User talk:StrangeloveFan101/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions about User:StrangeloveFan101. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vader Episode I: Shards of the Past and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Vader Episode I: Shards of the Past, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 22:16, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

Hello, Stinkyjaden! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 22:16, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:03, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Escape from Hell (2000 film) a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you.  — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)  14:11, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:03, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

The problem is that we seek third-party, impartial sources for articles. The company that made Escape from Hell is naturally going to want to paint their movie in the best possible light. What we seek is substantial analysis from impartial third-party sources. Note that in this context, "impartial" does not mean "having no viewpoint". Obviously, a review of a movie like that in Christianity Today is going to start from a particular point of view, whereas one in The Humanist will start from a different POV. Nonetheless, once you know who these reviewers are speaking to, reviews from both sources would be relevant in a way that promotional content from the film's makers, distributors, etc. will not, since the film was intended to move the souls of readers of both publications, and neither publication has a financial interest in the film. --Orange Mike | Talk 20:02, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

You have a response.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 17:33, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:04, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

Plot descriptions cannot be copied from other sources, including official sources and IMDb, unless these can be verified to be public domain or licensed compatibly with Wikipedia. They must be written in original language to comply with Wikipedia's copyright policy. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 01:47, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

Vader Episode I: Shards of the Past, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Cerebellum (talk) 20:41, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:03, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

Darth Maul: Apprentice, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SITH (talk) 10:57, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

Cleanflix (film), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Atlantic306 (talk) 00:17, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

Waiting for the Miracle to Come, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

97198 (talk) 13:12, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Come Together: A Fashion Picture in Motion, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

___CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 17:40, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Darth Maul: Apprentice, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Padawan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:56, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:RichardDutcherBrighamCity.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 17:14, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

Rebel Scum (film), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Atlantic306 (talk) 16:14, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:FuryRoadNux.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:39, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

Raiders!: The Story of the Greatest Fan Film Ever Made, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

97198 (talk) 01:56, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Greg Benson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Buckley (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:35, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Dark Father. Since you had some involvement with the Dark Father redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 23:25, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Atlantic306 (talk) 19:29, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:BingingWithBabishSeason1TitleCard.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:24, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Clap alien cheeks. Since you had some involvement with the Clap alien cheeks redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 22:33, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

No more please. I have nothing further to say to you. Any more will be considered harassment. And I WILL report you, film quote or no film quote. Cassianto^Talk 19:06, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

Stop with the harassment on my talk page. You have been already been warned. Cassianto^Talk 20:11, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

Stay off Cassianto's Talkpage. He's made it perfectly clear you're unwelcome. KJP1 (talk) 12:19, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

@KJP1: I want to find a way to settle our dispute. I'm fully sorry for everything I did wrong. I just hope me and Cassianto can put all of this stuff behind us. I posted to ANI again for a dispute resolution. I want to be able to get along with everyone I can, even on here. Again, please realize that I want a dispute resolution, I wasn't wanting to attack.

- StrangeloveFan101 (talk) 12:24, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

• Enough. Taking Cassianto to ANI for deleting your 'apology'? That's trolling, pure and simple. Stay off his page, stay away from him, don't try to interact with him. - SchroCat (talk) 12:32, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

This isn't because he deleted my apology. I tried doing this between us, but I had to consult how to seek a dispute which led me back to ANI. Please (I beg of you PLEASE), I mean every word of my apologies. I'm not trolling. Again, please realize this.

- StrangeloveFan101 (talk) 12:36, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

Rubbish. You are trolling. The dispute exists in your own head. Walk away and don't interact with him again if you can. - SchroCat (talk) 12:43, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

There are occasions were you will just need to cut your losses and accept even an undesirable outcome. You cannot make somebody want to interact with you, and if someone asks you to leave them be, just do it. You do not need to be friends with everyone on this platform.

I get the distinct impression that you are among the younger userbase, most editors do not fall in the minority age bracket (most editors are rather significantly older than myself, some more than a factor of 3 times as old). It's important for you to bear in mind that there is at least an expectation that you are either a mature adult, or act sufficiently alike to one as to not be noticeable.

Your best course of action is, as I said, just to move on. Find an article or discussion your interested in and contribute there. Wikipedia is a massive place, you could hit "random article" 10,000 times without ever falling on the same page twice and still have another 6 million articles to find. But, whatever you do, put this behind you. It's not worth your time or concern. Mr rnddude (talk) 14:09, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

StrangeloveFan10, I think you're getting Wikipedia & real life intertwined. GoodDay (talk) 15:15, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

@Mr rnddude: @GoodDay: I tried my best (my absolute best) to offer an apology to you know who. Clearly it wasn't accepted so the best thing for me is to just leave as an "incompetent troll." I honestly hope you folks are happy with me going away.

- Incompetent Troll

Oh for heaven's sake. Don't be so melodramatic. Here's a link to one of Wikipedia's most important philosophical doctrines: WP:DGAF. Take a break, and come back later. A week from now, nobody will have bothered to remember this event. Yeah, sure, it's unpleasant and sad now. Learn what you can from it. Mr rnddude (talk) 16:07, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

Learn what I can from it? You know what I learned here today, @Mr rnddude: I learned that apologies mean nothing now. Go back and read mine for proof where I admitted I did wrong and that I wanted me and you-know-who to bury the hatchet. But they clearly don't want to from their response, so the best thing for me to do is just go. Go ahead, call me melodramatic. Call me a troll. Call me incompetent. Call me whatever you want. The fact still remains that I offered and still offer an apology, while they hold a grudge against me.

StrangeloveFan101 (talk) 16:22, 15 March 2020 (UTC) (aka Incompetent Troll)

If you feel like it, try editing again in a week or a month. If not, do whatever brings you joy. You do whatever is best for you. I'm only even commenting here, because I don't think you're trolling, and think you were being sincere in apologizing. I just think you misjudged the situation, and made a bad situation worse for yourself. Re, AN/I here's what a wise admin said to me: Every time I've gone onto ANI to get consensus on something or complain that we aren't doing things the right way (and it seems to be happening more since I got the tools) I end up finding the nearest brick wall to bash my head against. Peace, Mr rnddude (talk) 16:54, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

@Mr rnddude:Thank you. :)

- StrangeloveFan101 (talk) 16:57, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

WP:DGAF = Less stress for yourself. GoodDay (talk) 16:58, 15 March 2020 (UTC)