User talk:Rcb1

Hello Rcb1! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Runcorn 21:08, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply] Getting started Wikipedia tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload and use images Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Attribution • Neutral point of view • Notability Conflict of interest • Autobiography Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Citing sources • Footnotes Image use policy • Copyrights • Fair use External links • Spam • Vandalism Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry What Wikipedia is not • Deletion policy The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The "perfect" article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review Miscellaneous User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Your reversion of me wasn't a reversion of mistaken good faith edit: it was no mistake. At the time I reverted you, there was no source provided in those articles, your edit summaries, or Boston's article, and no web articles mentioned the death (which is still true. Nor was he listed at dead at Parliament's website (that at least has changed). Even now, the article only has a reference to page 55 today's Times without a title of any kind, and again, it and the mention of his death only appeared after you were reverted. Your edit summary mentions the Daily Telegraph as a source, but it is not included anywhere on Wikipedia. Next time you decide to declare someone dead, be sure to provide a source somewhere, preferably at the subject's article. There have been embarrassing false death edits at Wikipedia, and it is our duty as editors to ensure that any claim that a person has died is backed up by reliable sources to avoid additional embarrassment for us and more importantly spare undue stress on people who know the subject and receive false information from us, directly or indirectly. -Rrius (talk) 17:36, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure whether you are the same person as the IP editor who has noted deaths of Privy Counsellors at List of Privy Counsellors (1952–present); if you aren't, please disregard this. When making a date range such as 1966—2011, please use a dash, not a hyphen, to join the dates. If you use a Mac, the code is Option-hyphen; on a PC, it is Alt-0150 (on a laptop, you may also need to press Fn). In Wikipedia, you can also make an en dash by clicking the first dash after "Insert" below the Save button when editing a page. In a page such as the one I mentioned, you can also copy an existing dash from elsewhere. Finally, you can type & ndash; (without the space after the "&") between the numbers. -Rrius (talk) 16:49, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In Deaths in May 2008, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Golfer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:04, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Deaths in September 2005, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brazilian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:37, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

When adding birthday honours to articles, can you please also add the source where you obtained the information? See Wikipedia:Citing sources for further information. -- Dr Greg  talk  14:24, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits were reverted. Sorry, but articles like these are about the Deaths of individuals, not the individuals themselves. Furthermore, IMDb is NOT a reliable Wikipedia source. Thanks. — WylieCoyote (talk) 21:27, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Paul Birch (writer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marconi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:19, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Don Broadhurst, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Frank Warren (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:23, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Julian Waters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 1992 Olympic Games (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:19, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sir John Banks, 1st Baronet, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page King Charles II (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Crispian Strachan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page QPM (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:42, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John Anderson Strong, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kells (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:47, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rcb1,

are you sure you have assigned the MBE title to the correct Robin Williams? In the document you provided as source material it says Robin Williams is a rowing coach. The Robin Williams you edited is a former slalom canoeist. Those are two very different sports and I am not sure these two are one and the same person.

Vladyreaper (talk) 15:32, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Surveyor of the Queen's Works of Art, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CVO (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:31, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am removing all your additions of clerical styles before the subject's name in the first sentence of articles. It is contrary to the Manual of Style to include most styles or titles at here except in specific circumstances which don't apply in these cases. Thanks, Anglicanus (talk) 08:33, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kenneth Cragg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page DD (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:32, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Deaths in May 2004, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Medal of Honour (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 00:40, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Will Jefferson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page T20 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:49, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited George Patterson (missionary), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Khampa (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:19, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your recent work for Wikipedia. I see that you have added 'Actors from Surrey' to many articles. A lot of these are already cat'd by the towns they are from. As this page explains "each categorized page should be placed in all of the most specific categories to which it logically belongs. This means that if a page belongs to a subcategory of C (or a subcategory of a subcategory of C, and so on) then it is not normally placed directly into C". That is to say, if Plath is put in the cat of 'American women poets', she should not also go in 'poets', 'American poets', or 'American writers', which are parent categories. The idea is that if you are looking via category, you go to the parent category first, say, 'Poets', then you see there 'poets by Nationality'. You can then see 'American poets' and finally 'American women poets'. It's a 'tree based' approach. It would be helpful if you went back and checked which actors' articles were already cat'd by town and removed Surrey cat (to save the work of some sap like me). Best wishes Span (talk) 17:21, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm GiantSnowman. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Angus Carmichael, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. GiantSnowman 13:34, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rcb1. You have new messages at Talk:Edward Crewe.
Message added 18:06, 30 March 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:06, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nigel McCulloch, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page KCVO (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:18, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Peter Worsley may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:13, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Baron Burton may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:24, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Bridget Rosewell may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• '''Bridget Rosewell''' [[OBE] is a British [[economist]]. Her expertise includes economic development, transport and

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:57, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of extinct baronetcies may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Hopkins of St Pancras]] (cr. 3 July 1929), extinct with the grantee's death on 16 February 1946).

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:46, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Michael Baillie, 3rd Baron Burton may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• [[Category:British Army personnel of World War II]]]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:35, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Deaths in 2013 may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:39, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Neil Brailsford, Lord Brailsford may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• [[Category:Advocates]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:30, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to William Wells Hewitt may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• [[Category:Royal Air Force personnel of World War I]]]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:12, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to George Guest may have broken the syntax by modifying 4 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• '''George Guest''' [[CBE[[ [[FRCO]] (Feb 9, 1924 - Nov 20, 2002) was a Welsh [[organist]] and [[choral conductor]].

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:17, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Campbell Hardy may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• [[Category:1984 deaths]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:05, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to John Tresidder Sheppard may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• [[Category:English classical scholars]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:22, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your final warning. Failure to stop vandalism on Deaths in August 2013 will result in you being blocked from editing Wikipedia. Rusted AutoParts 22:20, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I recently relocated to the country and haven't remembered to update my user page in that respect. Besides, its a joke column, as it shows with the (on Google Maps ;)) bit.I don't view it as my job, I have OCD and get agitated when my routine gets intervened with. I concede when I'm wrong, but here, it's a pattern, it's what I do and have for two years. And citing your revert as vandalism is wrong, I agree. I was just angered. Another editor, Vandelack or something back in 2011 would revert me each and every time. It was aggravating and made me in reality unbearable to be around because my routine was being screwed around with. Rusted AutoParts 00:39, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Deaths in December 2006 may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• *[[Joe Walton (footballer)|Joe Walton]], 81, English football player ([[Preston North End]]. [http://www.independent.co.uk/news/obituaries/joe-walton-432196.html]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:14, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to David Clark (cricketer) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• '''David Graham Clark''' (27 January 1919 - 8 October 2013) <ref>[http://announcements.telegraph.co.uk/deaths/168905/clark-david-graham CLARK - DAVID GRAHAM}</ref> was an [[England|English]] [[cricket]]er and cricket administrator.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:52, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As you may know, VisualEditor ("Edit ^beta") is currently available on the English Wikipedia only for registered editors who choose to enable it. Since you have made 50 or more edits with VisualEditor this year, I want to make sure that you know that you can enable VisualEditor (if you haven't already done so) by going to your preferences and choosing the item, "MediaWiki:Visualeditor-preference-enable". This will give you the option of using VisualEditor on articles and userpages when you want to, and give you the opportunity to spot changes in the interface and suggest improvements. We value your feedback, whether positive or negative, about using VisualEditor, at Wikipedia:VisualEditor/Feedback. Thank you, Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 20:16, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Giles Vickers-Jones may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• He has hosted shows such as [[ITV at the Movies]], Reading Festival for ITV] and [[Playdate]] (ITV2) and presented on T4 and E! as well as producing shows.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:14, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Molly Allott may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Born at [[Wortley, Leeds]], [[Yorkshire]]), she was educated at [[Sheffield High School, South Yorkshire|Sheffield High School]], and joined

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:27, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Olivier James Garden may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• [[Category:Commanders of the Order of the British Empire]][

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:01, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Mike Melluish may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Mike Melluish was born in [[Westcliff-on-Sea]], [[Essex]], [[England]]) and educated at [[Rossall School]] in [[Lancashire]]. He captained the school team in 1951, his

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:31, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Anne Lovett (musician) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s and 2 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• [[Category:Alumni of the Royal Academy of Music}}

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:18, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Richard Peirse (RAF officer) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• [[Category:2014 deaths

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:24, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Michael Henley may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• [[Category:2014 deaths

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:58, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Peter Scoones may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• '''Peter Scoones''' (27 October 1937- 20 April 2014<ref>[http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/obituaries/10788646/Peter-

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:36, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ivor Robinson may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• from 1968 to 1973 of its successor, Designer Bookbinders. He was a triple medalist at the [Prix Paul Bonet in Switzerland in 1971 and his bindings have been shown in over one hundred

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:53, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of extinct baronetcies may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• *[[Lloyd baronets|Lloyd of Peterwell]] (cr. 26 January 1763, extinct with the grantee's death.
• *[[Lawson baronets|Lawrence of Brough Hall]] (cr. 6 July 16650, extinct with the death of the sixth baronet.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:50, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of extinct baronetcies may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• s Gardens and The Pavilion]] (cr. 7 July 1911), extinct with the grantee's death on 8 June 1924).
• *[[Lockhart-Ross baronets|Lockhart-Ross of Carstairs]] (cr.28 February 1672]], extinct with the death of the ninth baronet on 29 June 1942

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:01, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of Privy Counsellors (1952–present) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• * [[Norman Lamb]] b. 1957)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:10, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of extinct baronetcies may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• *[[MacRobert baronets|MacRobert of Douneside]] (cr. 5 April 1922, extinct with the death of the fourth baronet.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:07, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Hans Riegel may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• '''Johannes Peter "Hans" Riegel''' (10 March 1923&nbsp;– 15 October 2013<ref>[http://www.focus.de/finanzen/news/gummibaerchen-

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:49, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Michael Allenby, 3rd Viscount Allenby may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• [[Lieutenant-Colonel]] '''Michael Jaffray Hynman Allenby, 3rd Viscount Allenby''' (20 April 1931 - 3 October 2014 <ref>[http://announcements.telegraph.co.uk/deaths/182376/allenby

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:33, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your edit and your kind words. Unfortunately I never played against Tony Priday, but one could see from his TV appearances what a nice man he was. JH (talk page) 16:45, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to David Somerset (banker) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• [[Category:1930 births

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:28, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of current members of the British Privy Council may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• to the Treasury]] (2012–2013)<br />Minister of State at the [[Cabinet Office]] (2013–present))<br />[[Minister of State|Minister]] for [[Department for Business, Innovation and Skills|

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:12, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Joseph2302 was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at St John's College, Cambridge. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of Honorary Fellows of St John's College, Cambridge and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Joseph2302 (talk) 01:09, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Rcb1, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Joseph2302 (talk) 01:09, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Accents was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at St John's College, Cambridge. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of Honorary Fellows of St John's College, Cambridge and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Accents 18:34, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rcb1. You have new messages at Accents's talk page.
Message added 10:38, 16 June 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Accents 10:38, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

List of Honorary Fellows of St John's College, Cambridge, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Sulfurboy (talk) 18:59, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rcb1. Since you've edited one or more of List of current members of the British Privy Council, British Government frontbench and Official Opposition frontbench in the last six months, I'd like to invite you to a discussion about the use of honorifics in those lists. The discussion is happening here, and I look forward to a helpful and robust discussion. DBD 20:56, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Order of the Companions of Honour may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• url=http://www.royal.gov.uk/MonarchUK/Honours/CompanionsofHonour.aspx |title=The Monarchy Today > Queen and public > Honours > Companions of Honour |publisher=Royal.gov.uk |accessdate=3 December 2011}}</ref>
• | 28 ((321) || {{flagicon|UK}} [[Ian McKellen|Sir Ian McKellen]] || {{post-nominals|country=GBR|size=100%|

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:28, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your many contributions to Wikipedia, including various Deaths in (month year) articles. I have noticed that you have made many edits where you strip out useful reference material. For example your edit of 00:12, 24 November 2015 of Deaths in December 2011 stripped out useful reference info on 7 entries. I believe Wikipedia favors more rather than less reference material. I base this on WP:CITEHOW, which says

Citations for newspaper articles typically include:

• byline (author's name), if any
• title of the article within quotation marks
• name of the newspaper in italics
• city of publication (if not included in name of newspaper), in parentheses
• date of publication (the "{{Cite news}}" template places the date after the byline if there is one)
• page number(s) are optional

...

Citations for World Wide Web pages typically include:

• URL of the webpage – that is the URL of the webpage where the referenced content can be found, not, e.g., the main page of a website when the content is on a subpage of that website (see Wikipedia:Shallow references)
• name of the author(s)
• title of the article within quotation marks
• title or domain name of the website
• publisher, if known
• date of publication
• page number(s) (if applicable)
• the date you retrieved (or accessed) the webpage (required if the publication date is unknown)

If you know of a Wikipedia policy supporting the changes you made, please share it here. Otherwise, please do not make any more edits like the one under discussion. Cheers! —Anomalocaris (talk) 05:34, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have started a discussion on this topic at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive 124#Deaths in month, Deaths in year: (enforced non)compliance with Wikipedia citation standards. —Anomalocaris (talk) 08:41, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:List of Honorary Fellows of Magdalene College, Cambridge. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 16:23, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of Honorary Fellows of Magdalene College, Cambridge and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 16:23, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of Honorary Fellows of Magdalene College, Cambridge and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LaMona (talk) 01:08, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of Honorary Fellows of Magdalene College, Cambridge and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 06:18, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:List of Honorary Fellows of Magdalene College, Cambridge, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:35, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Ian McKellen, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. Categories must also be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 17:24, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rcb1. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "List of Honorary Fellows of Magdalene College".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ERK ^talk 09:17, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Daniel kenneth was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of Honorary Fellows of Trinity College, Oxford and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Daniel kenneth (talk) 13:59, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Oliver Letwin, without citing a reliable source. Especially do not add knighthood until subject is officially knighted. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. David J Johnson (talk) 19:52, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Joe Roe was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Magdalene College, Cambridge instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of Honorary Fellows of Magdalene College, Cambridge and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Joe Roe (talk) 01:01, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zppix was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Needs third party references, and needs more references overall

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of Honorary Fellows of Churchill College, Cambridge and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 02:32, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by NewYorkActuary was:

There is no reason for this to exist as a stand-alone article. The articles being linked here could just as easily be placed in a new category called Category:Honorary Fellows of Gonville and Caius College, Cambridge, which could itself be a sub-category of Category:Fellows of Gonville and Caius College, Cambridge

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of Honorary Fellows of Gonville and Caius College, Cambridge and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

NewYorkActuary (talk) 18:12, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rcb1. I noticed that you removed the BLP proposed deletion from Hans-Dietrich Sander because the person is no longer alive. However, you should be aware that per WP:BDP, the BLP policy also applies to people who have recently died. In the case of Mr. Sander, he died approximately a month before the article was written. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 16:12, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

My understanding is that titles and post-nominals aren't added to opening line names of bios as you have done with Aubrey Murphy (mayor).

Hello, Rcb1. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "List of Honorary Fellows of Trinity College".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Boomer Vial^{Holla! We gonna ball!} 13:36, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rcb1. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "List of Honorary Fellows of Churchill College".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 06:04, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rcb1. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "List of Honorary Fellows of Gonville and Caius College".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 06:05, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rcb1. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "List of Honorary Fellows of Magdalene College".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 06:05, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Whispering was:

This submission is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please read 'What Wikipedia is not' for more information.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information also if this article was in main article space it most likely would get deleted due to it being mostly a collection of links Whispering 20:37, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of Honorary Fellows of Jesus College, Cambridge and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Whispering 20:37, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - you've really upset me by your edit today to Michael Proctor (botanist). Not that by adding a note of his death was in any way wrong from a Wikipedia perspective - it's just that MCF Proctor was one of my botany lecturers at University who, forty years ago, inspired me to spend all of my own working life in the field of natural history and especially botany. I was motivated a couple of years back to write to him and tell him about his influence, having just published a county-based Flora which took 18 years of data collecting. He seemed genuinely delighted that I should contact him, and it seems somehow very fitting that I found out of his passing through your edit here on Wikipedia. Kind regards from the UK, Nick Moyes (talk) 16:33, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You removed the note that Earl Mountbatten of Burma's son could choose Lord Brabourne or Lord Romsey as a courtesy title with the claim that "Lord Brabourne is not a courtesy title". That this had not been a courtesy title before is irrelevant...now that it has the same substantive holder as an earldom,it is,as a barony older than Romsey and not of the same name as the earldom,is the subsidiary peerage that would be expected to become the first choice as courtesy title for the heirs of the present earl and his descendants holding the title.When the 3rd Duke of Fife inherited the title of Earl of Southesk on the death of his father,his son straightaway changed his courtesy title of Earl of Macduff that he had borne since birth to Earl of Southesk.When the 1st Marquess of Linlithgow received that title his former principal title of Earl of Hopetoun became the courtesy title for heirs apparent of holders of that marquessate.So also when the 3rd Earl Grosvenor became 1st Marquess of Westminster.That's just the way it's done.I'd be surprised if the Knatchbull Earls Mountbatten did not use their family's longtime title as their preferred courtesy title henceforward.12.144.5.2 (talk) 07:38, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize Wikipedia as you did at Edna O'Brien or you may be blocked from editing privileges. Quis separabit? 18:57, 30 December 2017 (UTC) [reply]

Excuse me -- is Edna O'Brien a Dame Commander of the Order of the British Empire (substantive or honorary)?? Yes or no? Screw my OCD, nothing to do with this issue. Quis separabit? 19:35, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No, I must apologize. There is so much vandalism going on but I should have remembered that you are genuine contributor of standing. I also should have Googled whether O'Brien was somehow named an Honorary DBE. I knew it could not have been a substantive DBE and it seemed so wacky that I jumped to an erroneous conclusion. You were right and I was wrong. My apologies. Let's close out this year on a high note. Happy New Year to you and yours. Quis separabit? 20:25, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your gracious comment, and indeed for the very many extremely useful edits that you make. I'm sorry that I overreacted to what was clearly a just a simple misunderstanding, and Happy New Year to you too. Rcb1 (talk) 20:41, 30 December 2017 (UTC)rcb1[reply]

A previous edit on the article strongly suggests that the person whose death was reported in the Telegraph was not Baroness Turner. Until this is clarified, I suggest you revert yourself (or I will do so). Ghmyrtle (talk) 15:45, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Rcb1. What is your source for 30 September 2003 as the date of death of Granville Slack [1]? The article Granville Slack has 30 November 2003, edited by user Warofdreams in 2013 who gives this site: [2] as a reference for various statements in the article, though not for the date of death which therefore is still not referenced. --Proofreader (talk) 18:54, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the correction. --Proofreader (talk) 01:58, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi-I noticed you have been amending several categories to have individuals listed by their first names instead by their surnames. The categories should be kept alphabetically with their surnames. Do you have any reasons why the names begin with their first names instead alphabetically according to their surnames? Thank you-RFD (talk) 12:35, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comment and the explanation-RFD (talk) 14:18, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I'm not sure I understand the category amendments you're making. For example, this edit at Squire Boone still displays the category "Boone family (pioneers)" at the bottom of the article, and still links to "Boone family (pioneers)" (not specifically to the "squire" section). Am I missing something? Thanks! Magnolia677 (talk) 23:54, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I just noticed User:RFD inquired about this two days ago. Magnolia677 (talk) 23:57, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Rodney Fern, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. GiantSnowman 15:29, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:List of Honorary Fellows of Jesus College, Cambridge, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rcb1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of Honorary Fellows of Jesus College".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. — JJMC89 (T·C) 20:54, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rcb1. I wanted to let you know that I have reverted a number of your recent edits related to broken external links in references. Please do not delete them. Very often the broken links can be repaired, replaced with links to archived copies, or replaced with suitable equivalent links. However, when you simply delete a reference because of a broken link, the reference becomes lost. For more information about why it is best not to delete such references and to learn how to help repair them, please have a look at Wikipedia:Link rot. Thank you. -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:12, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Yo Rcb1, what's with your recent edits to categories? Hope all's well! —SerialNumber54129 ^{paranoia /cheap shit room} 11:01, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yo Serial Number 54129. Just standardising a few inconsistencies. Hope all's well with you too. Rcb1 (talk) 11:07, 30 March 2018 (UTC)rcb1[reply]

Hi Rcb1, I wonder if you could clarify your source that Henry Ropner, of Thorpe Perrow, has been given the title of "Sir"? I may be wrong, but a hereditary title is not a given, but must be proved through The Standing Council of the Baronetage. If you read their section on "Succession to a Baronetcy" it is explained there. Therefore, as the title is still not official on the Standing Council's list, and not wanting Wikipedia to be incorrect in their information, may I suggest you remove the word "Sir" or Henry altogether. I only wish to bring this to your attention for fear of you putting someone as a "Sir" who is not legally entitled to be until proven, so please forgive me if your information is from a reliable source. With best wishes Brokencraw (talk) 15:24, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Rcb1: It may interest you to know that there's a standardized template for post-nominal letters. Take a look at Template:Post-nominals. If you do more edits like your recent additions of DL and OBE in several articles, the template is likely to make your job easier, because you don't have to spell out the honors. The standard template automatically provides the correct wikilink, and makes the post-nominal letters smaller. So, for example, if you type

'''Nigel Incubator-Jones''' {{post-nominals|country=GBR|KBE|QC|DL|MP|FRS}}

you get Nigel Incubator-Jones KBE QC DL MP FRS, with each of the honours properly wikilinked. A list of the supported honors for the UK can be found at Template:Post-nominals/GBR, and the order of precedence is at List of post-nominal letters (United Kingdom). Lwarrenwiki (talk) 15:00, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rcb1. You might want to have a look at Template:Post-nominals: this has more details about the use of the post-nom template. There are also some guidelines at WP:POSTNOM, which incudes the all or none requirement for commas (you may not have noticed the comma when you added the template to John Stollery, but just in case you didn't know). Hope this helps, Gaia Octavia Agrippa ^Talk 18:48, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not to bug, but please have a look at the guidance at Template:Post-nominals. Gaia Octavia Agrippa ^Talk 21:15, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Businesspeople awarded knighthoods seems odd to me. For example, how do you know this guy received the honour because of his involvement in business? He was a politician, a candidate and supporter of a particular party both in local politics and through his newspaper. Does the category have any confines? Should it have? - Sitush (talk) 16:22, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Dennis Bratland. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Gavin Trippe, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Dennis Bratland (talk) 17:34, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Racer X Online is the only source dumb enough to announce a death based on nothing but a Facebook post. The entire rest of the professional media won’t do that until they get official verification. HOLD YOUR HORSES. Please. What’s the hurry? —Dennis Bratland (talk) 17:37, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I note you updated the Baron Tryon page, wondering if you might be sufficiently interested to also create a Lord Anthongy Tryon article/ page here: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Anthony_Tryon&action=edit&redlink=1Lord Anthony Tryon (funeral today I think, obituary in the Telegraph I see) .. just in case?? Bruceanthro (talk) 08:35, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the message/advice you will not be able to create this article! Cheers Bruceanthro (talk) 08:58, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that per the conclusion at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Biography#Request for comment: Size of post-nominals, postnominals should not be changed from large to small, as no size is preferred. Please use the 100% parameter if adding the template the postnominals that are already at 100%. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:32, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Rcb1: You have removed the KT from the above article. Could you not have replaced it with a Kt that was clearly indicated in the awards section? It was simple spelling mistake.scope_creep^Talk 11:26, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Rcb1: It appears it is not listed in the post noms. I have no clue how it works. I guess I will need to remove it from all the rest of the articles I've added it into. Thanks. scope_creep^Talk 11:43, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to John Sheffield (athlete) has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 07:40, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I don't understand your edit on Marcin Kazanowski. The title of the Category is Kazanowski family. Regards Denisarona (talk) 09:52, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I understand your edit, but it makes no difference - click on the Category at the bottom of the article and it leads to the category, not just to Marcin. So, for me, it is useless. No problem. Regards Denisarona (talk) 10:42, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, This catgory is only for confirmed member of the Faye dynasty - i.e. descendants of Boukar Djillakh Faye. You have added it in several articles. Please remove that category from the articles you have added them unless you can confirm their relations to the Faye dynasty in their own respective articles. Thanks.Tamsier (talk) 13:20, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at David Will, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. GiantSnowman 08:34, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have just re-added the unsourced information, except now you have also removed a reference?! GiantSnowman 09:15, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again! Could you please maintain the same post-nom styling as per WP:POSTNOM when you add the template? This isn't a choice but a rule settled by the Arbitration Committee, and is the same one that applies to other guideline-defined optional styles such as date formats and American vs British spellings.

The Arbitration Committee has ruled that editors should not change an article from one guideline-defined style to another without a substantial reason unrelated to mere choice of style, and that revert-warring over optional styles is unacceptable. If discussion cannot determine which style to use in an article, defer to the style used by the first major contributor.

Thanks, Gaia Octavia Agrippa ^Talk 22:24, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank for doing the 100% when appropriate, but you also need to add the correct commas: eg "John Smith, CBE, FRS" or "John Smith CBE FRS" not "John Smith, CBE FRS" or "John Smith CBE, FRS". I can give more examples if you need, Gaia Octavia Agrippa ^Talk 12:48, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You’ve been editing these articles long enough to know that additions need sources to be placed in. Why would you scold @TDKR Chicago 101: for deleting an unsourced entry? That was a needless bad faith remark you made in your edit summary. Rusted AutoParts 17:36, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Thank you @Rusted AutoParts:. I simply reverted it because it was unsourced and I've deleted entries before simply for not being cited. I did give it a google but nothing popped up so I deleted the entry for reliability not for being lazy. --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 17:39, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What were you attempting to do in this edit?--Quisqualis (talk) 20:49, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you look at the "Macaulay family of Lewis" category, you will the consistency of the edit. Rcb1 (talk) 21:12, 8 February 2020 (UTC)rcb1[reply]

Hi. You removed all the Lord Justices of Appeal categories from articles of law lords. A Lord Justice of Appeal (an English Court of Appeal justice) is *not* the same thing as a law lord, and many law lords were never LJs. Please edit accordingly! Atchom (talk) 02:48, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rcb1, I see you have been asked about doing this before but despite following your advice to other editors to check the category and observe the consistency, I am still mystified as to the purpose. All I see is that some other entries have a similar piped addition which seems to me to make no material difference at all. Am I being thick? Can you please explain explicitly what's going on here? Thanks! Regards Captainllama (talk) 23:11, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Could you provide a third opinion here? The discussion seems to have become stuck... --Pesqara (talk) 14:48, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I can't very exercised about this but the longstanding practice on this page is only to provide one reference per person. Rcb1 (talk) 14:50, 13 June 2020 (UTC)rcb1[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at 1933, you may be blocked from editing. Elizium23 (talk) 14:29, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at 1933. Elizium23 (talk) 17:57, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I take GREAT offence to your baseless allegation.

To suggest that my edits were disruptive, presumably because they have no reference, is preposterous when dozens of similar entries on each of the pages are similarly formatted. Worse, as I have explained to you before, what I am doing is helping Wikipedia by unifying the births and deaths entries. So, if you delete these entries of myself, you are therefore yourself disrupting and damaging Wikipedia by failing to delete the similar entries on the births pages. At the very least in promulgating this inconsistency, you are guilty of a lack of rigour which calls into question your suitability as an administrator.

You need to explain why you consider my edits "disruptive" in the light of the above. Should you fail to do so I am minded to make a formal complaint against you.

In more than 10 years and 60,000 entries, I have never received anything remotely approaching such an intemperate threat from any other editor. So you have severely damaged my faith in Wikipedia Rcb1 (talk) 19:19, 9 January 2021 (UTC)rcb1[reply]

The WP:ONUS is on you, the one adding the information, to supply reliable secondary sources, regardless of what already exists in the article (everything is required to be verifiable so eventually we have to furnish sources for everything in the article.) Elizium23 (talk) 19:32, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

First, there are verifiable sources in each of the articles on the underlying subject, to which I provide the link on each and every one of the articles I add. Second, not just the years I have edited but every year from at least 1500 to 1950 has an essentially identical page, in which the references are provided in the same way. I am explicitly mindful of the way that pages are formatted in every page I edit and strive to be consistent. Therefore I would assuredly add references on the page if they were provided for the thousands and thousands of other similar entries. They are not. To single out the few hundred edits I have made from the many tens of thousands of essentially identical edits is bizarre and itself disruptive. I contend that it you who is damaging Wikipedia by deleting bona-fide entries which enhance the pages seemingly randomly. To this once is unfortunate: to do it a second time when I have explained what I am doing is what Lady Bracknell would have called "careless." It is hard to avoid the sense that this has become a fixation, if not a vendetta. Please now desist from this most ill-judged campaign or add the references you seem to believe are needed to the births and deaths pages of each and every year which has a Wikipedia page.Rcb1 (talk) 20:01, 9 January 2021 (UTC)rcb1[reply]

Wikipedia is not a WP:RS. You cannot cite an article by name, because it is user-generated content that could change at any time. Sure, the source is in the article now, but what about next week? Next year? 10 years from now? Copy the citations and place them, properly, in the article that needs the citation. Wikipedia:Other stuff exists. It doesn't matter "what everybody else is doing". Your own personal conduct is in question here. I am simply warning you so that you can do the right thing. I am not an administrator. That is all. Elizium23 (talk) 20:07, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your "warning" is unseemly and inappropriate. I would readily add references if I thought it would be helpful. But in this case, it is clear that it would only involve others in unnecessary, even fatuous, work to set such a precedence. In future, I will readily accede to your request by adding references where other similar entries on the specific page have references but I will NOT do so where it will set a precedent for the page. To do so would be ridiculous. And I will continue slowly to make the births and deaths pages consistent. Rcb1 (talk) 20:22, 9 January 2021 (UTC)rcb1[reply]

On 4 February 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Wayne Terwilliger, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 02:52, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. As you are doing plenty of place-related editing, for which many thanks, I hope you won't mind a gentle reminder that "Middlesbrough" is spelt thus, without the tempting O of "borough". Cheers DBaK (talk) 00:30, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Rcb1: I see you're going around adding content without any references e.g. Sir Roger Palmer, 5th Baronet and adding in bare urls like its 2008, e.g David Hull (paediatrician). If you add content, please add a proper full reference. All your doing is adding work for everybody else. scope_creep^Talk 10:50, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CommanderWaterford was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:1991 Special Honours and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:1991 Special Honours, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CommanderWaterford (talk) 21:42, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Deb (talk) 15:01, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The allegation claims that I added "unreferenced or inappropriate content." Inappropriate is plainly absurd, as what I was doing was adding in "Deaths" an entry which already existed in "Births", so that the two corresponded. If it were inappropriate, it would never have been added to "Births" or would have been quickly deleted. Unreferenced is true - but not a single other entry in that month was referenced, nor was the corresponding entry in "Births". While - in more than 60,000 edits, as a matter of course I add references where appropriate, I contend that to add a reference to that one unique entry would merely set a precedent which would create wholly unnecessary work for other editors. The entry in Births had no reference either.

Worse, prior to being blocked today, I had a bad-tempered exchange with Deb, the administrator. In response to a polite request only to revert part of the edit, if she felt she must, she sent me a silly, sarcastic and rude reply. I then made bad-tempered observation in adding the (unnecessary) reference to the edit she reverted. It seems plain that she took the action that she did in response to that. I contend that this is an abuse of her privileges as an administrator. Such behaviour is seriously detrimental to people editing Wikipedia in good faith and you should ask your yourselves if someone who behaves in such a vindictive way is a fit an proper person to be an administrator.

As it happens, I will be busy tomorrow, so I have no great concern about this temporary block. But I take grave exception to Deb's behaviour, which brings Wikipedia into disrepute for the reasons I have explained. Please ensure that this extremely unsatisfactory and unsavoury episode does not happen again - to me or to anyone else.

Your "polite request" was If you really must persist in the habit of deleting any entry without an reference - itself a dubiously useful practice when almsot almost no other similar entries in that section (or births) has a reference - at least please did not just lazily revert the other edits made at the same time, as you did with the birth date of Lloyd Gaines. Deb's reply precisely mirrored your own language: If you really must persist in the habit of creating new entries without the reference required by the guidelines, after being told previously not to do it, at least don't just lazily make other entries at the same time, as it causes additional work for others. If your comment is a "polite request", then so is Deb's. Schazjmd (talk) 21:34, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources. IMDb cannot be used as a source as it is considered unreliable. I've fixed that for you. Deb (talk) 18:01, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank youRcb1 (talk) 18:48, 26 May 2021 (UTC)rcb1[reply]

Hi Rcb1, hope all is well with you. I thought it best to let you know that we don’t put in the full birth and death dates in the opening sentence if the article has this info in the body. More info on this can be found at MOS:BIRTHDATE. - Aussie Article Writer (talk) 16:13, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rcb1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:1978 Special Honours, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:02, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please read and conform to Wikipedia:Citing sources where possible. Your latest addition to 1909 was completely wrongly sourced, and once again I've fixed it for you. Also, please check that entries you add genuinely meet a high level of international notability before adding to Year articles, and don't add them there until you've ensured that they are already present in Year in Topic (in this case, Hogan is not mentioned in 1909 in the United States - why not? Deb (talk) 08:28, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please read and conform to Wikipedia:Citing sources where possible. Once again you failed to do this in your latest edit to 1938. Deb (talk) 17:59, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On 4 October 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Emmanuel Agassi, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page.  — Amakuru (talk) 09:25, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 14:20, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Schazjmd. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Jimmy Millar, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. You added a year-of-death to Jimmy Millar which is unsourced and not supported in the target article. Schazjmd (talk) 18:01, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rcb1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "1978 Special Honours".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Celestina007 (talk) 20:07, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please read and conform to Wikipedia:Citing sources where possible. I know I've reminded you about this a number of times. Deb (talk) 10:42, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I know it's a nuisance and it doesn't seem important, but it's not that difficult to follow the guidance in the article I've just referred you to. Just use one of the templates provided and you won't go far wrong. Deb (talk) 11:16, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There's even a template for this, which would enable you to use and reference the source properly. See Template:Find a Grave. If you can't figure out how to use it, just have a look at the correction I made to your latest addition to 1919. Deb (talk) 10:02, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, will do.Rcb1 (talk) 10:55, 20 December 2021 (UTC)rcb1[reply]

Rcb1, please help me understand how you evaluated the source you gave here? Kuru (talk) 03:25, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. It seems a "reliable source the information in question (his dates) can be found. In turn, please help me to understand why you reverted the part of the edit relating to Adegoke Adelabu back from the correct date to an incorrect date Rcb1 (talk) 14:49, 26 December 2021 (UTC)rcb1[reply]

This does not appear to be an answer to my question. How did you evaluate that source to ensure that it met the criteria for a reliable source? Are you saying that since you feel other reliable sources can be found, that a google entry marked as sourced from Wikipedia would be acceptable? Kuru (talk) 15:01, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Nor do you appear even to have tried to answer my question. I did give, admittedly only momentary, thought as to whether it was a reliable source and thought that Google Arts & Culture probably was. If you feel strongly to the contrary I will happily avoid using it again. But please now explain why you reverted the edit relating to Adegoke Adelabu.Rcb1 (talk) 15:12, 26 December 2021 (UTC)rcb1[reply]

I see you didn't change the Adelabu edit. My apologies. Nor did I realise that the Google site was circular to Wikipedia.Rcb1 (talk) 15:34, 26 December 2021 (UTC)rcb1[reply]

Again, please do not use this source. Thanks. Sam Kuru (talk) 10:42, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year!

Rcb1,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. See this for background context.
— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 17:12, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 17:12, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The category you made, Earls of Louth, was made as an article, not a category. Furthermore, a category with that name already exists. Please do something about the page. QuicoleJR (talk) 00:46, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rcb, Like you I was surprised that the births and deaths sections in the Year pages 1980-1989 were removed without a link to content. Please be advised that I have fixed this by creating corresponding 'Deaths in YEAR' pages regarding the years 1987-1989. I will do the same for the years 1980-1986 soon so there will be no need for you to do a rv like this one. As for the missing Births sections; I can't help you. Kind regards, Mill 1 (talk) 07:10, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Mill1. I won't revert deaths on those years again. Though I wouldn't do it myself, I had no problem at all with moving births and deaths to a sub-section, with a suitable link, if that is what the consensus believes; only with removing the information altogether. Rcb1 (talk) 09:04, 6 April 2023 (UTC)rcb1[reply]

Hear, hear Mill 1 (talk) 12:52, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Lawson Johnston family requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Xx236 (talk) 09:37, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to List of Honorary Fellows of Green Templeton College, Oxford. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 16:10, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for this. I understand your point but this list is essentially identical to 24 existing articles at: Category:Lists of Honorary Fellows of colleges of the University of Oxford and by it's very nature is unlikely to have external source. I have provided the internal source and I suggest it should take its place with the other 24 articles. Rcb1 (talk) 19:34, 17 May 2023 (UTC)rcb1[reply]

Thank you for this. I understand your point but this list is essentially identical to 24 existing articles at: Category:Lists of Honorary Fellows of colleges of the University of Oxford. By it's very nature is unlikely to have external source. I have provided the internal source and I suggest it should take its place with the other 24 articles. Rcb1 (talk) 22:11, 17 May 2023 (UTC)Rcb1[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:List of Honorary Fellows of Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:45, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:22, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think you know what a category is for. How could you be an editor for 16 years and not understand that articles are put INTO categories, categories do not contain article content. Has this account been compromised? Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:24, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I noticed your latest edit summary: "reinstated births, as only links to a category" as a reason for re-adding the whole Births section. I'm not saying I necessarily disagree with your action, but the reason seems very doubtful. Which category do you think is affected here? Deb (talk) 09:35, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Deb. The point I was trying to make, which I perhaps I didn't explain very well, is that I don't see the need to reinstate the deaths, as it links to a page which lists the deaths by date: but the births simply link to a category, which has an alphabetical list of births but not the specific dates. That seems to be useful information, which needs to be listed somewhere - and this is obvious place to put it, unless someone starts a "Births in 2001". page. Thank you for your work in this area; you have obviously spent many hours helpfully improving these pages. Rcb1 (talk) 12:29, 19 August 2023 (UTC)rcb1[reply]

Okay, I see what you're getting at. Deb (talk) 13:36, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 1991, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 09:46, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LJF2019 was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Green Templeton College, Oxford. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of Honorary Fellows of Green Templeton College, Oxford and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LJF2019 ^talk 22:59, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to List of Honorary Fellows of Sidney Sussex College, Cambridge. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources, it needs more sources to establish notability and Please add more into the article lead or it might just be a category . I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. FuzzyMagma (talk) 13:35, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Caird Baronets indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:55, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Liz. Please do

delete it. I accidentally capitalised Baronets, sorry, and don't have permission to delete it. Rcb1 (talk) 20:57, 8 October 2023 (UTC)rcb1[reply]

Category:Chalmers family has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 01:21, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Nutting family has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 00:47, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Mountain family has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 00:48, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Ridgeway family has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 00:49, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Catto family has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 03:35, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Since much of its content is user-edited, Transfermarkt is not considered a reliable source. Please do not cite the website in articles. Thank you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:00, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rcb1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of Honorary Fellows of Green Templeton College, Oxford, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:06, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Honorary Fellows of Corpus Christi College, Cambridge is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Honorary Fellows of Corpus Christi College, Cambridge until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Newhaven lad (talk) 19:40, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for including me in this. There are 21 other essentially identical lists on such honorary fellows here: Category:Lists of Honorary Fellows of colleges of the University of Cambridge. `I don't see why Corpus should be missing from the group and feel with conviction that it should not be singled out for deletion. Rcb1 (talk) 19:47, 29 February 2024 (UTC)rcb1[reply]

On 15 April 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Alasdair Macintosh Geddes, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Schwede66 00:21, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Hartsonge baronets indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:10, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Liz. Please delete it. The title contained a typo and I don't know how to delete it myself.Rcb1 (talk) 08:37, 30 June 2024 (UTC)rcb1[reply]

I keep warning you about adding unreferenced content, but you keep doing it. So I've given you a short block to help get your attention. Deb (talk) 09:16, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've explained this to you before, but Transfermarkt is not considered a reliable source, since much of its content is user edited. Please stop citing the website in articles. Thank you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:35, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved content from Orders, decorations, and medals of the United Kingdom into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content (here or elsewhere), Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. This is concerning your edits to the page 2001 Special Honours GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 00:31, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]