User talk:Sarca sc

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. RileyBugz^{私に叫ぼう}_私の編集 00:39, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I want to tell you the reason why I nominated the article you created, Studio VOLN, for speedy deletion. I did it because there is no mention of it in reliable sources. Additionally, the article didn't really provide a reason why there would be any significant coverage in reliable sources. Note, sources not independent from the company in question and sources such as Anime News Network are not reliable. Thanks. RileyBugz^{私に叫ぼう}_私の編集 00:46, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You are going to need things that actually are about the company, and not just their animations. RileyBugz^{私に叫ぼう}_私の編集 01:54, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'll try lol

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Morita-san wa Mukuchi, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. —Farix (t | c) 21:45, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Mobile Suit Gundam: Hathaway's Flash, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ^ᐐT₳LKᐬ 01:11, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, everything needs to be cited on a biographical page about a living person. Nuke (talk) 03:58, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your input is so much more useful than actual help in citations, bravo.Sarcataclysmal (talk) 04:35, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You also removed all of the storyboard credits that were hidden, because they were uncited, and now you're telling me that you want all of the other uncited content that you didn't remove from being even hidden shown off to the world. Wikipedia does not belong to you and it is a collaborative encyclopedia. This is not so much my "input" as actual Wikipedia policy, even though "immediate removal," not hiding-things-with-comments, is what is truly mandated by Wikipedia policy. Nuke (talk) 04:11, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I guess. But don't compare "director" and "unit director" credits and the such. The difference between them is: one can be cited, one cannot; one can be confirmed in articles on Wikipedia, one cannot; one is present in the multitude of anime database websites, one isn't. And with that I am done. Sarcataclysmal (talk) 04:35, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And for the record, you could have let me do the citations; MAL's people database is about as poor of a source as MAL itself. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

On this edit you commented, "I'd post a link but Japanese Amazon has the longest links ever created"

For future reference, you can shorten an Amazon product URL by removing everything after the domain name except the dp/########

So for example, https://www.amazon.co.jp/やはり俺の青春ラブコメはまちがっている%E3%80%82-comic-12-サンデーGXコミックス-渡/dp/4091575501/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1545096912&sr=8-2&keywords=やはり俺の青春ラブコメはまちがっている+comic

can be shortened to: https://www.amazon.co.jp/dp/4091575501/

Oornery (talk) 01:54, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That so-called discussion in the talk page about it was OVERDUE, for about 15 days without closure and you know its also stupid to split the article just because the reason is "its getting big". You only split an article if something has Relevance. NEVER revert it again, because the discussion on moving the Fate Grand Order anime article has no closure at all thanks to stupid fans!--BlackGaia02 (talkpage if you dare) (talk) 12:39, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• I supported the splitting of Demonic Front and the two 2020 films, whilst keeping the other entries on the main F/GO page, but unlike you, I complied with the ordinance. It would eventually have closure, not everything has to be fast-moving, for example, the request on merging the Golden Kamuy TV article with the main page. I don't understand why you can't seem to grasp the idea that you're not supposed to move the page under ANY circumstance, regardless of your personal opinion, but if you want to go against the rules like a buffoon alright. Sarcataclysmal (talk) 20:54, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at White Fox, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Masum Reza^📞 11:39, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

no Sarcataclysmal (talk) 11:45, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

? What did you mean by that? Masum Reza^📞 11:46, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Sarcataclysmal (talk) 11:48, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I meant that you need to add source on White Fox and Goblin Slayer. Thanks. Please don't restore unsourced content. Wikipedia is not a WP:CRYSTALBALL.

I still don't get what you are saying. Is that an emoji? Masum Reza^📞 11:49, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It is — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sarcataclysmal (talk • contribs) 11:52, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

And what that emoji means? I am not familiar with emojis. Sorry. Masum Reza^📞 11:57, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It's fine lol, don't worry about it Sarcataclysmal (talk) 18:28, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I see. Masum Reza^📞 18:31, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I wanted to apologize for adding the Worldometer ref in a shoddy manner. I felt a little aggrieved as someone unilaterally decided to use the JHU site, whose data is not entirely accurate. MattSucci (talk) 09:46, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No hard feelings; I get it, I would've used it too, but at the end of the day it doesn't really matter because the numbers are going to keep climbing, and it won't be until the pandemic is stopped that both sources will finally be in agreement. Sarcataclysmal (talk) 09:51, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good to hear that! It was probably my Asperger's kicking in and finding myself needing correct and up-to-date information. MattSucci (talk) 10:03, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you reverted my reversion of your edit. My reason for reverting is that your edit was not sourced. You still have not provided a source in the edit, and under WP:BRD, it was your responsibility to initiate discussion after I reverted your edits. Since I really don't feel like engaging in an edit war, if you could add a citation for a reliable source where Fuyashi Tō is verified as a pseudonym for Studio Shaft, I'd appreciate it. Please note that since MAL, imdb, and AniDB contain a fair amount of user-generated content, they are not generally considered reliable sources for factual information apart from show schedules and casts. Other language wikis also cannot be used as sources, though they can be used to link to additional information. Also, please add the same citations to the edits you made to Shaft (company) and Zaregoto (series). — Jkudlick ⚓ t ⚓ c ⚓ s 01:47, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose that is true; I shall add citations where necessary, then. Sarcataclysmal (talk) 02:56, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Memories (1995 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Masao Maruyama (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:04, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ginga-ya has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. 十八 11:47, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for providing a creible source for the studio update of the Uzumaki anime. This wasn't specified in the original press release and a reverted it because it needed more than a storyboard to back up the original announcement details.--GalaxyFighter55 (talk) 19:28, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

no problem Sarcataclysmal (talk) 21:32, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Sarcataclysmal,

I've just made (yet another) big change to the main table at Shaft (company), and since you're a fellow editor of Shaft credits, I thought I would tell you more about it (my edit summary got truncated).

I've commented out the following credits from the "Director(s)" column: シリーズディレクター (shirizu director) and チーフディレクター (chifu director). This is partly based on seeing this ref, which lists 総監督 ("chief director") Shinbo, 監督 ("director") Itamura, and two シリーズディレクター: Naoyuki Tatsuwa for episodes 7–10, and Yuki Yase for 17–23.

I believe that this implies that シリーズディレクター are not integral to a given anime project like 監督, and are instead more like one-rank-above "assistant directors" (副監督), which are also ubiquitously credited on most projects, but "rank low enough" to not belong in a "Director(s)" column. I think that this interpretation is supported by this ANN piece, which compares the two roles. (Note: this piece also touches on the credit シリーズ演出 (chifu enshutsu) or "chief episode director", which I have commented out for now as well).

In any case, I think it's in our interest (and our readers' interest) to make those messy credits as simple/effective as possible by distilling them down to the staff with the most over-arching creative control, and I believe that limiting that column to 総監督 and 監督 is the best way of doing that.

P.S. In case you're interested, there's a WP:ANIME project chat on the official Wikimedia Discord server (WP:DISCORD). I've found that it's a great place for asking small questions about anime articles. — Goszei (talk) 03:03, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

P.P.S. I have the uncommented version w/ series directors visible in one of my sandboxes (here), so let me know if you want me to do anything with it. — Goszei (talk) 07:28, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The ANN article implies that チーフディレクター and 総監督 are the same thing, so I'm against not including anyone credited for that (which there aren't in this instance, but since it was brought up).

I can agree シリーズディレクター is a lower ranking role than 監督, but I think they should be listed too. For one, occasionally シリーズディレクター is the only credit present (Akira Amemiya, for example, is credited as such on Ninja Slayer the Animation, with no one credited as 監督; and it would suck to only credit "series director" on a case-by-case basis if there's no "director"). Secondly, JP Wiki seems to think that it's an important enough credit to warrant its own little... line thing in infoboxes (I'm not Wikipedia term savvy bear with me), for example here on (アニメ) Hidamari Sketch. There's also the fact that Shinbo's involvement with all of the Shaft series in question is undeniable, most certainly, but the differences in directorial style, artistic choices, and narrative presentations depending on the series director leads me to believe that, despite being a "lesser" role, series directors still contribute a whole lot to projects (and according to the ANN article they still retain a lot of creative input), especially when it comes to Shaft works. For example, with Bake and Nise (Oishi and Itamura), there are huge creative differences between the two series, despite Shinbo being the sole "director", so to me it feels wrong to list only Shinbo. I'd personally do exactly what you've done with the sandbox in regards to this.

When it comes to シリーズ演出 and チーフ演出, however, I'm not sure. I'd personally leave it on, since it seems they have a good amount of creative input according to the ANN article: "[they] tend to work closely with the staff, do more direct work and thus have a stronger creative impact on the work." Beyond that single sentence, however, I have no understanding of what this credit is, I just know Aniplex likes to translate it as "chief director" (like on Nisekoi), so, whether or not シリーズ演出 or チーフ演出 stays is entirely up to you. Sarcataclysmal (talk) 07:57, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Sarcataclysmal: A few comments:

• I think the ANN article is actually mistaken on that point. In one case (Hidamari Sketch), both 総監督 and チーフディレクター are credited. If they were the same, we wouldn't expect to see that.

• There are actually two cases where チーフディレクター is credited in the table (for Negima!? and Hidamari Sketch). There are six instances of チーフ演出 (all Yukihiro Miyamoto) which I have marked in the code with comments. For both credits, I have used (chief) to visibly mark them in the table.

• I now agree with you about listing シリーズディレクター and チーフディレクター based on their creative influence. That's a good point based on the Akira Amemiya credit, and like you said, the difference is particularly clear in a case like Bake and Nise.

Thanks for moving the sandbox (I was sleeping, hehe), and happy editing. — Goszei (talk) 17:46, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I see, my mistake; thanks for clarifying on that. Sarcataclysmal (talk) 18:06, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Sarcataclysmal, you're absolutely right that Okada and Watanabe are credited in the film as "kikaku" and not "producer." Although I came across references describing them as producers, and Okada referring to himself as one, I guess we should go with the official credits. Okada was originally intended to be the producer when the project was first submitted, I added a note about that and also a citation explaining what the "kikaku" role is as there is no category for it in the infobox. Thanks again.Iura Solntse (talk) 05:09, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Iura Solntse: Yeah that tends to be an issue with the anime industry in general; regardless of credit, they seem to call anyone who works in that department a producer, regardless of if they're an "assistant producer", "planner", or something weird like... "production generalization." It's good to have the note, though, I should have done that to avoid the confusion like you did; glad I could help. Sarcataclysmal (talk) 06:22, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, is there any reason as to why you are removing the macrons for certain names like this one for example? Isn't Wikipedia using the Hepburn romanization? Custardbandlers (talk) 09:02, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Custardbandlers:

Ryouki is a more common spelling than with the macron (Ryōki), is all. Same for, say, Akiyuki Shinbo; Shinbō is the correct Hepburn romanization, but as we must adhere to WP:COMMONNAME, we can see that Shinbo is the more popular romanization used Google users and reliable sources. But regardless of COMMONNAME, no, Wikipedia does not specifically use correct Hepburn romanization for articles. Sarcataclysmal (talk) 09:59, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ROMAJI says otherwise, if we go by what is common on Google then all the macrons would be removed as they are not commonly used, there is a lack of consistency regarding this topic, while Ryouki is another romanization of Ryōki, Shinbo is not, the long vowel o is either ō, ô, ou, oh or oo, the latter is just the common way english language would write it. Custardbandlers (talk) 10:34, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There's nothing inherently incorrect about removing the macros from article titles, and Shinbo is not an inherently incorrect romanization of Shinbō-- perhaps by Hepburn standards, it is, but romanization at its core is just about writing something in Latin script. Unfortunately, most English users don't notice the different between short and long vowel sounds, and so people who would normally have their names Romanized with macrons usually don't get those crossed over. For example, Junji Ito should be Itō according to the character 藤 (tō), but due to popular English usage his page is Ito. It's the same with Ryouki/Ryōki and Shinbō/Shinbo, the most popularly used romanizations by reliable sources and users from Google (which is taken from Google Trends and search information) is ultimately what is used for these articles. Sarcataclysmal (talk) 10:58, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

— 21:23, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

Great work on Shinbo's article! Do you plan to nominate the article to GA? Looks pretty good to me. DarkFallenAngel (talk) 21:25, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas to you, as well; I dunno, really, I have no idea how GA nominations work or any of that, but maybe lol. Sarcataclysmal (talk) 22:20, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2021!

Hello Sarcataclysmal, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2021. Happy editing, Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 02:09, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply] Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2021!

Hello Sarcataclysmal, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2021. Happy editing, FlalfTalk 04:34, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply] Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

	The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
	thank you for pointing me towards Template:Annual readership when I needed help on the Wikipedia Discord! I really appreciate your act of thoughtfulness :) Yitz (talk) 05:43, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Yukihiro Miyamoto, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page TBS.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Akiyuki Shinbo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page TBS.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shaft (company), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CGI.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Akiyuki Shinbo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Moe.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kingdom (manga), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CGI.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. About the addition of URA's direction and storyboard of Hanekawa's Letter in Neko Kuro. You didn't mix up that with the Letter in Neko Shiro? Afaik there isn't any Letter in Tsubasa Family. That happens in the last episode of Tsubasa Tiger... Actually, it seem to be that as seen here https://www.animenewsnetwork.com/encyclopedia/people.php?id=122262 Crosswrm (talk) 01:32, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Crosswrm: – I did in fact mix them up, thanks for letting me know.

Hello Sarcataclysmal. In the article for My Hero Academia, the infobox credits Tomo Ōkubo as chief director for the third season, however upon doing some searching I couldn't find a source to back this up, and our article for My Hero Academia (season 3) only credits this person for individual episodes instead of the entire season. Since you appear to be knowledgeable in this area, do you have a source for this? Link20XX (talk) 16:37, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Link20XX: – チーフ演出 as "chief director" is wrong, it should be "chief unit director" (chifu enshutsu), but it's worthy of inclusion in the infobox anyway. It's basically a role that means this person, Ookubo, oversaw each individual episode's production, like a director themselves, but was a bit more hands on with the work because the director was too busy to do all of it themself; but, since they're only overseeing production at the episodic level, they're not credited as the normal "director" (kantoku), "chief director" (chifu direkuta/sou kantoku), or "series director (shirizu direkuta). I don't have a third party source on hand, but I can use the series' opening credits as a primary source at the very least, so I've added that to the main article in case you want to copy it elsewhere. Also, Ookubo was chifu enshutsu on the first film, as well.

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Centcom08. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, High School Fleet: The Movie, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Centcom08 (talk) 14:42, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Centcom08: Also, even if I request a correction on ANN's Encyclopedia and they accept it as being valid and credible, which the name will then be used in all articles from here on out, the likelihood of the source referring to Nakagawa as "Jun" in the High School Fleet film is pretty low-- they still incorrectly list Yoshinobu Tokumoto as the director for Devils' Line in their announcement article, despite ANN Encyclopedia correctly referring to Hideaki Nakano as the director. The issue is that 淳 can be read as both "Jun" and "Atsushi", and "Jun" was assumed to be correct as the likely reading; however, with the evidence I gave of other series he's worked on that have provided Kana readings of his name, it should be Atsushi. Sarcataclysmal (talk) 15:57, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Sarcataclysmal I understand that they have the same kanji, but the Wikipedia article is built on reliable sources and the ANN source and Crunchyroll source (see here) supports it as Jun Nakagawa. If you can provide a source confirming it otherwise then I would gladly understand your edit. Centcom08 (talk) 16:07, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Centcom08: I understand the way Wiki works, but I don't believe a source is necessitated in instances where the source itself is primary-- the works of Nakagawa himself, rather than third-party English sources which have the undeniable propensity for assuming romanizations (which, as I've mentioned, they do: https://www.animenewsnetwork.com/bbs/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=3174865); I'm not discrediting their reliability as news websites, but when it comes to the nuance of Japanese name romanizations, the question of reliability seems to come up to being dubious at best. Sarcataclysmal (talk) 16:12, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Sarcataclysmal You're reasoning might require an additional opinion from other editors. I stand on my ground that the director's name is supported by reliable sources and it is my responsibility to add details to an article from a reliable source. I'll wait for the other editors to give their opinion (hence, kindly start a discussion on the article's talk page in question). Centcom08 (talk) 16:17, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Then I will simply ask ANN to change it per my rationale. Sarcataclysmal (talk) 16:20, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Sarcataclysmal You should contact Crunchyroll as well and both of the companies should make an apology for making an error in their report or even the news sources can be updated to the director's correct name. Kindly do that and link me to the news source (and not the encyclopedia section of any of the websites as they are WP:USERG). Centcom08 (talk) 16:29, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Centcom08: I'll try but who knows if they'll reply lol. I tried contacting CR about a separate issue and they never responded or corrected it, and I even tried correcting HIDIVE on their English credits to Ya Boy Kongming (they also referred to Shuu Honma as Osamu Honma). At least ANN corrected the Honma interview/articles, but unfortunately it seems many of my requests end up swimming the abyss, forgotten by the article editors. We'll see, though; I've already contacted ANN about it, so we'll see. Sarcataclysmal (talk) 16:40, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Sarcataclysmal By the way, kindly contact UniJapan (a non-profit organization holding Tokyo International Film Festival) and The Japan Foundation as well because the website they operate (Japan Film Database) spells the director's name as Jun Nakagawa (see here). This is my final reply until I hear the good news of your success with notifying the sources in the discussion of how they misspelled the director's name. Good night, my friend! Centcom08 (talk) 17:06, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And, as I said, I could try and get ANN Encyclopedia to change the romanization to Atsushi per the above reasoning, but they would likely not change the article's mention of Nakagawa to "Atsushi" from "Jun." In doing so, then we'd have to wait for Nakagawa to be involved in another anime in which the news site refers to Nakagawa correctly as "Atsushi"-- by which point, their rationale for the name on the news is based on the same rationale here, the only difference is the "reliability" of the website rather than looking at credits. Sarcataclysmal (talk) 16:15, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Neo Tokyo (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Masao Maruyama.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, One of the editors always adds Animation director section to each anime they are editing but as far as I know we don't do that for Animes, and it is something mostly done for Western animations, Since I saw you did this edit on this anime a couple of months ago: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Call_of_the_Night&oldid=1108418487 I was wondering what's you take on this matter. for example check this out: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tomo-chan_Is_a_Girl!&oldid=1135668309 I already undid the edit but adding the Animation Director section just makes the table look very cramped. We can't just add any cast who has done some work in the episode. Parham.es (talk) 12:12, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Another example is this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Urusei_Yatsura_(2022_TV_series), Which has bizarre structure. This guy makes edits based on TV Series rules which are for western animation and series. Check his reasoning: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Urusei_Yatsura_(2022_TV_series)&oldid=1113282933

As far as I know, we don't have this for Anime/Manga section. Parham.es (talk) 12:19, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I also shared this matter with another editor: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Link20XX#Animation_Director Since you edited something like this before and as far as I can see we have the same opinion on this matter so Please share your thoughts on this with me. Thanks. Parham.es (talk) 13:22, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I understand why I have such a structure for what I see pages, I'm aware. But, I usually use the credits if they are front credited or if an international Wikipedia lists storyboard artists or animation directors. A few months ago I opposed storyboard artists and animation directors because I was in a discussion, but I kinda missed them I thought to put them in if front-credited for an English show or if the credit is added for an international Wikipedia, like the Japanese Wikipedia. That's just what I see things really. BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 23:32, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@BaldiBasicsFan: I get what you mean, but JP Wikipedia has the advantage of being a part of a character-based language where you can fit a ton of information (and names) into some really small and cramped sections without it looking terrible. The unfortunate circumstance is that here on EN Wikipedia, we kind of have to choose what we add, and I would say storyboard artists (who are in charge of shot compositions/shots in general, the timing of the frames and scenes, etc.) should get ahead of the line of animation directors (which, in the Japanese pipeline, correct key frames). Otherwise, we'd also have things like Love Flops where, if you look at the JP Wiki, the episodic notation for "chief animation directors" and "animation directors" is pretty insane, and would look completely terrible on EN Wikipedia. The way I think it's best to do it is to prioritize episode directors and storyboard artists, and in the events that all of the episode directors did the storyboard art for their episodes, or one person did all/most of the storyboard art for the episodes, you can just notate that in the prose and replace that with animation directors (assuming they don't clutter the boxes too much). Limitations of our language woohoo.

So, I think a good compromise for articles like this on Onimai would be this: if Michiko Yokote writes all of the episodes herself, I think it'd be best to move that to the prose above the episode table (like where Imamura is credited as chief animation director for all of the episodes), and that can then be replaced by animation directors, and you'd have sort-of the best of both worlds. But that's limited to series that don't have an outstanding number of animation directors per episode, of course (unless there's a cleaner way of implementing that, which I couldn't say). Sarcataclysmal (talk) 23:42, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You know, I will think about re-adding animation directors, if the anime finishes if the animation directors are not way too much for an episode. The most an episode had was three animation directors for episode 4, which is not much per say. BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 23:49, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know if you are interested but I managed to give Fate/kaleid liner Prisma Illya: Vow in the Snow some expansions and rearrangements of sections. Still, I'm not that experienced with film articles (see my current work at Jujutsu Kaisen 0 (film) ) so I don't know if certain parts need to be changed before any nomination. It's kinda a small article so I wouldn't mind giving it a try. Cheers Tintor2 (talk) 23:33, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think it looks good so far, I'm not sure if I have any particular comments as I'm not that experienced with films either, though. Sarcataclysmal (talk) 06:17, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Nobuyuki Takeuchi is a very good page. Well done! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 02:40, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Sarcataclysmal (talk) 05:39, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Kazuhiro Oota, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:59, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As unhelpful as before. Sarcataclysmal (talk) 16:30, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Nobuhiro Sugiyama, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:58, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It appears to me that might be unaware of what's happening to the Attack on Titan TV series. The Final Chapters will have an "each episode version" getting distributed on streaming services in November 2023. Special 1 will be split up into traditional TV slot sized episodes 88–90 and Special 2 will be split up into episodes 91–94. That is why I split the specials up, because new information revealed they aren't actually considered episodes 88 and 89 of the TV series. Its a big mess and to be honest I think it was unnecessary of them to do such a thing but we will have to wait for more information and details before figuring out what we should do. I've already talked to Alex 21 regarding the problem so we might have to come up with a group-based user consensus soon on the talk page. GalaxyFighter55 (talk) 00:49, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@GalaxyFighter55: I see, that does seem pretty messy. Thanks for the info. Sarcataclysmal (talk) 02:29, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Sarcataclysmal: like i thought, the staff for the second special was not confimed by the citation. fixed now - It's not my fault the official JP website had a staff credit error, some things are simply subject to error even through reliable sources. Just simply fix it, no need to be rude about it please.--GalaxyFighter55 (talk) 21:39, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@GalaxyFighter55: AoT's website has historically had many errors in staff listing (many of which from the prior seasons are still up), and I don't feel the comment I left was not particularly rude, though I apologize if that's how it felt. Sarcataclysmal (talk) 21:50, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Sarcataclysmal: Was not aware of that; most JP anime websites usually are reliable. They really need a new website editor then lol. I felt as if that summary comment was a direct jab at me, which is why I replied to you here. Thank you for fixing the SP credits regardless.--GalaxyFighter55 (talk) 21:54, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@GalaxyFighter55: Oh, sorry, that's not how I meant it. It's not that the website itself is bad, it's just that the people who are running the website are usually not the people at the studio itself, and communication errors (especially for messier productions) can lead to inconsistencies on the website and the credits (as far as who is "actually" credited). Kingdom also tends to have issues with this. Sarcataclysmal (talk) 21:57, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sarcataclysmal. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kazuhiro Oota".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 14:00, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sarcataclysmal. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Nobuhiro Sugiyama".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 01:53, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was actually trying to revert only Special:Diff/1220507382 but I misread the combined diff. -- ferret (talk) 03:18, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ferret: No worries. Sarcataclysmal (talk) 03:22, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]