User talk:Steminist04

Hello, Steminist04, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 14:39, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi User: Steminist04, nice work on improving the article for Christy Haynes, I think the reorganization helps the readability. I'm a data scientist at the USGS, and I only have a couple suggestions for improving the article. I hope this helps!

• I think add some hyperlinks to analytical chemistry, biochemistry, and nanomaterials would help in the lead sentence.
• Adding Christy's field of study in the infobox would help with search engines to find notable scientists when someone searches a subject. See a list of other categories that you can add to these infoboxes here. All you'd need to add is

| fields = Chemistry

and optionally other fields

• Christy Haynes also has A LOT of awards, which is great, but I'm not sure all need to be listed. I wonder if the Honors and awards section could be a 'selected list of awards / honors' and list the most prominent ones, and then link to Christy's CV or webpage to see a complete list of awards. I think leaving as is would also be fine.

Nice work on this, and let me know if you have any questions / concerns Jayzlimno (talk) 20:27, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

		The Limnology and Oceanography Barnstar
		Nice job! Jayzlimno (talk) 20:27, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Steminist04! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Christy Haynes that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Kj cheetham (talk) 12:59, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the clarification! I'm still new to this, so it's nice to have other editors to help make sure things are getting done correctly :) Steminist04 (talk) 15:02, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Tamingimpala were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gianluigi Veglia and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Gianluigi Veglia, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tame (talk) 10:55, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Steminist04! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Tame (talk) 10:55, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Steminist04. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Gianluigi Veglia, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:03, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Steminist04. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Gianluigi Veglia".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:10, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]