User talk:ST1849

Hello, ST1849. Welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for your contributions. My name is Howicus, and I've been an editor here for some time. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

If you're working on creating a new article, you should take a look at this page on your first article, and use the article wizard here to get started. Also, this page has instructions on how to cite sources, complete with videos.

If all this Wikicode is a little overwhelming, this cheatsheet may help untangle it.

If you're looking for a tutorial of sorts, The Wikipedia Adventure is a good option.

And if you need more help, I'd recommend getting live help at the Wikipedia help chat channel: click here to join. Additionally, you could ask me on my talk page, try the Teahouse (a help page for new users) or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. Again, welcome, and have fun editing! Howicus (Did I mess up?) 19:52, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ST1849. You have new messages at Pichpich's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Thanks for creating Thomas Welcome Roys, ST1849!

Wikipedia editor Garagepunk66 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I enjoyed reading your article on Thomas Welcome Roys. Nicely done.

To reply, leave a comment on Garagepunk66's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Hello, ST1849. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for your dedicated edits. As of the title, I have a issue with your edits about the article. In the reference I cited,

"North Pacific right whales (Eubalaena glacialis japonica), that had been regularly observed in the Shanter region before the be-ginning of whaling (Томилин 1962), during the last half-century have not been seen in this part of the sea or their observations were not confirmed (Brownell et al.,2001). "

Therefore I hardly see any reasons that you may delete my adding even though you may consider that Shantar is out of the species' normal range.

Best Regards Daniel0816 (talk) 08:25, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I just checked my talk page. Thanks for all the info.Daniel0816 (talk) 08:34, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks Very Much! Daniel0816 (talk) 08:42, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your information on the Fabius shipwreck. I can only add in things to the shipwreck list from the sources I have, so that's what I did. Your amplifying information is helpful, so I recommend you go ahead and make changes to the shipwreck list accordingly, following the general page format and citing your source. As for the "coast of California" meaning the "coast of Baja California" to the old-time whalers, that's a matter of historical interest, but for a list of shipwrecks read by a general audience of modern-day readers in 2017, it would be confusing if we relied on the general Wikipedia readership to know that; besides, the source I am using is referring specifically to the State of California, not Baja California. Hence, "coast of California" in the shipwreck lists means the coast of California as it is understood by the general readership today, and the coast of Baja California would need to specified when applicable. Mdnavman (talk) 15:47, 28 August 2017 (UTC)mdnavman[reply]

The point is Soledad reef is on the west coast of Baja. I'll change it when I have time. For now I'll remove it so mirror sites don't repeat your mistake. ST1849 (talk) 16:58, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ST1849. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yes. Thanks for the note; I've blocked this reincarnation. Graham87 02:32, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

see reply on my talk page. Benjamin Trovato (talk) 01:05, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Re: your query about whaling stations - my knowledge of Russian American Company operations is really quite limited and does not extend to whaling stations. I have never studied RAC systematically, just when they crossed paths with someone or something I was working on. Sorry I can't help.Dankarl (talk) 02:16, 28 March 2018 (UTC) You might ask User:SaberToothedWhale who might know or refer you to somebody else.Dankarl (talk) 02:24, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That's ok. Thanks for the reply and reference. ST1849 (talk) 17:43, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I saw the message you left for Ezhiki and looked at the reference. There is one photo dated 1940 of a whaling station crew. So it looks like a Soviet-era station. Whether the apparently American steam engine is a remnant of an earlier American station or salvage from something else, or was simply sold to some Russian or Soviet entity is the next question. Americans were all over the Russian Pacific Coast 1880-1923, but I have not seen a whaling station mentioned. The Russian Empire was not much happier with outside investment than the Soviets were, so I would guess a pre-Soviet station would have had a Russian name and at least nominally majority Russian ownership. If there was US company involved it might have been the Pacific Steam Whaling Co. and the site might have shown up among their stations in their materials, even if the Russians thought of it as a Russian venture. They had some competitors who do not come specifically to mind right now. Good hunting.Dankarl (talk) 03:25, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm pretty sure the only photos on that site that show Big Shantar Island are the ones with the old rusted steam engine. The other ones I think they just found on Google. For example, one shows a sperm whale at one of the stations on South Georgia Island in the South Atlantic. I'm familiar with the Pacific Steam Whaling Company. They were primarily involved in the Western Arctic. They didn't do very much whaling in the Sea of Okhotsk. They did send the Mary and Helen II to the sea in 1885, which visited the Shantar Islands. Her logbook only mentions finding some rusted old barrels on Feklistova Island. As I told another editor, I think the remains on the island are Soviet-era, but I don't think they were a whaling station. Very few bowheads existed by the 1870s, and almost none by the 1880s. There was some beluga hunting in the region in the early 20th century though. I'm not sure if that was associated with any settlements on the islands. ST1849 (talk) 18:30, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I almost forgot. I saw a video on Youtube (since deleted, unfortunately) that showed various rusted old pieces of machinery on Big Shantar Island. It included a shot of a spoked metal wheel like the ones on the old steam engine. On its rim was written "Clayton & Shuttleworth, Ltd, Lincolnshire, England". According to their wikipedia article, they didn't become a limited company until 1901. The article doesn't use inline citations though so I wasn't able to verify that it became a limited company that year. If that date is right, it would put it after the peak of bowhead whaling there (1852-1860) and well after bowheads had been depleted in that region (1860s and 1870s). ST1849 (talk) 18:43, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Could you tell me what this would have been used for? ST1849 (talk) 02:11, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Try semi-portable engine. Andy Dingley (talk) 21:17, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. ST1849 (talk) 16:40, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Whaling in the Sea of Okhotsk, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Church (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:31, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ST1849. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I think so, though I had to look through my archives to jog my memory. I've blocked him as a sock. and done a mass-rollback and mass-delete of many of his edits. Graham87 07:15, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. ST1849 (talk) 14:47, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:49, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Yamsk, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sandspit. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have not altered the edit you made; I do not understand why you insist on abusing my talk page. Refrain from doing so again or I will report you. WorldlyVoice (talk) 15:37, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I asked you a question. You can post this nonsense but your too lazy to answer a simple question? Is it because you realized you were wrong? ST1849 (talk) 16:56, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dude. WP:CIVILITY. WannurSyafiqah74 (talk) 09:01, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. WorldlyVoice (talk) 00:30, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

So you can't answer a simple question? ST1849 (talk) 06:00, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. to ST1849: @WorldlyVoice didn't want you to make disruptive edits on their talk page. They are "not lazy" or "posting nonsense" - the more you post rude comments towards them, no matter if you're irritated or not, please avoid such behavior as per WP:CIVILITY. WannurSyafiqah74 (talk) 09:00, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Otto Wilhelm Lindholm is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Otto Wilhelm Lindholm until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Ravenswing 07:22, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. What is your reasoning for this revert that was trying to make the article readable and removing massive over-referencing? Being a non-expert is not a valid reason to revert an edit. Canterbury Tail talk 11:35, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Whaling in the Sea of Okhotsk is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Whaling in the Sea of Okhotsk until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Ravenswing 12:09, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 14:06, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 15:23, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]