User talk:STT121103122

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Sōtetsu 10000 series. Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. --DAJF (talk) 10:51, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In your edit to Sōtetsu 10000 series here, are you suggesting that the original livery differed on either side of the trains? If so, please mention this in the image caption. Otherwise, I really don't think it is necessary to have two images showing trains in exactly the same livery. Please see WP:Galleries, which says that "Wikipedia is not an image repository". --DAJF (talk) 10:58, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I suppose I should be grateful that you have spent so much time checking through many of the articles I have worked on. However, I see you have added (and then re-added) a "Failed verification" tag to a statement in the E657 series article, which I am unclear on. The sentence in question says "The trains will include wheelchair-accessible toilets and security cameras.", and this is clearly supported by the reference source given. Could you please explain why you think this fails verification? Thanks. --DAJF (talk) 22:40, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. The same applies to the "Failed verification" tag you added to the Mizuho (train) article in this edit. Again, the statement is clearly supported by the online reference source, so could please explain why you think this fails verification? Awaiting your clarification. --DAJF (talk) 22:51, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reply - Talk:Mizuho (train)#User:DAJF ----STT121103122 (talk) 23:14, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]