15, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

		Season's Greetings
		Wishing you a Happy Holiday Season, and all best wishes for the New Year! Hafspajen (talk) 09:14, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ser Amantio I'm having trouble fixing this? [12]....any ideas?, thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 17:35, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

its fixed--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 21:01, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

	Happy New Year 2016
	Looking forward to working with you in 2016! Rosiestep (talk) 17:39, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

	Hopp(y) Gnu Ear
	Hoppy Gnu Ear to you! Hoppy Gnu Ear to you! Be Safe! 216.80.117.134 (talk) 07:19, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

.

	Happy New Year!
	Hello Ser Amantio di Nicolao: Did you know ... that back in 1885, Wikipedia editors wrote Good Articles with axes, hammers and chisels? Thank you for your contributions to this encyclopedia using 21st century technology. I hope you don't get any unneccessary blisters. North America1000 21:24, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Happy New Year elves}} to send this message

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.