User talk:RIT RAJARSHI

Hi RIT RAJARSHI! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Soni (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:22, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Miztiszo (talk) 05:41, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 14:47, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment at Wikipedia:Village pump (technical) for your technical suggestions. Wikipedia talk:Village pump (technical) is for discussions about how the technical discussions that are being held should be organized. I already moved your content over and responded to what I could. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 08:27, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:SIGLINK, your signature should contain at least one link to your user page, talk page or contributions page. Either make sure "Treat the above as wiki markup" is unticked in the settings, or set it to something like [[User:RIT RAJARSHI|Rajarshi Rit]].

Also, there is no need to add a new signature every time you edit your previous comment. You can either leave the previous one there or replace it with a new one. A new signature is only needed if you make a new comment. nyuszika7h (talk) 13:56, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Granatanine and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 19:37, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:RIT RAJARSHI/Granatane and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 19:39, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for using the collections feature in Wikipedia beta! Due to technical and moderation issues, we will be turning off this experimental feature. Your collections will be available for viewing and export until March 1st. If you would like to save your collection as links on a special Wikipedia page, please fill out the following form. If you are interested in giving your feedback about Wikipedia Collections please do so here.

Thanks,

Jon Katz
Product manager, Wikimedia Foundation
Jkatz (WMF) (talk) 00:05, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 17:58, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Time are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic or unrelated topics. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. I have removed your comment from the talk page. The best place to go is probably wp:Reference desk/science. Good luck. - DVdm (talk) 08:13, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 14:46, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm doing sign. Still I'm getting "Previous unsigned comment added by" !!!! Sine bot also giving me Warnings.

Why this is happening when I'm doing sign? Rajarshi Rit 14:52, 25 March 2016 (UTC) Rajarshi Rit 14:52, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Perhaps you have tried to customise your signature and have erroneously ticked the "Treat the above as wiki markup" box at Special:Preferences? --David Biddulph (talk) 02:56, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unticked. Restored default in all sections . Thanks, & it was very much helpful. RIT RAJARSHI (talk) 09:08, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm doing sign. Still I'm getting "Previous unsigned comment added by" ! Sine bot also giving me Warnings.

I'm doing sign. Still I'm getting " — Preceding unsigned comment added by RIT RAJARSHI (talk • contribs) " .

Sine bot also giving me Warnings. 

Why is this happening so-many times? Rajarshi Rit 14:59, 25 March 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by RIT RAJARSHI (talk • contribs)

Hello and welcome @RIT RAJARSHI: Your signature needs to link to your user talk page, or it is not recognized as a signature. Instructions on how to do so can be found at This page. You can also revert to the default signature by clearing out the preferences you changed to create your custom signature. The simplest way to fix the problem, if you want to change your custom signature to work right, is to set it to [[User talk:RIT RAJARSHI|Rajarshi Rit]]. I hope that helps. --Jayron32 15:07, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You so so so much.

Rajarshi Rit 03:17, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

@RIT RAJARSHI:

03:17, 26 March 2016 (UTC)Rajarshi Rit

RIT RAJARSHI (talk) 10:15, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

( Also submitted at Help:Books/Feedback )

Thanks for this feedback pole on Wikibook. Here I post, the problems that I’m facing as user.

• 1. When the book is open, but not under edit in book-creator (eg. edits just saved) ; the pages/links are allowed to clicked to add (+’d ), shows signs as-if they are successfully added; but they actually doesn’t get added in the book. Even after opening book-creator and several reloads, they doesn’t appear. The only way to include them, is remembering those articles, then clicked to remove (-’d) , then starting edit with book creator; then adding (+) the pages again.

So please ensure successful inclusion of links into the book, when-ever and where-ever the options for add (+) and remove (-) page is available.

• 2. After adding a link (while editing is on) each time, it need to Reload the page.

Please include the new-entries automatically, without reload.

• 3. On clicking remove (-) icon on links/pages, the respective page on book are so easily getting deleted. So, erroneous or accidental click on remove (-) icon on pages, often deletes important pages.

So, please do-not allow so-easy deletion of entries. Show at-least 2 warnings, and may also provide “turn off” the page removal button. On the book, keep a trace of pages deleted from outside/inside the book.

• 4. While re-ordering the pages on book, I need to drag the heading (sometimes scrolling) ; across all-other headings(page-names) . That confuses where to place the heading. Also, when the mouse fails to drag accurately, some-other heading get scrambled and misplaced. That is terrible.

(Surprisingly, I’m seeing, book-creator can recognize dragging error, and place such wrongly-dragged page-name into the initial zone. However, sometimes it acts on correct-drags also. )

So, a simple, effective remedy could-be taken: Please provide all the new-entries on a separate, Side- Palette. They could be scrolled separately. Then we could scroll the existing book-content to find the proper place, & then click-and-drag the respective new-entry into proper-place of the book. This-will help to avoid scrolling through so-many headings(page-names).

• 5. There are also many-other problems with Click-and-drag.

i. The page-names, often change their place automatically. Causes I don’t know. ii. The page-names, change their place automatically, if I replace a page-name >1 times on a single edit-session. iii. While dragging 1 page-name, sometimes, >1 page-names get moved, simultaneously. Causes I don’t know.

So , please ensure the chapter-names don’t change their place automatically. If this is caused by problems with temporary auto-save ( … I guess), then there is a simple way. Instead of temporary-auto-save, use temporary-manual-save. Provide option like “lock it” or “Stepple it” or “pin it” or such, that is to be manually selected by user. Once placed, if the user again wants to change place of a page-name, the user have to manually select an option like “unlock it” or “remove stepple” etc. Before proceed to change place of another page-name, user must-have to Lock the the previous page-name.

Also, several-pages (under a chapter-heading) could be “grouped” manually, so-that all-the pages in a chapter, stay together. If someone want to move a whole chapter (with all its pages, maintaining sequence), this “manual” grouping would help.

By this way, usually, I don’t need the “arrange alphabetically” option. More-over, accidental/ erroneous click on this option can destroy months or years of labor to re-order. So, please keep an option to turn-Off this option, and also display warnings.

• 6. Many copies of the same book, generated. There are 2 folders/drives to save the books. They often become different.

Please ensure, while saving the last-edit, both-copies get updated simultaneously and automatically. Warn, if I start edit an old-version. Notify, I’m editing on latest revision. Please display, conflicts in recent edits, specially, if there are some-pages more in older-versions, those are absent in newer version.

• 7. Some informations such-as book-descriptions, problems(bug command), copyleft cover etc. doesn’t get saved after few-edits. They’re to be set again and again.

Please automatically add them to next edits

RIT RAJARSHI (talk) 10:02, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

RIT RAJARSHI (talk) 10:18, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ChamithN. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Stereophonic sound has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. See MOS:IMGSIZE ChamithN (talk) 05:27, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've copy-pasted further conversation on this topic, from ChamitN's talk page.

(About the page stereophonic sound )

Thanks for informing me.

I expanded the graph to maximum size , and aligned it to the centre, because it seemed to me that, it could give a better visualization about what's goes-on in a stereophonic sound. And the other image, was slightly increased than default; just because it is a diagram.

Not only for this page, where-ever in Wikipedia I encounter diagrams , whose labelings are not visible at-a-glance, or difficultly readable, I try to increase the image size. I didn't knew well about wikipedia's terms and conditions about image size (i'm not experienced user) , and i don't know whether those edits by me are being maintained or not.

While reading a scientific text, clicking on the diagrams all the time (to read the labelings) , is quite irritating.

In-fact many critical things actually may remained unnoticed if someone read a scientific text , not matching it with the diagram. And also, several times while reading Wiki pages i've noticed i've missed a diagram (didn't click on a diagram), Just because i couldn't read some labelings of the diagram at-a-glance, so didn't realize the importance. (think about a person trying to understand a phenomenon, thinking, scribbling on paper, flipping pages of books & websites, obviously be benefited if the person could realize, clicking on which link would reach to stronger answer. Or think about a non-expert , say a kid, is reading a topic. Normally it could fail to decide click on an image, and thereafter correlating the thought with text. (especially on a topic like stereophonic sound ... about which, the kid may be already preoccupied with a lots of popular misconceptions like stereophonic gadgets contain 2 speaker to increase loudness et cetera. )

However I've nothing to do if the sizes flouted rules and regulations. But , I always think, diagrams should appear in properly readable sizes. Surprisingly, there exists a trend to show photographs in larger size and diagrams in smaller size. But the thing should be opposite (with exceptions also). RIT RAJARSHI (talk) 13:37, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@RIT RAJARSHI: I too agree that visibility matters when it comes to diagrams. However, the thing is, forcing image size like this often causes accessibility issues for mobile users. And, frankly, these guidelines aren't employed in some articles (whereas they should be) due to less scrutiny and overall article quality. In any case, if you think the guidelines regarding image size is unreasonable, you can always start a discussion at Wikipedia:Village pump to change the current consensus. Cheers! -- ChamithN (talk) 14:36, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@ChamithN: To mean "like this" You cited a revision that was too old. But in latter revisions, i adjusted them. though the graph was kept big, the diagram made much smaller than the white space. Such as in the last revision did by me (that i found in contrib list) it was like that. It was happened because I took time to learn use of preview, sandbox, etc. I did the edits on the article's page in several steps , quite non-seriously and i'm sorry for that.

However, how to start a discussion in vlllage pump? Earlier i asked questions and lodged complaints on village pump, but i don't know about that consensus or discussion.

Thanks.

RIT RAJARSHI (talk) 15:15, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As you can see, the images are still too large for the lead (in terms of Thumbnail sizes) in this revision. On a different note, it's quite OK to save edits contiguously as long as they are not test edits.

Regarding Wikipedia:Village pump, you just have to select the specific section where you think is the best to address your issue, and initiate a discussion (e.g: If you want to discuss about a change to a policy, then Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)). To do so, click new section from the toolbar and state your concern(s). Once you have done that, keep track of the discussion by adding the page to your watchlist. You'll know when it has reached a consensus. -- ChamithN (talk) 16:20, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, RIT RAJARSHI. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by {{u|Checkingfax}} {Talk} 17:22, 3 June 2016 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

RIT RAJARSHI (talk) 07:42, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back to the Teahouse, RIT RAJARSHI. Please post your article idea at Wikipedia:Requested articles. Of course, volunteers monitor that page, and it may take a while for someone to get around to it. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 08:11, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copied and pasted from conversation at teahouse the 3 questions on editing RIT RAJARSHI (talk) 08:30, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Suppose an wiki article is already rated as low importance, but i think it should be upgraded as mid importance. could i do that? if not, then could i suggest that? and how? Could i newly rate one? RIT RAJARSHI (talk) 07:35, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, RIT RAJARSHI, and welcome to the Teahouse. Technically you can, but I would suggest getting more experience so you can have a better feel for what is appropriate. If something is clearly a stub, you could class it as a stub. Rating importance is more difficult, as an article as simple as liqueur may engender a high level of importance. Cheers! {{u|Checkingfax}} {Talk} 07:44, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You can read more about importance and quality assessments here, and here, RIT RAJARSHI. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 08:01, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest that you upgrade halfway decent stub articles to start without hesitation, RIT RAJARSHI. In my opinion, there are a lot of stub articles that have been improved over time but have not been upgraded. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 08:24, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Could I upload image taken from a public museum? Would it hamper the copyright? ( And what for a zoological garden,or a botanical etc )?

RIT RAJARSHI (talk) 07:28, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the Teahouse, RIT RAJARSHI. You have asked an excellent question, and if you love visiting museums as much as I do, then I encourage you to upload as many museum photos as possible. What follows is a brief summary of a very complex area. First of all, please comply with the museum's photography policy for each specific exhibit. It is common that a museum may allow photography of its permanent collection but maybe not for some of its temporary exhibits. In general, photos of zoological or botanical topics are copyright free and OK to upload. The same applies to ancient and Renaissance art, and archeological objects. These items are not covered by copyright. On the other hand, contemporary art published and displayed since 1923 is usually copyrighted and cannot be uploaded in general. But great photography and public art paid for by the U.S. government is usually copyright free, which includes some (but not all) classic photos by Dorothea Lange and Ansel Adams. The bottom line is that the museum object that you photograph may (or may not) have an underlying copyright. You need to study the matter, verify the copyright status of each object you photograph, and be sure that you are not uploading any copyright violations. Feel free to ask more specific questions about particular objects here at the Teahouse at any time. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 08:01, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Rit raja, your article does not cite any sources, please put some references to your article, otherwise maybe someone tag your article for deletion, Please–– مجتبیٰ (Talk!) 06:44, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Rit, have a cup of coffee (for you!!).–– مجتبیٰ (Talk!) 08:54, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello RIT RAJARSHI! You’re invited to Urdu Wikipedia. –– مجتبیٰ (Talk!) 07:24, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Granatanine, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:39, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Muffler, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Silencer. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:20, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

For your comments at Talk:Mustard oil. Muffled Pocketed 18:24, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, RIT RAJARSHI. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, RIT RAJARSHI. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Granatanine".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 16:07, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, RIT RAJARSHI. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Granatane".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 23:45, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, RIT RAJARSHI. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've moved the question that you posted on the Wikipedia:Reference desk landing page to the correct location, Wikipedia:Reference desk/Science. Deor (talk) 04:52, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Deor: Thank you so so so so much for this move. RIT RAJARSHI (talk) 04:56, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi RIT RAJARSHI! You created a thread called Please Help me find a botanical term and an existing page at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi RIT RAJARSHI! You created a thread called Controversial Structure for a drug under Clinical Trial at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, RIT RAJARSHI. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi RIT RAJARSHI! You created a thread called IP Block!!! at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi RIT RAJARSHI! You created a thread called Should i use an alternate Wikipedia account for anonymity? at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi RIT RAJARSHI! You created a thread called There are several Wikipedia editor apps in various mobile app stores. How to verify if they are genuine? at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well, thanks! That was unexpected! Nice of you to notice. When I first looked at the article it looked like it could be filled out a bit with some hard data, and then I watched it take off and multiply! Have a good day --Ziounclesi (talk) 17:50, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Ziounclesi: Thank you :) :) . RIT RAJARSHI (talk) 18:10, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi RIT RAJARSHI! You created a thread called May I upload this PDB file? at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi RIT RAJARSHI! You created a thread called Is there a drastic reduction of Wikipedia activity? at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hi [Username]! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Sdkb (talk) 21:42, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

RIT RAJARSHI (talk) 09:50, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:RIT RAJARSHI/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:RIT RAJARSHI/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 11:08, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi RIT RAJARSHI! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 14:54, Wednesday, April 1, 2020 (UTC)

Hi RIT RAJARSHI! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 14:55, Wednesday, April 1, 2020 (UTC)

Hi RIT RAJARSHI! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 15:00, Wednesday, April 1, 2020 (UTC)

Bold

The

Adventure

This is a help page for people partaking in The Wikipedia Adventure. We're here to help you!

• You can post a query in the Intergalactic Lounge just for TWA players like you
• You can drop by the Teahouse where friendly and experienced hosts will assist you
• You can pop into the live irc chat to talk to someone: webchat.freenode.net/?channels=wikipedia-en-help

Awesome User:GaiaGirl86, it's my favorite planet! How do I get there? Bakarpuran (talk) 15:35, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi RIT RAJARSHI! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 19:41, Wednesday, April 1, 2020 (UTC)

Hello, RIT RAJARSHI. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝) 06:13, 6 April 2020 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

	The Brilliant Idea Barnstar
	For helping fellow editors on teahouse by starting this useful discussion. I would be missing out on this useful toolbar feature had you not raised this up on Teahouse. The Tutuorial links on this talk page were also very helpful. Cedix (talk) 13:32, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Cedix: I can't believe my eyes I now have a barnstar!!!!!!!!!! Thank you so much RIT RAJARSHI (talk) 16:14, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome. Good work done by you must not go without appreciation. Cheers. --Cedix (talk) 16:16, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi RIT RAJARSHI! You created a thread called How to get these code insertion buttons in en.wikipedia.org? at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi RIT RAJARSHI! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 11:43, Wednesday, April 15, 2020 (UTC)

• Wikipedia talk:Welcoming committee/Welcome templates#‎RfC on welcome template standardisation.---Moxy 🍁 12:05, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi RIT RAJARSHI! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Possible duplicate of 2 articles under Molecular Cell biology, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi RIT RAJARSHI! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Is there an inactivity in Wikiproject Molecular Cell Biology articles?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Teahouse#is_there_an_index_for_academic_or_subjectwise_templates%3F

Replies:

:Hello, RIT RAJARSHI. Those are navigation templates. Please see that link for more information. --ColinFine (talk) 14:26, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's worth looking at which categories the templates are in. The first you mention is in Category:Protein biosynthesis templates, and the second is in Category:Biochemistry templates. You can then see which categories those categories are in. --David Biddulph (talk) 14:52, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@RIT RAJARSHI: How about Category:Navigational boxes by topic. (Please also check out the article on indenting, especially example 4.) —[AlanM1 (talk)]— 23:55, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

RIT RAJARSHI (talk) 18:23, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi RIT RAJARSHI! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, is there an index for academic or subjectwise templates?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi RIT RAJARSHI! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Help add a new Column in the Help page; about Language and font settings., has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:48, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, RIT RAJARSHI. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:11, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Arbuscular mycorrhiza, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 10:27, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Common Symbiotic Signaling Pathway, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 15:24, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]