User talk:ScottishFootballObseasive

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Pumpherston Juniors F.C.. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 15:07, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there - Wikipedia relies on reliable sources to verify information, especially about living people. You didn't provide a source for your changes to the Joe Mbu (footballer) article, and I couldn't find one either. If you have a reliable source please let me know and we can change the article. Please let me know if you have any questions. GiantSnowman 17:41, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I went by Transfermarkt, and my knowledge of local football. ScottishFootballObseasive (talk) 18:36, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

is this a reliable source?

https://m.footballdatabase.eu/en/player/details/197874-joe-mbu ScottishFootballObseasive (talk) 18:39, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ScottishFootballObseasive! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! ★ Ayaena Aya helps you 22:13, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started Introduction • Contributing to Wikipedia • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Get help at the Teahouse Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions Department directory Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Verifiability • No original research Reliable sources • Citing sources • Content guidelines What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sockpuppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper) Things to do Task Center • Be bold in editing Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Copy editing • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguation • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Hello, ScottishFootballObseasive

Thank you for creating Kevin Magee (Scottish footballer).

User:Paul W, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

The reference from The Scottish Sun is not reliable. Wikipedia deprecates all citations from this tabloid -see WP:THESUN.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Paul W}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Paul W (talk) 11:40, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Ross Cunningham, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. GiantSnowman 17:54, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:SUBCAT - if a player is in e.g. Category:Sportspeople from West Lothian then they should not be in Category:People from West Lothian, as the former is a subcategory of the latter. GiantSnowman 17:58, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Robbie Arthur (footballer, born 1986) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability, passing mentions in routine match coverage for lower level teams.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 12:55, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Dene Droudge (footballer, born 1989) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability, only lower league appearances, sources are passing mentions or not independent.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 13:12, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ScottishFootballObseasive, when you create an article or add references to an existing article, please make sure that the references are not just a link with a title. The reader should be able to tell what the source is (a news provider, or a book, or a journal, or an encyclopedia, or something else), who the author is (if there is a named author), when the source was published (not always relevant, but a newspaper article, for instance, will have a publishing date which is important info). WP:CITEHOW has more information about this.

Another thing to be aware of: please make sure that sources you cite are not Wikipedia mirrors. Enacademic, which you have used as a source a couple of times recently, is a website that copies Wikipedia articles, and we can't use such websites as sources. If you look at https://en-academic.com/dic.nsf/enwiki/1551752 , it says "Wikipedia" at the top and "Wikimedia Foundation. 2010" at the bottom. Regards, --bonadea contributions talk 20:43, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I went through the references in Stephen Raynes, and found that several of them did not in fact verify any of the information – those have been removed from the article. For instance, this source was placed after the sentences "Raynes started his career at Hibernian but struggled make an impact on the first team. He left Easter Road in 1993 having made just 3 first team appearances." The source mentions Raynes scoring a goal for Hibernian in a match in 1991 – it doesn't say anything about it being his first team, about him "struggling to make an impact" (on the contrary, since he scored!), about him leaving in 1993 (well, it couldn't mention that, the article was published in '91), or about how many games he appeared in. That's just one of the references in the article, and unfortunately the same thing applied to the rest of them as well. A couple of refs verified some of the info, so those were kept but moved to the information they actually support. (The ones that didn't meet WP:RS were removed, they shouldn't be used at all.) --bonadea contributions talk 13:38, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, one final thing about that article: please take a few minutes to look at how the remaining references in Stephen Raynes are formatted. That's the minimum of information that's required. It would be great if you could go through Craig Feroz, Sean Clark (footballer, born 1980), Jim Sherry, Neil Bennett (footballer, born 1971), and all other articles you have created to make sure each reference includes at least that info and, of course, that they verify the info. Again, have a look at WP:CITEHOW. Thanks! --bonadea contributions talk 13:43, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thank you! ScottishFootballObseasive (talk) 12:02, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jack Cook (footballer, born 1998) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack Cook (footballer, born 1998) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

^Complex/_Rational 20:44, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article David Ormiston has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

One second-tier appearance plus fewer than 20 fourth-tier appearances is insufficient for biographical notability; nor can substantial coverage of the subject be found.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AllyD (talk) 20:58, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David Ormiston is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Ormiston until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

AllyD (talk) 19:20, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jordan Pettigrew is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jordan Pettigrew until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Jmorrison230582 (talk) 10:57, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Jacob Glass, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 09:24, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Mark Duthie requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Duthie. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 21:12, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Mark Duthie requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Duthie. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:07, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Steven Laidlaw has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Coverage is just routine sports coverage. Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NSPORTS.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:09, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Craig McCartney is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Craig McCartney until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fram (talk) 13:48, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mark Duthie is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Duthie (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 21:21, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I will review and add more sources to the article over the next week. Please delay any action until then ScottishFootballObseasive (talk) 10:04, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion runs for at least 1 week anyway, so unless there is a WP:SNOW consensus (highly unlikely), there will be at least 7 days. Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 10:52, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks

ScottishFootballObseasive (talk) 10:53, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Stuart Thorburn has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability for this lower-leagues player, passing mentions only.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 14:07, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Stuart Sorbie has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:19, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stuart Thorburn is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stuart Thorburn until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fram (talk) 10:05, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Steven Laidlaw is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steven Laidlaw until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:50, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Liam Watt, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. GiantSnowman 19:03, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The page Category:East Calder C.F.C. has been deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. As the page met any of these strictly-defined criteria, it was deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been deleted are:

• The category had been empty for seven days or more and it was not presently under discussion at Categories for discussion, or at disambiguation categories. (See section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:16, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ScottishFootballObseasive,

You tagged this category with a CFD tag but you didn't start a discussion at CFD about it so I assume it was a request to delete this category. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:18, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, thank you! ScottishFootballObseasive (talk) 06:31, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on East Calder C.F.C. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.pitchero.com/clubs/eastcalderfc/a/history-43684.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:28, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Michael Beagley has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability, either passing mentions or sources which aren't independent.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 13:23, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

there are three sources which are articles specifically about him.

ScottishFootballObseasive (talk) 13:48, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The two from his old club and one from his new club. These are not "independent", and don't give notability. Please read WP:BASIC. You seem to make this error quite often, leading to many of your articles getting deleted: it would save yourself and others a lot of time if you could restrict your article creations to clearly notable subjects. Fram (talk) 14:04, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate that, but I notice some articles with no sources which have not been proposed for deletion, so it's difficult to know what the standard is. Perhaps it depends on the reviewer. But I will be more mindful of your advice when creating articles in the future. Many thanks.

ScottishFootballObseasive (talk) 10:15, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Many of these unsourced articles were likely created at a time when notability requirements were different. Best to just stick to WP: BASIC. MarchOfTheGreyhounds (talk) 16:24, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michael Beagley is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Beagley until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fram (talk) 14:30, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fauldhouse Amateurs F.C. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fauldhouse Amateurs F.C. until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Govvy (talk) 11:44, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Jack Harkness (footballer, born 2004), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:27, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:56, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Lucas Stenhouse, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, and currently has zero. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG, neither does routine sports coverage.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:42, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Danny Burns has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lots of passing mentions in routine game reports, but apparently no sources actually about him (at best one local source), which isn't surprising as he has never played in one of the top leagues in Scotland (one game in Division 2, that's it?).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 13:11, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've added a couple of sources from a national newspaper where Danny Burns is the subject of the articles.

ScottishFootballObseasive (talk) 14:27, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Danny Burns is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danny Burns until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fram (talk) 14:45, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ScottishFootballObseasive. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jacob Glass, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:02, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Jayson Alexander, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) WP:NFOOTY is no longer a valid SNG, so GNG must be met. It needs several refs from independent, reliable, secondary sources to pass WP:GNG. It should have at least 3 of those. Please remember that routine sports coverage does not satisfy GNG, and that interviews, being primary sources, do not go to notability either. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:32, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Dale Gillespie, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) WP:NFOOTY is no longer a valid SNG, so GNG must be met. It needs several refs from independent, reliable, secondary sources to pass WP:GNG. It should have at least 3 of those. Please remember that routine sports coverage does not satisfy GNG, and that interviews, being primary sources, do not go to notability either. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:04, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Craig Findlay (Scottish footballer, born 1980), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) WP:NFOOTY is no longer a valid SNG, so GNG must be met. It needs several refs from independent, reliable, secondary sources to pass WP:GNG. It should have at least 3 of those. Please remember that routine sports coverage does not satisfy GNG, and that interviews, being primary sources, do not go to notability either. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:19, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lucas Stenhouse is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucas Stenhouse until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:10, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

please make it a draft instead of deleting

ScottishFootballObseasive (talk) 12:18, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Too late now. I had draftified it, but you returned it to mainspace without significant improvement, so now it's at AfD. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:44, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ScottishFootballObseasive,

If you would like to work on this article in Draft space, then please go to the AFD discussion and request this happen. It more than likely will be draftified. But you have to go and participate in the deletion discussion and communicate with other editors, tell them what you want. Otherwise, this article could just be deleted. I encourage you to go to the AFD and ask for "Draftify" or "Move to User space". Good luck. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:24, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Jayson Alexander, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) WP:NFOOTY is no longer a valid SNG, so GNG must be met. It needs several refs from independent, reliable, secondary sources to pass WP:GNG. It should have at least 3 of those. Please remember that routine sports coverage does not satisfy GNG, and that interviews, being primary sources, do not go to notability either. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:33, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Jayden Fairley, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) WP:NFOOTY is no longer a valid SNG, so GNG must be met. It needs several refs from independent, reliable, secondary sources to pass WP:GNG. It should have at least 3 of those. Please remember that routine sports coverage does not satisfy GNG, and that interviews, being primary sources, do not go to notability either. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:56, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jordan Orru is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jordan Orru until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:37, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ScottishFootballObseasive. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Craig Findlay".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 14:03, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ScottishFootballObseasive. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jayson Alexander".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 14:07, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ScottishFootballObseasive. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jayden Fairley".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 12:13, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Calan Ledingham is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Calan Ledingham until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

MarchOfTheGreyhounds 22:02, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Ryan Stewart (footballer, born 1993) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Sources available do not meet WP:NSOCCER's requirements of significant coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ––– GMH MELBOURNE 08:19, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article John Grant (footballer, born 1988) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 00:14, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Grant (footballer, born 1988) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Grant (footballer, born 1988) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

_signed, Rosguill ^talk 23:09, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ScottishFootballObseasive. Thank you for your work on Derek Grant (footballer). North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start. IMO and edge-case regarding wp:notability but I'm marking it as reviewed. Suggest finding a couple sources which cover him in depth and developing and citing more article material from those sources. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 01:33, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ScottishFootballObseasive. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Craig Findlay (footballer), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:06, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Shamal George. Thank you. GiantSnowman 18:14, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The source was from the Daily Record? Don't see what the issue is. ScottishFootballObseasive (talk) 18:29, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:BLPCRIME, with the name of the perpetrator. GiantSnowman 18:53, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tommy Sharp is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tommy Sharp until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fram (talk) 09:12, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would rather this was put back into draftspace. I believe 'acceptable' sources will be created in the future for Tommy Sharp ScottishFootballObseasive (talk) 09:32, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Charlotte Ferguson has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability, only sources are a database and a local interview about the club, not an article about her.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 08:42, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Daily Record is a national news outlet. Surely a reliable source, with the main feature of the article being Charlotte? ScottishFootballObseasive (talk) 08:57, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

But they have localized sections which they don't print nationally. The article is in the "local-sport" section. Fram (talk) 09:15, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - if you wish to prevent the deletion of Charlotte Ferguson, please remove the deletion templates from the article. The article will be deleted in 2 days from now if you don't. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:24, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  I did that earlier. Done it again now. ScottishFootballObseasive (talk) 17:53, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Raewyn Murphy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability for this footballer; the only independent source is an interview.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JTtheOG (talk) 19:08, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New source added to avoid deletion. ScottishFootballObseasive (talk) 09:14, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Shannon Mulligan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability for this footballer; the only sources are a pair of interviews.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JTtheOG (talk) 19:09, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New source added to avoid deletion. ScottishFootballObseasive (talk) 09:14, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@JTtheOG: do you think that the new source added is enough here? Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:26, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Vhairi Munro has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability for this footballer; the only independent source is an interview.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JTtheOG (talk) 19:11, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New source added to avoid deletion. ScottishFootballObseasive (talk) 09:14, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Bryony Ross has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I am unable to find anything approaching WP:SIGCOV for this footballer.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JTtheOG (talk) 19:19, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New source added to avoid deletion. ScottishFootballObseasive (talk) 09:14, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Eilidh Begg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:TOOSOON for an article for this young footballer. The Perthshire Advertiser piece already in the article is the closest to WP:SIGCOV I was able to find.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JTtheOG (talk) 19:22, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New source added to avoid deletion. ScottishFootballObseasive (talk) 09:13, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anna Dickov is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anna Dickov until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JTtheOG (talk) 07:33, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New source added to avoid deletion. ScottishFootballObseasive (talk) 09:13, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Bryony Ross has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not have any WP:SIGCOV

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:53, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New source added to avoid deletion. ScottishFootballObseasive (talk) 09:13, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Shannon Mulligan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I can't find any WP:SIGCOV of Mulligan

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:56, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New source added to avoid deletion. ScottishFootballObseasive (talk) 09:13, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Raewyn Murphy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No apparent WP:SIGCOV available

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:57, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New source added to avoid deletion. ScottishFootballObseasive (talk) 09:13, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Emma McFadyen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I am unable to find WP:SIGCOV for this footballer.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JTtheOG (talk) 19:24, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Hannah Davie has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Simply WP:TOOSOON for an article. I am unable to find anything approaching WP:SIGCOV for this Scottish women's footballer.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JTtheOG (talk) 23:28, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Natasha Frew has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Poorly sourced footballer BLP. The sources in the article contain very little coverage of the subject.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JTtheOG (talk) 23:32, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New source added to avoid deletion. ScottishFootballObseasive (talk) 09:12, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Rebecca Jaconelli has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I am unable to find anything approaching WP:SIGCOV for this footballer.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JTtheOG (talk) 23:35, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Vhairi Munro has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not even close to passing WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:26, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New source added to avoid deletion. ScottishFootballObseasive (talk) 09:12, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Rebecca Jaconelli has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Quotes from the player do not count as WP:SIGCOV.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:28, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Charlotte Ferguson has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Clear WP:GNG fail

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:51, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Sharon Hughes-Lee has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability for this footballer; the only sources are a pair of interviews.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JTtheOG (talk) 18:14, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Molly Reeve has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability for this footballer; the only sources are a pair of interviews with some routine coverage interspersed.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JTtheOG (talk) 18:18, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New source added to avoid deletion. ScottishFootballObseasive (talk) 09:11, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rachel Walkingshaw is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rachel Walkingshaw until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JTtheOG (talk) 23:14, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eilidh Begg is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eilidh Begg until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JTtheOG (talk) 16:07, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bryony Ross is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bryony Ross until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JTtheOG (talk) 16:10, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Raewyn Murphy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raewyn Murphy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JTtheOG (talk) 16:13, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vhairi Munro is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vhairi Munro until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JTtheOG (talk) 17:01, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Charlotte Ferguson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charlotte Ferguson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fram (talk) 07:08, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Molly Reeve is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Molly Reeve until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JTtheOG (talk) 18:21, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Natasha Frew is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natasha Frew until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JTtheOG (talk) 18:23, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shannon Mulligan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shannon Mulligan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JTtheOG (talk) 18:32, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lauren Evans (Scottish footballer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lauren Evans (Scottish footballer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:48, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jen Dodds is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jen Dodds until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JTtheOG (talk) 02:41, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jess Murphy (Scottish footballer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jess Murphy (Scottish footballer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JTtheOG (talk) 02:35, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Sarah Jane Duncan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Fram (talk) 09:45, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Sarah Jane Duncan, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Bbb23 (talk) 15:14, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Courtney McAvoy, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Courtney McAvoy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Maura Paterson, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maura Paterson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ScottishFootballObseasive,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Harrz and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, Ewan Moyes, for deletion, because a consensus decision previously decided that it wasn't suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. If you wish to restore a page deleted via a deletion discussion, please use the deletion review process instead, rather than reposting the content of the page.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Harrz}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

harrz ^talk 17:23, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Daniel Dobbin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Dobbin until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JTtheOG (talk) 17:23, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Summer Laird, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Summer Laird until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sébastien Socié, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sébastien Socié until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Aidan Martin requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/local-news/west-lothian-author-hosts-event-26491412, https://www.edinburghlive.co.uk/news/edinburgh-news/west-lothian-dad-three-forced-27756215, and https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/local-news/gritty-new-work-fiction-set-33747642. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fram (talk) 14:25, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

One of your recent edits has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 23:40, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

NOTE: This is a final warning You have been warned previously against introducing copyright violations. Any further repetition will be considered persistent violation and you will be blocked from editing. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 23:45, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Alumni of West Lothian College indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:31, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

dude I'm on the committee at the club... Salty1984 (talk) 17:27, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nice one. But things need to be sourced on Wikipedia. I find it frustrating too and had loads of stuff removed. Unfortunately need to play the game! 2A00:23C8:7583:5701:5798:6A28:982E:4919 (talk) 17:35, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ScottishFootballObseasive. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tommy Sharp, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:11, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]