User talk:Renamed user 9d6c46bf028596824e6760c5c03e339e

Hello, Renamed user 9d6c46bf028596824e6760c5c03e339e, my name is Auroranorth. Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like our encyclopedia and decide to stay. Thank you very much for creating a username, it's the first step to becoming a respected member of the community. Here are a couple of pages you might find useful. I won't go into great detail here, but if you ever need any help, you can always try Help:Contents. So, the pages:

• Wikipedia:Your first article - how to construct a great first article!
• Wikipedia:Cheatsheet - essential in learning about the different buttons you see when you click 'edit this page'.
• User:Renamed user 9d6c46bf028596824e6760c5c03e339e/Sandbox - your very own sandbox where you can fiddle around with the buttons on 'edit this page'.
• My talk page - if you ever have any questions, edit that page and ask!

I hope you enjoy being a Wikipedian! Always remember to sign your name with the four tildes (~~~~) on any talk page (not in any article) - this will produce your name and date, similar to what will appear at the end of this message. Remember, if you need any help at all, check out Help:Contents, my talk page or the help desk. Or if you like, place {{helpme|YOURPROBLEMHERE}} on your talk page (this page) and someone will swing by soon. Once again, welcome, Renamed user 9d6c46bf028596824e6760c5c03e339e!

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from Romancecar. Please be careful when editing pages and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Auroranorth 12:38, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thanks for edits on the Thai articles. It seems you did fall into the same misunderstanding I myself fell before - the cities like e.g. Rayong are not identical with the Mueang district. The municipal (thesaban) areas (and this includes Pattaya which is a municipality outside the thesaban system) take over some of the tasks normally assigned to the district or province administration (most notably the sanitation), but they are still part of the district for the other tasks (e.g. civil registry). And while these municipalies are local administrative units, the districts as well as the tambon are directly controlled by the central government. andy 11:30, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:OER-3000-SSE10.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 14:08, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide reliable references for all your additions otherwise your information can be removed at anytime. see WP:ATT. kind regards --Merbabu 10:59, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Balabalagan Islands, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. Rambutan (talk) 17:28, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Balabalagan Islands, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Balabalagan Islands satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Balabalagan Islands and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Balabalagan Islands during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Rambutan (talk) 17:44, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Lambang propinsi sulsel.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 20:09, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

Stubs created with little or no backup are a bad reflection of the Indonesian project - please at least learn about putting stub tags at the bottom of the stubs that you create = they could be speedy deleted very easiy by outsider editors - please take attention to this - cheers SatuSuro 02:31, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

At least '''{{Indonesia-geo-stub}}''' - please - SatuSuro 02:33, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Conventions with disambig pages - we do not add red links - unless you are about to create the article SatuSuro 02:37, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that there are subcategories as below - please try and help put the stubs you are creating into the sub categories rather than the main category - it would be appreciated if you can help the cleanup! thanks

• Category:Islands of Indonesia
• The main article for this category is Islands of Indonesia.
• There are 8 subcategories in this category, which are shown below. More may be shown on subsequent pages.

• Archipelagoes of Indonesia (this will have to be moved it does not fit here!)
• Bali
• Greater Sunda Islands
• Java
• Lesser Sunda Islands
• New Guinea
• Sulawesi
• Sumatra

SatuSuro 02:44, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh and if I have misunderstood your editing and stub creation - my apologies for my intrusion! SatuSuro 04:28, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thank you. --Slashme 08:59, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Coco Snatch requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. UtherSRG (talk) 20:00, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Editing your talk page comments is usually advised against. A quick touchup for spelling or something else trivial is OK but changing the words or other substantive edits should be avoided, especially after someone already has responded to your comments. See WP:TPG#Own_comments for details. Raymond Arritt (talk) 03:44, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can I just say "Wow" again!? Nice work on Template:LGBT history! Have you considered joining the LGBT WikiProject? We'd love to have your input! Take a look around, and if you are interested, sign up! :) -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 14:41, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In light of Lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender-related films of Thailand and a new category, Category:LGBT-related films from Thailand, I wonder if the template is still needed? Perhaps rather than a template on films, maybe one is needed for the broader subject of LGBT topics in SE Asia? Care to discuss? Please see Template talk:Thai LGBT movies. — WiseKwai 21:02, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Tops Supermarkets (Thailand) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sting_au Talk 06:56, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I recently saw you split off retinoids, carotenes, and xanthophylls into their own templates. I can't see any reason why we shouldn't have all the carotenoids in the same template, which actually helps navigation if the template is set up correctly. I've modified {{Carotenoids}} to reflect the members in each set, and that's the template I think we ought to use. I'm going to nominate Template:Carotenes, Template:Retinoids, and Template:Xanthophylls for deletion, as Template:Carotenoids is a better format for this information. Jeff Dahl (Talk • contribs) 20:51, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Carotenes has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Jeff Dahl (Talk • contribs) 20:54, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Xanthophylls has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Jeff Dahl (Talk • contribs) 20:55, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated List of largest suburbs in the world, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of largest suburbs in the world. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Deiz talk 08:58, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Doseiai, I've identified several problems with this list, hence the AfD nomination. I would ask that you don't add the link to any more articles until the issue has been resolved. No doubt you'll have a chance to look at the AfD and give your opinion there. Thanks, Deiz talk 09:00, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Japan Automotive Industry has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — Luccas 05:51, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating the category Category:ApoCarotenoids‎. I'm curious why it has capitalization in the middle, though. Shouldn't it just be "apocarotenoids"? -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:57, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On 24 August, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Brazilian Traditional medicine, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Thanks for your contributions, looking forward to more from you! - Mailer Diablo 19:33, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Have you been on the Thai highway network‎ lately? Pawyilee (talk) 07:53, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On 22 October, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article 3-MCPD, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

nice article Victuallers (talk) 19:44, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like a recent edit of yours may have played some havoc Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. Or maybe you were reorganizing it on purpose & I didn't understand your rather cryptic edit summary. Given your history, I'm assuming that was at worst an innocent mistake; I'm posting here just to ask you to look at what you did there and make sure it was what you intended. - Jmabel | Talk 01:16, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Hatari Electronics requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. McWomble (talk) 10:44, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Hatari Electronics, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. McWomble (talk) 11:06, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted your edits on Buddhism tonight. I understand the point that you are trying to make, but there were a couple problems with the edit. One is that the definition of Buddhism in the intro is a controversial topic, and changes should really be discussed first on the talk page. The issue of Buddhism as philosophy vs. religion vs. multiple religions, etc., is not uniformly settled in published sources, and Wikipedia has to reflect that ambiguity, even if it produces a somewhat weak sounding intro. Second, the term 'idolatry' regarding religious practices is generally to be avoided as a NPOV issue. Some would argue that the veneration of images present in Buddhism and Hinduism is not idolatry as typically understood because it is the being that the image represents, rather than the image itself, that is worshiped; others would say that the issue of idolatry is inherently a POV that only makes sense in the context of the Abrahamic religions which prohibit it. Finally, your assertion regarding Buddhism's spread into the West is incorrect. Many temples exist in the West that practice Buddhism more or less just as it is practiced within Asian countries, and even more Westernized practice and study centers often include ritual elements such as bowing, chanting, making offerings to images of the Buddha, etc. The Talk:Buddhism page may have more details on these issues, or feel free to contact me on my talk page if you have questions. --Clay Collier (talk) 12:57, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Moving the paragraph that you're adding out of the intro is a step in the right direction, but it still has some serious NPOV issues with regards to the characterization of Asian and Western Buddhism. If you want to create a section on differences in practice between Western and traditional Buddhism and add some sourced information to it, or add it to the Criticism of Buddhism article, that would be fine. Otherwise, I think that you are going to find that it is going to be repeatedly reverted. --Clay Collier (talk) 13:13, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I understand your point but saying that Western Buddhism is "not a complete religion", that Asian Buddhism contains idolatry, blind devotion and superstition are clearly in contravention of the NPOV policy. Saying that Westerners are confused by these things, that they lack cultural understanding, and that they are "sidestepping" the issue is also a violation of NPOV. Furthermore, you're making broad assertions about what Buddhism in Asia and the West are like in general without any source to back up that opinion. --Clay Collier (talk) 13:20, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Here's the thing: if sources exist to support it, it would be fine to say that Asian Buddhism is generally marked by an interest in protective charms, amulets, fortune telling, and the supernatural not generally encountered in Western Buddhism. If a source can be found for it, it would be fine to say that the significant differences in how Buddhism is presented to Westerners and how it is practiced in Asia makes it difficult for Westerner's to understand certain aspects of popular Buddhism in Asia. With sources, any of these sorts of statements would be fine. What isn't OK is saying that Asian Buddhists are blindly devout idolaters that worship money, and that Westerners are too culturally illiterate to understand what's going on. It might be true, and by and large I think it is, but that isn't how an encyclopedia would present it, and Wikipedia can't present the situation that way either. We need sources, and we need to state the situation in neutral language. --Clay Collier (talk) 13:29, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This has nothing to do with my understanding of history. As I mentioned, I'm sympathetic to the point you're trying to make. What you need to understand is that the specific way in which you are making your point does not comply with Wikipedia:Neutral point of view and Wikipedia:Verifiability. --Clay Collier (talk) 13:37, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

part of verifiability is the pre-existing wikipedia articles. But my original point which was reversed was "Buddhism is a family of beliefs and practices considered by many to be a religion" are weasel words when clearly it is a "religion" or even family of religions and should be stated as such. I have a problem with the statement "considered by many to be a religion". It is a religion, and those who don't know shouldn't be writing about it. Doseiai2 (talk) 13:45, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have stepped on a rather problematic issue with that - that needed to be resolved - please lets keep the conversation at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Indonesia so that other members of the project can discuss the issue. SatuSuro 03:59, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't create red links. thanks as you did here. Leave it unlinked, or create the article. --Merbabu (talk) 07:22, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

When you start new articles (1) please help with WP:RS, and (2) add project tags or add Categories and or stub tags - it would be appreciated if you could make the effort - thanks SatuSuro 07:58, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please indicate that you have read the above about your contributions to the Indonesian project - we have considerable problems with uncited/unsourced articles - you have made no indication of what we have requested - any word in response will help. Lack of response can constitute nuisance editng when adding unsourced articles - thanks SatuSuro 04:53, 17 February 2009

Also your odd unsigned self reverted edit at the noticeboard has not solved anything: - http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk%3AWikiProject_Indonesia&diff=271061941&oldid=271061835(UTC)

The new red link category is even more problematic - SatuSuro 04:59, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Have no WP:RS - please take note - for whatever you are up to - reliable sources or cites are important - specially for some of your recent edits - also have a close look at WP:COPYVIO just in case you are not consideirng adding WP RS in the short term SatuSuro 01:36, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please remember that any unreferenced material without *reliable* sources might be removed. thanks --Merbabu (talk) 23:36, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The population table in this article is not supported by the link you provided (here). Please provide adequate sources, or this information will be deleted. thanks --Merbabu (talk) 23:55, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Very reassuring that you can actually respond on talk pages when you choose to - for a while it was like you were not going to respond to anything - thanks for reassuring those who have tried to get a word out of you that you are a real person and not an Indonesian speaking non english speaking bot or something SatuSuro 03:01, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:ID_Kai.PNG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:00, 12 March 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. multichill (talk) 13:00, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please include a link to the source file and credit the author. multichill (talk) 13:01, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please if you are capable of editing such a wide range of articles and offer some rather erudite edit summaries for your edits - you should at least offer either a WP RS or something else at Boo islands - you may not want to - but creating geographical location stubs without any context is potentially an issue SatuSuro 00:35, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Anything without references should be removed. If you can start an article, then you can find a source. --Merbabu (talk) 10:47, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

For a start thank you very much for responding - it is appreciated.

Your point is as valid as merbabus above - the problem is that the WP Indonesia project has a terrible legacy of english free editors dropping odd bits in and never returning to clean up there mess. Do you have the slightest clue where you are getting your information from? cannot you use it for ref purposes? SatuSuro 12:37, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

However, one of the points is that vast swaths of islands in Indonesia are completely missing from Wikipedia. You may think that is ok, but I don't

I am not personally really focused upon whether the 'ultimate list' of islands ultimately gets up on Wikipedia or not - there are WP:NOT issues in your assumption there - the point is as a traditional encyclopedia does not necessarily have every location in it - there are usually gazetteers as appendices to good encyclopedias for that sort of thing - I do not think that WP Indonesia has as an aim or end in a comprehensive listing of every nameable island of Indonesia - if you wish to do so maybe you need to find a good source while you are doing that and please dont expect any support if the afd hawks start watching you :) SatuSuro 05:16, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok you have been on for a few years now. Every time you edit an article at the bottom of the edit pane appears:- Encyclopedic content must be verifiable That means every time you create another Island article - yes it means you need something to verify that every article you have created is not a hoax.

Your response to Merbabu misses the point - all items with entries in Wikipedia should ideally have WP:RS for WP:V purposes - Islands are not existential stand alones - they do require proof.

If you are creating a new article - you need to offer up WP:RS each time - you are an experienced editor - you edit over a whole range of articles that show a particularly wide range of knowledge - surely that would follow that if you are capably of such editing - you can also identify the source of information about the obscure islands that you add to the WP Indonesia project. It is simple as that. And it would be appreciated if you could do so - and thanks for what you have added already and please keep doing so - but please a source or two. SatuSuro 12:37, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop linking to articles that don't exist unless you create them *first*. This is not Indonesian wikipedia. --Merbabu (talk) 12:52, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ill second that SatuSuro 07:14, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• See WP:REDLINK, which does say that red links help Wikipedia grow.

Anyway, I stopped by to comment that Ubud District should probably be Ubud Subdistrict; the 'District' is the Regency, such as Gianyar. Ditto the category; Category:Subdistricts of Bali.

• Subdistricts of Indonesia

Cheers, Jack Merridew 15:51, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please read wp:rs before adding uncited statements to the article. Please take disagreements to the discussion page. Thanks.--Work permit (talk) 22:34, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Map_of_California_hightlighting_the_LA_Metro_Area.PNG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:20, 11 July 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:20, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article Thai zig zag scam has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-encyclopedic subject

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. mhking (talk) 03:32, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Rangkasbitung. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 10:22, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Locator_Serang_Regency.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:09, 20 October 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey (talk) 11:09, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Celebrity Fitness requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 21:32, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Celebrity Fitness, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 21:39, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Medan Station. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Eeekster (talk) 03:39, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nice start. Got a picture? If you hurry, you might be able to get it into DYK. Let me know if I can help. -AndrewDressel (talk) 16:19, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia! If you need help with anything let me know by leaving me a message here or placing {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will come along and help out shortly. Thanks and happy editing!  IShadowed  ✰  22:12, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You put this at the Java Trench http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Java_Trench&diff=next&oldid=283024588 - I see no reference or cite to substantiate that - so in a sense it is POV - any refs to hand on that one? SatuSuro 08:47, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, do you remember which image you used to base File:Population decline.png on ? Attribution is probably required. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 11:29, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Category:HIV/AIDS research institutes (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for renaming to Category:HIV and AIDS research institutes (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 04:36, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It is very hard to consider the issues involved with WP:AGF and civility when finding these recent additions:-

1. Cempi Bay (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) by Doseiai2 (talk · contribs) started at 16:30, 11 April 2010
2. Bima Bay (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) by Doseiai2 (talk · contribs) started at 16:17, 11 April 2010
3. Sanggar Bay (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) by Doseiai2 (talk · contribs) started at 16:14, 11 April 2010
4. Waworada Bay (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) by Doseiai2 (talk · contribs) started at 16:05, 11 April 2010 - that one is a real classic!!!
5. Saleh Bay (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) by Doseiai2 (talk · contribs) started at 15:51, 11 April 2010

The cleanup involved to fix these contributions will take longer than you did to make them - the separate stubs for the bays are not necessarily inherently notable, (all contributions need WP:RS - it is there in the box in your edit page), need project tagging, need re-categorising. Please note that your apparent forgetting advice up this talk page shows that, despite the fact that you may be a very good contributor, you seem to have forgotten the main issues of what and how new stubs need to survive deletion :) SatuSuro 01:07, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bintuni_Bay is one tagged by another editor - I fail to see why it should not be deleted - please either comment - or do something about it - dumping one liner stubs with geography of indonesia category could be seen in your case as disruptive editing - expect an admin to broach the subject if you continue to add stubs that way - or if you are really genuine abut the notability of these less than 20 word stubs - find a WP:RS or something like that to show that you actually care about creating such stubs SatuSuro 08:09, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This is particularly important when adding or changing any facts or figures and helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. I will ask an admin to consider whether your creation of oneline stubs constitutes nuisance editng - your lack of response and continued creation of these is disruptive and hardly WP:AGF editing SatuSuro 13:37, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Locator Jabotabek WestJava.PNG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:35, 30 April 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —LX (talk, contribs) 21:35, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Mainstream gay. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mainstream gay. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:09, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:NEW PSEimage.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. FASTILY ^(TALK) 18:43, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Locator Surabaya metro.PNG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:59, 16 November 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:59, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Sumbawa, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Merbabu (talk) 09:24, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

see 36-38 and 52 above - it seems the annual reminders are not enough - do we request some extra hoops to jump through for you to add material that is actually sourced - please? SatuSuro 09:50, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

From reliable source Mainstream news sources are generally considered to be reliable. There it is reliable. Reverting. Doseiai2 (talk) 17:01, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. N2e (talk) 21:40, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Huh? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sultanate_of_Bima why bother? there is already Bima which has mention of the same - please in WP:AGF try some reading of what already is on wp and improving existing articles rather than adding something like 'Sultanate of Bima' SatuSuro 02:06, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There are plenty of anonymous people who will improve an article, but to create a new one requires an account. So therefore, most people will be daunted and won't bother. This speeds up the process, especially since pages already exist in two other languages. Doseiai2 (talk) 19:50, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

False logic for defending starting irrelevent stub - sorry try pulling another another one - over the years you have repeatedly created under-worked on stubs that sit there for ages without WP:RS, without adequate locality specific categories and no one comes to save them SatuSuro 03:47, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I notice you're the creator of File:Smoking bans.png; a couple of things: 1. Spain's legislation has changed, it would be nice if someone updated this. 2. Several people have asked what brown means, since it's not on the legend. Would it be possible to clarify this? Many thanks. Lampman (talk) 15:47, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. As you seem to be the original creator of this file, I would like to know which color is intended for countries such as Portugal, Italy and India. After all, said countries are painted in a color which is not represented in the summary. Should they be painted dark red like France and Spain or is the light brown tone intended? In the second case, there is an item missing in the summary... Sabbut (talk) 19:24, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't use the "expand" template. It's deprecated and in the process of being deleted. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 06:26, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from VWBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Homocaust, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.homocaust.org.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) VWBot (talk) 23:09, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

For a second time, Please don't use the "expand" template. It's deprecated and in the process of being deleted. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 04:05, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A blogspot link does not meet WP:Reliable sources guidelines. Thanks, OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 14:31, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Per your edit to New York City Subway; we can't use circular references; ie, Wikipedia can't be used as a source in on of its articles. Acps110 ^{(talk • contribs)} 17:22, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Particles in alveolus.png.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:51, 30 October 2011 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 03:51, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:OccupyTheRoof.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 19:24, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Venoco, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Santa Barbara (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:21, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Greater Jakarta (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Regencies, Batak, Kota, Javanese and Sundanese

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:02, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Amusement parks in Thailand has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:28, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Bukit Batu Biosphere Reserve at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Maile66 (talk) 12:27, 25 June 2012 (UTC) Maile66 (talk) 12:27, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you get the chance, can you have another look at Template:Did you know nominations/Bukit Batu Biosphere Reserve so we can try to move things along? --LauraHale (talk) 03:14, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

On 21 July 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Giam Siak Kecil-Bukit Batu, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that there are Sumatran elephants and Sumatran tigers in Giam Siak Kecil-Bukit Batu, a UNESCO Man and the Biosphere Reserve? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 16:02, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Opuntia matudae, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Prickly pear (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:40, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tian, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mandarin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:13, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Miyako Strait, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Satsuma (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Crime in Thailand (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Golden Triangle, Red shirt, Phuket, Yellow shirt and Thaksin

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:35, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Klang District, Doseiai2!

Wikipedia editor Lgcsmasamiya just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Expand it

To reply, leave a comment on Lgcsmasamiya's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

You wrote at 10:46, 8 December 2012 on my talk page "Of course, you've never been into the real Nepal, the mountains, have you, or you would know this already..."

How presumptuous are you! Check the guest registers of hotels in Thamel, Kathmandu for the last seventeen years to know how many times I have been to Nepal. (I, of course, don't need a visa or passport, thanks to the 1950 Indo-Nepal Treaty of Peace and Friendship.) Anyway, I need not climb Mount Everest to learn its height, go to San Francisco Bay to confirm the existence of Golden Gate Bridge or visit the White House to confirm that Mr. Barack Obama has been elected the President for the second term. Rao Ravindra (talk) 12:01, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

---

Hello. I was NPP'ing and noticed you created this article. An inclusion concern came to mind, but I don't want to drag you into one of the public fora like a noticeboard or something.

My concern is twofold, (1) does this article give undue weight to the transgender status of these people, and (2) is this categorization meaningful per Wikipedia:Categorization/Ethnicity, gender, religion and sexuality. You may be basing this article off of the inclusion of a different, valid categorization like Category:Transgender_and_transsexual_writers, but these exist only because the people listed therein write actively about transgender/transsex issues. However, while being transgender is very likely to be relevant to what a writer writes about, it is not at all relevant to how old a person can be (just as ethnicity, religion, etc. are not, hence why we don't have List of the verified oldest known Jews, List of the verified oldest known Muslims, List of the verified oldest known Wikipedia editors, and so on. Intelligentsium 01:00, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. Right now, list of oldest male/female exist because there is a clear correlation extensively supported by medical research between sex and longevity, and because this is the simplest and most universal biological binary for humans (thus all other variables are in effect controlled variables so the correlation is not because of something else). I am not saying it is not possible to be or identify outside this binary; what I am saying is that the correlation between intersex/transgender status and (extreme) longevity has not been studied or discussed in published literature, so we can't write about it. It might be in the future that a groundbreaking study is published on a statistically significant sample of transgender/intersex individuals showing such individuals tend to live much longer/shorter lives than their male/female peers and that this is a correlation independent of upbringing or environment. In that case, there would be no problem with having an article. Right now, however, it doesn't seem that is the case, just as it is not with Muslims or Hindus, or left-handed persons or persons favouring Brie cheese over Camembert cheese, for that matter, hence it is not appropriate to include any of these topics as an article. Intelligentsium 02:28, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of the verified oldest known transgender has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This isn't a list, but a mention of just one person and no evidence that she even fits the article. The IC says she is OLDEST IN CHINA.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ...William 01:01, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Region VIII (Mexico State), Doseiai2!

Wikipedia editor Narvekar ameya just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

This page is reviewed

To reply, leave a comment on Narvekar ameya's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Thanks for creating Region IX (Mexico State), Doseiai2!

Wikipedia editor Narvekar ameya just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

This page is reviewed

To reply, leave a comment on Narvekar ameya's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Tokyo. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Please see Prefectures of Japan. As far as I know, there's nothing wrong with the article. Your edits were unsourced and looks like WP:OR. Oda Mari (talk) 09:39, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2013 Southeast Asian floods, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Chon Buri and Phuket (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:49, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of through trains in Japan has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. satusuro 14:33, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

reverting the prod has nothing to the article - there is no sign of editing or translating - and you have offered no edit summary commenr. satusuro 14:53, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of through trains in Japan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of through trains in Japan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Safiel (talk) 00:17, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on List of through trains in Japan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. DAJF (talk) 01:04, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited High-speed rail in Indonesia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indonesian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:49, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Could you please elaborate on why you keep adding quote boxes to articles as an IP editor? [1][2] Most of the times there is no indication of actual relevance. I'd rather see more scholarly content added to Wikipedia articles. Quotes such as those you recently added may fit to news website articles, but not to an encyclopedic website. Also, I would advise you to read WP:SOCK, WP:V, WP:NOR, WP:RS and WP:DRIVEBYTAGGING. —Omnipaedista (talk) 07:03, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Myanmar Railways Tanintharyi Line, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages SRT and Myeik (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Paleo Kathmandu Lake, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lacustrine (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Anjaree, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Custody (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please send me a link to the move discussion, or revert the move, which is not supported by WP:RS.--Ubikwit ^連絡 _{見学/迷惑} 14:04, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted it myself. Doseiai2, please make a requested move if you want to move this article; I am not convinced that "story" is better than myth, and I doubt others will be. —Xezbeth (talk) 14:15, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you.

That was an absolutely baseless and arbitrary "move" based on personal religious bias/beliefs, and essential represents some form of POV pushing bordering on activism.

There is no correspondence between controversy with the name of the Genesis creation narrative and Japanese mythology. I suggest that Doseiai2 abstain from further "move" adventurism until such a time when you have acquired a degree of competence in Japanese religion and language.

Attempting such a surreptitious move without initiating a discussion could be seen as disruptive.
--Ubikwit ^連絡 _{見学/迷惑} 16:08, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is not, according to the article and Marapu, a story about the creation of the world. It also had no more information than the main article, so I've turned it into a redirect to the main article. I note that it actually had no source either. I did copy some material from it into the main article, but that was about the religion, not about the story, so was in the wrong place in any case. Dougweller (talk) 15:27, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hey man, I noticed that about four years ago at the Sumbawa article, you asserted that the name of one of the tourist beaches there is "Supersuck." I just wanted to check to be absolutely sure that's really the name of the beach and not a typo. I mean...it does sound kind of weird, right? MezzoMezzo (talk) 10:07, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Racism in Thailand, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Songkran (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Open a thread in the articles talk-page first, and try to gain consensus. Many people would like to discuss the changes first. We are presently trying to get the article to GA status. Thanks. Antiochus the Great (talk) 12:32, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kawasaki City Tram, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kawasaki. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

One of your edits appear to be copy and pasted from another source. We at Wikipedia usually require paraphrasing. If you own the copyright to this material please send permission for release under a CC BY SA license to permissions-en@wikimedia.org per WP:CONSENT. Such as you did on syphilis. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 01:49, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of cities in ASEAN by population, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Davao and Zamboanga. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of Arabian cities by population

added links pointing to Sharjah and Hawalli

List of largest suburbs by population

added a link pointing to Hawalli

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Two-wheeler usage in Japan

added links pointing to Grade, Edogawa, Parts, Scooters and Two-wheeler

List of bicycle sharing systems

added a link pointing to Toyama

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of places named after peace, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Nara, Heiwadai Station and San Jose. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I saw your page 'List of places named after peace', a very good idea, thank you. On the anti-war and peace template I've changed it to 'List of places named Peace', which might be a good name for the page. I'm remembering Peacefield, John Adams and John Quincy Adams' home, as I type this, don't know if you've included it or not. Just wanted to both suggest the name tweak to see if you like it and to thank you for a nice page. Happy New Year to you, yours, and theirs. Randy Kryn 10:34 4 January, 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Circuit underutilization, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Flip-flop. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited PSHDL, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page HDL. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pandaka, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Immaturity. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ventura Fault, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Santa Barbara. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

We at Wikipedia love evidence-based medicine. Please cite high-quality reliable sources. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations. A list of resources to help edit such articles can be found here. The edit box has a build in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN. WP:MEDHOW walks through editing step by step. We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 21:33, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please, we do not typically use popular press for medical information. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 04:05, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding low quality sources to Wikipedia. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 07:24, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Doseiai2. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Vaginal microbiota, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Yes, it should be "microbiota" but "flora" is used by long-standing convention. "Flora" in this context is used not as a synonym of Plantae sensu stricto, but to mean "living organisms that are not Animalia. Thank you. Shirt58 (talk) 10:24, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating List of neighborhoods of Kathmandu, Doseiai2!

Wikipedia editor Sammanhumagain just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please extend the article with a proper lead and some references. Otherwise it might be considered for deletion. Thank You!!!

To reply, leave a comment on Sammanhumagain's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

The article List of Indian cities by GDP (PPP) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This information and more is covered by List of cities by GDP

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Batternut (talk) 08:30, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Greater Jakarta, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Development bank. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:12, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist)(2014), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Banda. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited April 2015 Nepal earthquake, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chepang. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:17, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Remember that when adding medical content please only use high-quality reliable sources as references. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations. WP:MEDHOW walks you through editing step by step. A list of resources to help edit health content can be found here. The edit box has a build in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN. We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 13:03, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited T-cell growth factor, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages IL-2, IL-9 and IL-7. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Doseiai2. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Induced thymic epithelial cells, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

1. edit the page
2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Josu4u (talk) 13:23, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2015 Nepal Fuel Crisis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 2015 Nepal earthquake. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:38, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

2015 Nepal Fuel Crisis

added links pointing to Stateless, Sherpa, Tharu, Raute and Thakali

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shogun, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hōjō. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited NIOSH air filtration rating, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CDC. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2015 Nepal fuel crisis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chepang. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:41, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:35, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Updated popular press with review articles. Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 11:55, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of population milestones by country is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of population milestones by country until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. EnigmaLord515 (talk) 03:58, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Tamang people, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 21:52, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Tamang people

added links pointing to Sherpa and Tihar

Education in Nepal

added a link pointing to Chepang

Thapa

added a link pointing to Magar

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:37, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Oxalate oxidoreductase, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page C0. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

2015 Nepal blockade

added links pointing to Indo-Aryan and Tharu

Federal Limbuwan State Council

added a link pointing to Madhesi

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:52, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article PSHDL is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PSHDL until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AZ1199 (talk) 04:50, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What were you trying to do with this template? Do you need help? —PC-XT+ 05:34, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I moved it to User:Doseiai2/sandbox/Template:US Metro Area population as a test, but feel free to move it back, after the redirect is deleted, if you want to use it in articles. I think your sandbox just needed purging. That is, it was still showing an old cached version from before the template was updated. —PC-XT+ 05:30, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Helicase–primase complex, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page EBV. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:09, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lama clan (Tamang), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sherpa. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:49, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Capital of Japan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shuri. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:06, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited China microcensus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hukou. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited MyRIO, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page NEON. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:13, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating List of gym chains by country, Doseiai2!

Wikipedia editor AdamSmith12 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

This article does not cite any sources.

To reply, leave a comment on AdamSmith12's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Thanks for creating Kikkoman Soy Sauce Museum, Doseiai2!

Wikipedia editor Blythwood just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Added a more specific category and citation.

To reply, leave a comment on Blythwood's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Please only place full articles into templates, and not non-existent, red-linked articles. Thank you. - Takeaway (talk) 18:51, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article 2-AA has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Disambiguation pages are meant to distinguish among existing article titles, not prospective titles of to-be-composed articles. Suggest deletion without prejudice for re-creation when conditions warrant it's presence.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 00:10, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Arctic Low. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Polar low. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Polar low – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. David.moreno72 08:08, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please quote your source.Xx236 (talk) 13:41, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Prostitution among elderly. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prostitution#Among_the_elderly. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prostitution#Among_the_elderly – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Fbergo (talk) 03:18, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Remember that when adding content about health, please only use high-quality reliable sources as references. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations (There are several kinds of sources that discuss health: here is how the community classifies them and uses them). WP:MEDHOW walks you through editing step by step. A list of resources to help edit health content can be found here. The edit box has a built-in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN. We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Jytdog (talk) 16:00, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Protein prosthetic has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Neologism not in common use. Note: search engine hits for "protein prosthetic" will encounter many hits for protein-prosthetic group interactions.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BiologicalMe (talk) 17:58, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Phage therapy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MDR. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:09, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:LA County Incorporated Areas Silicon Beach corehighlighted.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 03:01, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:SumatraMegathrust has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Dawnseeker2000 02:06, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm not a template builder, but try to create new content on fossils, plants and animals. Recently, I've been working on Brassicaceae. The fact that there is a template Cruciferous biochemistry seems functional to me. However, it contain a red link to Raphanus, while the page Raphanus does exist. This is because Raphanus in the template is an evoked template which does not exist. This is rather confusing. Looking a little bit better, it turns out that Brassicaceae and Brassica also are evoked templates, which exist this time, although being identical, which they should not be. It seems to me non of these sub templates belong in a template about biochemistry. For a template on Brassicaceae, I think a listing of genera per subfamily and tribe would be a necessary component, and I'm sure phylogenetic knowledge is not yet advanced enough for this family. Perhaps these thoughts may persuade you to do some work on this template. Thank you in advance, regards, Dwergenpaartje (talk) 08:38, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Air Canada Flight 759 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

An article on something that might have happened is not really noteworthy, crew were aware they made a mistake so nothing to see here.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MilborneOne (talk) 18:39, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Raboso, Doseiai2!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for creating it. Just made small edits: 1 blue link per line on dabs.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 09:04, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Doseiai2. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Chiran-o, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

1. edit the page
2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 09:34, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Remember that when adding content about health, please only use high-quality reliable sources as references. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations (There are several kinds of sources that discuss health: here is how the community classifies them and uses them). WP:MEDHOW walks you through editing step by step. A list of resources to help edit health content can be found here. The edit box has a built-in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN. We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 09:20, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article China Eastern Airlines Flight 5106 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not a major incident as no casualties.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Atlantic306 (talk) 00:54, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Remember that when adding content about health, please only use high-quality reliable sources as references. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations (There are several kinds of sources that discuss health: here is how the community classifies them and uses them). WP:MEDHOW walks you through editing step by step. A list of resources to help edit health content can be found here. The edit box has a built-in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN. We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 01:20, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Same as before. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 05:41, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Orphan's Day, Doseiai2!

Wikipedia editor El cid, el campeador just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please consider expanding article, and adding more info on how it is celebrated, etc

To reply, leave a comment on El cid, el campeador's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ^ᐐT₳LKᐬ 16:44, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of countries and dependencies by domestic citizen population is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of countries and dependencies by domestic citizen population until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 16:38, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Interdependence, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. —swpb^{T go beyond} 18:35, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Multiscriptualism, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. New articles generally need at least two (but preferably more) references from reliable sources that are independent of the subject that discuss the subject with significant coverage (trivial mentions do not contribute to notability). Further more the article currently appears to consist of nothing more than a dictionary definition without demonstrating the notability of the subject, i.e. as a field of study. ^{(See Rule 42)} Information that can't be referenced to reliable sources should be removed from the draft because verifiability is necessary for information added to Wikipedia.
I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of Draft: before the article title) where you can work on the article with minimal disruption from other users while you improve it.
When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready to be published, you can move it back to the article space yourself. However, I recommend that instead of moving it yourself that you follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template that I have added to the page. This submits the article to be reviewed by experienced editors that specialize in helping new editors write their first articles. Edaham (talk) 08:23, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Latin American cities by murder rate is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Latin American cities by murder rate until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. wikitigresito (talk) 16:47, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Remember that when adding content about health, please only use high-quality reliable sources as references. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations (There are several kinds of sources that discuss health: here is how the community classifies them and uses them). WP:MEDHOW walks you through editing step by step. A list of resources to help edit health content can be found here. The edit box has a built-in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN. We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 10:26, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Commercial baking, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 09:04, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Train station moving walkways, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. PamD 15:38, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Vismia baccifera, Doseiai2!

Wikipedia editor Nick Moyes just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

This article requires a taxobox to show its position in the plant kingdom, and the authors who named it. You can copy much of this from the Infobox used in the genus account.

To reply, leave a comment on Nick Moyes's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Nick Moyes (talk) 07:38, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Bad map scale has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Pkbwcgs (talk) 12:03, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Doseiai2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:List countries live births by year.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 07:18, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:EW and WP:BRD - the first is policy, and the second is widely respected and adhered to. When you make changes to an article and they are contested and reverted, you need to start a discussion to seek consensus, and not edit war to reinstate them. The onus is on you to demonstrate that you have community consensus, which you need to do on the article talk page. So please do not reinstate your changes again until you have such consensus, or the next stop will be the Edit Warring noticeboard. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 23:25, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• In case you miss it on my talk page, you need to be aware that any sources used to support claimed medical benefits of Gua Sha must comply with the strict standards of WP:MEDRS. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 23:54, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yuvraaj Parashar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yuvraaj Parashar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. QueerEcofeminist ^{"cite! even if you fight"!!!} [they/them/their] 08:57, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings,

I've done some changes on List of solar maxima and minima. I've taken out the pre-historic events list because to my knowledge nobody has associated these events to solar variation. On the second section, I think it might be a good idea to add sources to each event. Also, a question that came to me, but Iron Age Cold Epoch does not look like a solar minimum to me ... maybe the Homeric Minimum is the corresponding SM? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:21, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, List of solar maxima and minima, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 10:30, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Doseiai2, Pls note that stand alone lists do need independent, reliable sources to support the content claimed just like any other article - pls see [[Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists[edit source]]]. Once you have provided sources then click submit button. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 10:32, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article Localities of Mexico has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article is poorly sourced, fails WP:DICDEF

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SportingFlyer T·C 00:06, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Nippo (company), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 07:53, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Chagara, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hitro talk 08:17, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:List of solar maxima and minima, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:28, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Doseiai2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of solar maxima and minima".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! ~riley (talk) 08:22, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gold Tea is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gold Tea (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 00:21, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:HIV/AIDS research institutes, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 16:06, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Pyrrole–imidazole polyamides has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

trivial definition

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 06:34, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Chagara, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Ph density pampanga.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

• File:Ph density rizal.PNG

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:05, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Ph density cavite.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Ph density bulacan.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:03, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Doseiai2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Chagara".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 13:54, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Nippo (company), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:22, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Doseiai2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Nippo".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:34, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, North-South Seismic Belt, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Akhiljaxxn (talk) 12:22, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Powernex has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails the general notability guideline.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Teratix ₵ 00:02, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Shingo nawa, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 11:49, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Phonegyi thaye, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Gpkp [u • t • c] 07:05, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of cities whose population has fallen under a million, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of cities whose population has fallen under a million until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Near-Mars object has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unsourced neologism. There is an external link but it does not use the term.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 08:06, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Doseiai2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:North-South Seismic Belt, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:02, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Doseiai2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Shingo nawa, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:02, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Doseiai2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Phonegyi thaye, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:01, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Defacto rulers of Japan has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:13, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Factor Inhibiting HIF Asparaginyl Hydroxylase Inhibitors. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 09:50, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Laser Types has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Izno (talk) 19:42, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that content disputed are conducted on article talk pages, not in edit summaries. You have been reverted by two different people, so the onus on you is to obtain consensus. AndyTheGrump (talk) 00:48, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. MrOllie (talk) 00:48, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Guangfo, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:33, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Doseiai2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Guangfo, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:02, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Doseiai2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Guangfo".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:21, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:AmphoePattaya 2004.PNG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Electronic writing has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Remsense诉 11:56, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Heji Jufang. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ratnahastin (talk) 09:11, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Doseiai2, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Rainbow-collar worker, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rainbow-collar worker.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Chaotic Enby}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 22:29, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Prince Rupert Gas Transmission pipeline. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. — Moriwen (talk) 17:34, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Renamed user 9d6c46bf028596824e6760c5c03e339e. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Heji Jufang, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:07, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]