User talk:Seicer/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions about User:Seicer. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

→

Archive 5

Hello, Seicer/Archive 1, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay.
Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!
If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up very shortly to answer your questions. Don't be afraid to ask!
If you would like to experiment with Wikipedia, I invite you to do so in my own personal sandbox (just follow the simple rules!) or in the Wikipedia sandbox.
When you contribute on talk pages or in other areas, it is important to sign your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date.

Again, welcome! — ßottesiηi ^{Tell me what's up} 18:08, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

Don't mention the welcome. It's the thing that can turn a potential future vandal into a future administrator. — ßottesiηi ^{Tell me what's up} 18:23, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for adding the bit about the old railroad bed. It added an interesting context to the article as a whole. Cheers. youngamerican (talk) 21:38, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the comment! I stumbled upon it accidently while photographing a parallel abandoned bridge that was for old WV 152. The abandoned span was no more than 20 years older than the existing span from my estimate. Seicer 03:30, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

		The Exceptional Newcomer Award
		For making several smart articles, edits, and redirects in just over a month as a Wikipedian, I hereby award Seicer the Exceptional Newcomer Award. youngamerican (ahoy-hoy) 01:41, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

Alright, but as it's a featured article, it's better to have paragraphs of prose rather than bulletted lists with 1-sentence tidbits... generally stuff like that has to be rewritten into paragraphs during the FAC process. We'll see what happens though, your addition/rewrite is still brand new. --W.marsh 19:00, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the suggestion. I'll go and rewrite the bullets into paragraphs sometime today. Seicer 19:06, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

Since you offered up such good photos of Waverly Hills Sanitorium - what are the rights going to be for release of them? (The rules require a release from the copyright owner for them to be on Wikipedia.--Mike Straw 16:57, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

You can file it under Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike for any photograph under Waverly Hills. Just be sure to credit them to (text removed) (and not Seicer) with an address to the site (http://www.abandonedonline.com). Thank you :) Seicer 17:23, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

I wonder if you could help look over the "ghost hunters" wiki entry for NPOV. LuckyLouie 21:15, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

Got it. I returned as much as I could on the article to a NPOV. There may be some small edits that may be required on a subsection or two, but for the most part, the bias is gone. On the other hand, it needs citations. Glad to be of some assistance! :) Seicer 19:24, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

Thank you Seicer!!!! I'd appreciate it if you'd look into that page from time to time. Folks on both sides of the debate often attempt to make POV additions. LuckyLouie 06:37, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

Like now... at least it hasn't resorted to vandalism. Seicer 18:47, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

My apologies for thrusting you into the hot seat. It is certainly one of the longest and most cantankerous discussions I've seen. :-) LuckyLouie 01:38, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

No problems, glad to help out where I can. Remember that all the "discussions" are coming from one side where the user shouts (all caps), accuses others of vandalism, and is a general nuisance from what I can tell based on that thread. You've got nothing to worry mate Seicer 02:06, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

OK...HELP. Both the page and the discussion is out of control again. Not sure how to proceed. Thanks. LuckyLouie 18:25, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

Got your note about Urban Exploration. I owe you a WikiFavor, so I'll look into it. LuckyLouie 20:09, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

24.99.68.246 18:58, 1 August 2006 (UTC) I got your note on vandalizing on the Ghost page, but it was not vandalism as I was adding a show that deals with ghosts called BLEACH, not anything else. I'm sorry for it being mistaken.

One of our respected admins pointed out that alot of the articles on WV state routes are lack context (ie they say that "West Virginia State Route XX is an east-west connector route"). I was going to start by going through and basically adding that they are "highways" or "roads" or whatnot to show that they are automobiles. She made a good point that people from other countries might think that they are commuter rail lines. Anyhow, if you can help me out on this, I'd owe you a wikifavor of some sort. Cheers. youngamerican (ahoy-hoy) 12:28, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, I noticed that the highway listings are rather vague. To bring it up to Wiki standards for the US, in terms of terminology, the listings should be "West Virginia State Highway XXX" rather than "Route XXX", which would probably end a lot of confusion right there. Seicer 15:46, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

I would agree, but there is a ban right now on moving state highway articles until a consensus-based name is agreed upon for all states. It was pretty messy a few months back. youngamerican (ahoy-hoy) 15:58, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

No problem. The language of whether to use "route" or "highway" is largely demographic and a regional one at that. I was wondering for a bit why there were no "West Virginia State Highway XXX" articles at first... Should I continue to add new WV state route articles, if I do get around to that, or save it for when the cleanup is complete? Seicer 00:38, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

Never let that stop you. This is totally a minor back-burner sort of miniproject. youngamerican (ahoy-hoy) 04:20, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

A little reminder - You put the POV-check template in the Ghost article, in a context where it should not be used. It is meant to be used in articles that are written without any regard to the NPOV policies, and not in content disputes. Replace it with something more appropriate, ie POV or Disputed. /Magore 21:35, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the correction. I'll make the revision now. Seicer 22:04, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

As for the debate over the links, keep it going on the talk page and see if you guys can reach a common ground. If you guys cannot after a few weeks, go to Wikipedia:Request for Comment and seek input from others (be sure to follow the guidelines there to a T). As for the SVG, I've wondered about that myself. I'll do some looking into it and see how its done. youngamerican (ahoy-hoy) 16:49, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

Seicer, I don't know much about UE, but the issue seems to be removing bias to links on the page. I am observing your edits in order to be better equipped to help out. LuckyLouie 18:22, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

Ditto. The links were not originally sorted, and had misshapen descriptions. I corrected this by adding accurate descriptions based on the content they had and the language they catered to. Now that some users want to influence the article's links by adding their strong bias and untruth to it, I removed the descriptions entirely. Seicer 18:32, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

I just did further cleanup and removed more bias. I think it is nearing its perfect state at this moment. Seicer 18:44, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

I make them by hand. --SPUI (T - C) 17:52, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Seicer! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. - Glen 02:29, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for stepping in on the talk page over there, it's really starting to get out of hand. :) --james _{// bornhj (talk)} 17:53, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

No problem. Just doing my part to help keep Wikipedia nice and clean :) Seicer (talk) 17:54, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for your help in the Habbo Hotel article. You got to the vandalism quicker than I could :) Seicer (talk) 12:12, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

pleasure to help - article is clearly a vandalmagnet so I'll keep it on the watchlist --Peripitus (Talk) 12:17, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

thanks for the welcome and related comment --Dch111 03:49, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

I asked the person who added the tags earlier today about what suggestions he had for new names for the articles, as they already seemed to match naming convention as they stood. I am waiting for a reply, but I tend to agree with you that they are fine for now.

As far as renaming the WV road articles, I would hold off for a bit. A recent arbcom ruling warned against any sort of renaming until some over-reaching guidelines are agreed upon and it seems that the official names for such highways are West Virginia State Route xx. Making any changes might land you in hot water. This will eventually get sorted out. Cheers. youngamerican (ahoy-hoy) 00:57, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

Hey listen up nintendo has recently leaked a wifi page that everybody had access to only recently removed check out club skill.com for the story and put my information back

No. It is unsourced and is not encylopedia content. This is not a place for leaked information. Seicer (talk) 22:29, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

Did you actually read the edit summary? The section I removed was unnecessary, badly written, informal and probably stolen from a fan website. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.44.21.74 (talk • contribs) .

Do not vandalise or remove content from the talk pages. Seicer (talk) 12:27, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

What? Oh, I'm just going to ignore you now. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.44.21.74 (talk • contribs) .

Hmm. That's too bad. Well, if you'll notice, they're a GIPU. That is to say, they're not registered users. It's unfornate, but blocking might have to a consideration just to avoid confusion. Still, as far as I'm concerned, they're actions are kind...obvious. If you'll note the Trivia section of my userpage, there are various reasons why one should never believe them to be moi. Is that what you were asking? ACS (Wikipedian); Talk to the Ace. See what I've edited. 18:32, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

I am not sure why my update was deleted... I was just watching the Daily Show, was entertained by their updated graphics package encompassing the entire region and tried to find it on here. When I found it wasn't mentioned, I waited for the graphic to be repeated, transcribed the title ("Israfghyianonanaq") and placed it on here. I am just as concerned as you are with spam, but believe me this is not spam. --JnB987 03:16, 25 July 2006 (UTC) (I was logged out when I edited.)

I'll revert it back. From the name of the title, it appeared to be vandalism at first. Thanks for bringing this up and sorry for any inconveniences! Seicer (talk) 03:17, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

The title is rather unusual, but (as I will now be adding to the page), it refers to Israel, Afghanistan, Syria, Lebanon, Iran and Iraq. No worries about the reversion... we were civil, were we not? --JnB987 03:22, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

		The Exceptional Newcomer Award
		Yeah, you already got this award, but I wanted to double it over because of all your great work to Louisville-related articles, something very unexpected from a newcomer. Cheers! —  Stevie is the man!  Talk • Work 23:31, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

This is an archive of past discussions about User:Seicer. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

→

Archive 5

Nothing special to say, you just asked me to post if I created an account. I did, so I am.  ;-) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Oherian (talk • contribs) .

Went to the top. I'm tired of being ignored at WP:RPP (see the stupid answer I got for Minnesota State Highway 33) and here, where we've been ignored. And WP:ANI. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 19:38, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

I suggest you read this link:

http://www.uer.ca/forum_showthread_archive.asp?fid=1&threadid=9293&currpage=1

Mike Dijital was found to have stolen items from a MA asylum and was charged by MA authorities over this. His E-Bay account was closed by E-Bay for this. So, it is not speculation that it happened, it did happen. It is a fact, not a rumor and this community has a right to know it and what Deggi5 really is about. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.188.126.200 (talk • contribs) .

"And my question is, there are vandals on both UER and D5. What makes D5 stand out that much further from the pack, aside from personal opinion? It is obvious you hold a grudge against D5 based on the instance of Mike (@ D5) while holding UER up on a pedistal - although both sites are equal in comparison. As for your edit to the "Shiroi" meet, it has been confirmed that no vandalism occured. See the Discussion page for urban exploration. Seicer (talk) 19:44, 3 August 2006 (UTC)"

As a former member (I don't have that much time anymore to check around on a bunch of UE sites unfortuantely), I never had any problems with Deggi5. They were, in my opinion, much more welcoming and free spirited than UER. But this is not the place to discuss grudges against various sites, its about your baised edits to urban exploration. Seicer (talk) 19:46, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Believe me I don't like having to do that, but I've been on edge about this whole thing since the arbcom. Especially since he started violating the ruling. He had more then enough chances to be good and was given WAY more warnings then any other users would have been. This was a long time coming. I'm going to stay on the lookout for any more violations of it. Because if I can't edit war then he sure as hell isn't going to be getting away with it either. JohnnyBGood t c VIVA! 00:30, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Not a problem. Doesn't look like it amounted to anything but there are those biased admins... --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 20:20, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

Seicer, your participation is welcome in the Wikipedia:State route naming conventions poll. Please give your input as to the process by 23:59 UTC on August 8.

Regards, Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 21:58, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

If you are going to accuse me, please present the evidence so I have something to refute. Otherwise you are poisoning the well. --SPUI (T - C) 03:03, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Of course, you ignored the citations I provided which justified your lack of respect for copyright laws in the United States. You also have a very hot temper, which irks the ill of many, and as a result, a few have left Wikipedia. Good job. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 03:05, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Good job in not giving any evidence of copyright violations by me on Wikipedia. Please stop poisoning the well. --SPUI (T - C) 03:16, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for writing the summation of Lexington's new developments; I think that says what needs to be said without reading like an advertisement. Incidentally, I don't have any data to support this but I doubt that Main & Rose will really be Lexington's first downtown grocery (I changed it from "urban" to be more clear); having grown up downtown I know there haven't been any for decades, but I am very skeptical of the claim that there has NEVER been a grocery store in Lexinton's downtown. Cmadler 15:50, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

You are correct on that, I should have reread what I wrote. I was trying to make the point, from what I read in the H-L, that it would be an urban grocery store. None currently exist in the CBD. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 15:52, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

You moved this to List of Ohio State Highways by copying and pasting the content. This splits the article history and removes attribution. Please use the move tag to move a page. --SPUI (T - C) 04:55, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Your "blanking" of other material (essentially, since you shunned the pages to the main List of numbered highways in Ohio) is inapproperiate. The seperation of the pages, similar to West Virginia, is far more approperiate and wise since the list of highways is very long in Ohio. Most people do not care to scroll through a very un-user friendly list. See Talk:List of numbered highways in Ohio for my full reason list. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 05:52, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

If you continue to label good-faith edits as vandalism, you will be blocked. --SPUI (T - C) 06:25, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

"Good faith" my ass. Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Arbitration enforcement#Multiple_reverts_User:SPUI. Numerous instances have been recorded to which you have been blocked and warned many times before for. Shall I remind you of Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Arbitration enforcement#User:SPUI and many other instances of infractions in the past? Seicer (talk) (contribs) 06:27, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

May I inform you of [1]? My status as a pariah is not an entitlement for you to play dirty. --SPUI (T - C) 06:29, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

I see you are reverting to threats, similar to what other users have had to put up with you. I shouldn't be suprised by this, but I'll continue reporting to the Arbitration Enforcement whenever issues rise. And I am pretty certain that I am not alone in this. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 06:31, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

"I'll continue reporting to the Arbitration Enforcement whenever issues rise." If my statement is a threat, that certainly is. --SPUI (T - C) 06:36, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

I'm looking at it now -- is there nay correlation on those rows (e.g. is VT 2A related to 8A in any way)? The shading seems to imply such a relation exists (I'm guessing there isn't and it's just a numerically ascending table of the VT routes). If there isn't such a relation, maybe you can experiment with a checkerboard-type shading scheme? The only probelm with this that i've run into is when it needs to be changed it gets to be quite a pain to fix the shading, espeically if you're adding something in here or there. If you want, I can whip up a PHP app really quickly that throws out the correct shading for the routes currently on the table. The only risk we'd be taking with a checkerboard shading is that it might seem to be a little too 'busy' on the page with so many colours and images around.

Another usability issue is not your fault but more wikipedia's -- i'd be inclined to click on the image to go to the article with the current scheme -- but the mediawiki automatically links us to the image itself, which is arguably useless. Maybe if you try the following format it would look better (excuse the HTML needed to make it look like a table, I know it's not wikipedia-standards compliant):

Route 2A	Route 2B	Route 3
Route 4A	Route 5A	Route 7A
Route 7B	Route 8	Route 8A

Also, I seem to be favouring the term 'Route 2A' over 'VT 2A', it would make the area to click on (the text itself) more prominent compared to the 'VT 2A', and the vermont is more or less implied by the title of the page. atanamir 07:26, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

• looking it over again, maybe you can afford making the images a little bigger (I experimnted using the bottom row) since the clickable text seems to be prominent enough now. Plus, the numbers on the images were getting a little distorted. atanamir 07:27, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Another thing you can do which should most likely make it much much harder on the editor is to make the entire cell clickable to the article -- you can look atthe HTML required in the source. I've done so on the last bottom right cell of that table (Route 8A) to show you. This would absolve many of the clickability problems. The image, still, when clicks, will go to the Image page. I dont think that can be overriden without advanced Jscript. atanamir 07:30, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
    • Never mind, mediawiki takes out the onclick. ignore that last point ^^. The 100% can get a little too big too -- that was my first thought. I have a 24" monitor and it streches all the way across the screen and can get a little busy/cumbersome to look at. What I did above was to soften the background colour a bit as well. atanamir 07:32, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
      • I would say the grey / white ratio is exactly what causes the business phenomenon to occur. I've created several examples of gradually lightening shades of grey at User:Atanamir/VT. You can take a look tomorrow. Good night! atanamir 07:42, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Should we update that move proposal at OH for List of highways in Ohio and start a new vote? I think the sheer number of possibilities I've proposed there are throwing people off and there's starting to be votes for too many different names. atanamir 17:46, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

• Personally, I prefer the current name as its most specific (I tend to agree with SPUI most of the time when it comes to these things), but seeing as most people would liek it moved, my second choice would be List of highways in Ohio -- if you look at the article state highway, it makes it clear that the term state highway only refers to state route / state highways -- roads that are completely state-administered. Interstates and U.S. Routes are both partially funded by the federal government, and thus don't fall under the 'state highway' category, although they are maintained by the state. I think we should change it to List of highways in Ohio, if that's fine with you. atanamir 17:53, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Do I need to create a whole new proposal? or just edit the one and archive the previous votes? atanamir 19:01, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Hi – thanks for chiming in on my contribution on the talk page. I'll reply there regarding the Infobox, but I wanted to personally ask you if you had any thoughts on the rest of my suggestions there? I have created all new shields (as all of the 3-digit shields were an incorrect size), and they're sitting on my computer right now. I'm hoping some others will give some feedback on the suggestions I've made. I'm also trying to work on a junctions table as I mentioned there. Thanks! Homefryes 15:20, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

Sorry, it took so long, but I have created a poll regarding the organization issue at WT:WASH. -- NORTH ^talk 21:23, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

No problem, Seicer. Always glad to help! The Punk 05:50, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

List of State Highways in Ohio -- couple of questions:

1. Do you mind if I move this to lowercase? they shouldn't be capitalised because it's not a proper noun.
2. Is it OK to take off the "Ohio" prepending all of the State Routes? This is for several reasons:
   1. (main reason) The article won't fit unless I maximize the browser window in 1280 resolution, simply having State Route X should fix this.
   2. (other reason) Ohio's DOT calls them State Routes too.
   3. (minor reason) all the "Ohio"s seem superfluous

If you don't want me to, that's OK too. atanamir 22:46, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

• BTW, good job with the list -- the main page looks a lot cleaner now :) 22:47, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

I've added a navibox to all the Ohio route pages, what do you think?

List of State Routes in Ohio atanamir 06:18, 24 August 2006 (UTC) PS - sorry about that really dirty move from state highways in ohio to state routes in ohio, i wanted to see the results an was too lazy to go through requested moves pages. atanamir 06:18, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

• If you like the way it looks, I'll go through the requested moves so we can get the talk page and history and all so it'll be better. For now it's just an experiment on how it can be used. atanamir 06:21, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

Please check the following removal from RSS talk Page by HKelkar who I have reasons to believe is the meatpuppet of Subhash Bose.I am looking for a particular comment on the same lines made by both these two logins.TerryJ-Ho

Even I make comments and edit summaries very similar to user:Subhash bose. Does that make me a sock (no I have over 15x as many edits as TerryJ-Ho)? I think TerryJ-Ho is merely biting a newbie.Bakaman _Bakatalk 18:45, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

I would contact an admin or go [Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Arbitration enforcement here] to take action. It does seem as if he is a sock puppet.

And who are you all? :P Seicer (talk) (contribs) 21:06, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

I would like to differ you to WP:AN/I rather than AIV. The user has a mix of constuctive edits and now there is the issue over Lexington. Please post your complaint there, and outline the history of the dispute. Otherwise, the IP is not worthy of blocking. Teke ^(talk) 04:49, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Absolutely not a problem. Those were the edits that lead me to pointing you to ANI. It's obvious there is a dispute, and it will be resolved. Teke ^(talk) 05:03, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Will this be dealt with soon? This user just isn't stopping. Stevie is the man! ^{Talk • Work} 05:57, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

I blocked the IP 703523767 user for 24 hours. I'm going to leave him a message explaining how to better resolve disputes. When the block is over I need for you all to stay calm and be a good example. The typed of edits the user was making were not highly damaging to the articles so you need to try and discuss on the talk page instead of doing multiple revert edits. If the user will not engage in discussion that leads toward consensus and starts back disruptive editing leave me a message and report on WP:AN/I.

The Ashland school offers AA or AS not BA or BS. FloNight 01:23, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

In regards to what is considered a constructive edit, many edits by 70.35.237.67 appear constructive at first glance due to the fact that they cite sources, but when the sources are examined they do not directly reference what they are being sourced to. This user cites inaccurate sources in an apparent attempt to create legitimacy to his/her form of vandalism. Chris24 02:18, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

Remember that we always need to assume good faith and not WP:BITE. I blocked the IP to stop them from editing and get their attention because they were not following policy and not listening to your warning. I'm not sure that the IP is a vandal. Good chance the IP does not understand the rules and is too stubborn to admit it. I'm going to encourage them to get an account and follow the rules. If that does not work then we can block for longer, okay. FloNight 02:40, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

Apologies for the multiple comments inserted as italics. I have gone back and converted these to ^{[citation needed]}s with comments as suggested. Speaking as someone with a dairy farming background (120 head in a relatively modern setup for the mid-1970s) the article seems to have been written by contributors with a good knowledge of the business, but considerable work is needed to add citations for the facts they may have taken as basic knowledge, and to balance some of the bits on competition which appear to be geared to particular national perspectives. Anyway, thanks for your pointers on the proper way of doing this. Hopefully it looks a bit better now. ClearwaterAg 02:32, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

I appreciate it... I needed that. Although I thought I got blocked at first :) --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 19:18, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

And so CBD is complaining now? I left him a note at his talk page. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 17:50, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

I sent you an email. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 05:34, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

It's clear to me that at least two of the editors participating in the discussion have no interest in reaching consensus but instead would prefer to bandy about insults and avoid direct questions asked of them, so I'm putting this on your Talk page instead, where you, who seem like an eminently reasonable editor, and I can further discuss things. :)

Have you thought through any proposed revisions to the article yourself? I've been sort of playing around with it in my head, and I think an "Aftermath" section might be an appropriate addition. That would allow for a brief discussion of the violation of FAA staffing policy and the FAA's reaction to it, if nothing else. Unfortunately, it would also open up the article for all sorts of other, even less relevant garbage, like a mention of the lawyer scum in Texas "recruiting" clients, which is unquestionably "aftermath" of the crash as well. I really don't want to have to fight this battle about those sorts of things too.

I am adamantly against including any mention of the pilots getting into the wrong aircraft, as this only serves to indict the pilots as completely incompetent absent an explanation (which has thus far not been forthcoming from either Comair or the NTSB) of why this happened.--chris.lawson 21:04, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

I just wanted to say that there has been a RfC. regarding Comair Flight 5191 Since you have been a contributor to the article, I encourage you to add to the debate and to contribute to the article, in the future. Mytwocents 05:34, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for your kind words over on my talk page! I agree, something had to be done, and from the way it appears, a compromise seems to be in place. But we'll see if it holds. In any case, two days away was plenty enough for me and I'm ready to go. Thanks again! --TMF ^{T - C} 16:15, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

I am disturbed by your bad faith assumption on User Talk:Lar's talk page, implying that I am a stooge recruited by SPUI to make his argument; I have disagreed with him vehemently more often than not on road issues and only find myself in agreement here by coincidence, not pre-agreement. The Proposal 3 that I offered seems to be a reasonable solution to the issue, and your support for it as an option will go a long way to addressing these differences of opinion. Alansohn 19:23, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Are you User:Rschen7754's stooge or do you have your own independent thoughts? I will assume that your views were independently arrived at unless otherwise proven. If it's not referring to me, then who is included in your claim that SPUI has been "dragging in others that he has requested from the NJ roads project", which seems to be calling me (and any other person who has participated in both WP:NJSCR and WP:SRNC) a stooge of SPUI's because they happen to agree with him. If you can't provide any evidence that this is the case, your assumption is a blatant failure to assume good faith. Other than foolish consistency, I fail to see what is lost by acceptance of Principle III in addition to the two alternatives previously proferred, which would achieve real consensus. Who would be excluded from agreement or otherwise harmed if Principle III is accepted as a compromise? Alansohn 19:48, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

If you check history carefully of Mila Jovovich article, you will see that it is not 213.240.3.17 who is a dynamic ip 3rr, it is 213.240.3.* that is. Lowg 04:36, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Hi. Vandalism on Milla Jovovich article continues. I have reason to believe the same editor who used dinamic IP did it again, and opened a new account. The same user just accussed me of the same, although it is obvious from history of that article this is not the case. He also revelaed the name of my IP. It is possible the user fails to understand the meaning of his violation, or Wikipedia rules in general. The user changed the article erasing references that made that data verifiable and replaced it by unsupported claims that conflict the rest of the article anyway. I will not edit just yet, as I don't intend to breach the 3RR, but what can be done against this vandalism and what can be done to stop a destructive edit war? I've tried my best and gave good, official, undisputable references that support my version, but they are persistantly being replaced. I proposed in the Talk page for that article to be protected from further editing for a limited amount of time, so we can let those hot heads cool off. After, of course, it has been reverted to the well-sourced version, as you did previously. Can this be done? Can I take this proposal to someone, as this edit-war is really frustrating, although I'm not about to let the thing go just because vandals are persistant. Please let me know what you think. Regards--213.240.3.118 22:48, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

I had just gotten my watchlist a moment before, and hovering over the diff didn't show that you'd made an edit in the intervening seconds. My apologies. ClairSamoht - Help make Wikipedia the most authoritative source of information in the world 03:01, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

As mentioned in WP:USSH, please link to State Route 55 (Virginia) rather than Virginia State Route 55 where the context is clear (which includes the two links in this edit). Thank you. --NE2 23:27, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

I'd say include both - people that are exclusively browsing WV roads would only see the WV-specific page, so it'd probably be best to include the templates on both the main page and the WV subpage. --TMF ^{T - C} 04:34, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

Consider renaming your excellent photos to a more-descriptive name. That way other user can easily use them in other articles as needed. Cheers. youngamerican (ahoy-hoy) 18:59, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

The Tristate project sounds pretty cool. I'm game. youngamerican (ahoy-hoy) 19:23, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

One more thing, I have a photo of the Art Museum that I took on one of my drive abouts, but coulnd't wedge it into the main article on H-ton...I'll try to post it today or tomorrow. youngamerican (ahoy-hoy) 19:26, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

...is a giant pain in the arse. Don't worry about it. I was refering to future images that you may upload. Just change the name on your computer before uploading them.

Also, thanks for starting the new project. My next edit will be to join. Cheers. youngamerican (ahoy-hoy) 15:54, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

If I may ask, exactly how do you change the font and/or color of your signature under 'my preferences'? Chris24 02:08, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for inviting me, Seicer! The Punk 03:09, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

No problem :) Just trying to help out Seicer (talk) (contribs) 04:08, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Hey. Here's the blank WV shield: . To make the shields, I use Inkscape, a freeware SVG editor. Even though it's free, its quality is top notch. Regards, TMF ^{T - C} 02:25, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

Sorry about that. My maps didn't show 52 entering Kentucky. Thanks for fleshing out that section. ObtuseAngle 03:54, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

He blanked his talk too. ... take it to WP:ANI to see what to do? Or just leave it? --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 02:58, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

Take it to ANI. I'll be gone for a few days, but I will easily say that you will have a lot of support. I'm reverting the talk page. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 03:29, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

omg, you guys, lololol Stratosphere ^{(U T)} 03:31, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

I put it up there. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 03:39, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks. Looks like SPUI's biggest fan, Freakofnature, posted. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 04:00, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

Consensus is to leave it blank, so that's probably the best option. There's always the history, and if he returns, we can probably unblank. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs)

I don't know much about North Carolina, since I've been concentrating an Virginia. I do however see two things: the article should be at North Carolina Highway 143 (per WP:USSH), and the secondary (four-digit) highways repeat in different counties. I also believe NC 1127 is actually called Secondary Road 1127. --NE2 05:03, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

In accordance with WP:USSH, the articles should all be at Kentucky Route. I will move them once the link fixing is complete. --NE2 00:05, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Are you familiar with the former WV 59 (now CR 59) from Lost City east to Virginia? I'm going to write an article about the former VA 59, which connected to it, and would appreciate any insight into the road. VA 59 was part of the original 1918 state highway system, with no other state line crossings between US 250 and US 50, but was transferred to the secondary system in 1949 as a very minor local route. --NE2 00:05, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

What are you talking about? The cites were right at the end of the section. Here [2] and here [3]. Cheers. L0b0t 15:27, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

No problem. SlimVirgin explained it on the talk page. Cheers. L0b0t 15:47, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

Situation resolved due to misintepertation on my part. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 01:53, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

What do you mean by 'Seconded'? Do you mean that you second the response by Alien3 or do you second the creation of a criticism section?-Localzuk^(talk) 15:21, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

Situation resolved due to misintepertation of my comment. Amended said comment. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 01:53, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

They all seem to be major projects - no minor secondary routes - so I'd put them in the individual articles. For the various connectors that are planned, especially where there is little information, it might be best to create a proposed highways in West Virginia article until construction begins. Just my two cents. --NE2 19:57, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

That Excel file includes "I-66 TUG RIVER TO KING COAL HIGHWAY". It may not be built to Interstate standards, but it's as much of an "Interstate" as I-73 and I-74 in West Virginia. I definitely see your side though - do you think it should be removed from the list? --NE2 01:06, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

Interestingly, I was just thinking about that; I added something about that duplication to Corridor G (Appalachian Development Highway System), but of course in a NPOV manner. If I were doing the planning, I would have taken US 119 south from Huddy to I-66 and then west on I-66 to Pikeville.

Also: K-80: I-66?

-Tom From Ohio... er, --NE2 01:22, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

I don't think routes listed in the 6000s should be listed on the Roads in Louisville Page b/c they are only for state maintenace at interstate ramps & not through routes themselves. -67.150.63.219 17:28, 26 October 2006 (UTC)!

I'll agree with that. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 18:46, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

WOuld you want some pictures of the I-77 tunnel at the WV/VA line? I have some vacation photos of them 67.150.95.27 21:19, 26 October 2006 (UTC)!

You should sign up for an account and use the Special:Upload link to the left. Vacation photos aren't warranted here, but if you have a clearer one of the entrance or one that is relevant to the article, feel free to add it. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 23:44, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

Situation resolved. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 06:10, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Obviously you are unfamilar with WV roads, and don't let the facts get in the way of your edits. City Streets are not part of the WV highway system. Your shielding is wrong of secondary roads, that matches C.R.'s. You left out C.R.'s which stands for County Route, although they are part of the state system. You also left out the Orphan Road program signage as well. --71Demon 14:04, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

"Roads of Charleston, West Virginia" do not necessairly be part of the WV Highway system. They are meant to explain in detail, the roads of a particular city. See Cincinnati, Toledo, Lexington, Ashland, and Louisville. You completely misinteperted the meaning of my post, so you should reread them and then reread the pages I have cited. Secondary roads utilise circular shields, but I have not made any of them, so do not place the blame on me - and the fact that I haven't updated *anything* about County Routes, you have demostrated that you cannot approperiate the edits to the right editor. Please correct your attributions and try again. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 20:25, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

Situation resolved. 71Demon wrongly attributes a correct shield designed to WVDOH specs to numerous users and expects a serious response. This user also cannot discriminate against "City specific" and "City streets" - which was clearly explained on numerous occassions. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 06:10, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Hey Seicer. An issue came up earlier today in which 71Demon believes that my WV shields are unprototypical, despite the fact that I created them based on specs publicly available on the WVDOH site. The argument can be found here and here. Since I trust in your knowledge of WV highways, I'd like your take on my signs. Thanks in advance, TMF ^{Let's Go Mets - Stats} 23:13, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

I agree. The signage is designed to WVDOT specifications and I see no problem with it. Remember that this is the same user who cannot differentiate between "City specific" and "City streets" - not that the latter violates any rulesets. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 00:53, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Situation resolved. 71Demon, as stated above, spammed many user talk pages with irrelevant comments. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 20:09, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Sorry, Seicer - it's done in an attempt to merge the information to the more appropriate article, Charleston, West Virginia. Unless you have a great explanation as to why a city with only 50,000 people should have a "List of Roads in..." article (without a discussion as to inclusion/exclusion criteria) when major cities don't have them (never mind the argument I present on the Charleston talk page), this is the best way to avoid AfD. Please assume good faith and realize that Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. We all want to improve Wikipedia, and I know that you are editing in good faith as well. 4.234.165.179 01:13, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Situation resolved. IPuser is a rogue tag-happy user who does not contribute outside of creating controversy. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 01:47, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

I noticed that you've been naming your images with camera-generated names. It would be helpful if from now on you titled them instead. Thanks! --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 01:52, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Please follow WP:USSH for the titles of Indiana's state roads. Thank you. --NE2 03:25, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Situation resolved. I was unaware of the difference in titles for the pages and "common useage" since I am not typically an Indiana contributor. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 20:08, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

I closed it out, but next time I'd wait until it's closed normally to ensure that people don't think of bias. I don;t think they will here but just to make sure. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 03:44, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

I responded to your comment regarding the proposed naming convention change. I believe you misinterpreted Serge's proposal. -- tariqabjotu 04:37, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

I'm pretty sure that is you, but you might want to trim off that copyright tag you put on the bottom of the image and explian that you are opening it up to a free license.

Also, I'm not too familiar with the Corridor G past those shops just south of Chas. Sorry. But I will check out my maps when I get a chance. Cheers. youngamerican (ahoy hoy) 16:50, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

It shouldn't be too bad, just crop the bottom and re-upload. But yea, it is a big red flag. I know you and that you release it, but there are others that don't and will delelte on site of that copyright notice. youngamerican (ahoy hoy) 16:58, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks. youngamerican (ahoy hoy) 19:36, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Situation resolved. All images affected were reuploaded sans stamp. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 20:08, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

While I wholeheartedly agree that the two articles should not be merged, I humbly suggest that you cool your jets and assume good faith a little bit longer with this IP. I've looked through the IP's contributions and don't see anything too alarming. There's nothing wrong with being a little tag happy; tags promote discussion and do far more good than harm. It only becomes a problem when people act on those tags even when consensus speaks otherwise. As of now, that hasn't happened. -- NORTH ^talk 17:28, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Like I said, I do agree that they shouldn't be merged, and I'll say something to that effect on the article talk page when I get the chance tomorrow. -- NORTH ^talk 08:20, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

1. Thanks for the notice of the WV work.
2. Did you try this: [4] ?
3. I think I will go ahead and join your project.
4. Do you have any photos of Beech Fork SP? If so, can you post one to the article?

Thanks, WVhybrid 02:10, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

It looks like we may have some photos of Beech Fork SP coming soon. You might want to hold off until you see if you like the pix that get posted soon. WVhybrid 23:13, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

Why did you remove the county categories from West Virginia Route 2? WV 2 relates to the counties, just as their communities, lakes, parks, and other features do. --NE2 20:57, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

However, if the counties are removed, you can't get to the route from the county's category. Your argument would lead to completely emptying the categories because you can always get to them from the articles. --NE2 21:02, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

I don't think that's possible, but I don't see why it matters. The categories are at the bottom of the page, possibly for this reason. --NE2 21:06, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

I don't have a verified answer for you about how the WV state parks are named. I think they just add the word resort to the destination style parks, like Canaan and Pipestem. WVhybrid 05:56, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

Yea, its Canaan Valley Resort State Park, for example. youngamerican (ahoy hoy) 14:05, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

There is a post from the editor of the website www.state-ends.com on my talk page (heading 31). --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 03:52, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

Image deleted, user blocked 1 week. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 03:58, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

With articles like Memorial Park, Huntington, West Virginia, instead of deleting it, it will be helpful to make it a redirect to Recreation in Huntington, West Virginia.--Commander Keane 03:53, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

Have a look at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee, which describes what the arbitration committee is in detail. Basically, it's the last resort in our dispute resolution process, so only a number of elected users are on the committee, and only they are allowed to start and vote on motions. Actually, there'll be an election in a few weeks, like every year. --Conti|✉ 03:23, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

I'm well known in WVDOH as well. Paul Mattox called me on the phone the other day. I don't have a problem with list as long as it acurately reflects WV's system and not trying to make it work with how other states do it. --71Demon 00:02, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

I would like to see if you had changed your views concerning the AfD for The Wiseguys: Comedy You Can't Refuse. There have been major edits performed to the enrty in an attempt to meet Wikipedia:Notability (comedy) since your comment on the talk page. Any additional comments would be appreciated in the effort to make the entry comply.

Thank you for your consideration.Apatronoftruth 18:40, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for arguing to keep this page. Even though it was deleted, I appreciate your efforts. --Lawcomic 04:00, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

I just essentially reverted an IP edit on Ashland, Kentucky that added "Noah Madden" as a notable native. A quick web search didn't turn up anything on him, but maybe he's a local celeb or something. You seem to have more knowledge of the area than I, so if my revert was a mistake, please correct it. Also, the editor before me changed the description on Billy Ray Cyrus from "Born in Flatwoods, Kentucky, a suburb of Ashland" to "Born in Flatwoods, Kentucky, a suburb of Greenup." I'm from the western part of the state, so I don't know which is more accurate; if a revert is needed, please do so. Thanks! Acdixon 17:01, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

I am sorry if I offended. Of course, I do not feel Keith Albee, Recreation in Huntington, etc. should be deleted since they have significance beyond the local area: Historical, tourism and so on. My feelings on the Pink Bridge is that it is not only of local interest (homeowners feuding with the Mayor), but it is of transient interest and not historical or noteworthy for an encyclopedia entry. I do think the article was very well written and nicely sourced, and as a new editor you are correct in that I am just getting my feet wet. Along those same lines, as a brand new editor I would not have made a nomination if I did not feel strongly that the subject matter didn't belong, regardless of how well written the article is.MiaKarina 16:25, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for arguing to keep this page. Even though it was deleted, I appreciate your efforts. I am somewhat disenheartened by some editors' attitude and condescension. Thank you for giving constructive commentary. --Lawcomic 04:00, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

I don't know why the discrepancy is so wide, but it doesn't seem to be commented on elsewhere, and this is not the place for original research. Perhaps the Kentucky Kernal or the Herald-Leader should look into this? I have attempted to simply state facts and give citations. Cmadler 19:27, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:UK Law Building Rendering.jpg. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:12, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

Corrected! Now I know all about the Fair Use Rationale for future purposes. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 19:25, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

Congratulations on the keep. WVhybrid 05:04, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

Good photo. I would have snagged one as requested, but I am currently w/o a digi cam. youngamerican (ahoy hoy) 00:59, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

My digital camera has been yet another victim of me leaving shit on the roof of my car. I'll get the Pink Bridge as soon as I can get a new one. youngamerican (ahoy hoy) 03:38, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Please have someone removed all the "never completed" buildings from the list of notable structures. If it will never exist, then why list it? 136.165.88.39 15:42, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

No. They are notable in their own right and require extensive searching. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 18:11, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

What do you mean "We have no sources to verify the ebaumsworld cite otherwise"? Surely that should be ANOTHER reason to delete it - there are no RS saying Ebaums raided Habbo. --Wooty Woot? contribs 08:46, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

Well, he just can't handle the truth some times, =( Zerocannon 13:47, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

re: Wikipedia_talk:Naming conventions (settlements) I have created a "discussion template" modeled off of an RfC to attempt to structure the discussion, which is spinning wheels and spraying mud. I'd greatly appreciate any input you could provide (including "what are you smoking?"--or perhaps, "keep this in your back pocket"). Thanks in advance. --Ishu 03:51, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Hideous? What are you talking about? Having three huge images on one side, boxes on the other, and the text smashed into the middle? That's hideous. Maybe if you'd deign to give us a little time to, oh, maybe add some content or an additional 3rd-gen image, it'd look a litle nicer. By the way, I found nothing under WP:MOS that applies there. Yes, I know that the two fourth-gen images weren't lined up very well. Give me a little time.--Sable232 22:46, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

I just checked the old version in Firefox, and it displays just fine, exactly like it does in Safari (Apple). Exactly what is the problem with the old layout? I'm trying to get a good posed photo of a 3rd-gen Ranger for the highlight image so I can move the other one to the empty space, and that should take care of it. Two images would be the best If i can get them.

It took quite a bit of work just to stretch out the Generation 1 section so there wasn't any open space, and I'm going to try and do the same to the other three. --Sable232 23:04, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Regarding photos - the best ones I have seen are on this webpage Check-Six 20:13, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Where do I learn (on Wikipedia) about that [referencing] stuff. I like to create references in artilces but I need a reference to where that can be learned (hopefully easily) on Wikipedia. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 00:29, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

(Replied on user talk page but posted here for others.) Footnotes referencing is the method I prefer. I utilise the MLA format. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 00:29, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

I fixed all of the duplicate action by merging the page histories. In the future, don't just blank and redirect if this comes up. Just give me a holler and I can use my fancy admin buttons and sort it out. :) youngamerican (ahoy hoy) 00:13, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

BTW, it'll take a few mins for the server to catch up, but it'll show up soon. youngamerican (ahoy hoy) 00:15, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Hi - you reverted my edits to Cincinnati. I had changed some external links which had double brackets ([[]]) round them. Double brackets are only used for internal links, and therefore, when used on external links they display as [[5]] rather than the correct [6]. I will be reverting them back to single brackets. I hope this does not cause any problems. Neilgravir 17:56, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Hi, There is my link add on Urban Exploration page. You have remove this and demand that we talk about. My website is www.boreally.org, it's a photoblog and a website about Urban Exploration in Europe. What informations do you need for add a new link? See you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Djwallace (talk • contribs) 07:13, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject Louisville is sprouting its wings for 2007! We have a new Assessment Department and a much more refined project template. We have nearly 1,000 articles catalogued for our project. And we still have a lot of work to do. We have 500+ articles left to assess for quality, and all our articles, as always, need tender loving care. Please consider dropping by the project and seeing what you might be able to do to move Louisville-related articles forward. Cheers, and Happy New Year! Stevie is the man! ^{Talk • Work} 01:19, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, it probably would be best to move ghost ramp here. If you agree with that, I'd be willing to close the AFD as a speedy keep. --NE2 05:22, 29 December 2006 (UTC)